Skip to main content
Log in

On the classification of mixed construction and demolition waste aggregate by porosity and its impact on the mechanical performance of concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The properties of recycled aggregate produced from mixed (masonry and concrete) construction and demolition (C&D) waste are highly variable, and this restricts the use of such aggregate in structural concrete production. The development of classification techniques capable of reducing this variability is instrumental for quality control purposes and the production of high quality C&D aggregate. This paper investigates how the classification of C&D mixed coarse aggregate according to porosity influences the mechanical performance of concrete. Concretes using a variety of C&D aggregate porosity classes and different water/cement ratios were produced and the mechanical properties measured. For concretes produced with constant volume fractions of water, cement, natural sand and coarse aggregate from recycled mixed C&D waste, the compressive strength and Young modulus are direct exponential functions of the aggregate porosity. Sink and float technique is a simple laboratory density separation tool that facilitates the separation of cement particles with lower porosity, a difficult task when done only by visual sorting. For this experiment, separation using a 2.2 kg/dm³ suspension produced recycled aggregate (porosity less than 17%) which yielded good performance in concrete production. Industrial gravity separators may lead to the production of high quality recycled aggregate from mixed C&D waste for structural concrete applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rilem Recommendation (1994) Specification for concrete with recycled aggregates. Mater Struct 27:557–559. doi:10.1007/BF02473217

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deutsche Institut fur Normung (2002) Aggregates for mortar and concrete—part 100: recycled aggregates. Germany

  3. Alaejos PG, Sánchez MJ (2004) Utilization of recycled concrete aggregate for structural concrete. In: Vazquez E et al (eds) International Rilem conference on the use of recycled materials in building and structures, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  4. Poon CS, Shui ZH, Lam L, Fok H, Kou SC (2004) Influence of moisture states of natural and recycled aggregates on the slump and compressive strength of concrete. Cement Concr Res 34:31–36. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00186-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gómez-Soberón J (2002) Porosity of recycled concrete with substitution of recycled concrete aggregate—an experimental study. Cement Concr Res 32:1301–1311. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00795-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wirquin E, Hadjieva-Zaharieva R, Buyle-Bodin F (2000) Utilisation de l’absorption d’eau des bétons comme critères de leur durabilité—application aux bétons de granulats recycles. Mater Struct 33:403–408. doi:10.1007/BF02479650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levy SM, Helene P (2004) Durability of recycled aggregates concrete: a safe way to sustainable development. Cement Concr Res 34:1975–1980. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. John VM, Angulo SC, Miranda LFR, Agopyan V, Vasconcellos F (2004) Strategies for innovation in construction and demolition waste management in Brazil. Paper presented in the CIB World Building Congress, National Research Council of Canada, Toronto

  9. Angulo SC, John VM, Kahn H, Ulsen C (2003) Characterisation and recyclability of construction and demolition waste in Brazil. Paper presented in the International Conference on the Environmental and Technical Implications with Alternative Materials, ISCOWA, San Sebastian

  10. Nederland Normalisatie-instituut (1997) Toeslagmaterialen voor beton—Materialen met een volumieke massa van ten minste 2000 kg/m3 (Aggregates for concrete: materials with a bulk density of at least 2,000 kg/m3), Delft

  11. Hendriks CF (2000) The building cycle. Aeneas, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  12. Müller A (2003) Recycling von Mauerwerkbruch—stand und neue verwertungswege (teil 1). Ziegelindustrie Int 56:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  13. Angulo SC, Ulsen C, Carrijo PM, Silva RM, John VM, Kahn H (2004) Characterization of Brazilian construction and demolition coarse recycled aggregate. In: Vazquez E et al (eds) International Rilem conference on the use of recycled materials in building and structures, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  14. Tam VWY, Tam CM, Le KN (2007) Removal of cement mortar remains from recycled aggregate using pré-soaking approaches. Resour Conserv Recycl 50(1):82–101. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagataki S, Gokce A, Saeki T, Hisada M (2004) Assessment of recycling process induced damage sensitivity of recycled concrete aggregates. Cement Concr Res 34:965–971. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz A (2004) Treatments for the improvement of recycled aggregate. J Mater Sci Civ Eng 16(6):597–603. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(597)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tam VWY, Gao XF, Tam CM (2005) Microstructural analysis of recycled aggregate concrete produced from two-stage mixing approach. Cement Concr Res 35(6):1195–1203. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noguchi T, Tamura M (2001) Concrete design towards complete recycling. Struct Concr 2(3):155–167. doi:10.1680/stco.2.3.155.40107

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shima H, Tateyashiki H, Matsuhashi R, Yoshida Y (2005) An advanced concrete recycling technology and its applicability assessment by the input–output analysis. J Adv Concr Technol 3(1):53–67. doi:10.3151/jact.3.53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. American Society for Testing and Materials (1993) Standard test method for specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregates: C 129. Pennsylvania, USA

  21. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (1994) Ensaio de compressão de corpos-de-prova cilíndricos de concreto: NBR 5739. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  22. American Society for Testing, Materials (1994) Standard test methods static Modulus Elast Poisson’s ratio concr compression C:469. Pennsylvania, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beaudoin JJ, Feldman RF, Tumidajski PJ (1994) Pore structure of hardened Portland cement pastes and its influence on properties. Adv Cement Base Mater 1:224–236. doi:10.1016/1065-7355(94)90028-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by FINEP (Fundo Verde e Amarelo/Habitare), SINDUSCON-SP and FAPESP. SCA and VMJ acknowledge scholarships from CNPq and PMC from CAPES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. M. John.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angulo, S.C., Carrijo, P.M., Figueiredo, A.D. et al. On the classification of mixed construction and demolition waste aggregate by porosity and its impact on the mechanical performance of concrete. Mater Struct 43, 519–528 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9508-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9508-9

Keywords

Navigation