Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using Landsat ETM+ imagery and decision-tree-based models

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The location and distribution of wetlands and riparian zones influence the ecological functions present on a landscape. Accurate and easily reproducible land-cover maps enable monitoring of land-management decisions and ultimately a greater understanding of landscape ecology. Multi-season Landsat ETM+ imagery from 2001 combined with ancillary topographic and soils data were used to map wetland and riparian systems in the Gallatin Valley of Southwest Montana, USA. Classification Tree Analysis (CTA) and Stochastic Gradient Boosting (SGB) decision-tree-based classification algorithms were used to distinguish wetlands and riparian areas from the rest of the landscape. CTA creates a single classification tree using a one-step-look-ahead procedure to reduce variance. SGB uses classification errors to refine tree development and incorporates multiple tree results into a single best classification. The SGB classification (86.0% overall accuracy) was more effective than CTA (73.1% overall accuracy) at detecting a variety of wetlands and riparian zones present on this landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bolstad, P. V. and T. M. Lillesand. 1992a. Improved classification of forest vegetation in northern Wisconsin through a rule-based combination of soils, terrain, and Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Forest Science 38: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad, P. V. and T. M. Lillesand. 1992b. Rule-based classification models: flexible integration of satellite imagery and thematic spatial data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58: 965–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civco, D. L. 1989. Knowledge-based land use and land cover mapping. p. 276–291. In Technical Papers, 1989 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Baltimore, MD, USA.

  • Custer, S. G., P. Fames, J. P. Wilson, and R. D. Snyder. 1996. A Comparison of Hand- and Spline-Drawn Precipitation Maps for Mountainous Montana. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 32: 393–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2000. Evaluating wetlands within an urban context. Ecological Engineering 15: 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS. 2001. ERDAS Imagine® Configuration Guide. ERDAS Incorporated, Atlanta, GA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, C. M. and A. G. van der Valk. 1995. Wetland classification and inventory: A summary. Vegetatio 118: 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, K. R. and G. J. E. Hill. 2001. Vegetation mapping of a tropical freshwater swamp in the Northern Territory, Australia: a comparison of aerial photography, Landsat TM and SPOT satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22: 2911–2925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, M. J. 1990. Synoptic inventory of riparian ecoystems: The utility of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Forest Ecology and Management 33/34: 605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., B. Wylie, L. Yang, C. Homer, and G. Zylstra. 2002. Derivation of a Tassled Cap transformation based on Landsat and at-satellite reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23: 1741–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., L. Yang, C. Homer, B. Wylie, J. Vogelman, and T. DeFelice. 2001. At-satellite reflectance: a first order normalization of Landsat and ETM+ images. USGS White Papers, http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/huang2.pdf, last accessed February 13, 2006.

  • Insightful. 2001. S-Plus 6 User’s Guide. Insightful Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R. 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing, second edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. M. and M. M. Barson. 1993. Remote sensing of Australian wetlands: An evaluation of Landsat TM data for inventory and classification. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Resources 44: 235–252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendy, E. 2001. Ground-water resources of the Gallatin Local Water Quality District, southwestern Montana. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 007-01.

  • Kindscher, K., A. Fraser, M. E. Jakubauskas, and D. M. Debinski. 1998. Identifying wetland meadows in Grand Teton National Park using remote sensing and average wetland values. Wetlands Ecology and Management 5: 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmi, V., E. F. Wood, and B. J. Choudhury. 1997. Evaluation of Special Sensor Microwave/Imager satellite data for regional soil moisture estimation over the Red River Basin. Journal of Applied Meteorology 36: 1309–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. L. and A. Wright. 2001. Rule-based classification systems using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 1137–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R., A. Bunn, S. Powell, and M. Zambon. 2004. Classification of remotely sensed imagery using stochastic gradient boosting as a refinement of classification tree analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment 90: 331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlke, J. 1996. Characterization of Oklahoma Reservoir wetlands for preliminary change detection mapping using IRS-1B Satellite imagery. IGARSS 1996: 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1769–1771.

  • Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics 35: 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, G. R. 1996. RCA III Riparian areas: reservoirs of diversity. Working paper No. 13, http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/land/pubs/wp13text.html, last accessed February 13, 2006.

  • Muller, E., H. Decamps, and K. D. Michael. 1993. Contribution of space remote sensing to river studies. Freshwater Biology 29: 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narumalani, S., Y. Zhou, and J. R. Jensen. 1997. Application of remote sensing and geographic information systems to the delineation and analysis of buffer zones. Aquatic Botany 58: 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, D. E. and J. R. Lovvorn. 2001. The importance of flood irrigation in water supply to wetlands in the Laramie Basin, Wyoming, USA. Wetlands 21: 370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, E. W. and S. C. Laine. 1997. Comparison of Landsat Thematic Mapper and high resolution aerial photography to identify change in complex coastal wetlands. Journal of Coastal Research 13: 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sader, S. A., D. Ahl, and W. S. Liou. 1995. Accuracy of Landsat-TM and GIS rule-based methods for forest wetland classification in Maine. Remote Sensing of Environment 53: 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salford Systems. 2001. TreeNet stochastic gradient boosting: An implementation of the MART methodology. Salford Systems, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semilitsch, R. D. and R. Bodie. 1998. Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology 12: 1129–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabacchi, E., D. L. Correll, R. Hauer, G. Pinay, A. Planty-Tabacchi, and R. C. Wissmar. 1998. Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape. Freshwater Biology 40: 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W. 1993. Using plants as indicators of wetlands. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 144: 240–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W. 2003. Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States. Wetlands 23: 494–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. A. and S. J. Walsh. 2001. Remote sensing of forested wetlands: application of multitemporal and multispectral satellite imagery to determine plant community composition and structure in southeastern USA. Plant Ecology 157: 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toyra, J., A. Pietroniro, L. W. Martz, and T. D. Prowse. 2002. A multisensor approach to wetland flood monitoring. Hydrological Processes 16: 1569–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA 2003. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: how wetlands are defined and identified. http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/wetlands/facts/fact11.html (last updated September 26, 2003).

  • Venables, W. N. and B. D. Ripley. 1997. Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS, second edition. Springer, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., J. Lyons, and P. Kanehl. (2001). Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales. Environmental Management 28: 255–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Western Regional Climate Center. 2002. Historical Climate Information. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/index.html (last accessed 20 January 2003).

  • Willard, D. E. 1935. Montana: the Geological Story. The Science Press Printing Company, Lancaster, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, 59717-3490, Bozeman, Montana, USA

    Corey Baker, Rick Lawrence, Clifford Montagne & Duncan Patten

Authors
  1. Corey Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rick Lawrence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Clifford Montagne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Duncan Patten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, C., Lawrence, R., Montagne, C. et al. Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using Landsat ETM+ imagery and decision-tree-based models. Wetlands 26, 465–474 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[465:MWARAU]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[465:MWARAU]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation