Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of superplasticizer on the non-Newtonian characteristics of cement paste

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The superplasticized cement paste usually exhibits non-Newtonian characteristics, which depend on the type of superplasticizer and its dosage. Current attempts in the cement paste rheology literature have mainly focused on reducing the data from steady shear experiments to simple constitutive models, and exploring the influence of superplasticizer dosage and type based on these model parameters. In this study, the non-Newtonian behavior of the cement paste is characterized based on more fundamental experimental investigations without recourse to any specific model. Steady shear, creep and recovery, and stress relaxation experiments were conducted on a variety of superplasticizer and cement paste combinations, and the transition from non-linear viscoelastic to non-Newtonian and subsequently to linearly viscous fluid, as the dosage is increased were observed. Additionally, Marsh cone experiments were conducted to determine the optimum dosages and it was found that dosages determined based on Marsh cone were close to the dosages at the transition to the linearly viscous behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papo A, Piani L (2004) Effect of various superplasticizers on the rheological properties of portland cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 34:2097–2101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jayasree C, Gettu R (2008) Experimental study of the flow behaviour of superplasticized cement paste. Mater Struct 41:1581–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Struble L, Sun GK (1995) Viscosity of portland cement paste as a function of concentration. Adv Cem Mater 2:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cyr M, Legrand C, Mouret M (2000) Study of the shear thickening effect of superplasticizers on the rheological behaviour of cement pastes containing or not mineral additives. Cem Concr Res 30:1477–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy DM, Asaga K (1980) Rheological properties of cement mixes: V. The effects of time on viscometric properties of mixes containing superplasticizers; conclusions. Cem Concr Res 10:389–394

    Google Scholar 

  6. Masood I, Agarwal SK (1994) Effect of various superplasticizers on rheological properties of cement paste and mortars. Cem Concr Res 24(2):291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferraris CF, Obla KH, Hill R (2001) The influence of mineral admixtures on the rheology of cement paste and concrete. Cem Concr Res 31:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park CK, Noh MH, Park TH (2005) Rheological properties of cementitious materials containing mineral admixtures. Cem Concr Res 35:842–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartzentruber LD, Roy R, Cordin J (2006) Rheological behaviour of fresh cement pasts formulated from a self compacting concrete (SCC). Cem Concr Res 36:1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asaga K, Roy DM (1980) Rheological properties of cement mixes: IV—effects of superplasticizers on viscosity and yield stress. Cem Concr Res 10:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banfill PFG (1981) A viscometric study of cement pastes containing superplasticizers with a note on experimental techniques. Mag Concr Res 33(114):37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nehdi M, Rahman MA (2004) Estimating rheological properties of cement pastes using various rheological models for different test geometry, gap and surface friction. Cem Concr Res 34:1993–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mansoutre S, Colombet P, Van Damme H (1999) Water retention and granular rheological behaviour of fresh C3S paste as a function of concentration. Cem Concr Res 29:1441–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Struble LJ, Schultz MA (1993) Using creep and recovery to study flow behaviour of fresh cement paste. Cem Concr Res 23:1369–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun Z, Voigt T, Shah SP (2006) Rheometric and ultrasonic investigations of viscoelastic properties of fresh portland cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 36:278–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Min BH, Erwin L, Jennings HM (1994) Rheological behaviour of fresh cement paste as measured by squeeze flow. J Mater Sci 29:1374–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen CT, Struble LJ, Zhang H (2006) Using dynamic rheology to measure cement–admixture interactions. J ASTM Int 3(3):1–13

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. IS 12269 (2004) Indian standard specification for 53 grade ordinary portland cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jayasree C (2009) Study of cement–superplasticizer interaction and its implications for concrete performance. Doctoral thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, India

  20. Lootens D, Hebraud P, Lecolier E, Damme HV (2004) Gelation, shear-thinning and shear thickening in cement slurries. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev IFP 59(1):31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chougnet A, Audibert A, Moan M (2007) Linear and non-linear rheological behaviour of cement and silica suspensions. Effect of polymer addition. Rheol Acta 46:793–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tschoegl NW (1989) The phenomenological theory of linear viscoelastic behaviour—an introduction. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  23. ASTM D 2196-05. Standard test methods for rheological properties of non-Newtonian materials by rotational (Brookfield type) viscometer. ASTM International, USA

  24. Lapasin R, Papo A, Rajgelj S (1983) The phenomenological description of the thixotropic behaviour of fresh cement pastes. Rheol Acta 22:410–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Atzeni C, Massida L, Sanna U (1985) Comparison between rheological models for portland cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 15:511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Geiker MR, Mari B, Nyholm Lars, Lauge N (2002) On the effect of coarse aggregate fraction and shape on the rheological properties of self compacting concrete. Cem Concr Aggreg 24(1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Struble LJ, Lei W-G (1995) Rheological changes associated with setting of cement paste. Adv Cem Mater 2:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wineman AS, Rajagopal KR (2000) Mechanical response of polymers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Partial funding for this work was provided through grant number SR/S3/MERC/29/2006 by the Department of Science Technology, Government of India and grant number CIE/04-05/122/NFSC/RAVG by IIT Madras. The discussions with Dr. Abhijit P Deshpande, Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras on the use of dynamic shear rheometer are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Murali Krishnan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jayasree, C., Murali Krishnan, J. & Gettu, R. Influence of superplasticizer on the non-Newtonian characteristics of cement paste. Mater Struct 44, 929–942 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9677-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9677-6

Keywords

Navigation