Skip to main content
Log in

Does the shear-lag model apply to random fiber networks?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The shear-lag type model due to Cox (Br. J. Appl. Phys. 3, 72 (1952) is widely used to calculate the deformation properties of fibrous materials such as short fiber composites and random fiber networks. We compare the shear-lag stress transfer mechanism with numerical simulations at small, linearly elastic strains and conclude that the model does not apply to random fiber networks. Most of the axial stress is transferred directly from fiber to fiber rather than through intermediate shear-loaded segments as assumed in the Cox model. The implications for the elastic modulus and strength of random fiber networks are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. L. Cox, Br. J. Appl. Phys. 3, 72 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. For shear-lag models for discontinuous fiber composites, see I. M. Robinson and J. M. Robinson, J. Mater. Sci. 29, 4663 (1994).

  3. D. H. Page and R. S. Seth, Tappi J. 63, 113 (1980).

  4. R. W. Perkins, in Materials Interactions Relevant to the Pulp Paper and Wood Industries, edited by D. F. Caulfield, J. D. Passaretti, and S. F. Sobczynski (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), Vol. 197, p. 99, and references therein.

  5. See, e.g., C. Galiolis, Composite Sci. Technol. 48, 15 (1994) and references therein.

  6. M. C. Andrews, R. J. Day, X. Hu, and R. J. Young, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 11, 124 (1992).

  7. M. Murat, M. Anholt, and H. D. Wagner, J. Mater. Res. 7, 3120 (1992).

  8. L. Monette, M. P. Anderson, and G. S. Grest, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 1155 (1994).

  9. P. M. Duxbury, P. D. Beale, and C. Moukarzel, Phys. Rev. B 51 (6), 3476–3488; C. Moukarzel and P. M. Duxbury, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4086 (1994).

  10. B. F. Blumentritt, B. T. Vu, and S. L. Cooper, Polym. Eng. Sci. 15, 428 (1975).

  11. M. Karbhari and D. M. Wilkins, Scripta Metall. Mater. 25, 707 (1991).

  12. J. Astrom, S. Saarinen, K. Niskanen, and J. Kurkijärvi, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 2383 (1994).

  13. Cf, e.g., M. Sahimi, Physica A 186, 160 (1992).

  14. A. Hansen, in Statistical models for the fracture of disordered media, edited by H. J. Herrmann and S. Roux (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990), p. 115 ff.

  15. Version 4.9, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc., 1080 Main St., Pawtucket, RI 02860.

  16. We note here in passing that strictly speaking in our simulations the elastic modulus is not equal to Young’s modulus, because the Poisson contraction is prohibited. The relation between the two in 2D is given by [see, e.g., L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon Press Ltd., London, 1959), p. 52] \(E' = E\frac{1}{{\left( {1 - {v^2}} \right)}} \approx 1.05 \times E\) (19) where E’ is the elastic modulus of a network with fixed y-coordinate of the edges perpendicular to external stress, E is the elastic modulus of a network with Poisson contraction, and v = 0.33 is the Poisson contraction coefficient that can be obtained from the Cox model.

  17. H. Corte and O. J. Kallmes in The Formation and Structure of Paper, Transactions of the Symposium held at Oxford, edited by J. Bolam (William Clowes and Sons, Ltd., London, 1962), pp. 13–52.

  18. G. E. Pike and C. H. Seager, Phys. Rev. B 10, 1421 (1974).

  19. A. Jangmalm and S. Östlund, Nordic Pulp and Paper Res. J. 10, 156 (1995).

  20. S. Heyden and P. J. Gustafsson, A network model for application to cellulose fiber materials, conference paper in 7th Int. Conference on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, May 1995, The Netherlands.

  21. A. Hansen, in Statistical models for the fracture of disordered media, edited by H. J. Herrmann and S. Roux (Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, 1990), p. 134.

  22. Z. Hashin and S. Shtrikman, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 335 (1963); see also Z. Hashin, J. Appl. Mech. 50, 481 (1983) and references therein and M. Deng and C. T. J. Dodson, Paper: An Engineered Stochastic Structure (Tappi Press, 1994), pp. 204–206 for an application to fiber networks.

  23. D. T. Grubb, Z-F. Li, and S. L. Phoenix, Comp. Sci. Technol. 59, 237 (1995).

  24. See, e.g., Niskanen, in Products of Papermaking—Transactions of the Tenth Fundamental Research Symposium held at Oxford: September 1993, p. 685, Fig. 32.

  25. A. Hansen, in Statistical models for the fracture of disordered media, edited by H. J. Herrmann and S. Roux (Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, 1990), p. 149 ff.

  26. P. M. Duxbury, R. A. Guyer, and J. Machta, Phys. Rev. B 51, 6711 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Räisänen, V.I., Alava, M.J., Niskanen, K.J. et al. Does the shear-lag model apply to random fiber networks?. Journal of Materials Research 12, 2725–2732 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1997.0363

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1997.0363

Navigation