Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 2016, 52(1):22-29 | DOI: 10.17221/122/2015-CJGPB

Effects of faba bean (Vicia faba) varieties on the development of Bruchus rufimanusOriginal Paper

Marek SEIDENGLANZ1, Igor HUÒADY2
1 Department of Plant Protection, AGRITEC Research, Breeding and Services, Ltd., ©umperk, Czech Republic
2 Department of Grain Legumes and Technical Crops, Agritec Plant Research Ltd., ©umperk, Czech Republic

The development of Bruchus rufimanus was assessed in randomised field trials from 2005 to 2007 with eight faba bean genotypes (SU 5/13, SU-BT, Mistral, Merkur, Stabil Merlin, Melodie, Divine). Significant differences, reproducible between the years, were found between the faba bean lines. The varieties most attractive to B. rufimanus ovipositing females were SU-BT and Divine. Merkur showed a certain level of non-preference. The highest mortality rates of eggs and first instar larvae in pod valve tissues were recorded in Merkur (34-45%) and Divine (51-55%). The highest mortality rates of larvae and pupae during their development in seeds (effect of seed coat and cotyledon tissues) were recorded in Merkur (87-90%) and Melodie (87-99%). Parasitation by Triaspis thoracicus contributed to this mortality. The highest levels of B. rufimanus parasitation were found in SU-BT (32-35%), the lowest in Melodie (3-9%). The total reduction in Bruchus rufimanus individuals during their development was relatively high in all varieties, ranging from 72% to 99%.

Keywords: antibiosis; Bruchus rufimanus mortality in seeds; nonpreference; plant resistance to bruchids

Published: March 31, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SEIDENGLANZ M, HUÒADY I. Effects of faba bean (Vicia faba) varieties on the development of Bruchus rufimanus. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed.. 2016;52(1):22-29. doi: 10.17221/122/2015-CJGPB.
Download citation

References

  1. Annis B.A. (1983): Mechanisms of Host Plant Resistance to the Pea Weevil in Peas. [PhD. Thesis.] Moscow, University of Idaho.
  2. Bruce T.J.A., Martin J.L., Smart L.E., Pickett J.A. (2011): Development of semiochemical attractants for monitoring bean seed beetle, Bruchus rufimanus. Pest Management Science, 67: 1303-1308. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Burov D. (1980): Studies on monophagy in the pea weevil, Bruchus pisi L. Nauchni Trudove, Entomologiya, Mikrobiologiya, Fitopatologiya, 25: 77-81.
  4. Clement S.L. (1992): On the function of pea flower feeding by Bruchus pisorum. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 63: 115-121. Go to original source...
  5. Czerniakowski Z.W., B³ażej J., Olbrycht T. (1996): Increased incidence of major diseases and pests on horse bean (Vicia faba L. var. minor Harz.). Plant Breeding and Seed Science, 40: 79-86.
  6. Doss P.R., Oliver J.E., Proebsting W.M., Potter S.W., StreyReath K., Clement C.L., Williamson R.T., Carney J.R., DeVilbiss E.D. (2000): Bruchins: Insect-derived plant regulators that stimulate neoplasm formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97: 6218-6223. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Hoffmann A., Labeyrie V., Balachowsky A.S. (1962): Famille des Bruchidae. In: Entomologie appliqué à l´agriculture. Paris, Masson et Cie: 185-188. (in French)
  8. Kaniuczak Z. (2004): Seed damage of field bean (Vicia faba L. var. minor Harz.) caused by bean weevils (Bruchus rufimanus Boh.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Plant Protection Research, 44: 125-129.
  9. Kaniuczak Z. (2006): Bruchus rufimanus on beans. Ochrona Ro¶lin, 51: 15-17.
  10. Mat³osz I. (1998): Results of studies on susceptibility of some field broad bean cultivars to seed damage by broad bean weevil (Bruchus rufimanus Boh.) in Rzeszów region. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 38: 154-157.
  11. Mat³osz I., Kaniuczak Z. (1997): Results of studies on the occurrence of the broad bean weevil (Bruchus rufimanus Boh.) and on the effects of its control on broad bean at different dates. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 37: 94-98.
  12. Medjdoub-Bensaad F., Khelil M. A., Huignard J. (2007): Bioecology of broad bean bruchid Bruchus rufimanus Boh. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in a region of Kabylia in Algeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2: 412-417.
  13. Meyer E. (1998): Attack by seed beetle (Bruchus sp.) on broad beans. Gemüse (München), 34: 152-153.
  14. Middlekauf W. (1961): Field studies on the bionomics and control of the broad bean weevil Bruchus rufimanus. Journal of Economic Entomology, 44: 240-243. Go to original source...
  15. Seidenglanz M., Rotrekl J., Poslu¹ná J., Kolaøík P. (2011): Ovicidal effects of thiacloprid, acetamiprid, lambda-cyhalothrin and alpha-cypermethrin on Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) eggs. Plant Protection Science, 47: 109-114. Go to original source...
  16. Smith A.M., Hepworth G. (1992): Sampling statistics and a Sampling plan for eggs of pea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 85: 1791-1796. Go to original source...
  17. Tran B., Huignard J. (1992): Interactions between photoperiod and food affect the termination of reproductive diapause in Bruchus rufimanus (Boh.), (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 38: 637-642. Go to original source...
  18. Tran B. Darquenne J., Huignard J. (1993): Changes in responsiveness to factors inducing diapause termination in Bruchus rufimanus (Boh.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 39: 769-774. Go to original source...
  19. Ward R.L., Smart L. (2011): The effect of temperature on the effectiveness of spray applications to control bean seed beetle (Bruchus rufimanus) in field beans (Vicia faba). Aspects of Applied Biology, 106: 247-254.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.