Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal choice of parameters for particle swarm optimization

  • Computer & Information Science
  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The constriction factor method (CFM) is a new variation of the basic particle swarm optimization (PSO), which has relatively better convergent nature. The effects of the major parameters on CFM were systematically investigated based on some benchmark functions. The constriction factor, velocity constraint, and population size all have significant impact on the performance of CFM for PSO. The constriction factor and velocity constraint have optimal values in practical application, and improper choice of these factors will lead to bad results. Increasing population size can improve the solution quality, although the computing time will be longer. The characteristics of CFM parameters are described and guidelines for determining parameter values are given in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carlisle, A., Dozier, G., 2001. An Off-the-shelf PSO. Proceedings of the Workshop on Particle Swarm Optimization, p. 1–6.

  • Clerc, M., 1999. The Swarm and Queen: Towards A Deterministic and Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, p. 1951–1957.

  • Clerc, M., Kennedy, J., 2002. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space.IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation,6(1):58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, R.C., Kennedy, J., 1995. A New Optimizer Using Particle Swarm Theory. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, p. 39–43.

  • Eberhart, R. C., Shi, Y., 2000. Comparing Inertia Weight and Constriction Factors in Particle Swarm Optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, San Diego, CA, p. 84–88

  • Eberhart, R.C., Shi, Y., 2001. Particle Swarm Optimization: Developments, Applications and Resources. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Seoul, Korea, p. 81–86.

  • Eberhart, R.C., Simpson, P.K., Dobbins, R.W., 1996. Computational Intelligence PC Tools. Academic Press Professional. Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gallad, A.I., El-Hawary, M.E., Sallam, A.A., Kalas, A., 2002. Enhancing the particle Swarm Optimizer via Proper Parameters Selection. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, p. 792–797.

  • Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C., 1995. Particle Swarm Optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ, p. 1942–1948.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhang Li-ping.

Additional information

Project (No. 20276063) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li-ping, Z., Huan-jun, Y. & Shang-xu, H. Optimal choice of parameters for particle swarm optimization. J. Zheijang Univ.-Sci. A 6, 528–534 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.A0528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.A0528

Key words

Document code

CLC number

Navigation