Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: The role of food and refuge

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salt marshes are widely believed to serve as nurseries for many fishes and crustaceans of fishery value as a result of the high production of vascular plant detritus and the protection from predation offered by shallow, spatially complex habitats. Comparisons of the yields of species which reside in salt marsh habitats during critical life history stages (such as penaeid shrimp) with the area of such habitats and their greater densities in flooded marshes and associated tidal creeks support the premise that marshes enhance the yield of such species. A range of evidence, including the amount of detrital export from marshes, the poor nutritive value of vascular plant detritus, and natural diets, casts doubt on the notion that production of fishery species is based on the direct consumption of marsh grass detritus or predominantly on food chains based on this detritus. Vascular plants and associated algae may, however, contribute to the production of prey species. The limited observations available support the hypothesis that salt marshes offer significant escape from mortality due to predation, but there have been yet few experimental tests of this hypothesis.

Knowledge of relative importance of the food and refuge functions in support of living resources is of practical value in marsh and fisheries management. Better understanding of these roles is important to the effective evaluation of the effects of coastal habitat modifications on fisheries resources and design of alterations to minimize the losses of these values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adkins, G., and P. Bowman. 1976. A study of the fauna in dredged canals of coastal Louisiana. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Commission Tech. Bull. 18. 72 p.

  • Barrett, B. B. 1975. Environmental conditions relative to shrimp production in coastal Louisiana. La. Dep. Wildlife Fish. Tech. Bull. 15. 22 p.

  • Bell, S. S., andB. C. Coull. 1978. Field evidence that shrimp predation regulates meiofauna.Oecologia 35:141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borey, R. B., P. A. Harcombe, andF. M. Fisher. 1983. Water and organic carbon fluxes from an irregularly flooded brackish marsh on the upper Texas coast, U.S.A..Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 16:379–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R.. 1958. Food habits of fishes and larger invertebrates of Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, an estuarine community.Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Univ. Tex. 5:353–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R.. 1961. Trophic spectrum of an estuarine community, based on studies of Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.Ecology 42:553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doi, T., K. Okada, andK. Isibashi. 1973. Environmental assessment on survival of Kuruma prawn,Penaeus japonicus, in tideland. I. Environmental conditions in Saizyo tideland and selection of essential characteristics. Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 76:37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, R. J., G. L. Taghon, E. D. Gallagher, G. E. Kenny, andP. A. Jumars. 1979. Immunological methods for food web analysis in a soft-bottom benthic community.Mar. Biol. 54:61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, B., 1981. Natural stable carbon isotope tag traces Texas shrimp migrations.Fish. Bull. 79:337–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackney, C. T., andE. B. Haines. 1980. Stable carbon isotope composition of fauna and organic matter collected in a Mississippi estuary.Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 10:703–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, R. S., R. D. DeLaune, andW. H. Patrick, Jr. 1983. Sedimentation, accretion, and subsidence in marshes of Barataria Basin, Louisiana.Limnol. Oceanogr. 28:494–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, E. B.. 1977. The origins of detritus in Georgia salt marsh estuaries.Oikos 29:254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, E. B.. 1979. Interactions between Georgia salt marshes and coastal waters: a changing paradigm, p. 35–46.In R. J. Livingston (ed.), Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Systems. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, E. B., andC. L. Montague. 1979. Food sources of estuarine invertebrates analyzed using13C/12C ratios.Ecology 60:48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, K. L., Jr., andT. Thoman. 1981. Experiments on predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 53:125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herke, W. H.. 1971. Use of natural and semi-impounded, Louisiana tidal marshes as nurseries for fishes and crustaceans. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge. 242 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. W.. 1984. The ecological significance of sulfur in the energy dynamics of salt marsh and marine sediments.Biogeochemistry 1:5–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. G. 1974. Particulate matter at the sediment-water interface in coastal environments.J. Mar. Res. 273–282.

  • Knudsen, E. E., W. H. Herke, andJ. M. Mackler. 1977. The growth rate of marked juvenile brown shrimp,Penaeus aztecus in a semi-impounded Louisiana coastal marsh.Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 29:144–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinucci, A. C.. 1982. Trophic importance ofSpartina alterniflora production and decomposition to the marsh-estuarine ecosystem.Biol. Conserv. 22: 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mock, C. R.. 1967. Natural and altered estuarine habitats of penaeid shrimp.Proc. Gulf. Caribb. Inst. 19: 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, D. J. W., andM. C. Barclay. 1981. Carbon and nitrogen content of food and the assimilation efficiencies of penaeid prawns in the Gulf of Carpentaria.Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 32:245–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., andJ. R. Sibert. 1979. Detritus and juvenile salmon production in the Nanaimo Estuary. III. Importance of detrital carbon to the estuarine ecosystem.J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36:504–520.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W.. 1980. Between coastal marshes and coastal waters—a review of twenty years of speculation and research on the role of salt marshes in estuarine productivity and water chemistry, p. 437–525.In P. Hamilton and K. B. MacDonald (eds.), Estuarine and Wetland Processes. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, W. E., andE. J. Heald. 1975. The detritusbased food web of an estuarine mangrove community, p. 265–286.In L. E. Cronin (ed.), Estuarine Research, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J., K. L. Heck, Jr., and J. van Montfrans. 1984. Seagrass faunal communities: the influence of plant structure and prey life style on the outcome of predator-prey interactions.Estuaries [this issue].

