Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T05:56:51.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Policy, Institutions, and Coalition Avoidance: Norwegian Governments, 1945–1990

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Kaare Strøm
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Jørn Y. Leipart
Affiliation:
Norwegian Central Bureau of Statistics

Abstract

Norwegian party politics is characterized by coalition avoidance that defies conventional coalition theory. This failure of coalescence can be caused either by policy pursuit (preference-induced) or by institutional constraint (structure-induced). We test the explanatory power of policy-based and institutional explanations, relying on content analysis of authoritative party and government documents for our policy measures. The results show that the left–right policy dimension has powerfully constrained Norwegian interparty bargaining and that policy-based coalition theory can account for many apparent anomalies in Norwegian coalition politics. A permissive institutional environment has also fostered coalition avoidance. Although core-based coalition theory can thus be successfully adapted to the Norwegian case, it rests on a number of critical assumptions that limit its general applicability.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey. 1988. “Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82:405–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1991. “A Spatial Theory of Government Formation in Parliamentary Systems.” American Political Science Review 85:137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, David P. 1993. “Government Formation and Endogenous Parties.” American Political Science Review 87:3447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilstad, Karl-Anders. 1986. “Konfliktstruktur og partiavstand” [Conflict structure and party distance]. Graduate thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Björnberg, Arne. 1939. Parlamentarismens utveckling i Norge efter 1905 [The development of parliamentary government in Norway after 1905]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Browne, Eric C., and Franklin, Mark N.. 1973. “Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 67:453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian, and Farlie, Dennis, eds. 1977. Voting and Party Competition. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, and Laver, Michael J.. 1986. “Office Seeking and Policy Pursuit in Coalition Theory.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11:485506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian, Robertson, David, and Hearl, Derek, eds. 1987. Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Postwar Election Programmes in Nineteen Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Swaan, Abram. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1961. “A Theory of Coalition Formation.” American Sociological Review 26:373–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigmund, Grønmo. 1975a. “Politiske skillelinjer i norske partiprogrammer: En analyse av utviklingen fra 1936 til 1973” [Political cleavages in Norwegian party programs: An analysis of the development from 1936 to 1973]. Presented at the meeting of the Nordic Political Science Association, Århus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Sigmund, Grønmo. 1975b. “Skillelinjer i partipolitikken 1969–1973: Noen virkninger av EF-striden” [Cleavages in Norwegian party politics, 1969–1973: Some effects of the European Community controversy]. Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning 16:119–53.Google Scholar
King, Anthony. 1981. “What Do Elections Decide?” In Democracy at the Polls, ed. Butler, David, Penniman, Howard R., and Ranney, Austin. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Knutsen, Oddbjørn. 1989. “Cleavage Dimensions in Ten West European Countries: A Comparative Empirical Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 21:495533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael J. 1981. The Politics of Private Desires. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael J., and Budge, Ian, eds. 1992. Party Policy and Government Coalitions. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael J., and Hunt, W. Ben. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael J., and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael J., and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1990. “Coalitions and Cabinet Government.” American Political Science Review 84:873–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael J., and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1993. “Bargaining in Parliaments.” Trinity College, Dublin. Typescript.Google Scholar
Leiserson, Michael A. 1966. “Coalitions in Politics: A Theoretical and Empirical Study.” Ph.D. diss., Yale University.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments, ed. Lipset, Seymour M. and Rokkan, Stein. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Listhaug, Ola, MacDonald, Stuart E., and Rabinowitz, George. 1990. “A Comparative Spatial Analysis of European Party Systems.” Scandinavian Political Studies 13:227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory M. 1983. “Coalition Theory and Government Formation in Multiparty Democracies.” Comparative Politics 15:235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory M. 1986. Comparative Democracy: Policymaking and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Strøm, Kaare. 1993. “Coalition Stability and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lyng, John. 1976. Mellom øst og vest: Erindringer, 1965–1968 [Between east and west: Memoirs, 1965–1968]. Oslo: Cappelen.Google Scholar
Lyng, John. 1978. Fra borgfred til politisk blåmandag: Erindring 1968–1971 [From harmony to hard reality: Memoirs, 1968–1971]. Oslo: Cappelen.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D. 1976. “Intransitiviries in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12:472–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordby, Trond, ed. 1985. Storting og regjering, 1945–1985 [Parliament and government, 1945–1985]. Oslo: Kunnskapsforlaget.Google Scholar
Olsen, Johan P. 1983. Organized Democracy: Political Institution in a Welfare State—the Case of Norway. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Pettersen, Per Arnt. 1973. “Konfliktlinjer og partistrategi”, [Cleavages and party strategy]. Graduate thesis. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Pettersen, Per Arnt. 1979. “Ideologiske skillelinjer: Stabilitet og endring” [Ideological cleavages: Stability and change]. University of Oslo. Typescript.Google Scholar
Rasch, Bjørn Erik. 1987. “Manipulation and Strategic Voting in the Norwegian Parliament.” Public Choice 52:5773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1980. “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 74:432–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, David. 1976. A Theory of Party Competition. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Rommetvedt, Hilmar. 1984. Borgerlig samarbeid: Sprikende staur eller laftet tømmer? [Bourgeois cooperation: Sprawling fence posts or dovetailed joists?]. Stavanger: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Särlvik, Bo. 1983. “Scandinavia.” In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. Bogdanor, Vernon and Butler, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, William R. 1991. “Interparty Spatial Relationships in Norwegian Storting Roll Call Voting.” Scandinavian Political Studies 14:5983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 1:131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavang, Per. 1971. “Negativt Fleirtal i Norsk Parlamentarisme” [Negative majorities in Norwegian parliamentarism]. Lov og rett (4)1971:145–66.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1985. “Stortinget i et komparativt perspektiv” [The Norwegian parliament in comparative perspective]. Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift 1:1124.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1990a. “A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 34:565–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1990b. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. N.d. “The Presthus Debacle: Intraparty Politics and Bargaining Failure in Norway.” American Political Science Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, Budge, Ian, and Laver, Michael J.. N.d. “Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, and Leipart, Jorn Y.. 1989. “Ideology, Strategy, and Party Competition in Postwar Norway.” European Journal of Political Research 17:263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torp, Olaf C. 1990. Stortinget i navn og tall: Høsten 1989–Våren 1993 [The Norwegian parliament in names and numbers: Autumn 1989–Spring 1993]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Valen, Henry, and Grønmo, Sigmund. 1972. “Partiprofiler og konfliktlinjer i norsk politikk etter 1884” [Party profiles and cleavages in Norwegian politics after 1884]. Institute for Social Research (Oslo). Typescript.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.