Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vacuum mixing technology to improve the mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultra-high performance concrete is an important evolution in concrete technology, enabled by the combination of a good particle packing density, a suitable mixing procedure and compatible binders and admixtures. In the last decades a lot of research has been performed to explore the boundaries of this new type of concrete. Mixers equipped with a vacuum pump able to lower the mixing pressure from 1,013 to 50 mbar are an interesting way to improve the performance by lowering the air content. Profound research is necessary, because little is known about this technique of air content reduction. The influence of a reduced air content on the mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete is tested at The Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research. This paper reports the results of the compressive strength, the splitting and bending tensile strength and the modulus of elasticity. All the mechanical properties after 28 days curing are improved by reducing the air content in the ultra-high performance concrete. An increase in compressive strength between 7 and 22 % is measured. The bending tensile strength increases maximum with 17 % and the splitting tensile strength gains 3–22 % in performance. Furthermore, the modulus of elasticity improves with 3–8 %. In conclusion, the air content can be controlled and a higher performance can be achieved by vacuum mixing technology. Finally, it is shown that the vacuum technology is not as effective in a 75 l capacity vacuum mixer as it is for a smaller vacuum mixer with a capacity of 5 l.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nöldgen M, Fehling E et al (2012) Ultra high performance concrete structures under aircraft engine missile impact. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on ultra-high performance concrete and nanotechnology for high performance construction materials, Kassel, March 2012, pp 593–600

  2. Ricciotti R, Lafarge Group (2008) Villa Navarra Provence. Brochure of Lafarge Group, pp 1–20

  3. Moeller A (2008) Use of UHPC in offshore wind turbine foundations. In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on ultra high performance concrete, Kassel, March 2008, pp 863–869

  4. Sagmeister B (2012) On the way to micrometer scale: applications of UHPC in machinery construction. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on ultra-high performance concrete and nanotechnology for high performance construction materials, Kassel, March 2012, pp 819–823

  5. Dugat J, Roux N, Bernier G (1996) Mechanical properties of reactive powder concretes. Mater Struct 29:233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Piotrowski S, Schmidt M (2012) Life cycle cost analysis of a UHPC-bridge on example of two bridge refurbishment designs. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on ultra-high performance concrete and nanotechnology for high performance construction materials, Kassel, March 2012, pp 957–964

  7. Graybeal B, Tanesi J (2007) Durability of an ultra high-performance concrete. J Mater Civ Eng ASCE 19:848–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Piérard J, Dooms B, Cauberg N (2013) Durability evaluation of different types of UHPC, RILEM-fib-AFGC. International symposium on ultra high performance fibre-reinforced concrete, UHPFRC, Marseille, October 2013, pp 275–284

  9. Wille K, Naaman AE et al (2011) Ultra-high performance concrete with compressive strength exceeding 150 Mpa (22 ksi): a simpler way. ACI Mater J 108:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wille K, Naaman AE et al (2012) Ultra-high performance concrete and fiber reinforced concrete: achieving strength and ductility without heat curing. Mater Struct 45:309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt M, Geisenhanslüke C (2005) Optimierung der Zusammensetzung des Feinstkorns von Ultra-Hochleistungs—und von Selbstverdichtendem Beton, UHPC—10 Jahre Froschung und Entwicklung. Beton 36(5):224–235

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dils J, De Schutter G, Boel V (2012) Influence of mixing procedure and mixer type on fresh and hardened properties of concrete: a review. Mater Struct 45:1673–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feys D, Roussel N et al (2009) Influence of air bubbles size and volume fraction on rheological properties of fresh self-compacting concrete. 3rd International RILEM symposium on rheology of cement suspensions such as fresh concrete, Reykjavik, August 2009, pp 113–120

  14. Zain MFM, Safiuddin M, Yusof KM (1999) A study on the properties of freshly mixed high performance concrete. Cem Concr Res 29:1427–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ikeda T, Hamada H et al (2013) Experimental investigation of air void formed around steel bar using X-ray CT scanning. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on concrete under severe conditions—environment and loading, Nanjing, September 2013, pp 742–748

  16. Markovic I (2006) High-performance hybrid-fibre concrete—development and utilisation. Doctoral thesis, Delft University, p 51

