Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T13:31:14.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonrecursive tilings of the plane. I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

William Hanf*
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

Extract

A finite set of tiles (unit squares with colored edges) is said to tile the plane if there exists an arrangement of translated (but not rotated or reflected) copies of the squares which fill the plane in such a way that abutting edges of the squares have the same color. The problem of whether there exists a finite set of tiles which can be used to tile the plane but not in any periodic fashion was proposed by Hao Wang [9] and solved by Robert Berger [1]. Raphael Robinson [7] gives a more detailed history and a very economical solution to this and related problems; we will assume that the reader is familiar with §4 of [7]. In 1971, Dale Myers asked whether there exists a finite set of tiles which can tile the plane but not in any recursive fashion. If we make an additional restriction (called the origin constraint) that a given tile must be used at least once, then the positive answer is given by the main theorem of this paper. Using the Turing machine constructed here and a more complicated version of Berger and Robinson's construction, Myers [5] has recently solved the problem without the origin constraint.

Given a finite set of tiles T1, …, Tn, we can describe a tiling of the plane by a function f of two variables ranging over the integers. f(i, j) = k specifies that the tile Tk is to be placed at the position in the plane with coordinates (i, j). The tiling will be said to be recursive if f is a recursive function.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Berger, R., The undecidability of the domino problem, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, no. 66 (1966), 72 pp.Google Scholar
[2] Hanf, W., Model-theoretic methods in the study of elementary logic, Theory of models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 132145.Google Scholar
[3] Jockusch, C. Jr., classes and Boolean combinations of recursively enumerable sets, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 9596.Google Scholar
[4] Mostowski, A., A formula with no recursively enumerable model, Fundamenta Mathematica, vol. 43 (1955), pp. 125140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Myers, D., Nonrecursive tilings of the plane. II, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 286294.Google Scholar
[6] Putnam, H., Trial and error predicates and the solution to a problem of Mostowski, this Journal, vol. 30 (1965), pp. 4957.Google Scholar
[7] Robinson, R. M., Undecidability and nonperiodicity for tilings of the plane, Intentiones Mathematicae, vol. 12 (1971), pp. 177209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Rogers, H. Jr., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[9] Wang, H., Proving theorems by pattern recognition. II, Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 40 (1961), pp. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar