Skip to main content
Log in

Packing density of cementitious materials: part 1—measurement using a wet packing method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The packing characteristics of the cementitious materials have great influence on the performance of a concrete mix, but there is so far no generally accepted method of measurement. Herein, a new method, called the wet packing method, is developed. It mixes the cementitious materials with water and then measures the apparent density and voids content of the resulting mixture at varying water/cementitious materials ratio to characterise the packing behaviour of the cementitious materials. Trial mixing and testing revealed that the mixing procedure is crucial to the success of the test method. To ensure thorough mixing within a reasonable time, a special mixing procedure is adopted. Using this method, the packing characteristics of pure cement and blended cementitious materials under different conditions have been measured. Based on the results so obtained, it is advocated that the packing density and water demand should be measured directly using a wet packing method rather than indirectly by any consistence test because the water content at any preset consistence is not necessarily the same as the minimum water content needed to fill up the voids. Some useful applications of the new method are illustrated in Part 2 of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Powers TC (1968) The properties of fresh concrete. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeLarrard F, Sedran T (1994) Optimization of ultra-high-performance concrete by the use of a packing model. Cem Concr Res 24(6):997–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Richard P, Cheyrezy M (1995) Composition of reactive powder concretes. Cem Concr Res 25(7):1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sedran T, DeLarrard F, Hourst F, Contamines C (1996) Mix design of self-compacting concrete. In: Bartos PJM et al (eds) Proceedings of the international RILEM conference on production methods and workability of concrete. Paisley, Scotland, pp 439–450

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lange F, Mörtel H, Rudert V (1997) Dense packing of cement pastes and resulting consequences on mortar properties. Cem Concr Res 27(10):1481–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones MR, Zheng L, Newlands MD (2003) Estimation of the filler content required to minimize voids ratio in concrete. Mag Concr Res 55(2):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reed JS (1995) Principles of ceramics processing. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. British Standards Institution (1995) BS 812 Testing of aggregates part 2: method of determination of density. BSI, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Svarovsky L (1987) Powder testing guide: methods of measuring the physical properties of bulk powders. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd, England

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu AB, Bridgwater J, Burbidge A (1997) On the modeling of the packing of fine particles. Powder Technol 92(3):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pietsch W (1997) Size enlargement by agglomeration. In: Fayed ME, Otten L (eds) Handbook of powder science and technology, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. British Standards Institution (1995) BS EN 196 Methods of testing cement part 3: determination of setting time and soundness. BSI, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dewar JD (1999) Computer modelling of concrete mixtures. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bigas JP, Gallias JL (2002) Effect of fine mineral additions on granular packing of cement mixtures. Mag Concr Res 54(3):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DeLarrard F (1999) Concrete mixture proportioning: a scientific approach. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iveson SM, Litster JD, Hapgood K, Ennis BJ (2001) Nucleation, growth and breakage phenomena in agitated wet granulation processes: a review. Powder Technol 117(1–2):3–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaafsma SH, Vonk P, Segers P, Kossen NWF (1998) Description of agglomerate growth. Powder Technol 97(3):189–190

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iveson SM, Wauters PAL, Forrest S, Lister JD, Meesters GMH, Scarlett B (2001) Growth regime map for liquid-bound granules: further development and experimental validation. Powder Technol 117(1–2):83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. British Standards Institution (1978) BS 4550 Methods of testing cement part 3: physical tests. BSI, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zou RP, Yu AB (1996) Evaluation of the packing characteristics of mono-sized non-spherical particles. Powder Technol 88(1):71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwan AKH, Mora CF (2001) Effects of various shape parameters on packing of aggregate particles. Mag Concr Res 53(2):91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. HKU 7139/05E).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert K. H. Kwan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, H.H.C., Kwan, A.K.H. Packing density of cementitious materials: part 1—measurement using a wet packing method. Mater Struct 41, 689–701 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9274-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9274-5

Keywords

Navigation