Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2020, 66(2):55-64 | DOI: 10.17221/212/2019-AGRICECON

Investments of Czech farms located in less favoured areas after EU accessionOriginal Paper

Radek Zdeněk*, Jana Lososová
Department of Accounting and Finances, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

This paper investigates the development and structure of the fixed assets of Czech farms and their investment behaviour. We use data from a long-term (2003-2016) survey of farms and categorise farms into three groups according to their share of agricultural land in less favoured areas. The development of tangible fixed assets and their structural development points to the importance of investments to agricultural holdings. Above all, there is an extensive trend of investing in the land, but purchases of land are likely to affect the growth of the relative age of tangible fixed assets, especially the obsolescence of buildings that are not sufficiently modernised by farms. Results of the accelerated model indicate that there is an absence of soft budget constraints but a presence of capital imperfections and high importance of both operating and investment subsidies when deciding on investments in fixed assets.

Keywords: accelerated model; ageing; agriculture; assets; investments; subsidies

Published: February 29, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zdeněk R, Lososová J. Investments of Czech farms located in less favoured areas after EU accession. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2020;66(2):55-64. doi: 10.17221/212/2019-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Bakucs L.Z., Ferto I., Fogarasi J. (2009): Investment and financial constraints in Hungarian agriculture. Economics Letters, 104: 122-124. Go to original source...
  2. Bathla S. (2017): Public investment in agriculture and growth: An analysis of relationship in the Indian context. In: Bathla S., Dubey A. (eds): Changing Contours of Indian Agriculture. Singapore, Springer: 13-28. Go to original source...
  3. Bergschmidt A. (2009): Powerless evaluation. EuroChoices, 8: 37-42. Go to original source...
  4. Blancard S., Boussemart J.-P., Briec W., Kerstens K. (2006): Short- and long-run credit constraints in french agriculture: A directional distance function framework using expenditure-constrained profit functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88: 351-364. Go to original source...
  5. Blandford D., Boisvert R.N., Hill B. (2010): Improving the evaluation of rural development policy. EuroChoices, 9: 4-9. Go to original source...
  6. Bojnec S., Ferto I. (2016): Financial constraints and farm investments in Slovenia. New Medit, 4: 2-9.
  7. Bojnec S., Latruffe L. (2007): Investment of Slovenian farms in the transition context. In: Proceedings IAAE - 104th EAAE Seminar Agricultural Economics and Transition, Budapest, September 6-8, 2007: 1-10.
  8. Czech Statistical Office (CZSO) (2016): Farm Structure Survey - Analytical Evaluation - 2016. Available at https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/farm-structure-survey-analyticalevaluation-2016 (accessed Sept 23, 2019).
  9. Ezcurra R., Iraizoz B., Pascual P., Rapun M. (2011): Agricultural productivity in the European regions: Trends and explanatory factors. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18: 113-135. Go to original source...
  10. FADN (2008): Over view of the Less Favoured Areas Farms in the EU-25. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/pdf/rd0101_overview_lfa.pdf (accessed Sept 23, 2019).
  11. FADN (2018): Farm Accountancy Data Network - Standard Reports. [Public electronic database]. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/database/consult_std_reports_en.cfm (accessed Feb 1, 2019).
  12. Fazzari S.M., Hubbard R.G., Petersen B.C, Blinder A.S., Poterba J.M. (1988): Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988: 141-206. Go to original source...
  13. Ferto I., Bakucs Z., Bojnec S., Latruffe L. (2011): Investment and financial constraints in European agriculture: Evidence from France, Hungary and Slovenia. In: Proceedings EAAE 2011 Congress Change and Uncertainty, Zurich, Aug 30-Sept 2, 2011.
  14. Giannakis E., Bruggeman A. (2015): The highly variable economic performance of European agriculture. Land Use Policy, 45: 26-35. Go to original source...
  15. Harris R., Trainor M. (2005): Capital subsidies and their impact on Total Factor Productivity: Firm-level evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Regional Science, 45: 49-74. Go to original source...
  16. Hlavsa T., Hruska M., Turkova E. (2017): The impact of investment support from the Rural Development Programme of the Czech Republic for 2007-2013 on the economic efficiency of farms: A comparison of the performance of farms within and outside Less Favoured Areas. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 119: 11-17. Go to original source...
  17. Hoffmann H., Jahnke D., Kogl H. (1997): Effektivitat der Investitionsforderung. Rostocker Agrar- und Umweltwissenschaftliche Beitrage, 6: 179-201. (in German)
  18. Krejci I., Mazouch P., Vltavska K., Kvasnicka R. (2015): Age of machinery and equipment in the Czech agriculture. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 61: 356-366. Go to original source...
  19. Latruffe L., Davidova S., Douarin E., Gorton M. (2010): Farm expansion in Lithuania after accession to the EU: The role of CAP payments in alleviating potential credit constraints. Europe-Asia Studies, 62: 351-365. Go to original source...
  20. Lososova J., Zdenek R. (2013): Development of farms according to the LFA classification. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 59: 551-562. Go to original source...
  21. Lososova J., Zdenek R., Kopta D. (2017): Development of the main production and economic indicators of Czech farms. Custos e Agronegocio, 13: 88-109.
  22. Margarian A., Blandford D., Hill B. (2010): A theoretical foundation of rural development interventions and evaluations is needed. EuroChoices, 9: 35-39. Go to original source...
  23. Mazouch P., Krejci I. (2016): The analysis of the age structure of regional fixed capital in the agriculture. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 8: 89-101. Go to original source...
  24. McCloud N., Kumbhakar S. (2008): Do subsidies drive productivity? A cross-country analysis of Nordic dairy farms. In: Chib S., Griffiths W., Koop G., Terrell D. (eds): Bayesian Econometrics.Bingley, Emerald Group Publishing Limited: 245-274. Go to original source...
  25. Medonos T., Ratinger T., Hruska M., Spicka J. (2012): The assessment of the effects of investment support measures of the rural development programmes: the case of the Czech Republic. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 4: 35-48.
  26. Michalek J., Ciaian P., Kancs D. (2016): Investment crowding out: Firm-level evidence from northern Germany. Regional Studies, 50: 1579-1594. Go to original source...
  27. Nilsson P. (2017): Productivity effects of CAP investment support: Evidence from Sweden using matched panel data. Land Use Policy, 66: 172-182. Go to original source...
  28. O'Toole C., Hennessy T. (2015): Do decoupled payments affect investment financing constraints? Evidence from Irish agriculture. Food Policy, 56: 67-75. Go to original source...
  29. Pender J.L. (1998): Population growth, agricultural intensification, induced innovation and natural resource sustainability: An application of neoclassical growth theory. Agricultural Economics, 19: 99-112. Go to original source...
  30. Quiroga S., Suarez C., Fernandez-Haddad Z., Philippidis G. (2017): Levelling the playing field for European Union agriculture: Does the Common Agricultural Policy impact homogeneously on farm productivity and efficiency? Land Use Policy, 68: 179-188. Go to original source...
  31. Rizov M. (2004): Firm investment in transition. Evidence from Romanian manufacturing. Economics of Transition, 12: 721-746. Go to original source...
  32. Rizov M., Pokrivcak J., Ciaian P. (2013): CAP subsidies and productivity of the EU farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64: 537-557. Go to original source...
  33. Rosenzweig M.R., Binswanger H.P. (1993): Wealth, weather risk and the composition and profitability of agricultural investment. The Economic Journal, 103: 56-78. Go to original source...
  34. Roy B.C., Pal S. (2002): Investment, agricultural productivity and rural poverty in India: A state-level analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57: 653-678.
  35. Ruben R., Pender J. (2004): Rural diversity and heterogeneity in less-favoured areas: the quest for policy targeting. Food policy, 29: 303-320. Go to original source...
  36. Serra T., Zilberman D., Gil J.M. (2008): Differential uncertainties and risk attitudes between conventional and organic producers: The case of Spanish arable crop farmers. Agricultural Economics, 39: 219-229. Go to original source...
  37. Severova L., Svoboda R., Kopecka L. (2017): Increase in prices of farmland in the Czech Republic. Property Management, 35: 326-338. Go to original source...
  38. Szabo L., Grznar M., Zelina M. (2018): Agricultural performance in the V4 countries and its position in the European Union. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 64: 337-346. Go to original source...
  39. Stolbova M., Micova M. (2012): The farm size in the lessfavoured areas and the economy of support spending on public goods production in the case of the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 58: 482-496. Go to original source...
  40. The Ministry of Agriculture (2017): Report on the State of Agriculture of the Czech Republic for 2016 "Green Report". Available at http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/zemedelstvi/publikace-a-dokumenty/zelene-zpravy/zelenazprava-2016.html (accessed Jan 26, 2019). (in Czech)
  41. Viaggi D., Raggi M., Paloma S.G.Y. (2011): Understanding the determinants of investment reactions to decoupling of the common agricultural policy. Land Use Policy, 28: 495-505. Go to original source...
  42. Zinych N., Odening M. (2009): Capital market imperfections in economic transition: empirical evidence from Ukrainian agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 40: 677-689. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.