Title: Curved, precast, pretensioned concrete I-girder bridges
Date: November-December, 2008
Volume: 53
Issue: 6
Page number: 48-66
Author(s): Wilast Amorn, Christopher Y. Tuan, Maher K. Tadros
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11012008.48.66

Click here to access the full journal article

Abstract

The use of curved, precast, pretensioned concrete girders as an alternative to curved post-tensioned concrete girders and curved steel girders may have many advantages. A feasibility study has shown that the pretensioned concrete system is more cost effective than the other two. Many bridge designers have gradually recognized this trend. This paper summarizes a review of the current practice of horizontally curved bridge construction. A 1/10 -scale, curved, precast, pretensioned concrete beam was fabricated in the laboratory to illustrate the feasibility of fabrication in a precast concrete plant. A cost analysis was conducted to compare the estimated cost of a curved, precast, pretensioned concrete I-girder with that of a curved, precast, post-tensioned concrete I- girder. The results showed that the pretensioned concrete system has the potential to become the most cost-effective system for curved bridge construction.

References

1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications: 2004 and 2005 Interim Revisions. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.

2. Barnoff, R. M., G. Nagle, M. G. Suarez, L. F. Geschwindner, H. W. Merz, and H. H. West. 1984. Design, Fabrication, and Erection of a Curved, Prestressed Concrete Bridge with Continuous Girders.  Transportation Research Record, No. 950, V. 1: pp. 136–140.

3. Endicott, W. A. 2005. A Fast Learning Curve. Ascent (summer): pp. 36–49.

4. Sun, C., S. A. Hennessey, M. S. Ahlman, and M. K. Tadros. 2007. Value Engineering Arbor Road Bridge with Curved Precast Concrete Girders. PCI Journal, V. 52, No. 2 (March–April): pp. 94–106.

5. McManus, P. F., G. A. Nasir, and C. G. Culver. 1969. Horizontally Curved Steel I-Girder State-of-the-Art Analysis Methods. Journal of the Structural Division, V. 95, No. ST5 (May): pp. 853–870.

6. Zureick, A., and R. Naqib. 1999. Horizontally Curved Steel I-Girder State-of-the-Art Analysis Methods. Journal of Bridge Engineering, V. 4, No. 1 (February): pp. 38–47.

7. Bares, R., and C. Massonnet. 1968. Analysis of Beam Grids and Orthotropic Plates by the Guyon-Massonnet- Bares Method. London, UK: Crosby Lockwood & Son Ltd.

8. Rowe, R. E. 1962. Concrete Bridge Design. New York, NY: John Wiley & Son Inc.

9. Jaeger, L. G., and B. Bakht. 1982. The Grillage Analogy in Bridge Analysis. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 4: pp. 224–235.

10. Hambly, E. C. 1976. Bridge Deck Behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley & Son Inc.

11. West, R. 1973. C&CA/CIRIA Recommendations on the Use of Grillage Analysis for Slab and Pseudo-slab Bridge Decks. Publication 46.017. London, UK: Cement and Concrete Association.

12. Zokaie, T., T. A. Osterkamp, and R. A. Imbsen. 1991. Distribution of Wheel Loads on Highway Bridges. National Cooperative Highway Research Program  (NCHRP) report 12-26.

13. Heins, C. P. 1976. Applied Plate Theory for the Engineer. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, D. C. Heath & Co.

14. Bell, L. C., and C. P. Heins. 1970. Analysis of Curved Girder Bridges. Journal of the Structural Division, V. 96, No. ST8 (August): pp. 1657–1673.

15. Meyer, C., and A. C. Scordelis. 1971. Analysis of Curved Folded Plate Structures. Journal of the Structural Division, V. 97, No. ST10 (October): pp. 2459–2479.

16. Cheung, Y. K. 1976. Finite Strip Method in Structural Analysis. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

17. Loo, Y. C., and A. R. Cusens. 1978. The Finite-Strip Method in Bridge Engineering. Cement and Concrete Association.

18. National Steel Bridge Alliance (NSBA). 1996. VLoad Analysis. In Highway Structures Design Handbook. 2nd ed. V. 1. Chicago, IL: NSBA.

19. Tung, D. H. H., and R. S. Fountain. 1970.  Approximate Torsional Analysis of Curved Box Girders by the M/R-Method. AISC Engineering Journal, V. 7, No. 3 (July): pp. 65–74.

20. AASHTO. 2003. AASHTO Guide Specifications for Horizontally Curved Steel Highway Bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.

21. NCHRP. 1999. Improved Design Specifications for Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Highway Bridges. Report 424. Washington, DC: NCHRP.

22. NCHRP. 2006. Development of LRFD Specifications for Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Bridges. Report 563. Washington, DC: NCHRP.

23. PCI Bridge Design Manual Steering Committee. 1997. Chapter 12: Curved and Skewed Bridges. In Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Design Manual. Chicago, IL: PCI.

24. ABAM Engineers Inc. 1998. Precast Prestressed Concrete Horizontally Curved Bridge Beams. PCI Journal, V. 33, No. 5 (September–October): pp. 50–95.

25. PCI. 1988. Annacis Channel East Bridge. PCI Journal, V. 33, No. 1 (January–February): pp. 148–157.

26. Endicott, W. A. 1999. Bridge’s Complex Curves Preserve Historic Site. Ascent (winter): pp. 30–33.

27. Popovics, S. 1970. A State-of-the-Art Report: A Review of Stress-Strain Relationships for Concrete. ACI Journal. V. 67, No. 3 (March): pp. 243–248.