Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of wetland and landscape characteristics on the distribution of carpenter frogs

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of wetland breeding amphibians may be influenced by multiple habitat variables interacting at various scales. We applied a multi-scaled modeling approach to relate the presence and absence of carpenter frogs (Lithobates virgatipes), a species of conservation concern in Maryland, to several wetland and landscape characteristics. We also investigated relationships between wetland habitat quality and adjacent landscape composition using correlation analysis and summarized those relationships in a hierarchical path model. Breeding call surveys were conducted at 40 wetland sites to determine the presence of calling male carpenter frogs. We collected data on aquatic and terrestrial habitat using both on-site measurements and geographic information system analyses. Logistic regression modeling revealed that wetlands occupied by carpenter frogs were significantly more acidic, exhibited intermediate hydroperiods, and had higher proportions of surrounding forest cover than did sites unoccupied by carpenter frogs. Path analysis revealed forest cover exhibited a negative correlation with wetland pH and hydroperiod. Our study corroborates a growing body of research that suggests the distributions of many amphibians are related to forest cover adjacent to wetland habitat and provides evidence on the importance of forest cover for maintaining wetland habitat quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adams, M. J. 2000. Pond permanence and the effects of exotic vertebrates on anurans. Ecological Applications 10: 559–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, R. A. and S. J. Richards. 1999. Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 133–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebee, T. J. C. 1987. Eutrophication of heathland ponds at a site in southern England: causes and effects, with particular reference to the amphibia. Biological Conservation 42: 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodkin, M., I. Vatnick, M. Simon, H. Hopey, K. Butler-Holston, and M. Leonard. 2003. Effects of acid stress in adult Rana pipiens. Journal of Experimental Zoology 298A: 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. G. and M. L. Brown. 1972. Woody Plants of Maryland. Port City Press, Baltimore, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, J. F. and R. A. Zampella. 1999. Acid water anuran pond communities along a regional forest to agro-urban ecotone. Copeia 1999: 614–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D. E. 1991. Acidic Deposition and Aquatic Ecosystems: Regional Case Studies. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, E. A. 2004. Vernal Pools: Natural History and Conservation. McDonald and Woodward, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunson, W. A., R. L. Wyman, and E. S. Corbett. 1992. A symposium on amphibian declines and habitat acidification. Journal of Herpetology 26: 349–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freda, J. and W. A. Dunson. 1986. Effects of low pH and other chemical variables on the local distribution of amphibians. Copeia 1986: 454–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, D. R., T. Grant, J. Faivovich, R. H. Bain, A. Haas, C. F. B. Haddad, R. O. de Sa, A. Channing, M. Wilkinson, S. C. Donnellan, C. Raxworthy, J. A. Campbell, B. L. Blotto, P. Moler, R. C. Drewes, R. A. Nussbaum, J. D. Lynch, D. M. Green, and W. C. Wheeler. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgel, C. T. W. 2001. Activity, diet, and microhabitat of the carpenter frog (Rana virgatipes, Cope) in Virginia. M.S. Thesis. Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. 2000. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 14: 314–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. E. 1978. The metapopulation of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Ecological Monographs 48: 145–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Given, M. F. 1988. Territoriality and aggressive interactions of male Carpenter Frogs, Rana virgatipes. Copeia 1988: 411–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Given, M. F. 1999. Distribution records of Rana virgatipes and associated anuran species along Maryland’s eastern shore. Herpetological Review 30: 144–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosner, K. L. and I. H. Black. 1957. The effects of acidity on the development and hatching of New Jersey frogs. Ecology 38: 256–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerry, A. D. and M. L. Hunter Jr. 2002. Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forest and agriculture: an examination of landscape composition and configuration. Conservation Biology 16: 745–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulve, P. S. 1994. Distributions and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog, Rana lessonae. Ecology 75: 1357–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hels, T. and E. Buchwald. 2001. The effect of road kills on amphibian populations. Biological Conservation 99: 331–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D. and L. W. Johnson. 1981. Applied Discrete Choice Modeling. Croom Helm, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, R. N., B. S. Windmiller, and J. M. Reed. 2004. Critical threshold associated with habitat loss for two vernal poolbreeding amphibians. Ecological Applications 14: 1547–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, M. T. and W. A. Dunson. 1995. The interaction effects of low pH, toxic metals, and DOC on a simulated temporary pond community. Environmental Pollution 89: 155–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houlahan, J. E. and C. S. Findlay. 2003. The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Science. 60: 1078–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houlahan, J. E., C. S. Findlay, B. R. Schmidt, A. H. Meyer, and S. L. Kuzmin. 2000. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404: 752–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2006. Global Amphibian Assessment. www. globalamphibians.org. Downloaded on August 4, 2006.

