J. For. Sci., 2011, 57(10):439-450 | DOI: 10.17221/4/2011-JFS

Results of dynamic penetration test - an indicator of the compaction of surface soil horizons by forestry machinery

K. Rejšek1, J. Buchar1, I. Vaníček2, L. Hromádko1, V. Vranová1, K. Marosz1
Department of Geology and Pedology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology,
1 Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Geotechnical Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The objective of research was, on the basis of the exactly predefined input parameters of upper soil horizons of selected forest soils, to perform accurate measurements of the impact of soil loading by tested forestry machinery using the dynamic penetration test. The measurements by the dynamic penetration test in conditions changed by the wheel traffic of forestry mechanization were performed at three localities of the Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise, Masaryk Forest, a special-purpose facility of Mendel University in Brno. The dynamic penetration test was performed with a lightweight dynamic penetrometer. The methodology of the research is based on assessing the ability of soils to resist dynamic penetration of a rod with a cone, in relation to their lithological composition and physicomechanical properties; the measurement itself is defined by the ISO 22476-2 (2005) standard. Penetrometer measurements were repeated in the period after a harvesting operation and again 6 months later, i.e. in October 2007, April 2008 and October 2008. The results of the field dynamic penetration test and the results of laboratory testing of main soil physical parameters are presented in figures and tables. Besides the naturally variable soil compaction on geologically different substrates, the obtained original results document differences in the impact of particular forestry machines. In conditions of the identical geological substrate, the results indicate that the universal wheeled tractor had a more negative influence on the compaction of surface soil horizons compared to the multi-axle harvester and the forwarder.

Keywords: dynamic penetration test; soil compaction; soil mechanics; lightweight dynamic penetrometer

Published: October 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rejšek K, Buchar J, Vaníček I, Hromádko L, Vranová V, Marosz K. Results of dynamic penetration test - an indicator of the compaction of surface soil horizons by forestry machinery. J. For. Sci.. 2011;57(10):439-450. doi: 10.17221/4/2011-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Arshad M.A., Coen G.M. (1992): Characterization of soil quality: physical and chemical criteria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 7: 5-12. Go to original source...
  2. Cetin H., Fener M., Sőylemez M., Gũnaydin O. (2007): Soil structure changes during compaction of a cohesive soil. Engineering Geology, 92: 38-48. Go to original source...
  3. Etana A. (1995): Compaction effects of mechanical stress on some Swedish arable soils. [PhD Thesis.] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Soil Sciences, Uppsala.
  4. Goldmann N. (1699): Comprehensive guidelines to the art of building (Vollständige Anweisung zu der Civil Bau-Kunst).
  5. Herrick J.E., Jones T.L. (2002): A dynamic cone penetrometer for measuring soil penetration resistance. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66: 1320-1324. Go to original source...
  6. ISO 22476-2 (2005): The Geotechnical Survey and Testing. The Field Testing - Part B: Dynamic Penetration Test. The Czech Institute for Standardising, Prague: 31. (in Czech)
  7. IUSS Working Group WRB (2006): World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. 2nd Ed. World Soil Resources Report 103, FAO, Rome.
  8. Kirby B. (2007): Whither soil compaction research? Soil and Tillage Research, 93: 472-475. Go to original source...
  9. Klvač R., Vrána P., Jiroušek R. (2010): Possibilities of using the portable falling weight deflectometer to measure the bearing capacity and compaction of forest soils. Journal of Forest Science, 56: 130-136. Go to original source...
  10. Kutílek M., Kuráž V., Císlerová M. (2000): Hydropedology. Vol. 10. Prague, CVUT Publishing House: 176. (in Czech)
  11. Law on Forests (1995): 289/1995 Sb. Prague. (in Czech)
  12. Lebert M., Bőken H., Glante F. (2007): Soil compaction - indicators for the assesment of harmful changes to the soil in the context of the German Federal Soil Protection Act. Journal of Environmental Management, 82: 388-397. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Lhotský J. (2000): Soil Compaction and its Prevention. Prague, The Institute for Agriculture and Food Science Communications: 62. (in Czech)
  14. Malík V., Dvořák J. (2007): Soil compaction by the usage of harvestor technologies. Lesnická práce, 86: 212-214. (in Czech) Go to original source...
  15. Marshall T.J., Holmes J.W., Rose C.W. (2001): Soil Physics. 3rd Ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 453.
  16. Matthies D., Weixler H., Hess U. (1995): Befahrungsbedingte Strukturveränderungen von Waldböden. AFZ/Der Wald, No. 22: 1218-1221.
  17. Matys M., Ťavoda O., Cuninka M. (1990): Soil Field Trials. Bratislava, ALFA: 301. (in Czech)
  18. Míchal I. (1992): The Ecological Stability. Prague, Czech Ministery of the Environment: 243. (in Czech)
  19. Neruda J. (2008): Harvestor technologies in forestry. [Scriptum.] Brno, Mendel University: 150. (in Czech)
  20. Neruda J., Pokorný E., Ulrich R., Vavříček D. (2008): Tyre or caterpillar technologies within forest logging operations. In: Forest Machinery and Technologies for Unplanned Timber Logging. Prague, Czech Agricultural University: 86-89. (in Czech)
  21. Oliva J. (2008): VSelection processes in searching for the suitable forest technology in unplanned timber looging at Boletice Area. Lesnická práce, 87: 170-172. (in Czech)
  22. Owende P.M.O., Lyons J. Ward S.M. (eds) (2002): Operations Protocol for Eco-efficient Wood Harvesting on Sensitive Sites. Ecowood Partnership. Available at http://www.ucd.ie/foresteng/html/ecowood/op.pdf
  23. Rejšek K. (2003): Soil aggreation and soil biota: the interrelationships and the feedbacks. In: Frouz J., Šourková M., Frouzová J. (eds): Soil Physics and the Interrelationships among Soil Organisms and Plant Roots. 8th Annual Conference. Institute for Soil Biology, Czech Academy of Science. České Budějovice: 27-32. (in Czech)
  24. Rejšek K., Matějů L., Čtyřoká J. (2009): Soil Biology. In: Hauptman I., Kukal Z., Pošmourný K. (eds): Soil in the Czech Republic. Prague, Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic: 85-105. (in Czech)
  25. Šimon J., Lhotský J. (1989): Soil Management and Tillage. Prague, SZN: 317. (in Czech)
  26. Tullberg J.N. (2001): Controlled traffic for sustainable cropping. In: Proceedings of the 10th Australian Agronomy Conference Science and Technology: Delivering Results for Agriculture? Hobart, January 2001.
  27. Ulrich R., Schlaghamerský A., Štorek V. (2003): The Usage of Harvestor Technologies within Thinning Operations. Brno Mendel University: 98. (in Czech)
  28. Vaníček I., Vaníček M. (2008): Earth Structures in Transport, Water and Environmental Engineering. Berlin, Springer: 637.
  29. Vavříček D., Samec P., Šimková Pancová P., Neruda J., Ulrich R. (2008): The effect of forest processor hauling. Lesnická práce, 87: 164-165. (in Czech)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.