Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:55:45.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Private Standards in the Climate Regime: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jessica F. Green
Jessica F. Green*
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper seeks to explain the success of two NGOs in creating standards for calculating and reporting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the level of an entire company. These emissions accounting standards, called the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, have been widely adopted by multinational firms, emissions reporting registries, and even an emissions trading scheme. The paper traces the widespread adoption of the standards, and then offers an explanation for this successful instance of private regulation. It presents a supply and demand model of private entrepreneurial authority—where private actors project authority without delegation by states. The two NGOs were successful rule-makers because they were able meet a demand for three benefits to potential users of the standard: reduced transaction costs, first-mover advantage, and an opportunity to burnish their reputation as environmental leaders. The paper also explains the supply of private authority—that is, why we see entrepreneurial authority rather than delegation by states. The disagreement among developed countries on the appropriate role for emissions trading in the climate regime delayed action on developing firm-level accounting methodologies. Moreover, the relative weakness of the focal institution in the climate regime—the climate change Secretariat—meant that there was no obvious international organization to take up the task of creating new measurement tools.

Keywords

private governanceregulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , October 2010 , pp. 1 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2010 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

References

Betsill, Michele M. and Hoffman, Matthew J. 2009. “The Evolution of Emissions Trading Systems for Greenhouse Gases: Mapping the Cap and Trade Policy Domain.” Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, New York, NY, 15-18 February.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, and Cashore, Benjamin. 2007. “Can Non-State Global Governance be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework.” Regulation and Governance 1 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2010. “Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A Review of the Literature.” Business and Politics 12 (3).Google Scholar
Capoor, Karan and Ambrosi, Philippe. 2009. State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Carbon Disclosure Project. 2008. “Quick Facts” At http://stage.cdproject.net/reports.asp (last accessed Augsut 24, 2010).Google Scholar
Climate Action Registry. n.d. “About us.” At http://www.climateregistry.org/about.html (last accessed August 24, 2010).Google Scholar
Cutler, A. Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony, eds. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2: 201–216.Google Scholar
Depledge, Joanna. 2006. “The Opposite of Learning: Ossification in the Climate Change Regime.” Global Environmental Politics 6 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
GHG Protocol Initiative. “GHG Protocol Update, September 2001. “At http://www.ghgprotocol.org/downloads/newsletter_archive/GHG_Protocol_Newsletter_Sept_2001.pdf (last accessed August 24, 2010).Google Scholar
GHG Protocol Initiative. Newsletter #7, April 2003. At http://www.ghgprotocol.org/downloads/newsletter_archive/GHG_Protocol_Newsletter_No_7_2003.pdf (last accessed August 24, 2010).Google Scholar
GHG Protocol Initiative. n.d. “Funders.” At http://www.ghgprotocol.org/about-ghgp/funders (last accessed August 24, 2010).Google Scholar
Green, Jessica F. 2010. “A Theory of Private Authority.” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce, and Biersteker, Thomas J., eds. 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Martha. 1998. “Shell's New Worldview; At Helm of Oil Titan, Moody-Stuart Sees Profit in Principles” Washington Post 2 August 1998. Section H, p. 1.Google Scholar
Haufler, Virginia. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1996. Revised Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IGES: Japan.Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph and Snidal, Duncan. 2006. “The Choice of International Institutions: Cooperation, Alternatives and Strategies.” unpublished manuscript, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1008945.Google Scholar
Lefevere, Jurgen. 2005. “The EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowance Trading Scheme.” In Climate Change and Carbon Markets: A Handbook of Emissions Reduction Mechanisms, edited by Yamin, F. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. “Interests, Power and Multilateralism.” International Organization 46 (4): 765–792.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Woods, Ngaire. 2009. “In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Mattli, W. and Woods, N. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim. 2003. “Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?” World Politics 56 (1): 1–42.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim. 2005. “Global Private Governance: Lessons from a National Model of Setting Standards in Accounting.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (3/4): 225–262.Google Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, and Potoski, Matthew. 2006. The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary Environmental Regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riddell, Zoe and Chamberlin, Brittany. 2007. Investor Research Project. New York: Carbon Disclosure Project.Google Scholar
Schreurs, Miranda. 2004. “The Climate Change Divide: The European Union, the United States and the Future of the Kyoto Protocol. In Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union, edited by Vig, N. J. and Faure, M. G. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skjærseth, Jon Birger, and Wettestad, Jørgen. 2008. EU Emissions Trading. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sundin, Heidi, and Ranganathan, Janet. 2002. “Managing Business Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol – A Strategic and Operational Tool.” Corporate Environmental Strategy 9 (2): 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Climate Protection Initiative. 1998. Safe Climate, Sound Business: An Action Agenda. World Resources Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. 1995. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its First Session, Held at Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995. FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1. 6 June. Decision 5/CP.1.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. 2001. Administrative and Financial Matters. FCCC/SBI/2001/16. 19 October.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. 2002. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session. FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1-Add.4.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. 2006. Updated UNFCCC Reporting Guidelines on Annual Inventories Following Incorporation of the Provisions of Decision 14/CP.11. FCCC/SBSTA/2006/9. 18 August 2006.Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. Final Mandatory GHG Reporting Rule. Accessed at http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html. 23 October 2009.Google Scholar
Victor, David, and House, Joshua. 2006. “BP's emissions trading system.” Energy Policy 34: 2100–2112.Google Scholar
Vine, Edward and Sathaye, Jayant. 1997. The Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting and Verification of Climate Change Mitigation Projects: Discussion of Issues and Methodologies and Review of Existing Protocols and Guidelines. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2008. “Private Global Business Regulation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 261–282.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translation of Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, based on the 4th German ed. edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Werksman, Jacob. 1998. “The Clean Development Mechanism: Unwrapping the Kyoto Surprise.” Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 7 (2): 147–158.Google Scholar
World Resources Institute and the World Business Council on Sustainable Development. 2001. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. First edition. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
World Resources Institute and the World Business Council on Sustainable Development. 2004. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Revised edition. Washington DC: World Resources Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Yamin, Farhana, ed. 2005. Climate Change and Carbon Markets: A Handbook of Emission Reduction Mechanisms. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Zapfel, Peter, and Vainio, Matti. 2002. Pathways to European Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: History and Misconceptions. Milan: Fonazione Eni Enrico Mattei.Google Scholar