Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of geopolymer concrete columns

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ordinary portland cement (OPC) has been traditionally used as the binding agent in concrete. However, it is also necessary to search for alternative low-emission binding agents for concrete to reduce the environmental impact caused by manufacturing of cement. Geopolymer, also known as inorganic polymer, is one such material that uses by-product material such as fly ash instead of cement. Recent research has shown that fly ash-based geopolymer concrete has suitable properties for its use as a construction material. Since the strength development mechanism of geopolymer is different from that of OPC binder, it is necessary to obtain a suitable constitutive model for geopolymer concrete to predict the load–deflection behaviour and strength of geopolymer concrete structural members. This article has investigated the suitability of using an existing stress–strain model originally proposed by Popovics for OPC concrete. It is found that the equation of Popovics can be used for geopolymer concrete with minor modification to the expression for the curve fitting factor, to better fit with the post-peak parts of the experimental stress–strain curves. The slightly modified set of stress–strain equations was then used in a non-linear analysis for reinforced concrete columns. A good correlation is achieved between the predicted and measured ultimate loads, load–deflection curves and deflected shapes for 12 slender test columns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehta PK (2001) Reducing the environmental impact of concrete. Concr Int 23(10):61–66

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davidovits J (1994) High-alkali cements for 21st century concretes. Concrete technology past, present and future. ACI Special Publication, SP 144. Farmington Hills, Michigan, pp 383–398

  3. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ et al (2004) On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater J 101(6):467–472

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ et al (2005) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Aust J Struct Eng 6(1):77–86

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rangan BV (2006) Studies on low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Indian Concr Inst J October–December:9–17

  6. Sarker PK (2004) Making geopolymer concrete using Sarawak fly ash. In: Proceedings of the first international conference of Asian Concrete Federation, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 28–29 October 2004, pp 633–640

  7. Sarker PK, Grigg A, Chang EH (2007) Bond strength of geopolymer concrete with reinforcing steel. In: Zingoni A (ed) Recent developments in structural engineering, mechanics and computation, CD ROM. Mill press, The Netherlands, pp 1315–1320

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sarker PK, deMeillon T (2007) Residual strength of geopolymer concrete after exposure to high temperature. In: Zingoni A (ed) Recent developments in structural engineering, mechanics and computation, CD ROM. Mill press, The Netherlands, pp 1566–1571

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sumajouw DMJ, Hardjito D, Wallah SE et al (2007) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: study of slender columns. J Mater Sci 42(9):3124–3130. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0523-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandez-Jimenez AM, Palomo A, Lopez-Hombrados C (2006) Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete. ACI Mater J 103(2):106–112

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sofi M, van Deventer JSJ, Mendis PA et al (2007) Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). Cement Concr Res 37:251–257. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sofi M, van Deventer JSJ, Mendis PA et al (2007) Bond performance of reinforcing bars in inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). J Mater Sci 42:3107–3116. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0534-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hardjito D, Rangan BV (2005) Development and properties of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Research Report GC1, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia. Available via http://espace.lis.curtin.edu.au/

  14. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw MJ et al (2005) The stress–strain behaviour of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. In: Developments in mechanics of structures and materials. A A Balkema Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 831–834

  15. Popovics S (1973) A numerical approach to the complete stress–strain curve of concrete. Cement Concr Res 3:583–599. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarker PK, Rangan BV (2003) Reinforced concrete columns under unequal load eccentricities. ACI Struct J 100(4):519–528

    Google Scholar 

  17. AS 1012.17 (1997) Determination of static chord modulus of elasticity and poisson’s ratio of concrete specimens. Standards Association of Australia, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  18. ACI Committee 363 (1993) State of the art of high strength concrete. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. AS 3600 (2001) Concrete structures. Standards Association of Australia, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carrasquillo RL, Nilson AS, Slate FO (1981) Properties of high strength concrete subjected to short term loads. ACI J 78:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmad SH, Shah SP (1985) Structural properties of high strength concrete and its implication for precast pre-stressed concrete. PCI J 30:92–119

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thorenfeldt E, Tomaszewicz A, Jensen JJ (1987) Mechanical properties of high strength concrete and application in design. In: Proceedings of the symposium of on utilization of high strength Concrete. Tapir, Trondheim, 1987, pp 149–159

  23. Collins MP, Mitchell D (1991) Prestressed concrete structures. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  24. Collins MP, Mitchell D, MacGregor JG (1993) Structural design considerations for high-strength concrete. Concr Int 15(5):27–34

    Google Scholar 

  25. ACI Committee 363 (1984) State of the art report on high strength concrete. ACI Proc 81(4):364–411

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibrahim HHH, MacGregor JG (1997) Modification of the ACI rectangular stress block for high-strength concrete. ACI Struct J 94(1):40–48

    Google Scholar 

  27. MacGregor JG, Wight JK (2006) Reinforced concrete mechanics and design, 4th edn. In SI units. Prentice Hall, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pfrang EO, Siess CP, Sozen MA (1964) Load–moment–curvature characteristics of reinforced concrete cross-sections. ACI J Proc 61(7):763–777

    Google Scholar 

  29. Warner RF, Rangan BV, Hall AS et al (1998) Concrete structures. Addison Wesley Longman, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kilpatrick AE (1996) The behaviour of high strength composite concrete columns. PhD Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia

  31. Sarker PK (2001) Study of high strength concrete columns. PhD Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabir Kumar Sarker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarker, P.K. Analysis of geopolymer concrete columns. Mater Struct 42, 715–724 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9415-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9415-5

Keywords

Navigation