Abstract
Litter at beaches can come from more than one source and determining the proportions to assign pollution to different sources is very complex. There is no widely accepted methodology at present that links litter items to their source. The aim of this study was to create a method of assigning a source to litter found on beaches of the Bristol Channel but which could equally be used on any beach. Various methods that attempt to establish the source of beach litter were evaluated; their strengths, weaknesses, applicability and reliability for use on Bristol Channel, UK beaches were considered. Elements of existing methods coupled with new ideas were utilized in the production of a ‘refined’ methodology: consequently a new method of assigning a source to beach litter was developed. The developed ‘Matrix Scoring Technique’ was applied to data collected at Minehead beach on the Bristol Channel, UK. Several numerical and nomenclature variations were used to produce a system that reflected the various sources and eliminated as much bias as possible. This cross-tabulated matrix scoring system can produce an insight into the contribution of different source groups to litter found on beaches. This novel approach requires further testing with emphasis on a control data set.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- SRD:
-
Sewage related debris
References
Anon. 2000a.Beachwatch ’99—Nationwide Beach Clean and Survey Report. Marine Conservation Society (MCS).
Anon. 2000b.Assessment of Aesthetic Quality of Coastal and Bathing Beaches. Monitoring Protocol and Classification Scheme. May, 2000. Environment Agency and The National Aquatic Litter Group. London, UK.
Bowman, D., Manor-Samsonov, N. & Golik, A. 1998. Dynamics of litter pollution on Israeli Mediterranean beaches: a budgetary, litter flux approach.J. Coastal Res. 14: 418–432.
Coe, J.M. & Rogers, D.B. (eds.) 1997Marine debris: Sources, impacts and solutions. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, US.
Cunningham, D.J. & Wilson, S.P. 2003. Marine debris on beaches of the Greater Sydney Region.J. Coastal Res. 19: 421–430.
Derraik, J.G.B. 2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 44: 842–852.
Dixon, T.R. 1995.Temporal trend assessments of the sources, quantities and types of litter occurring on the shores of the United Kingdom: Introduction and methods with results from paired observations 8 and 11 years apart on 63 sampling units in mainland Scotland and the Western isles. Marine Litter Research Programme, Stage 7, The Tidy Britain Group, Wigan, UK.
Earll, R.C., Moore, J., Williams, A.T. & Tudor, D.T. 1999.The measurement of oily waste and garbage disposed of into the marine environment by shipping. A report to the Maritime and Coastguard Agency. Prepared by Coastal Management for Sustainability, Candle Cottage, Kempley, UK.
Earll, R.C., Williams, A.T. & Tudor, D.T. 2000.Pilot project to establish methodologies and guidelines to identify marine litter from shipping. Maritime and Coastguard Agency Research Project No 470. 137 pp. Prepared by Coastal Management for Sustainability, Candle Cottage, Kempley, Glos, UK.
Gabrielides, G.P., Golik, A., Loizides, L., Marino, M.G., Bingel, F. & Torregrossa, M.V. 1991. Man-made garbage pollution on the Mediterranean coastline.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 23: 437–441.
Gauch, H.G. 1982.Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Gilbert, C. 1996. The cost to local authorities of coastal and marine pollution—a preliminary appraisal. In: Earll, R.C. (ed.)Recent policy developments and the management of coastal pollution. Marine Environmental Management and Training, Candle Cottage, Kempley, UK.
Golik, A. & Gertner, Y. 1992. Litter on the Israeli coastline.Mar. Environ. Res. 33: 1–15.
Gregory, M.R. 1977. Plastic pellets on New Zealand beaches.Mar. Pollut. Bull., 8: 82–84.
Huntley, D.A. 1980. Tides on the Northwest European continental shelf. In: Banner, F.T., Collins, M.B. & Massie, K.S. (eds.)The Northwest European shelf seas: The sea bed and the sea in motion. Physical and chemical oceanography and physical resources, pp. 301–351. Elsevier Oceanography Series, Amsterdam, NL.