  • Johnston, C. A. 1994. Cumulative impacts to wetlands. Wetlands 14: 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly, P., C. Miaud, A. Lehmann, and O. Grolet. 2001. Habitat matrix effects pond occupancy in newts. Conservation Biology 15: 239–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, M. G., J. R. Sauer, D. A. Olsen, M. J. Mossan, L. M. Hiemesath, and M. J. Lannoo. 1999. Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A. Conservation Biology 13: 1437–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lide, F. L., V. G. Meentemeyer, J. E. Pinder III, and L. M. Beatty. 1995. Hydrology of a Carolina bay located on the upper coastal plain of western South Carolina. Wetlands 15: 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. M. and P. C. Trenham. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology 15: 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, E. J. and R. W. Skaggs. 1992. Simulation and evaluation of water management systems for a pine plantation watershed. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 16: 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, C. A., M. J. Adams, N. Leuthold, and R. B. Bury. 2005. Amphibian occurrence and aquatic invaders in a changing landscape: implications for wetland mitigation in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, USA. Wetlands 25: 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellet, J., A. Guisan, and N. Perrin. 2004. A concentric analysis of the impact of urbanization on the threatened European Tree Frog in an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 18: 1599–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. J. and E. J. McCarthy. 1994. Effect of land development and forest management on hydrologic response in southeastern coastal wetlands: a review. Wetlands 14: 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothermel, B. B. and R. D. Semlitsch. 2002. An experimental investigation of landscape resistance of forest versus old-field habitats to emigrating juvenile amphibians. Conservation Biology 16: 1324–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalles, J. F. and D. J. Shure. 1989. Hydrology, community structure, and productivity patterns of a dystrophic Carolina bay wetland. Ecological Monographs 59: 365–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, N. J. Jr. and B. D. Woodward. 1994. Surveys at breeding sites. p. 118–25. In W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnelly, R. W. McDiarmid, L. -A. C. Hayek, and M. S. Foster (eds.) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, and London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R. 2003. Carolina bay wetlands: unique habitats of the southeastern United States. Wetlands 23: 550–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. W., A. L. Bryan Jr., R. J. Lide, and G. M. Smith. 1996. Factors affecting the occurrence and structure of fish assemblages in isolated wetlands of the upper coastal plain, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Science 53: 443–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. W., W. A. Hopkins, B. P. Jackson, J. A. Baionno, and J. Broughton. 2005. Influence of larval period on responses of overwintering green frog (Rana clamitans) larvae exposed to contaminated sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 24: 1508–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. W., M. J. Komoroski, A. L. Bryan Jr., and J. Burger. 2000. Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology 14: 414–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, second edition. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. A., L. S. Kutner, and J. S. Adams. 2000. Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolt, M. H. and M. C. Rabenhorst. 1987. Carolina bays on the eastern shore of Maryland: II. Distribution and Origin. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51: 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, G., T. J. Callahan, J. E. Pyzoha, and C. C. Trettin. 2006. Modeling the climatic and subsurface stratigraphy controls on the hydrology of a Carolina bay wetland in South Carolina, USA. Wetlands 26: 567–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W. 2005. Assessing cumulative loss of wetland functions in the Nanticoke river watershed using enhanced national wetlands inventory data. Wetlands 25: 405–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D. B. 1991. Declining amphibian populations. Science 253: 229–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellburn, A. 1988. Air Pollution and Acid Rain: The Biological Impact. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whigham, D. F. and T. E. Jordan. 2003. Isolated wetlands and water quality. Wetlands 23: 541–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampella, R. A. and J. F. Bunnell. 2000. The distributions of anurans in two river systems of a coastal plain watershed. Journal of Herpetology 34: 210–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clint R. V. Otto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otto, C.R.V., Forester, D.C. & Snodgrass, J.W. Influences of wetland and landscape characteristics on the distribution of carpenter frogs. Wetlands 27, 261–269 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[261:IOWALC]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[261:IOWALC]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation