Skip to main content
Log in

Sodium sulfate salt weathering of porous building materials studied by NMR

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sodium sulfate is known as one of the most destructive salts causing weathering. Many experiments on accelerated weathering tests show that major deterioration effects by weathering are caused by drying and wetting cycles of porous materials saturated with salt solution. In this study we have performed accelerated weathering tests with sodium sulfate in common building materials (fired-clay brick, Indiana limestone and Cordova limestone) measuring the concentration in the materials simultaneously with their expansion. The concentration of sodium sulfate solution is measured non-destructively using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, while the expansion of the sample caused by crystal growth is measured with a fiber optic displacement sensor. The simultaneous measurement of solution concentration within a material and expansion allow assessment of crystallization pathways most responsible for damage during weathering, i.e., cycles of wetting and drying. It was shown by direct observation, that with rewetting of the partially dried samples, the present thenardite experiences a rapid partial transformation to decahydrate. Simultaneously with this transformation a rapid expansion of the sample was measured in situ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scherer GW (2004) Stress from crystallization of salt. Cem Concr Res 34:1613–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Steiger M, Asmussen S (2008) Crystallization of sodium sulfate phases in porous materials: the phase diagram Na2SO4–H2O and the generation of stress. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:4291–4306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Doehne E, Sebastian E (2000) How does sodium sulfate crystalize? Implications for the decay and testing of building materials. Cem Concr Res 30:1527–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Doehne E (1982) An unusual case of ground water sulphate attack on concrete. Cem Concr Res 12:633–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshida N, Matsunami Y, Nagayama M (2012) Sodium sulfate weathering in the residential concrete foundation, Concrete under severe conditions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 75–83. ISBN 978-0-415-59316-8

  6. Haynes H, O’Neill R, Neff M, Mehta PK (2008) Weathering distress on concrete exposed to sodium sulfate environment. Mater J 10:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  7. Correns CW (1949) Growth and dissolution of crystals under linear pressure. Discuss Faraday Soc 5:267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Thury H (1828) Sur le procédé proposé par M. Brard pour reconnaître immediatement les pierres qui ne peuvent pas résister à la gelée, et que l’on désigne ordinairement par les noms de pierres gelives ou pierres gelisses. Ann Chimie Phys 38:160–192

  9. Hartley H, Jones BM, Hutchinson GA (1908) The spontaneous Crystallization of Sodium sulfate solutions. J Chem Soc 93:825–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gans W (1979) Thermodynamic stability of sodium sulfate heptahydrate. Z Phys Chem Neue Folge 111:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Knofel DK, Hoffmann D, Snethlage R (1982) Physico-chemical weathering reactions as a formulary for time-lapsing ageing tests. Mater Struct 20:127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Doehne E (1999) Damage in porous media due to salt crystallization. Earth Surf Process Landf 24:19–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saidov TA, Pel L, van der Heijden GHA (2015) Crystallization of sodium sulfate in porous media by drying at a constant temperature. Int J Heat Mass Transf 83:621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saidov TA, Pel L, Kopinga K (2015) Crystallization pressure of sodium sulfate heptahydrate. J Cryst Growth Des 15(5):2087–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsui N, Flatt RJ, Scherer GWJ (2003) Crystallization damage by sodium sulfate. Cult Herit 4:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rijniers LA, Huinink HP, Pel L, Kopinga K (2005) Experimental evidence of crystallization pressure inside porous media. Phys Rev Lett 94:075503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rijniers LA (2004) Salt crystallization in porous materials: an NMR study. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven

  18. Coussy O (2006) Deformation and stress from in-pore drying-induced crystallization of salt. J Mech Phys Solids 54:1517–1547

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pel L, Kopinga K, Kaasschieter EF (2000) Saline absorption in calcium silicate brick observed by NMR scanning. J Phys D Appl Phys 33:1380–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kopinga K, Pel L (1994) One dimensional scanning of moisture in porous materials with NMR. Rev Sci Instrum 65:3673–3681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saidov TA, Pel L, Espinosa-Marzal RM (2012) G.W. Scherer, Nucleation of sodium sulfate heptahydrate on mineral substrates studied by nuclear magnetic resonance. J Cryst Growth 338:166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pel L, Huinink H, Kopinga K, van Hees RPJ, Adan OCG (2004) Efflorescence pathway diagram: understanding salt weathering. Constr Build Mater 18:309–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Flatt RJ, Steiger M, Scherer GW (2007) A commented translation of the paper by C.W. Correns and W. Steinborn on crystallization pressure. Environ Geol 52(2):187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saidov T (2012) Sodium sulfate heptahydrate in weathering phenomena of porous materials. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Oct 2012

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation (STW), Project 06752: Salt Weathering of porous building materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamerlan A. Saidov.

