We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Commercial development of stem cell technology: lessons from the past, strategies for the future

    Paul A Martin

    † Author for correspondence

    University of Nottingham, Institute for the Study of Genetics, Biorisks and Society (IGBiS), Law and Social Sciences Building, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.

    ,
    Catherine Coveney

    University of Nottingham, Institute for the Study of Genetics, Biorisks and Society (IGBiS), Law and Social Sciences Building, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.

    ,
    Alison Kraft

    University of Nottingham, Institute for the Study of Genetics, Biorisks and Society (IGBiS), Law and Social Sciences Building, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.

    ,
    Nik Brown

    SATSU, University of York, Department of Sociology, York, UK

    &
    Philip Bath

    University of Nottingham, Department of Stroke Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgical Sciences, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.1.6.801

    This paper presents historical and contemporary survey data on the commercial development of stem cell technology from the 1990s to the present day. We describe the first wave of industrial investment in hematopoietic stem cells during the 1990s and contrast this with the more recent expansion of the sector. In particular, we explore the cell types used, diseases targeted and business models adopted by firms. We conclude, by arguing that the commercial prospects for stem cell technologies remain highly uncertain and that innovative public policies should be adopted to prevent ‘market failure’.

    Bibliography

    • Wilan KH, Scott CT, Hererra S: Chasing a cellular fountain of youth. Nat. Biotechnol.23(7),807–815 (2005).
    • Martin P, Thomas S: The development of gene therapy in europe and the United States: a comparative analysis. Final project report/ STEEP Special Report No 5. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, UK (1996).
    • Haematopoietic Stem Cells: The Dynamics of Expectations in Innovation. Grant awarded under ESRC’s Stem Cell Initiative and held with Philip Bath, Alison Kraft and Nik Brown (ESRC RE-340–25–0007).
    • Understanding User Needs in Tissue Engineering - linked project as part of EPSRC funded Grand Challenge Award Regenerative Medicine – A New Industry. Remedi – A Grand Challenge. Grant number EPSRC: EP/C534247/1
    • Civin C, Strauss LC, Brovall C et al.: Antigenic analysis of hematopoiesis. iii: a hematopoietic progenitor cell surface antigen defined by a monoclonal antibody raised against kg1a cells. J. Immunol.133,157–165 (1984).
    • Bar-Shalom A, Cook-Deegan R: Patents and innovation in cancer therapeutics: lessons from cellpro. Milbank Q.80(4),637–676 (2002).
    • Martin P, Thomas S (Ibid.) (1996).
    • Brown N, Kraft A: Blood ties – banking the stem cell promise. TASM18,313–327 (2006).
    • Brown N, Kraft A, Martin PA: The promissory pasts of blood stem cells. Biosocieties (2006) (In Press).
    • 10  Helmsley R, Martin PA: Unpublished survey of the tissue engineering industry. IGBiS, University of Nottingham (2006).
    • 11  Sprigg N, Bath PMW, Zhao L et al.: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mobilises bone marrow stem cells in patients with sub-acute ischaemic stroke: the Stem cell Trial of recovery EnhanceMent after Stroke (STEMS) pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 16784092). Stroke (2006) (In Press).
    • 12  Rothman H, Kraft A: Downstream and into deep biology: evolving business models in “toptier” genomics companies. J. Commer. Biotechnol.12(2),86–98 (2006).
    • 101  UK Stem Cell Initiative: Report and Recommendations. Department of Health (2005) www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/uksci. and www.ukscf.org.
    • 102  UK Stem Cell Foundation www.ukscf.org.
    • 103  Information regarding clinical trials in human volunteers www.clinicaltrials.gov