15May 2017

ESTABLISHMENT OF A DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL FOR BRAIN CT PROCEDURES IN MOROCCAN HOSPITALS.

  • Department of Health Techniques, Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques, Agadir, Morocco.
  • Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Center of Oncology, Agadir, Morocco.
  • Department of Medical Imaging, Center of Medico-Surgical, Agadir. Morocco.
  • Laboratory of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
  • Department of Physics,Nuclear Physics and Techniques Research Unit, University of IbnTofail, Kenitra, Morocco.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the patient doses during ComputedTomography (CT) brain procedures in order to establish a local diagnostic reference level (DRL) in some hospitals in Morocco. Materials and methods: This study consisted of examining a total of 146 patients in six radiology departments in Morocco. The data were collected from CT Brain examinations at least of 20 CT scans per hospital. For each examination reported, CT acquisition parameters have included number of series, use of contrast medium, tube kV, tube current and rotation time, slice thickness, the displayed CT dose index (CTDIvol) and the Dose Length Product (DLP). Results: The patients were examined with their own department protocol using multislice CT (MSCT) quadruple slice, 16 and 64 CT slice from different manufacturers. The tube current time produce isusedin two hospitals (H4-AGA-CNSS, H5-RAB-INO). The patients are exposed to a high dose up 200 mAs. One hospital uses a higher value up to 130 kV per CT brain. The tube tension defines penetration strength of the X ray beam. In terms of DLP, the average dose varies between 379,4 mGy.cm and 2434 mGy.cm. Therefore, a third quartile value of 1408 mGy.cm can be used as a first DRL local for CT brain procedure for adults. The DRL value found is higher than that found in other countries. It is 14% to 42 % higher compared to other studies. This value is as a preliminary study result, initiated to raise the attention concerning the prevention of unnecessary radiation dose for patients in CT imaging. Conclusion: Doses received by patient during CT procedures vary from a radiology service to another and even at the same service. This large variation is due to patient clinical indication, CT system modality and image acquisition parameters. The value of 1408 mGy.cm assessed as the first Moroccan DRL for CT brain procedure for adults is the highest value found so far in theliterature. Therefore, in order to reduce this dose, corrective measures are required to eliminate unnecessary radiation dose that doesn?t contribute to the overall profile of the patients. So, we recommend the normalisation of practices in the radiology departments by the development of such protocols and the promotion of educational and training programs in the field of radioprotection of patients.


  1. Pearce MS, SalottiJA, Little MP, McHugh? ,? Lee? C,? Kim? KP,? Howe? NL,? Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de Gonz?lezA, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study.? Lancet.? 2012;380:499?505.
  2. Gregory KJ1,? Bibbo? G,? Pattison? ? Uncertainties in effective dose estimates of adult CT? head? scans:? the? eect? of? head? size.? Med? Phys.? 2009 Sep;36(9):4121-5.
  3. International Commission? on? Radiological? Protection? 1990? Recommendations? of? the? International? Commission? on? Radiological? ? ICRP Publication 60.? Annals.? of? the? ICRP.? 21? (1-3)? :? Pergamon? Press,? Oxford.? (1991).
  4. European Commission? (EC).? Radiation? protection? ? Guidance on diagnostic reference? levels? (DRLs)? for medical? exposures.? Directorate-General, Environment, Nuclear? Safety? and? Civil? Protection,? 1999.
  5. ICRP, Diagnostic? reference? levels? in? medical? imaging:? review? and? additional advice. Ann ICRP 2001, 31 (4), 33.
  6. Hart D, Wall B.F., ?U.K. Population Dose From Medical X-ray Examinations,? European Journal of Radiology, June 2004.
  7. Shrimpton P.C., Wall B.F., Hart D., ?Diagnostic Medical Exposures in the U.K.,? Applied Radiation and Isotopes, January 1999.
  8. United Nations Scienti?c Committee on the Eects of Atomic Radiation (2000). 2000 Report to the General Assembly, Annex D Medical Radiation Exposures. United Nations, New York.
  9. Semghouli S, Amaoui B, El Kharras A, Shaim, A, Choukri A and Hakam O. Physicians Knowledge of Radiation Risk in Prescribing CT Imaging in Moroccan Hospitals.British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 20(3): 1-8, 2017; DOI: 10.9734/BJAST/2017/32491
  10. Semghouli S, Amaoui B, El Fahssi M, Choukri A and O.M Hakam. Practitioners? Knowledge on Patients? Radioprotection in Emergency and Radiology Services of Hassan II Hospital Agadir Morocco. International Journal of Modern Physics and Applications. 1, No. 5, 2015, pp. 205-209. ISSN: 2381-6945 (Print); ISSN: 2381-6953 (Online).
  11. Semghouli S, Amaoui B, Maamri A. Estimated radiation exposure from medical imaging for patients of radiology service of Al Faraby Hospital, Oujda Morocco. International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology. Volume 3 ? Number 3 ? 2015. DOI: 10, 14319 / ijcto.33.25.
  12. Aabid M, Semghouli S, Choukri A, Hakam O.K: Medical Radiation Exposure of Various Personnel Categories at National Center of Rehabilitation and Neurosciences (NCRNS) of Rabat. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS). Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2016; 4(8E):3071-DOI: 10.21276/sjams.2016.4.8.66
  13. Y, Choukri. A, Hakam. O.K, Talsmat. K, Benouhoud. M, andSemghouli. S (2016): Assessment of Absorbed Dose By Target Organs Using Mird Formalism During Certain Nuclear Medicine Procedures.European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical sciences. Volume 3, Issue 11, 61-64.
  14. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment. Part 2-44: Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment or computed tomography. IEC 60601-2-44. Geneva, Switzerland; 1999.
  15. Imaging Performance Assessments of? CT? (ImPACT).? CT patient dosimetryspreadsheet? (v0.99u,? 10/12/2007).? Retrieved? April
  16. Downes P, Jarvis? R, Radu E, Kawrakow I, Spezi E. Monte Carlo simulation and patient dosimetry for a kilovoltage cone-beam CT unit. Med Phys. 2009;36(9):4156?4167.
  17. Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Yamamoto H, Kitagawa T, Kohno S, Ito K. Prospective ECG-triggered axial CT at 140-kV tube voltage improves coronary in-stent restenosis visibility at a lower radiation dose compared with conventional retrospective ECG-gated helical CT. EurRadiol. 2009;19(10):2363?2372.
  18. Elnour A, Youssef M, Sulieman A: Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Level For Brain CT Procedures. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2015 Volume : 4 Issue : 3 pp 295-298.

[Slimane Semghouli, Bouchra Amaoui, Abdennsser El Kharras, Khalid Bouya khlef,Oum Keltoum Hakam and Abdelmajid Choukri. (2017); ESTABLISHMENT OF A DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL FOR BRAIN CT PROCEDURES IN MOROCCAN HOSPITALS. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 5 (May). 319-324] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Slimane SEMGHOULI
Department of Health Techniques, Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques, Agadir, Morocco

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/4114      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/4114