Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Impacts of Societal Context on Student Motivation and Engagement

  • Articles
  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

Promoting a sense of societal connectedness is critical in today’s engineering educational environment. The NAE’s Grand Challenges for Engineering point to broad human concerns — sustainability, health, vulnerability, and joy of living — and human connectivity as the future of engineering problem solving. Engineering studies, however, are often presented in a completely decontextualized manner, with an emphasis on technical content that is free of any human meaning. As a result, students may have difficulty identifying either personal or societal value in their learning tasks. Through their course design, instructors can help students situate themselves and their engineering learning experiences within the larger human system. Studying technologies and technological development within the broader societal context may, in turn, offer significant benefits to student motivation and engagement in learning. In this paper, we report findings from a three-year investigation of the effects of disciplinary integration on student motivation and learning engagement in introductory materials science courses. The quantitative results show that integrating materials science with humanities provides for increased student motivation and cognitive engagement in learning. Compared to students in non-integrated project-based courses, students in integrated project-based courses show higher intrinsic motivation and task value. In addition to these motivational gains, students in the integrated materials science-history course report significantly higher use of critical thinking strategies in their project work, indicating that an emphasis on societal context may help students cognitively engage in their engineering studies. Our findings also indicate that women in the integrated materials-history course report higher intrinsic motivation, task value, self-efficacy, and critical thinking strategy use compared to women in the non-integrated materials course. Overall, our research suggests that putting human contexts at the center of engineering learning can help students build a sense of societal relatedness that promotes better learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheppard, S. D., K. Macatangay, A. Colby, W.M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing

  2. Hodgson, R. M., and B. R. Williams, Engineering education, accreditation and the Bologna Declaration: a New Zealand view, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 44, 2, 124–128 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. King, R.W., The Bologna process and its potential influence on Australian engineering education, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 44, 2, 118–123 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucena, J., G. Downey, B. Jesiek, and S. Elber, Competencies Beyond Countries: The Re-Organization of Engineering Education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America, Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 4, 433–447 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagel, J. H., D. W. Slaaf, and J. Barbenel, Medical and Biological Engineering and Science in the European Higher Education Area, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 26, 3, 18–25 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pawley, A. J., Getting our Stories Straight, ASEE Prism, November 2009.

