Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of particle size of treated CRT funnel glass on properties of cement mortar

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decade, new types of display technologies have increasingly replaced cathode ray tube (CRT) displays leading to an increase in the disposal of discarded old CRT monitors and TV sets. The present study is a further development of our previous work to explore the effects of using different size fractions of crushed CRT glass as 100 % substitution of sand in cement mortar. A range of cement mortar mixes were prepared and the tests conducted included table flow (fluidity), mechanical strength, drying shrinkage, alkali–silica reaction (ASR) expansion and toxicity characteristic leaching procedures. Generally, the results obtained for the CRT glass-based cement mortars were comparable to those of the beverage glass mortars except the hardened density due to the presence of lead in the CRT glass. Decreasing the particle size of the CRT glass led to a decrease in fluidity, compressive strength and water absorption. However, the use of finer glass particles slightly improved the flexural strength and reduced the risk of expansion due to ASR due to its pozzolanic reaction. The experimental results indicated that treated CRT glass can be utilized as 100 % replacement of sand in cement mortar regardless of its particle size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee CH, Chang CT, Fan KS, Chang TC (2004) An overview of recycling and treatment of scrap computers. J Hazard Mater 114:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee CH, His CS (2002) Recycling of scrap cathode ray tubes. Environ Sci Technol 36:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pascal YG, François MO (2009) Lead extraction from waste funnel cathode-ray tubes glasses by reaction with silicon carbide and titanium nitride. J Hazard Mater 172:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Townsend TG, Musson SE, Jang YC, Chung IH (2000) Characterization of lead leachability from cathode ray tubes using the toxicity characteristics leaching procedure. Environ Sci Technol 34:4376–4381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poon CS (2008) Management of CRT glass from discarded computer monitors and TV sets. Waste Manag 28:1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ling TC, Poon CS, Kou SC (2011) Feasibility of using recycled glass in architectural cement mortar. Cem Concr Compos 33:848–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi C, Zheng K (2007) A review on the use of waste glasses in the production of cement and concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:234–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie Z, Xi Y (2002) Use of recycled glass as a raw material in the manufacture of Portland cement. Mater Struct 35:510–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ling TC, Poon CS (2011) Properties of architectural mortar prepared with recycled glass with different particle sizes. Mater Des 32:2675–2684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu H, Chen W, Zhou W, Byars EA (2009) Expansion behaviour of glass aggregates in different testing for alkali–silica reactivity. Mater Struct 42:485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee G, Ling TC, Wong YL, Poon CS (2011) Effects of crushed glass cullet sizes, casting methods and pozzolanic materials on ASR of concrete blocks. Constr Build Mater 25:2611–2618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin W, Meyer C, Baxter S (2009) Glasscrete—concrete with glass aggregate. ACI Mater J 97:208–213

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ling TC, Poon CS (2011) Utilization of recycled glass derived from cathode ray tube glass as fine aggregate in cement mortar. J Hazard Mater 192:451–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ASTM C1437 (2007) Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  15. ASTM C 642 (2006) Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  16. ASTM C348 (2008) Standard test method for flexural strength of hydraulic-cement mortars. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  17. ASTM C349 (2008) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic-cement mortars (using portions of prisms broken in flexure). American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  18. BS ISO 1920-8 (2009) Determination of drying shrinkage of concrete for samples prepared in the field or in the laboratory. British Standard Institution, London

  19. ASTM C 1260 (2007) Standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (mortar-bar method). American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  20. Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), Test Method 1311 (1986). Specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

  21. Shi C, Wu Y, Riefler C, Wang H (2005) Characteristics and pozzolanic reactivity of glass powders. Cem Concr Res 35:987–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Andreola F, Barbieri L, Corradi A, Lancellotti I (2005) Cathode ray tube glass recycling: an example of clean technology. Waste Manag Res 23:314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Environment and Conservation Fund, the Woo Wheelock Green Fund, and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for funding support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Sun Poon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ling, TC., Poon, CS. Effects of particle size of treated CRT funnel glass on properties of cement mortar. Mater Struct 46, 25–34 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9880-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9880-8

Keywords

Navigation