Skip to main content
Log in

Principles of Design of Access with Evidence Development Approaches

A Consensus Statement from the Banff Summit

  • Consensus Statement
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Sudlow CLM, Counsell CE. Problems with the UK governments risk sharing scheme for assessing drugs for multiple sclerosis. BMJ 2003; 326: 388–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright M. Getting bang for buck from patient access schemes. PJ Online 2009 Nov 4 [online]. Available from URL: (http://www.pjonline.com/news/getting_bang_for_buck_from_patient_access_schemes) [Accessed 2009 Nov 30]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stafinski T, McCabe CJ, Menon D. Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28 (2): 113–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCabe CJ, Stafinski T, Edlin R, et al. Access with evidence development schemes: a framework for description and evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28 (2): 143–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Briggs A, Ritchie K, Fenwick E, et al. Access with evidence development in the UK: past experience, current initiatives and future potential. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28 (2): 163–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohr PE, Tunis SR. Access with evidence development: the US experience. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28 (2): 153–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menon, D., McCabe, C.J., Stafinski, T. et al. Principles of Design of Access with Evidence Development Approaches. Pharmacoeconomics 28, 109–111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11530860-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11530860-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation