Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:20:25.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Overreports Voting?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Brian D. Silver ,
Barbara A. Anderson  and
Paul R. Abramson
Brian D. Silver
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Barbara A. Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Paul R. Abramson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of respondent characteristics with regard to the propensity of nonvoters to report that they voted are examined by analyzing the vote validation studies conducted by the University of Michigan Survey Research Center in 1964, 1976, and 1980. Previous research has suggested that vote overreporting derives from the respondent's wish to appear to engage in socially desirable behavior. This earlier research suggests that the only respondent characteristic that is strongly related to overreporting is race; measures of socioeconomic status and of general political attitudes are said to be at most weakly related to the tendency to exaggerate voting. These earlier conclusions are incorrect. We measure the extent of overreporting for the population “at risk” of overreporting voting: those who did not actually vote. Respondents most inclined to overreport their voting are those who are highly educated, those most supportive of the regime norm of voting, and those to whom the norm of voting is most salient—the same characteristics that are related to the probability that a person actually votes. Blacks are only slightly more likely to overreport voting than whites. The pattern of relations between education and vote overreporting is opposite what would be found if those who falsely reported voting fit the typical image of the uneducated, uninvolved, “acquiescent” respondent who is concerned primarily with pleasing the interviewer.

Type
Research Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 613 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H.. 1982. The Decline of Electoral Participation in America. American Political Science Review, 76:502–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., and Claggett, William. 1984. Race-Related Differences in Self-Reported and Validated Turnout. Journal of Politics, 46:719–38.Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1983. Change and Continuity in the 1980 Elections, rev. ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Nelson, Forrest D.. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Barbara A., and Silver, Brian D.. 1986. Measurement and Mismeasurement of the Validity of Self-Reported Vote. American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradburn, Norman M., Sudman, Seymour, and Associates. 1979. Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design: Response Effects to Threatening Questions in Survey Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cahalan, Don. 1968–1969. Correlates of Respondent Accuracy in the Denver Validity Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32:607–21.Google Scholar
Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H.. 1983. Political Behavior of the American Electorate, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Q., and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1984. Nonvoters in Voters' Clothing: The Impact of Voting Behavior Misreporting on Voting Behavior Research. Social Science Quarterly, 65:199–206.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary R., and Muha, Michael J.. 1984. Education and Intergroup Attitudes: Moral Enlightenment, Superficial Democratic Commitment, or Ideological Refinement? American Sociological Review, 49:751–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katosh, John P., and Traugott, Michael W.. 1981. The Consequences of Validated and Self-Reported Voting Measures. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45:519–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Hugh J., and Crossley, Helen M.. 1950. Validity of Responses to Survey Questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 14:61–80.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, and Presser, Stanley. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee. 1982. The Nonvoting Voter in Voting Research. American Journal of Political Science, 26:47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Brian D., Abramson, Paul R., and Anderson, Barbara A.. 1986. The Presence of Others, Pre-Election Vote Expectations, and Overreporting of Voting in American National Elections. Public Opinion Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Silver, Brian D., Anderson, Barbara A., and Abramson, Paul R.. 1985. Who Overreports Voting in American Elections? A Reconsideration of the Effects of Respondent Characteristics. University of Michigan Population Studies Center Research Reports, No. 85-76. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Steeh, Charlotte G. 1981. Trends in nonresponse Rates, 1952–1979. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45:40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudman, Seymour, and Bradburn, Norman M.. 1974. Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Traugott, Michael W., and Katosh, John P.. 1979. Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43:359–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Carol H. 1968–1969. Validity of Welfare Mothers' Interview Responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32:622–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar