Skip to main content
Log in

Soil seed bank analysis of planted and naturally revegetating thermally-disturbed riparian wetland forests

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accelerating the reestablishment of a mature, biotic community following a disturbance is a common goal of restoration ecology. In this study, we describe the relative successional status of a recently disturbed riparian seed bank when compared with less recently disturbed and undisturbed systems, and the short-term effects of restoration on seed bank development within the recently disturbed system. The study location, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina, provides a unique opportunity to investigate the development of wetland seed banks following a severe disturbance, in this case the release of elevated temperature and flow effluent from nuclear reactor operations. To assess the recovery of wetland seed banks over time, we compared seed banks of naturally recovering riparian corridor and swamp delta sites of two different ages since disturbance (nine years and 30 years) with undisturbed forested corridor and swamp sites. To assess the potential effects of restoration efforts (site preparation and planting of seedlings) on seed bank development, we compared seed banks of naturally recovering (unplanted) and planted riparian corridor and swamp delta sites in the more recently disturbed system. We expected total germinants and species richness to be highest in the recently disturbed sites and decline as wetland systems matured. Within recently disturbed sites, we expected planted sites to have higher abundance and richness than unplanted sites. We also expected a greater abundance of woody species in the undisturbed forested sites. The number of germinants differed among the sites, ranging from 748 individuals per m2 in the undisturbed swamp area to 10,322 individuals per m2 in the recently disturbed planted swamp delta. When corridor and delta sites within a stream system were combined, the mean number of germinants was greater in the recently disturbed system, intermediate in the 30-year (mid-successional) system, and lowest in the undisturbed system. Seed banks from the recently disturbed and mid-successional sites were more similar in composition than they were to the undisturbed systems. Across all stream systems, riparian corridors had greater mean species richness than swamp deltas, though differences in seed bank abundances were not significant. Sedges and rushes were the predominant life forms in the recently disturbed and mid-successional sites, while undisturbed sites had a greater proportion of herbs and woody seedlings. In addition, there were more germinants from planted sites than from unplanted sites. The dominance by early successional species at recently disturbed planted sites may be an unintended consequence of site preparation treatments, and such potential effects should be recognized and weighed during the development of restoration plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abernethy, V. J. and N. J. Willby. 1999. Changes along a disturbance gradient in the density and composition of propagule banks in floodplain aquatic habitats. Plant Ecology 140: 177–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. R., D. J. Sweeney, and T. A. Williams. 1994. Introduction to Statistics: Concepts and Applications, third edition. West Publishing Co., St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M., J. Burk, and W. Pitts. 1987. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, S. J. and M. A. Brock. 2006. Flooding, soil seed bank dynamics and vegetation resilience of a hydrologically variable desert floodplain. Freshwater Biology 51: 206–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, M. T. and M. A. Brock. 2000. How do depth, duration, and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities? Plant Ecology 147: 237–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. and G. Wein. 1995. Seed bank and vegetation of a constructed reservoir. Wetlands 15: 374–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt, P. A., H. R. Delcourt, D. F. Morse, and P. A. Morse. 1993. History, evolution and organization of vegetation and human culture. p. 47–79. In W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht (eds.) Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delong, M. D. 2005. Upper Mississippi River basin. p. 327–73. In A. C. Benke and C. E. Cushing (eds.) Rivers of North America. Elsevier, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Steven, D., R. R. Sharitz, J. H. Singer, and C. D. Barton. 2006. Testing a passive revegetation approach for restoring coastal plain depression wetlands. Restoration Ecology 14: 452–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digby, P. G. N. and R. A. Kempton. 1987. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donelan, M. and K. Thompson. 1980. Distribution of buried viable seeds along a successional series. Biological Conservation 17: 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukes, E. K. 1984. The Savannnah River Plant Environment. National Technical Information Service Document DP-1642. United States Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulohery, N. J., C. S. Bunton, C. C. Trettin, and W. H. McKee. 1995. Reforestation, Monitoring, and Research at Pen Branch: Restoring a Thermally-Impacted Wetland Forest. Establishment Report. Center for Forested Wetlands Research. Southern Research Station. USDA Forest Service, Charleston, SC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulohery, N. J., R. K. Kolka, and M. R. McKevlin. 2000. Effects of a willow overstory on planted seedlings in a bottomland restoration. Ecological Engineering 15: S57-S66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. P. and R. R. Sharitz. 1987. Revegetation of a Taxodium-Nyssa forested wetland following complete vegetation destruction. Vegetatio 72: 151–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, M. 1987. Seedlings. New Phytology, Frontiers of Comparative Plant Ecology 106: 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist 111: 1169–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, K. L. 1990. A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil. Journal of Ecology 78: 1079–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. 1984. Regeneration of cypress in logged and burned stands at Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary, Florida. p. 349–57. In K. C. Ewel and H. T. Odum (eds.) Cypress Swamps. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, P. P., D. J. Casagrande, and R. R. Chernye. 1984. The viability and fate of seeds as a function of depth in the peats of Okefenokee Swamp. p. 168–79. In A. D. Cohen, D. J. Cassagrande, M. J. Andrejko, and G. R. Best (eds.) The Okefenokee Swamp: Its Natural History, Geology and Geochemistry. Wetlands Surveys, Los Alamos, NM, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, T. J., C. E. Williams, and W. J. Moriarity. 1998. Species composition of soil seed banks of Allegheny Plateau riparian forests. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 125: 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, J. M. and J. F. Franklin. 1995. Seed rain and seed bank of thirdand fifth-order streams on the western slope of the Cascade Range, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR, USA.PNW-RP-480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M. and T. Smith. 1987. Plant succession: life history and competition. The American Naturalist 130: 168–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K. and R. R. Sharitz. 1994. Vegetation disturbance and maintenance of species diversity in intermittently flooded Carolina bays in South Carolina. Ecological Applications 4: 177–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolka, R. K., J. H. Singer, C. R. Coppock, W. P. Casey, and C. C. Trettin. 2000. Influence of restoration and succession on bottomland hardwood hydrology. Ecological Engineering 15: 131–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaDeau, S. L. and A. M. Ellison. 1999. Seed bank composition of a Northeastern U.S. tussock swamp. Wetlands 19: 255–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, G. B. 2000. Seed bank patterns of Pen Branch corridor and delta in relation to restoration. Master’s Thesis, University of Georgia Athens, GA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Peyre, M. K. G., C. S. Bush Tom, C. Winslow, A. Caldwell, and J. A. Nyman. 2005. Comparison of seed bank size and composition in fringing, restored and impounded marsh in southwest Louisiana. Southeastern Naturalist 4: 273–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck, M. A. 1989. Wetland seed banks. p. 283–305. In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leck, M. A. and R. L. Simpson. 1987. Seed bank of a freshwater tidal wetland: turnover and relationship to vegetation change. American Journal of Botany 74: 360–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. B. and M. Allessio. 1968. Buried viable seed in successional field and forest stands, Harvard Forest, Massachusetts. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 95: 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack, G. R. and R. E. Good. 1990. Spatial heterogeneity in the soil seed bank of a mature Coastal Plain forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 117: 143–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. V., L. G. Leff, D. A. Kovicac, and J. Jaroscak. 1986. Green leaf decomposition in Coastal Plain streams. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 3: 553–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, B. A. 2003. Soil seed banks and the potential restoration of forested wetlands after farming. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 1025–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milberg, P. 1995. Soil seed bank after eighteen years of succession from grassland to forest. Oikos 72: 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhouse, J. M., L. E. Burbage, and R. R. Sharitz. 2005. Seed bank-vegetation relationships in herbaceous Carolina bays: responses to climatic variability. Wetlands 25: 738–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E. A., N. C. Dulohery, R. K. Kolka, and W. H. McKee Jr. 2000. Operational restoration of the Pen Branch hardwood and swamp wetlands — the research setting. Ecological Engineering 15: S23-S33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosting, H. J. and M. E. Humphreys. 1940. Buried viable seeds in a successional series of old field and forest soils. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 67: 253–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, R. L. 1981. Seed bank characteristics of the Delta Marsh, Manitoba: applications for wetland management. p. 61–69. In B. Richardson (ed.) Selected Proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Wetland Values and Management. Freshwater Society, Navarre, MN, U SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. 1984. Impounded Rivers: Perspectives for Ecological Management. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A. and M. J. McDonell. 1989. Changing perspectives in community dynamics. A theory of successional forces. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 241–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poiani, K. A. and W. C. Johnson. 1989. Effect of hydroperiod on seed bank composition in semipermanent prairie wetlands. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 856–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prach, K., P. Pysek, and P. Smilauer. 1997. Changes in species traits during succession: a search for pattern. Oikos 79: 201–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. L. and J. L. Vankat. 1991. Floristics of a chrononsequence corresponding to old field-deciduous forest succession in southwestern Ohio. II. Seed banks. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 118: 377–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1998. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, release 7.0 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. L. and R. R. Sharitz. 1986. Seed bank dynamics in a southeastern riverine swamp. American Journal of Botany 73: 1022–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schopmeyer, C. C. 1974. Seeds of Woody Plants in the United States. USDA Forest Service Agricultural Handbook. No. 450. Washington, DC, USA.

  • Sharitz, R. R., J. E. Irwin, and E. J. Christy. 1974a. Vegetation of swamps receiving reactor effluents. Oikos 25: 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R., J. W. Gibbons, and S. C. Gause. 1974b. Impact of production-reactor effluents on vegetation in a southeastern swamp forest. p. 356–62. In J. W. Gibbons and R. R. Sharitz (eds.) Thermal Ecology. AEC Symposium Series, (CONF-730505), Office of Information Services, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, L. A., A. B. Wright, and A. C. Benke. 2005. Atlantic coast rivers of the southeastern United States. p. 73–122. In A. C. Benke and C. E. Cushing (eds.) Rivers of North America. Elsevier, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. 2006. Damming the river: a changing perspective on altering nature. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 10: 165–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonides, E. 1986. Seed banks in old-field successional ecosystems. Ekologia Polska 34: 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K. 1978. The occurrence of buried viable seeds in relation to environmental gradients. Journal of Biogeography 5: 425–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J. H. 1991. Seed bank of a hardwood floodplain swamp in Florida. Castanea 56: 117–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA, NRCS). The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 17 July 2006). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA)

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 5: 738–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1979. A reconstruction of recent vegetational history of a prairie marsh, Eagle Lake, Iowa, from its seed bank. Aquatic Botany 6: 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivian-Smith, G. 1997. Microtopographic heterogeneity and floristic diversity in experimental wetland communities. Journal of Ecology 85: 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. R., J. C. Zasada, and F. S. Chapin III. 1986. The role of life history processes in primary succession on an Alaskan floodplain. Ecology 67: 1243–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, S. W. and K. W. McLeod. 1990. Vegetation of the Savannah River Site: Major Community Types. Savannah River Site, New Ellenton, SC, USA. National Environmental Research Park Program Publication SRO-NERP-19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landman, G.B., Kolka, R.K. & Sharitz, R.R. Soil seed bank analysis of planted and naturally revegetating thermally-disturbed riparian wetland forests. Wetlands 27, 211–223 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[211:SSBAOP]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[211:SSBAOP]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation