Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:15:05.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Parties Come to Order! Dimensions of Preferential Choice in the West German Electorate, 1961–1976*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Helmut Norpoth
Helmut Norpoth*
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spatial analyses of party systems typically construe the dimensions of party configurations in terms of policy-defined issues and ideologies such as the left-right framework. But as far as the mass public is concerned, perceptions and evaluations of parties in those terms require a degree of political sophistication beyond the grasp of the average voter. That is why this article explores the impact of alternative criteria. Its main thesis is that in multiparty systems with coalition governments the party alignments in government–and possibly in opposition–provide a cue to the public of great consequence for its preferential choice. Party preference orders of the West German electorate are examined by way of unfolding analysis. The data come from a series of surveys collected during the period 1961–1976. The results of the analysis reveal traces of the two dominant cleavages of German politics, namely social class and religion, but fail to show any significant influence of the left-right framework. What is most conspicuous is the susceptibility of preferential choice to cues emanating from the coalition behavior of party leaders. Given a context of changing coalition alignments among parties in government, that susceptibility prevents any fixed configuration of parties from governing voters' preferential choice.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 724 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to G. Robert Boynton, Thomas Herz, Hans D. Klingemann, Heinet Meulemann, Mitchell Seligson, Herbert F. Weisberg and Menno Wolters, as well as to the anonymous referees, for criticism and suggestions regarding earlier drafts of this paper. The staff of the Zentralarchiv in Cologne, Germany, as well as Sally Garnaat at the University of Arizona provided computational assistance, which I would also like to acknowledge.

References

Barnes, Samuel H., and Pierce, Roy (1971). “Public Opinion and Political Preferences in France and Italy.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15: 643–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Dennis, eds. (1976). Party Identification and Beyond. New York and London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald (1969). Political Change in Britain. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. (1966). “The Problem of Party Distances in Models of Voting Change.” In Jennings, M. Kent and Ziegler, L. Harmon (eds.), The Electoral Process. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 175–207.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Valen, Henry (1971). “Dimensions of Cleavage and Perceived Party Distances in Norwegian Voting.” Scandinavian Political Studies 6: 107–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, Clyde H. (1964). A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Damgaard, Erik, and Rusk, Jerrold G. (1976). “Cleavage Structures and Representational Linkages: A Longitudinal Analysis of Danish Legislative Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 20: 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Klingemann, Hans D. (1976). “Party Identification, Ideological Preference and the Left-Right Dimension Among Western Mass Publics.” In Budge, Ianet al. (eds.), Party Identification and Beyond. New York and London: Wiley, pp. 243–73.Google Scholar
Kaack, Heino (1971). Geschichte und Struktur des deutschen Parteiensystems. Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltefleiter, Werner (1970). “The Impact of the Election of 1969 and the Formation of the New Government on the German Party System.” Comparative Politics 2: 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans D. (1972). “Testing the Left-right Continuum on a Sample of German Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 5: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. (1964). “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis.” Psychometrika 29:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard (1969). “Strukturen ideologischer Konflikte bei Parteienwettbewerb.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 10: 285–313.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut (1977). “Kanzlerkandidaten: Wie sie vom Wähler bewertet werden und seine Wahlentscheidung beeinflussen.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 18: 551–72.Google Scholar
Pappi, Franz U. (1973). “Parteiensystem und Sozialstruktur in der Bundesrepublik.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 14:191–213.Google Scholar
Pappi, Franz U. (1976). “Sozialstruktur und Wahlentscheidung aus kommunalpolitischer Sicht.” In Stiftung, Adenauer (ed.), Kommunales Wahlverhalten. Bonn: Eichholz Verlag, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, George (1978). “On the Nature of Political Issues: Insights from Spatial Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 793–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, Roger N. (1962). “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function.” Psychometrika 27: 219–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. (1966). “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” In Campbell, Anguset al. (eds.), Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley, pp. 161–79.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert F., and Rusk, Jerrold G. (1970). “Dimensions of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 64: 1167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zülch, Rüdiger (1973). Von der FDP zur F.D.P. Bonn: Eichholz Verlag.Google Scholar