Appendix: Calculation of salt mixture content during drying

Appendix: Calculation of salt mixture content during drying

Let us estimate the pore filling coefficient, i.e., the relative volume occupied by salts (thenardite and/or decahydrate) with respect to the pore volume (volume of the sample times porosity), \(V_{0}\), initially filled with a solution. The pore filling coefficient of a particular salt varies from 0—no filling, to 1—complete filling and can be presented in the form:

$$\phi_{\text{t}} = \frac{{V^{\text{t}} }}{{V_{0} }};$$
(3)
$$\phi_{\text{d}} = \frac{{V^{\text{d}} }}{{V_{0} }};$$
(4)

where \(\,\phi_{\rm t}\) and \(\,\,\phi_{\rm d}\) are the pore filling coefficients, \(\,V^{\rm t}\) and \(\,V^{\rm d}\) are the crystal volumes of thenardite and decahydrate respectively. Then, the crystal volume of thenardite formed is \(\,V^{\rm t} = V_{\rm m}^{\rm t} \,\Delta n\), where \(\,V_{\rm m}^{\rm t} \, = 53\) cm3/mol is the molar volume of thenardite and \(\,\Delta n\) is the amount (in moles) of thenardite precipitated by drying. If by rewetting all thenardite transforms to decahydrate, then the volume of decahydrate is \(\,V^{\rm d} = V_{\rm m}^{\rm d} \,\Delta n\), where \(\,V_{\rm m}^{\rm d} \, = 220\) cm3/mol.

The amount of precipitated thenardite by drying can be found from the difference between initial,\(\,n_{0}\), and actual, \(\,n\), amount of sodium sulfate in a solution:

$$\,\Delta n = n_{0} - n = \frac{{m_{0}^{\rm salt} - m^{\rm salt} }}{{M_{\rm salt} }};$$
(5)

where \(m_{0}^{\rm salt}\) and \(m^{\rm salt}\) are the initial and actual masses of thenardite in a solution. The mass of the solution,\(\,m^{\rm sol}\), can be presented as a sum of the mass of water, \(m^{\rm w}\), and of the sodium sulfate dissolved in a solution, \(m^{\rm salt}\):

$$\,m^{\rm sol} = m^{\rm w} + m^{\rm salt} = n^{\rm w} M_{\rm w} + n^{\rm salt} M_{\rm salt} ;$$
(6)

where \(n^{\rm w}\) and \(n^{\rm salt}\) are the actual amounts (in moles) of water and salt in the solution respectively, \(M_{\rm w}\) and \(M_{\rm salt}\) are the molar masses of water and salt (in our case respectively 18 g/mol and 142.04 g/mol—thenardite). The concentration of a solution during the drying is:

$$c = \frac{{n^{\rm salt} }}{{m^{\rm w} }} = \frac{{n^{\rm salt} }}{{\theta \,m_{0}^{\rm w} }};$$
(7)

where \(\theta\) is the moisture content and \(m_{0}^{\rm w}\) is the initial mass of water in a solution. In the case, \(\theta = 1\), when \(n^{\rm salt}\) is equal to initial amount of salt in the solution (i.e., \(n^{\rm salt} = n_{0}^{\rm salt}\)), from Eq. (5) one will obtain the initial concentration of the solution, \(c_{0}\). Therefore, the initial mass of water can be found from Eqs. (6) and (7) by the expression:

$$\,m_{0}^{\rm w} = \frac{{m_{0}^{\rm sol} }}{{\left( {1 + c_{0} \,M_{\rm salt} } \right)}};$$
(8)

where the mass of initial solution, \(\,m_{0}^{\rm sol} = V_{0} \rho_{0}^{\rm sol}\), and the density of the initial sodium sulfate solution of 3 m is \(\rho_{0}^{\rm sol} = 1.34\) g/cm3, and inner pore volume is a sample volume times porosity, hence \(\,V_{0} = \rho_{\rm pore} \,V_{\rm sample}\), where \(\,V_{\rm sample} = 3.14\) cm3.

Combining Eqs. (5)–(8), we can find the amount of thenardite that precipitated during the drying:

$$\,\Delta n = \rho_{\rm pore} \,V_{\rm sample} {\kern 1pt} \rho^{\rm sol} \,\,\left( {\frac{{c_{0} - c\,\theta }}{{1 + c_{0} \,M_{\rm salt} }}} \right);$$
(9)

where \(c\) is the actual concentration of a solution and is measured by an NMR and presented in Fig. 4.

In the case, where not all thenardite is transformed to decahydrate, the concentration of a solution is expected to be between of the solubility of thenardite and decahydrate. Then the pore filling ratio of actually formed decahydrate (under assumption of homogenous distribution of a salt in the sample, i.e., Pe ≪ 1) can be in first order estimated by the relation of actual concentration of a solution and solubility concentrations of thenardite and decahydrate:

$$\,\,\phi_{{\rm d}}^{\rm act} \approx \left( {1 - \frac{{c - c_{\rm s}^{\rm d} }}{{c_{\rm s}^{\rm t} - c_{\rm s}^{\rm d} }}} \right)\,\phi_{\rm d} ;$$
(10)

In the case of all thenardite transformed to decahydrate, we return to initial expression (3).

The calculated initial pore volume,\(\,V_{0}\), and pore filling coefficients \(\,\phi_{\rm t}\) and \(\,\,\phi_{{\rm d}}^{\rm act}\) are given in Table 1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saidov, T.A., Pel, L. & Kopinga, K. Sodium sulfate salt weathering of porous building materials studied by NMR. Mater Struct 50, 145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1007-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1007-9

Keywords

Navigation