Abstract
In this article we report the influence of surface oxides and relative humidity on the nanomechanical response of hydrophobic and hydrophilic Si surfaces. Depth-sensing nanoindentation combined with force modulation enabled measurement of surface forces, surface energy, and interaction stiffness prior to contact. Several regimes of contact were investigated: pre-contact, apparent contact, elastic contact, and elasto-plastic contact. Both humidity and surface preparation influenced the surface mechanical properties in the pre- and apparent-contact regimes. Meniscus formation was observed for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces at high humidity. Influence of humidity was much less pronounced on hydrophobic surfaces and was fully reversible. In the elastic and elasto-plastic regimes, the mechanical response was dependent on oxide layer thickness. Irreversibility at small loads (300 nN) was due to the deformation of the surface oxide. Above 1 μN, the deformation was elastic until the mean contact pressure reached 11 GPa, whereby Si underwent a pressure-induced phase transformation resulting in oxide layer pop-in and breakthrough. The critical load required for pop-in was dependent on oxide thickness and tip radius. For thicker oxide layers, substrate influence was reduced and plastic deformation occurred within the oxide film itself without pop-in. Elastic modulus and hardness of both the oxide layer and Si substrate were measured quantitatively for depths <5 nm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.B. Pethica, R. Hutchings, and W.C. Oliver, Philos. Mag. A 48, 593 (1983).
G. Binnig, C.F. Quate, and Ch. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986).
N.A. Burnham and R.J. Colton, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7, 2906 (1989).
N.A. Burnham, R.J. Colton, and H.M. Pollock, Nanotechnology 4, 64 (1993).
M.R. VanLandingham, S.H. McKnight, G.R. Palmese, J.R. Elings, X. Huang, T.A. Bogetti, R.F. Eduljee, and J.W. Gillespie, Jr., J. Adhesion 64, 31 (1997).
S.A. Syed Asif, K.J. Wahl, and R.J. Colton, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 2408 (1999).
K.E. Petersen, Proc. IEEE 70, 420 (1982).
M.R. Houston, R.T. Howe, and R. Maboudian, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3474 (1997).
W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).
O.P. Behrend, F. Oulevey, D. Gourdon, E. Dupas, A.J. Kulik, G. Gremaud, and N.A. Burnham, Appl. Phys. A. 66, S219 (1998).
J.N. Israelachvili and D. Tabor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 331, 19 (1972).
M. Binggeli and C.M. Mate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 415 (1994).
J. Hu, X-D. Xiao, D.F. Ogletree, and M. Salmeron, Science 268, 267 (1995).
S.A. Syed Asif and J.B. Pethica, Philos. Mag. A 76, 1105 (1997).
S.G. Corcoran, R.J. Colton, E.T. Lilleodden, and W.W. Gerberich, Phys. Rev. B 55, R16057 (1997).
A.B. Mann and J.B. Pethica, Philos. Mag. A 79, 577 (1999).
H. Minomura and H.G. Drickamer, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23, 451 (1962).
M.C. Gupta and A.L. Ruoff, J. Appl. Phys. 51, 1072 (1980).
J.Z. Hu, L.D. Merkle, C.S. Menoni, and I.L. Spain, Phys. Rev. B 34, 4679 (1986).
A.P. Gerk and D. Tabor, Nature 271, 732 (1978).
D.R. Clarke, M.C. Kroll, P.D. Kirchner, R.F. Cook, and B.J. Hockey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2156 (1988).
G.M. Pharr, W.C. Oliver, and D.S. Harding, J. Mater. Res. 6, 1129 (1991).
C.J. Smithells, Smithells Metal Reference Book, 6th ed., edited by E.A. Brandes (Butterworths, London, 1983), p. 15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Syed Asif, S.A., Wahl, K.J. & Colton, R.J. The influence of oxide and adsorbates on the nanomechanical response of silicon surfaces. Journal of Materials Research 15, 546–553 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2000.0081
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2000.0081