Skip to main content
Log in

Direct shear test for the assessment of rheological parameters of concrete for 3D printing applications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rheology of concrete plays a major role in concrete 3D printing applications, where the concrete is pumped at high pressure and extruded through a nozzle at low speed to build the structural component. The 3D printable concrete should be stiff and is different to normal or self-compacting concrete. Hence, the common testing methods used to estimate the rheological parameters are not suitable for 3D printable concrete. In this study, the direct shear test is trialled as a potential method to measure the rheological parameters of different mixes of concrete. The effects of water–cement ratio and shear rates on rheological parameters were examined. The tests were carried out with varying shear rates, ranging from 0.5 to 15 min−1, and normal stresses, ranging from 2 to 15 kPa, for mixes with water–cement ratios of 0.3, 0.4 and 0.6. Further testing was carried out on mixes with varying aggregate to cement and fine to total aggregates ratios to study the effect of binder and aggregate proportions on the rheology of mortar. It was found that the shear rates, 0.5 to 15 min−1, have little effect on the cohesion values and friction angles. Further, the behaviour of the mixes was found to be following the Mohr–Coulomb model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolfs R, Salet T, Hendriks B (2015) 3D printing of sustainable concrete structures. In: Proceedings of IASS annual symposia, vol 2. International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), pp 1–8

  2. Lim S, Buswell RA, Le TT, Austin SA, Gibb AG, Thorpe T (2012) Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom Constr 21:262–268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alfani R, Guerrini G (2005) Rheological test methods for the characterization of extrudable cement-based materials—a review. Mater Struct 38(2):239–247

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferraris CF, Brower LE, Banfill P (2001) Comparison of concrete rheometers: international test at LCPC (Nantes, France) in October, 2000. National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD, USA

  5. Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, Buswell RA, Gibb AG, Thorpe T (2012) Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater Struct 45(8):1221–1232

    Google Scholar 

  6. Assaad JJ, Harb J, Maalouf Y (2014) Measurement of yield stress of cement pastes using the direct shear test. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 214:18–27

    Google Scholar 

  7. Perrot A, Rangeard D, Pierre A (2016) Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques. Mater Struct 49(4):1213–1220

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roussel N, Lanos C, Toutou Z (2006) Identification of Bingham fluid flow parameters using a simple squeeze test. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 135(1):1–7

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Assaad JJ, Harb J (2012) Assessment of thixotropy of fresh mortars by triaxial and unconfined compression testing. Adv Civ Eng Mater 1(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lu G, Wang K (2010) Investigation into yield behavior of fresh cement paste: model and experiment. ACI Mater J 107(1):12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Girish S, Santhosh B (2012) Determination of Bingham parameters of fresh Portland cement concrete using concrete shear box. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci 2(4):84

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lu G, Wang K (2011) Theoretical and experimental study on shear behavior of fresh mortar. Cement Concr Compos 33(2):319–327

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bingham EC (1922) Fluidity and plasticity, vol 2. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. M’barki A, Bocquet L, Stevenson A (2017) Linking rheology and printability for dense and strong ceramics by direct ink writing. Sci Rep 7(1):6017

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buswell RA, Leal da Silva WR, Jones SZ, Dirrenberger J (2018) 3D printing using concrete extrusion: a roadmap for research. Cem Concr Res 112:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roussel N (2006) A thixotropy model for fresh fluid concretes: theory, validation and applications. Cem Concr Res 36(10):1797–1806

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma MR, Baxter CD, Hoffmann W, Moran K, Vaziri H (2011) Characterization of weakly cemented sands using nonlinear failure envelopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1(48):146–151

    Google Scholar 

  18. Toutou Z, Roussel N, Lanos C (2005) The squeezing test: a tool to identify firm cement-based material’s rheological behaviour and evaluate their extrusion ability. Cem Concr Res 35(10):1891–1899

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schanz T, Vermeer P (1996) Angles of friction and dilatancy of sand. Géotechnique 46(1):145–152

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bolton M (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique 36(1):65–78

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vermeer PA, De Borst R (1984) Non-associated plasticity for soils, concrete and rock. J HERON 29(3):1984

    Google Scholar 

  22. Di Carlo T, Khoshnevis B, Carlson A (2013) Experimental and numerical techniques to characterize structural properties of fresh concrete. In: ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V009T010A062–V009T010A062

  23. Wolfs R, Bos F, Salet T (2018) Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: numerical modelling and experimental testing. Cem Concr Res 106:103–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pathmanathan Rajeev.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayathilakage, R., Sanjayan, J. & Rajeev, P. Direct shear test for the assessment of rheological parameters of concrete for 3D printing applications. Mater Struct 52, 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1322-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1322-4

Keywords

Navigation