Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture mechanics in timber engineering – Strength analyses of components and joints

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional timber engineering design approaches use for simple geometries stress- or strain-based criteria for strength analyses. For more complex cases purely empirical methods are also used. Although practical, purely empirical methods are not general, and could lead to estimations on the unsafe side, if extrapolated outside their original scope. It is furthermore known that stress- or strain-based methods are not useful in situations where large stress or strain concentrations arise, such as close to holes or notches, in dowel joints or in glued joints. Furthermore, such phenomena like size effects cannot be predicted, unless stochastic methods are introduced.

The paper discusses some fracture mechanics strength analysis methods that in recent years have been proposed in relation to timber engineering strength design. The methods discussed range from simple hand calculations based on linear elastic fracture mechanics and useful for simple geometries to finite element analyses for general cases taking into account non-linear performance of the material during fracture. Fracture mechanics results in rational strength design, which is based on mechanics, as opposed to purely empirical methods, and with parameters with a clear physical meaning. In order to obtain material characteristics needed for this approach examples of test methods are discussed.

Application examples include structural components, dowel joints and adhesive joints. Design formulae for beams with notches at the support and for the pull out strength of glued-in rods are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Nr 151 Proc Royal Swedish Institute for Engineering Research, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson P-E (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and concrete research, Oxford, England, 6(6), pp 773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gustafsson PJ (2003) Fracture perpendicular to grain. In: Thelandersson S, Larsen HJ (eds) Timber engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gustafsson PJ (2003) Crack propagation in wood and wood products. In proc. of the second International Conference of the European Society for Wood Mechanics, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 227–236

  5. Gustafsson PJ (1987) Analysis of generalized Volkersen-joints in terms of non-linear fracture mechanics. In proc. of the European Mechanics Colloquium 227. Mechanical Behaviour of Adhesive Joints, Edition Pluralis, France, pp 323–338

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen JL, Gustafsson PJ (2004) Shear strength of beam splice joints with glued-in rods. Journal of Wood Science 50:123–129, Springer-Verlag, Tokyo

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hellan K (1984) Introduction to fracture mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp 49–72

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gustafsson PJ (1988) A study of strength of notched beams. 21th CIB-W18 meeting, Vancouver Canada, paper 21-10-1

  9. Aicher S, Gustafsson PJ (ed), Haller P, Petersson H (2002) Fracture Mechanics Models for Strength Analysis of Timber Beams with a Hole or a Notch - A Report of RILEM TC-133. Report TVSM-7134, Lund University, Division of Structural Mechanics, Lund, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leijten AJM, van der Put TACM (2000) Evaluation of perpendicular to grain failure of beams caused by concentrated loads of joints, Proceedings CIB-W18, Delft, Netherlands, paper 33-7- 7

  11. Larsen HJ, Gustafsson PJ (2001) Dowel joints loaded perpendicular to grain. Proceedings CIB-W18, Venice, Italy, pp 34–7– 3

  12. Masuda M, Tabata K (2001) Theoretical and experimental analyses of fracture of wood in pinned joint using DIC and FSAFC (Finite Small Area Fracture Criterion). In Proceedings PRO 22. International RILEM Symposioum on joints in Timber Structures Stuttgart, Germany 2001. RILEM Publications SARL, Cachan, France

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morris V, Gustafsson PJ, Serrano E (1995) The shear strength of light-weight beams with and without a hole – a preliminary study. COST 508 -Wood Mechanics. Proc. of the 1995 Wood Mechanics Workshop on Mechanical Properties of Panel Product, Watford, UK

  14. Gustafsson PJ (1992) Some test methods for fracture mechanics properties of wood and wood adhesive joints. Proceedings RILEM TC Workshop on Determination of Fracture Mechanics Properties of Wood, Bordeaux, France

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boström L (1992) Method for determination of the softening behaviour of wood and applicability of a nonlinear fracture mechanics model. PhD thesis. Report TVBM-1012.Lund University, Division of Building Materials, Lund Sweden

  16. Wernersson H (1994) Fracture characterization of wood adhesive joints. Report TVSM-1006, Lund University, Division of Structural Mechanics, Lund, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stefansson F (2001) Fracture Analysis of Orthotropic Beams. Linear Elastic and Non-Linear Methods. Licentiate thesis. Report TVSM-3029. Division of Structural Mechanics, Lund University, Sweden

  18. Serrano E (2000) Adhesive Joints in Timber Engineering. Modelling and Testing of Fracture Properties. PhD thesis. Report TVSM-1012. Lund University, Department of Mechanics and Materials, Structural Mechanics, Lund, Sweden

  19. Olejniczak P, Gustafsson PJ (1994) Rate effect in tangential tension fracture performance. COST-508 Wood mechanics workshop on “Service life assessment of wooden structures”, Espoo, Finland

  20. Serrano E, Gustafsson PJ (1999) Influence of bondline brittleness and defects on the strength of timber finger-joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives:19(1), 9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ABAQUS 6.3 (2003) Finite element software manuals. Hibbitt, Karlsson, & Sorensen Inc, Pawtucket, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Serrano E (2001) Glued-in Rods for Timber Structures. A 3D Model and finite element parameter studies. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives:21(2):115–127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Serrano E (2001) Glued-in Rods for timber structures. An experimental study of softening behaviour. Materials and Structures 34 (238), RILEM Publications, pp 228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Serrano E, Gustafsson PJ (2001) Modelling and Testing of Adhesive Joints in Timber Engineering. In Joints in Timber Structures. Proceedings of the International RILEM Symposium, Stuttgart, Germany 12–14 September 2001. RILEM Publications S.A.R.L

  25. Bengtsson C, Johansson C-J (2002) GIROD – Glued-in Rods for Timber Structures. SMT4-CT97-2199. SP-Report 2002:26, SP Swedish National testing and Research Institute, Building Technology, BorUs, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  26. Volkersen O (1938) Die Nietkraftverteilung in Zugbeanspruchten Nietverbindungen mit Konstanten Laschenquerschnitten. Luftfahrtforschung, 15:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ranta-Maunus A (1998) The Effect of Weather Changes and Surface Coating on the Load Bearing Capacity of Curved Glulam Structures, In proc of the 5th World Conf on Timber Eng., Montreux, Vol 1, pp 541–548

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Serrano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serrano, E., Gustafsson, P.J. Fracture mechanics in timber engineering – Strength analyses of components and joints. Mater Struct 40, 87–96 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9121-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9121-0

Keywords

Navigation