Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part II. Finite element simulations

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The finite element method has been used to study the behavior of aluminum alloy 8009 during elastic-plastic indentation to establish how the indentation process is influenced by applied or residual stress. The study was motivated by the experiments of the preceding paper which show that nanoindentation data analysis procedures underestimate indentation contact areas and therefore overestimate hardness and elastic modulus in stressed specimens. The NIKE2D finite element code was used to simulate indentation contact by a rigid, conical indenter in a cylindrical specimen to which biaxial stresses were applied as boundary conditions. Indentation load-displacement curves were generated and analyzed according to standard methods for determining hardness and elastic modulus. The simulations show that the properties measured in this way are inaccurate because pileup is not accounted for in the contact area determination. When the proper contact area is used, the hardness and elastic modulus are not significantly affected by the applied stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Y. Tsui, W. C. Oliver, and G. M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 11, 752 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Simmons and H. Wang, Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties: A Handbook, 2nd ed. (The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. O. Hallquist, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Rept. UCID-19677, Rev. 1, University of California (1986).

  4. W. C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. M. Pharr, W. C. Oliver, and F. R. Brotzen, J. Mater. Res. 7, 613 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. I. N. Sneddon, Int. J. Engng. Sci. 3, 47 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. J. Lockett, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 345 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. W. Mott, Microindentation Hardness Testing (Butterworths, London, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. E. Ritter, T. J. Lardner, D. T. Madsen, and R. J. Giovinazzo, unpublished.

  10. T. A. Laursen and J. C. Simo, J. Mater. Res. 7, 618 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. A. Laursen, Duke University, private communication.

  12. H. Gao, C-H. Chiu, and J. Lee, Int. J. Solids Structures 29, 2471 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Bolshakov, W. C. Oliver, and G. M. Pharr, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V, edited by S. P. Baker, C. A. Ross, P. H. Townsend, C. A. Volkert, and P. Børgesen (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 356, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), pp. 675–680.

  14. A. Bolshakov and G. M. Pharr, unpublished.

  15. G. Sines and R. Carlson, ASTM Bull. 180, 35 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. L. Norbury and T. Samuel, J. Iron Steel Inst. 117, 673 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C. & Pharr, G.M. Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part II. Finite element simulations. Journal of Materials Research 11, 760–768 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1996.0092

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1996.0092

Navigation