  7. Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci, Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being, American Psychologist, 55, 1, 68–78 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deci, E. L., R. J. Vallerand, L. G. Pelletier, and R. M. Ryan, Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective, Educational Psychologist, 26, 3&4, 325–346 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M., The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., and Ryan, R. M., A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., and and Brière, N. M., Associations Among Perceived Autonomy Support, Forms of Self-Regulation, and Persistence: A Prospective Study, Motivation and Emotion, 25, 4, 279–306 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vansteenkiste, M, Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., and Lens, W., Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 3, 671–688 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., and Ryan, R. M., A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., and and Brière, N. M., Associations Among Perceived Autonomy Support, Forms of Self-Regulation, and Persistence: A Prospective Study, Motivation and Emotion, 25, 4, 279–306 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Black, A. E., and E. L. Deci, The Effects of Instructors’ Autonomy Support and Students’ Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective, Science Education, 84, 7, 740–756 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., and Guay, F., Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 257–274 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ratelle, C. F.; Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., and Senécal, C., Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 4, 734–746 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wlodkowski, R. J., Creating Motivating Learning Environments, In M. W. Galbraith, Adult Learning Methods: A Guide for Effective Instruction, 3rd ed., p. 141–164, Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence, Review of Educational Research, 74, 1, 59–109 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pintrich, P. R., and De Groot, E. V., Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1, 33–40 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vansteenkiste, M, Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., and Lens, W., Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 3, 671–688 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., and Deci, E. L., Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 1, 19–31 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., and Deci, E. L., Amotivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R.E. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: The classroom milieu (pp. 13–51). New York: Academic, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Candy, P. C., Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L., Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being, American Psychologist 55 1 (2000) 68–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wlodkowski, R. J., Creating Motivating Learning Environments, In M. W. Galbraith, Adult Learning Methods: A Guide for Effective Instruction, 3rd ed., p. 141–164, Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence, Review of Educational Research, 74, 1, 59–109 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Garcia, T., and P. R. Pintrich, The Effects of Autonomy on Motivation and Performance in the College Classroom, Contemporary Educational Psychologist, 21, 4, 477–486 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schunk, D. H., Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation, Educational Psychologist, 26, 3&4, 207–231 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zimmerman, B. J., Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview, Educational Psychologist, 25, 1, 3–17 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. De Groot, Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1, 33–40 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zimmerman, B. J., Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective, In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation, p. 13–39, Academic, San Diego, CA (2000).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. McCombs, B. L., Motivation and Lifelong Learning, Educational Psychologist, 26, 2, 117–127 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hauser, M. D., Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong, New York, Harper Collins (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zimmerman, B. J., A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 3, 329–339 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stefanou, C. R., K. C. Perencevich, M. DiCintio, and J. C. Turner, Supporting Autonomy in the Classroom: Ways Teachers Encourage Student Decision Making and Ownership, Educational Psychologist, 39, 2, 97–110 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Noels, K. A., R. Clement, and L. G. Pelletier, Perceptions of Teachers’ Communicative Style and Students’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, The Modern Language Journal, 83, 1, 23–34 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, H. L., L. R. Lattuca, and E. R. Hamilton, Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering, Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 3, 339–353 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Patrick, H., and M. J. Middleton, Turning the Kaleidoscope: What We See When Self-Regulated Learning is Viewed With a Qualitative Lens, Educational Psychologist, 37, 1, 27–39 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pintrich, P. R., A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students, Educational Psychology Review, 16, 4, 385–407 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Assor, A., H. Kaplan, and G. Roth, Choice is Good, but Relevance is Excellent: Autonomy-Enhancing and Suppressing Teacher Behaviours Predicting Students’ Engagement in Schoolwork, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hidi, S., and J. M. Harackiewicz, Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century, Review of Educational Research, 70, 2, 151–179 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vansteenkiste, M., W. Lens, and E. L. Deci, Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation, Educational Psychologist, 41, 1, 19–31 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Blumenfeld, P. C., E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar, Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning, Educational Psychologist, 26, 3&4, 369–398 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ford, M. E., Motivational opportunities and obstacles associated with social responsibility and caring behavior in school contexts. In J. Juvonen & K.Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment, 126–153, New York, Cambridge University Press (1996).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Ford, M. E., and P. R. Smith, Thriving With Social Purpose: An Integrative Approach to the Development of Optimal Human Functioning, Educational Psychologist, 42, 3, 153–171 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sheppard, S. D., J.W. Pellegrino, and B.M. Olds, On becoming a 21st Century Engineer, Journal of Engineering Education 97, 3, 231–234 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Coyle, E., L. Jamieson, and W. Oakes, Integrating engineering education and community service: Themes for the future of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 1, 7–11 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jamieson, L. H. and J. R. Lohman, Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education: Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society, Phase 1 Report, ASEE (2009).

  50. National Academy of Engineering, Grand Challenges for Engineering, National Academy of Sciences (2008).

  51. Adelman, C. Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lord, M., Not What Students Need: A major study questions whether engineering undergraduates are being prepared for 21st-century careers, ASEE Prism, January 2010.

  53. Shuman, L. J., M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty, The ABET Professional Skills - Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, 41–55 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Guay, F., R. J. Vallerand, and C. Blanchard, On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion 24, 3, 175–213 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W. J., A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Post-Secondary Teaching (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W. J., Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–803 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Duncan, T. G., and McKeachie, W. J., The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117–128 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Meece, J. L., and J. Painter, Gender, self-regulation, and motivation. In D. H. Schunk, B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications. pp. 339–367. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vallance, R. J., The Academic Motivation of Boys and Girls in High School Settings, In P. A. Towndrow, C. Koh, and T. H. Soon (eds.), Motivation and Practice for the Classroom, 83–102, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Middleton, M. J., and Midgley, C. Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory, Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kaplay, A., and Maehr, M. L., Adolescents’ achievement goals: Situating motivation in sociocultural contexts. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents, pp. 125–168. Greenwich, CA, Information Age Publishing (2002).

  62. Wigfield, A., and Tonks, S., Adolescents’ expectancies for success and achievement task values during the middle and high school years. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents, pp. 53–82. Greenwich, CA, Information Age Publishing (2002).

  63. Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., and Pintrich, P. R., The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males’ and females’ self-regulated learning, Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 2, 153–171 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., and Burg, S., Gender and motivation, Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Olin Way, Needham, MA, 02492, USA

    Jonathan D. Stolk

Authors
  1. Jonathan D. Stolk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stolk, J.D. The Impacts of Societal Context on Student Motivation and Engagement. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1532, 102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2013.427

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2013.427

Search

Navigation