  17. Wong HHC, Kwan AKH (2008) Packing density of cementitious materials: Part 1—measurement using a wet packing method. Mater Struct 41:689–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Larrard F (1999) Concrete mixture proportioning: a scientific approach, 1st edn. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Knab LI, Clifton JR, Ings JB (1983) Effects of maximum void and aggregate characteristics on the strength of mortar. Cem Concr Res 13:383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tynes WO (1967) Investigation of vacuum mixing of concrete. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mazanec O, Schiessl P (2008) Improvement of UHPC properties through an optimized mixing procedure. 8th International symposium on utilization of high-strength and high-performance concrete, Tokyo, October 2008, pp 307–313

  22. Nold P (2006) Mischen von beton: was muss man beachten, um betone gleichmässig gut aufzubereiten? Bayerische bauakademie

  23. Dils J, Boel V, De Schutter G (2013) Influence of cement type and mixing pressure on air content, rheology and mechanical properties of UHPC. Constr Build Mater 41:155–163

    Google Scholar 

  24. Malvern Instruments (2012) Dynamic light scattering: an introduction in 30 minutes. Technical Note Malvern, MRK656-01, pp 1–8

  25. Richard P, Cheyrezy M (1995) Composition of reactive powder concrete. Cem Concr Res 25:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lieblang P, Ringwelski D (2012) Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC)—influence of mixing on the fresh and hardened concrete characteristics. Concr Plant Int 3:40–43

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chopin D, De Larrard F et al (2004) Why do HPC and SCC require a longer mixing time? Cem Concr Res 14:2237–2243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mazanec O, Schiessl P (2008) Mixing time optimisation for UHPC. In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on ultra high performance concrete, Kassel, March 2008, pp 401–408

  29. Roberts LR (2006) Air content, temperature, unit weight and yield. In: Klieger P, Lamond JF (eds) Significance of tests and properties of concrete and concrete-making materials., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, p 65

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jakobsen UH, Pade C et al (2006) Automated air void analysis of hardened concrete—a Round Robin study. Cem Concr Res 36:1444–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pigeon M, Marchand J, Pleau R (1996) Frost resistant concrete. Constr Build Mater 10(5):339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Birchall JD, Howard AJ, Kendall K (1981) Flexural strength and porosity of cements. Nature 289:388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alford NM (1981) A theoretical argument for the existence of high strength cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 11:605–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lawrence LS, Van Dam T, Thomas M (2007) Evaluation of methods for characterizing air-void systems in Wisconsin paving concrete. Report Transportation Materials Research Center, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  35. Feys D, Verhoeven R, De Schutter G (2007) Evaluation on time independent rheological models applicable to fresh self-compacting concrete. Appl Rheol 17:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang K, Lomboy G, Steffes R (2009) Investigation into freezing–thawing durability of low-permeability concrete with and without air entraining agent. Report. Iowa State University, pp 1–34

  37. De Vries AWG (2001) Path and wake of a rising bubble. Doctoral thesis, Twente University

  38. Chen L, Carimella SV et al (1999) The development of a bubble rising in a viscous liquid. J Fluid Mech 387:61–96

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Mindess S, Young JF, Darwin D (2002) Concrete, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  40. Aydin S, Yazici H et al (2010) Effect of aggregate type on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete. ACI Mater J 107(5):441–449

    Google Scholar 

  41. Feret R (1892) Sur la compacité des mortiers hydrauliques. Ann Ponts Chauss 4:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  42. Graybeal B (2011) Technote: ultra-high performance concrete. FWA Publication No: FHWA-HRT-11-038, pp 1–176

  43. Magureanu C, Sosa I et al (2012) Mechanical properties and durability of ultra-high-performance concrete. ACI Mater J 109(2):177–184

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dils J, Boel V, De Schutter G (2013) Influence of entrapped air on the rheology of high performance concrete. The fifth North American conference on the design & use of self-consolidating concrete, Chicago, May 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support of the Hercules Foundation and of the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders is greatly acknowledged. The authors also want to acknowledge the support of the following companies, which provided materials free of charge: Sibelco Benelux, Elkem Silicon Materials and CBR-Heidelbergcement Group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Magnel Laboratory for Concrete Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    J. Dils, V. Boel & G. De Schutter

  2. Industrial Technology and Construction, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    V. Boel

Authors
  1. J. Dils
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Boel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. De Schutter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Dils.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dils, J., Boel, V. & De Schutter, G. Vacuum mixing technology to improve the mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete. Mater Struct 48, 3485–3501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0416-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0416-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation