Skip to main content
Log in

Linear rheology of bituminous mastics modified with various polyolefins: a comparative study with their source binders

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of bituminous mastics on controlling the mechanical properties of the asphalt mixtures has been largely claimed. Theoretical models often fail to predict the rheological behavior of highly concentrated mastics because of the various interaction forces involved. This situation becomes much more complex when dealing with biphasic polymer modified bitumens (PMBs). This investigation explores the influence of various recycled polyolefins (LDPE, HDPE and PP) on the linear rheological behavior of modified mastics with a fixed filler/binder ratio of 65/35 (by weight). The filler was of siliceous-type, and all the PMBs contained 4 wt.% polymer. Oscillatory torsion/shear tests were carried out between 25 and 65 °C. It was found that the rheology of the HDPE-binder very much resembles its polymer-rich phase (PRP), which behaves like a concentrated polymer solution. In contrast, the LDPE-binder proved to have a bitumen-rich phase (BRP) still playing a large part in the PMB rheology. This result had a strong effect on the mastic rheology, as the filler shows more affinity for the bitumen. In consequence, the G′ plateau observed in the HDPE-mastic was similar to that found in its parent PMB. In contrast, if compared to its source binder, the LDPE-mastic manifested a rheological behavior better described by the filler acting as bridging points of PRP domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Read J, Whiteoak D (2003) The Shell Bitumen handbook, 5th edn. Thomas Telford Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Polacco G, Stastna J, Biondi D, Zanzotto L (2006) Relation between polymer architecture and nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of modified asphalts. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 11:230–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pérez-Lepe A, Martínez-Boza FJ, Gallegos C (2005) Influence of polymer concentration on the microstructure and rheological properties of high-density polyethylene (HDPE)-modified bitumen. Energy Fuels 19:1148–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frigio F, Ferrotti G, Cardone F (2016) Fatigue rheological characterization of polymer-modified bitumens and mastics. In: Canestrari F, Partl MN (eds) 8th RILEM International Symposium on Testing and Characterization of Sustainable and Innovative Bituminous Materials, RILEM Bookseries, vol 11, pp 655–666

  5. Blazejowski K (2010) Stone matrix asphalt: theory and practice. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen JS, Kuo PH, Lin PS, Huang CC, Lin KY (2008) Experimental and theoretical characterization of the engineering behavior of bitumen mixed with mineral filler. Mater Struct 41:1015–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shashidhar N, Shenoy A (2002) On using micromechanical models to describe dynamic mechanical behavior of asphalt mastics. Mech Mater 34:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabowski W, Wilanowicz J (2008) The structure of mineral fillers and their stiffening properties in filler–bitumen mastics. Mater Struct 41(4):793–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mwanza AD, Hao P, Xongyonyar X (2012) Determination of mixing and compaction temperatures shift for asphalt mastic at different type and content of mineral fillers. Int J Civil Eng Build Mater 2(4):159–166

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yan KZ, Xu HB, Zhang HL (2013) Effect of mineral filler on properties of warm asphalt mastic containing Sasobit. Constr Build Mater 48:622–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guglielmo J, Peebles G, Mehta Y (2014) Evaluation of fatigue behavior of neat and polymer modified binders and mastics using multiple test methods. In: Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, Philadelphia

  12. Shen S, Airey GD, Carpenter SH, Huang H (2006) A dissipated energy approach to fatigue evaluation. Road Mater Pavement Des 7(1):47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu J, van de Ven M, Wu S, Yu J, Molenaar A (2012) evaluating self healing capability of bituminous mastics. Exp Mech 52:1163–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Polacco G, Filippi S, Merusi F, Stastna G (2015) A review of the fundamentals of polymer-modified asphalts: asphalt/polymer interactions and principles of compatibility. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 224:72–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fawcett AH, McNally T, McNally G (2002) An attempt at engineering the bulk properties of blends of a bitumen with polymers. Adv Polym Technol 21(4):275–286. doi:10.1002/adv.10032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lesueur D, Gerard JF, Claudy P, Létoffé JM, Martin D, Planche JP (1998) Polymer modified asphalts as viscoelastic emulsions. J Rheol 42(5):1059–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cardone F, Frigio F, Ferrotti G, Canestrari F (2015) Influence of mineral fillers on the rheological response of polymer-modified bitumens and mastics. J Traffic Transp Eng 2(6):373–381. doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2015.06.003

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yi-qiu T, Li ZH, Zhang XY, Dong ZJ (2010) Research on high- and low-temperature properties of asphalt-mineral filler mastic. J Mater Civil Eng 22(8):811–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Airey GD (2002) Use of Black diagrams to identify inconsistencies in rheological data. Road Mater Pavement Des 3(4):403–424. doi:10.1080/14680629.2002.9689933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. García-Morales M, Partal P, Navarro FJ, Martínez-Boza FJ, Gallegos C (2004) Linear viscoelasticity of recycled eva-modified bitumens. Energy Fuels 18:357–364. doi:10.1021/ef034032u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shivokhin M, García-Morales M, Partal P, Cuadri AA, Gallegos C (2012) Rheological behaviour of polymer-modified bituminous mastics: a comparative analysis between physical and chemical modification. Constr Build Mater 27:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Buttlar WG, Bozkurt D, Al-Khateeb G, Waldhoff A (1999) Understanding asphalt mastic behavior through micromechanics. Trans Res Rec 1681:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yusoff NIM, Chailleux E, Airey GD (2011) A comparative study of the influence of shift factor equations on master curve construction. Int J Pavement Res Technol 4(6):324–336

    Google Scholar 

  25. Medani TO, Huurman M (2003) Constructing the stiffness master curves for asphaltic mixes. Report 7-01-127-3, Delft University and Technology, Netherland

  26. Lesueur D (2009) The colloidal structure of bitumen: consequences on the rheology and on the mechanisms of bitumen modification. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 145(1–2):42–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bousmina M, Muller R (1993) Linear viscoelasticity in the melt of impact PMMA. Influence of concentration and aggregation of dispersed rubber particles. J Rheol 37(4):663–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cardinaud R, McNally T (2013) Localization of MWCNTs in PET/LDPE blends. Eur Polym J 49:1287–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by MINECO-FEDER (Subprogram INNPACTO project IPT-2012-0316-370000) and JUNTA DE ANDALUCÍA (TEP-6689). The authors gratefully acknowledge their financial support and declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. García-Morales.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roman, C., García-Morales, M. Linear rheology of bituminous mastics modified with various polyolefins: a comparative study with their source binders. Mater Struct 50, 86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0953-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0953-y

Keywords

Navigation