  • Paul, R. K. G.. 1981. Natural diet, feeding and predatory activity of the crabsCallinectes arcuatus andC. toxotes (Decapoda, Brachyura, Portunidae).Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 6:91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D. S., andW. E. Schaaf. 1981. Food requirements and sources for juvenile Atlantic menhaden.Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 110:317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. J., R. W. Howarth, F. Lipschultz, andD. Ashendorf. 1980. Salt marsh detritus: an alternative interpretation of stable carbon isotope ratios and the fate ofSpartina alterniflora.Oikos 34: 173–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, L. R.. 1979. Secondary production mechanisms of continental shelf communities, p. 163–186.In R. J. Livingston (ed.), Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Systems. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribelin, B. W., andA. W. Collier. 1979. Ecological consideration of detrital aggregates in the salt marsh, p. 47–68.In R. J. Livingston (ed.), Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Systems. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, G. H., A. J. Mearns, D. R. Young, R. J. Olson, H. A. Schafer, andI. R. Kaplan. 1983. Animal13C/12C correlates with trophic level in pelagic food webs.Ecology 64:1314–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, W., R. E. Turner, andR. Costanza. 1983. Indirect impact of canals on recent coastal land loss rates in Louisiana.Environ. Manag. 7:433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenore, K. R., L. Cammen, S. E. G. Findlay, andN. Phillips. 1982. Perspectives of research on detritus: do factors controlling the availability of detritus to macroconsumers depend on its source?J. Mar. Res. 40:473–490.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, G. W., P. L. Parker, M. W. LaCroix, andB. Fry. 1978. The stable carbon isotope ratio of some components of an eelgrass,Zostera marina, bed.Oecologia 35:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E.. 1977. Intertidal vegetation and commercial yields of penaeid shrimp.Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 106:411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E.. 1979. Louisiana’s fisheries and changing environmental conditions, p. 363–370.In J. W. Day, D. D. Culley, R. E. Turner, and A. J. Mumphrey (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Coastal Marsh and Estuarine Management Symposium. Div. of Continuing Education, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E. 1982. Wetland losses and coastal fisheries: an enigmatic and economically significant dependency, p. 112–120.In D. F. Boesch (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Coastal Erosion and Wetland Modification in Louisiana: Causes, Consequences, and Options. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-82/59.

  • Van Valkenburg, J. K. Jones, andD. R. Heinle 1978. A comparison by size class and volume of detritus versus phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay.Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 6:569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince, S., I. Valiela, andN. Backus. 1976. Predation by salt marsh killifishFundulus heteroclitus (L.) in relation to prey size and habitat structure: consequences for prey distribution and abundance.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 23:255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein, R. W.. 1977. The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic fauna in Chesapeake Bay.Ecology 58:1199–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. J.. 1983. Death in the sea: enigmatic phytoplankton losses.Prog. Oceanogr. 12:1–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. P.. 1979. Shallow marsh habitats as primary nurseries for fishes and shellfish, Cape Fear River, North Carolina.Fish. Bull. 77:339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. P., andH. A. Brooks. 1983. Comparative ecology of nekton residing in a tidal creek and adjacent seagrass meadow: community composition and structure.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 12:15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E., J. F. Gilliam, D. J. Hall, andG. G. Mittelbach. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish.Ecology 64:1540–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, K. M. 1980. Mississippi Deltaic Plain Region Ecological Characterization: A Habitat Mapping Study. A User’s Guide to the Habitat Maps. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/07.

  • Yakupzack, P. M., W. H. Herke, andW. G. Perry. 1977. Emigration of juvenile Atlantic croaker,Micropogon undulatus, from a semi-impounded marsh in southwestern Louisiana.Trans Am. Fish. Soc. 106:538–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, R. J., and T. J. Minello. 1984. Habitat-related densities of macrofauna associated withPenaeus aztecus andPenaeus setiferus in a Texas salt marsh.Estuaries [this issue].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boesch, D.F., Turner, R.E. Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: The role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7, 460–468 (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/1351627

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1351627

Keywords

Navigation