Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T10:41:00.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inequality, Social Comparison, and Relative Deprivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

William H. Panning
William H. Panning*
Affiliation:
The University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I present a formal model of relative deprivation and demonstrate its implications concerning the relationship between inequality and political instability. The model, which is based on assumptions similar to those of Nagel (1974), implies that the relationship of instability to inequality can be either curvilinear, as Nagel found, or linear, as Russett (1964) found, although under different conditions. In both cases the model implies that reducing inequality reduces the level of relative deprivation, thereby enhancing the prospect for political stability. However, changes in the tendency of individuals to compare their lot with that of others can also substantially affect the level of relative deprivation in a society.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 323 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Feld, S.Social structure determinants of similarity among associates. American Sociological Review, 1982, 47, 797–801.Google Scholar
Festinger, L.A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 117–140.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. S., Jackson, R. M., Stueve, C. A., Gerson, K., & Jones, L. M.Networks and places. New York: Free Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hey, J. D., & Lambert, P. J.Relative deprivation and the gini coefficient: comment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980, 95, 567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E. J.Inequality and insurgency: a statistical study of South Vietnam. World Politics, 1968, 20, 421–438.Google Scholar
Nagel, J. H.Inequality and discontent: a nonlinear hypothesis. World Politics, 1974, 26, 453–472.Google Scholar
Paige, J. M.Inequality and insurgency in Vietnam: a reanalysis. World Politics, 1970, 25, 24–37.Google Scholar
Paranzino, D.Inequality and insurgency in Vietnam: a further reanalysis. World Politics, 1973, 25, 565–578.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G.Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar
Russett, B. M.Inequality and instability: the relation of land tenure to politics. World Politics, 1964, 16, 442–454.Google Scholar
Russo, A. J. Jr.Economic and social correlates of government control in South Vietnam. In Feierabend, I. K.et al. (Eds.) Anger, violence, and politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
Sansom, R. L.The economics of insurgency in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Yitzhaki, S.Relative deprivation and the gini coefficient. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979, 93, 321–324.Google Scholar