Johnson, S.W. 1989. Deposition, fate, and characteristics of derelict trawl web on an Alaskan beach.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 20: 164–168.
Nash, A. 1992. Impacts of marine debris on subsistence fishermen—An exploratory study.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 24: 150–156.
Nelson, C., Morgan, R., Williams, A.T. & Wood, J. 2000. Beach awards and management.Ocean Coastal Manage. 43: 87–98.
Olin, R., Carlsson, B. & Stahre, B. 1995. The west coast of Sweden—The rubbish tip of the North Sea. In: Earll, R.C. (ed.)Coastal and riverine litter: Problems and effective Solutions, pp. 12–18. Coastal Management for Sustainability, Candle Cottage, Kempley, Glos, UK.
Randerson, P.F. 1993. Ordination. In: Fry, J.C. (ed.)Biological data analysis, pp. 173–217. IRL Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Ribic, C.A. 1998. Use of indicator items to monitor marine debris on a New Jersey beach from 1991–1996.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 36, 11, 887–891.
Shiber, J.G. & Barrales-Rienda, J.M. 1991. Plastic pellets, tar, and megalitter on Beirut beaches, 1977–1988.Environ. Pollut. 71: 17–30.
Silva-Iniguez, L. & Fischer, D.W. 2003. Quantification and classification of marine litter on the municipal beach of Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46: 132–138.
Tudor, D.T. 2001.Aspects of debris pollution at selected Bristol Channel beaches. Ph.D. Thesis, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK.
Tudor, D.T. & Williams, A.T. 2003. Public perception and opinion of visible beach aesthetic pollution: the utilisation of photography.J. Coastal Res. 19: 1104–1115.
Tudor, D.T., Williams, A.T., Randerson, P., Ergin, A. & Earll, R.E. 2002. The use of multivariate statistical techniques to establish beach debris pollution sources.J. Coastal Res. 36: 716–725.
Velander, K.A. & Mocogni, M. 1998. Maritime litter and sewage contamination at Cramond Beach, Edinburgh: a comparative study.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 36: 385–389.
Walker, T.R., Reid, K., Arnould, J.P.Y. & Croxall, J.P. 1997. Marine debris surveys at Bird Island, South Georgia 1990–1995.Marine Pollut. Bull. 34: 61–65.
Whiting, S.D. 1998. Types and sources of marine debris in Fog Bay, Northern Australia.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 36: 904–910.
Williams, A.T. & Markos, D. 1995. Persistent marine debris in the summer tourist season along the west coast of Evia, Greece. In: Özhan, E. (ed.)Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Mediterranean Coastal Environment, MEDCOAST 95, pp. 1425–1440. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, TR.
Williams, A.T. & Simmons, S.L. 1996. The degradation of plastic litter in rivers: implications for beaches.J. Coastal Conserv. 2: 63–72.
Williams, A.T., Pond, K., Tudor, D.T., Jansen, H. & Liu, H.B. 1999. The robustness of litter transect data collection by different survey groups. In: Özhan, E. (ed.)Proceedings of the MEDCOAST 99—EMECS 99 Joint Conference: Land Ocean Interactions—Managing Coastal Ecosystems, 9–13 November 1999, Antalya, Turkey pp. 715–725. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, TR.
Williams, A.T., Tudor, D.T. & Randerson, P. 2003. Beach litter sourcing in the Bristol Channel and Wales, U.K.Water Air Soil Pollut. 143: 387–408.
Willoughby, N.G. 1986. Man—made litter on the shores of the Thousand Island Archipelago, Java.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 17: 224–228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tudor, D.T., Williams, A.T. Development of a ‘Matrix Scoring Technique’ to determine litter sources at a Bristol Channel beach. J Coast Conserv 10, 119–127 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1652/1400-0350(2004)010[0119:DOAMST]2.0.CO;2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1652/1400-0350(2004)010[0119:DOAMST]2.0.CO;2