Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Mechanical and Electrical Properties in Hierarchical Composites Prepared using Electrophoretic or Chemical Vapor Deposition of Carbon Nanotubes

  • Article
  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two approaches have been employed in the preparation of hierarchical composite laminates with a carbon nanotube (CNT) phase. Glass fibers were coated with CNTs using electrophoretic deposition (EPD) prior to infusion with epoxy resin. The CNTs were functionalized using an ultrasonicated-ozone process followed by reaction with polyethyleneimine (PEI) to enhance CNT to fiber and matrix adhesion. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) was also used to grow CNTs onto quartz fibers, prior to infusion with an epoxy resin modified with a thermoplastic nanophase. The mechanical performance of the two CNT laminates types were similar, however, the fracture surfaces indicated distinct differences. The EPD laminates showed fracture in the CNT-rich interphase region, whereas, the CVD laminates showed that strength was limited by adhesion failure at the CNT-fiber interface. The electrical conductivity of CVD laminates was 100 times higher than EPD laminates. For the EPD laminates the PEI functionalization increases the CNT-CNT distance resulting in reduced conductivity, while the high CNT packing density and residual iron catalyst on the fiber surface in the CVD laminates creates conducting pathways resulting in higher conductivities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Pandey, E. T. Thostenson, Polym. Rev. 52, 355–416 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. T. Thostenson, W. Li, D. Wang, Z. Ren, and T. Chou, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 6034–6037 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Qian, A. Bismarck, E. S. Greenhalgh, and M. S. P. Shaffer, Compos. Sci. Technol. 70 (2), 393–399 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. J. Garcia, B. L. Wardle, A. John Hart, and N. Yamamoto, Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 (9), 2034–2041 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. N. Rider, E. Yeo, J. Gopalakrishna, E. T. Thostenson, and N. Brack, Carbon 94, 971–981 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Q. An, A. N. Rider, and E. T. Thostenson, ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 5 (6), 2022–2032 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Q. An, A. N. Rider, and E. T. Thostenson, Carbon 50 (11), 4130–4143 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Zhang, Y. Liu, M. Kuwata, E. Bilotti, T. Peijs, Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 70, 102–110 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Q. Zhang, J. Liu, R. Sager, L. Dai, and J Baur, Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 594–601 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Kappen, B. Halstead, A. N. Rider, P. J. Pigram, and N. Brack, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 113 (11), 4307–4314 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. N. Rider, Q. An, E. T. Thostenson, and N. Brack, Nanotechnology 25 (49), 495607 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. N. Rider, Q. An, N. Brack, and E. T. Thostenson, Chemical Engineering Journal 269, 121–134 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rider, A.N., An, Q., Brack, N. et al. A Comparison of Mechanical and Electrical Properties in Hierarchical Composites Prepared using Electrophoretic or Chemical Vapor Deposition of Carbon Nanotubes. MRS Advances 1, 785–790 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2015.51

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2015.51

Navigation