Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:12:30.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bounded Rationality in Budgetary Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

John F. Padgett
John F. Padgett*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two bounded rationality theories of federal budgetary decision making are operationalized and tested within a stochastic process framework. Empirical analyses of Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson domestic budget data, compiled from internal Office of Management and Budget planning documents, support the theory of serial judgment over the theory of incrementalism proposed by Davis, Dempster and Wildavsky. The new theory highlights both the structure of ordered search through a limited number of discrete alternatives and the importance of informal judgmental evaluations. Serial judgment theory predicts not only that most programs most of the time will receive allocations which are only marginally different from the historical base, but also that occasional radical and even “catastrophic” changes are the normal result of routine federal budgetary decision making. The methodological limitations of linear regression techniques in explanatory budgetary research are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 354 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, J., and O'Connor, R. (1975). “Operationalizing Incrementalism: Measuring the Muddles.” Public Administration Review 35: 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Peter J., and Doksum, Kjell A. (1977). Mathematical Statistics. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1972). “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowart, A. T., Hansen, T. and Brofoss, K. (1975). “Budgetary Strategies and Success at Multiple Decision Levels in the Norwegian Urban Setting.” American Political Science Review 69: 543–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crecine, John P. (1969). Governmental Problem-Solving: A Computer Simulation of Municipal Budgeting. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Crecine, John P. (1975). “Fiscal and Organizational Determinants of the Size and Shape of the U.S. Defense Budget.” In Appendices: Commission on the Organization of the Government for the Conduct of Foreign Policy, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
Crecine, John P. (1977). “Coordination of Federal Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Processes: Research Strategies for Complex Decision Systems.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard M., and March, James G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Danziger, James N. (1974). “Budget-Making and Expenditure Variations in English County Boroughs.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Dempster, M. A. H. and Wildavsky, Aaron (1966). “A Theory of the Budgetary Process.” American Political Science Review 60: 529–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Dempster, M. A. H. and Wildavsky, Aaron (1971). “On the Process of Budgeting II: An Empirical Study of Congressional Appropriations.” In Byrne, R. F.et al. (eds.), Studies in Budgeting. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Dempster, M. A. H. and Wildavsky, Aaron (1974). “Toward a Predictive Theory of Government Expenditures: U.S. Domestic Appropriations.” British Journal of Political Science 4: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M., and Corrigan, Bernard (1974). “Linear Models in Decision Making,” Psychological Bulletin 81: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, William (1968). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 1. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1953). “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays on Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gerwin, Donald (1969). Budgeting Public Funds. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gist, John R. (1974). Mandatory Expenditures and the Defense Sector: Theory of Budgetary Incrementalism. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Green, Bert F. (1968). “Descriptions and Explanations: A Comment on Papers by Hoffman and Edwards.” In Kleinmuntz, B. (ed.), Formal Representation of Human Judgment. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnson, Norman L., and Kotz, Samuel (1970). Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vols. 1 and 2. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Karlin, Samuel, and Taylor, Howard M. (1975). A First Course in Stochastic Processes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Larkey, P. D. (1979). Evaluating Public Programs: The Impact of General Revenue Sharing on Municipal Governments. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
LeLoup, Lance (1977). Budgetary Politics: Dollars, Deficits, Decisions. Brunswick, Ohio: King's Court.Google Scholar
LeLoup, Lance (1978a). Review of Aaron Wildavsky, Budgeting. American Political Science Review 72: 351–52.Google Scholar
LeLoup, Lance (1978b). “The Myth of Incrementalism: Analytic Choices in Budgetary Theory,” Polity 10: 488–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. (1961). “Decision-Making in Taxation and Expenditures.” In Public Finance: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. and Braybrooke, David (1970). A Strategy of Decision. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Loève, Michel (1955). Probability Theory. Toronto: Van Nostxand.Google Scholar
Natchez, Peter B., and Bupp, Irvin C. (1973). “Policy and Priority in the Budgetary Process.” American Political Science Review 67: 951–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, Alan, and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. (1978). “Coping with Complexity: Stochastic Models of Budgetary Decision Making in O.M.B. and Domestic Agencies.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. (1979). “A Sequential Attention Model of Federal Budgetary Decision Making: Preliminary Historical, Mathematical and Empirical Analyses.” RIAS Working Paper No. 19, Harvard University, unpublished.Google Scholar
Radner, Roy (1975). “A Behavioral Model of Cost Reduction.” The Bell Journal of Economics 6: 196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, R., Franklin, Grace, Holmes, William, and Moreland, William (1973). Structure, Environment, and Policy Actions: Exploring a Model of Policy-Making. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rorer, Leonard G. (1971). “A Circuitous Route to Bootstrapping.” In Haley, Harold B.et al. (eds.), Personality Measurement in Medical Education. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, I. (1968). “Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support, and Budget Success in State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 62: 1220–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. (1957). “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” In Models of Man. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. (1968). “On Judging the Plausibility of Theories.” In van Rootselaar, J. and Staal, H. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Sciences III. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. (1972). “Theories of Bounded Rationality.” In McGuire, C. B. and Radner, Roy (eds.), Decision and Organization. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Steinbruner, John D. (1974). The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stromberg, J. L. (1970). “The Internal Mechanisms of the Defense Budget Process.” Rand Publication No. RM–6243–PR.Google Scholar
Wanat, John (1974). “Bases of Budgetary Incrementalism,” American Political Science Review 68: 1221–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. (1966). “A Rational Theory of the Federal Budgetary Process.” In Tullock, Gordon (ed.), Papers on Non-Market Decision Making. Charlottesville, Va.: Thomas Jefferson Center for Political Economy.Google Scholar
Winter, Sidney G. (1971). “Satisficing, Selection and the Innovating Remnant.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 85: 237–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodroofe, Michael (1975). Probability with Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar