Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T21:34:10.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Official Language Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Jonathan Pool
Jonathan Pool
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Polities and organizations use and require particular languages for official business. The choice of official languages is a vexing issue. Theorists, convinced that a fair language policy cannot be efficient, have despaired of an elegant solution. To investigate this apparent dilemma, I mathematically model the problem of choosing an efficient and fair language policy for a plurilingual polity. The policy designates official languages and taxes the language groups to pay for translation among the official languages. Contrary to prevailing wisdom, this model implies that a fair language policy can be efficient. But what if language groups rationally misrepresent the costs of using a nonnative official language? Even then, the policy maker can discover a fair language policy and, under some conditions, can use a cost-revelation procedure that discovers a fair and efficient language policy. The results challenge the claim that efficiency and practicality excuse the inferior treatment of language minorities.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 85 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 495 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Barbara A., and Silver, Brian D.. 1984. “Equality, Efficiency, and Politics in Soviet Bilingual Education Policy, 1934–1980.” American Political Science Review 78:1019–39.Google Scholar
Andronov, M. S. 1975. “Problems of the National Language in Tamilnad.” Anthropos 70:180–93.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. D. C. 1978. “The English Language in Indian Schools.” In Americanizing the American Indians, ed. Prucha, Francis Paul. Lincoln: Unirversity of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Avrorin, Valentin A. 1975. Problemy izučenifa funkcional'noj storony jazyka [Problems in the study of the functional aspect of language]. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Beer, William R., and Jacob, James E., eds. 1985. Language Policy and National Unity. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul R. 1974. Language, Religion, and Polltics in North India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canada. Commissioner of Official Languages. 1989. Annual Report, 1988. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1985. Sprache und Staat [Language and state]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das Gupta, Jyotirindra. 1970. Language Conflict and National Development. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha, Hammond, Peter, and Maskin, Eric. 1979. “The Implementation of Social Choice Rules: Some General Results on Incentive Compatibility.” Review of Economic Studies 46: 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Witte, Bruno. 1989. “Droits fondamentaux et protection de la diversité linguistique” [Fundamental rights and the protection of linguistic diversity]. In Langue et droit [Language and law], ed. Pupier, Paul and Woehrling, José. Montreal: Wilson & Lafleur.Google Scholar
DeFrancis, John. 1977. Colonialism and Language Policy in Viet Nam. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dešeriev, Ju. D. 1977. Social'naja lingvistika [Sociolinguistics]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. 1984. “Space and Freedom: Conditions for the Temporary Separation of Incompatible Groups.” International Political Science Review 5:125–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falch, Jean. 1973. Contribution à l'étude du statut des langues en Europe [A study of the legal status of languages in Europe]. Quebec: Centre international de recherche sur le bilinguisme.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1973. Language and Nationalism. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1974. “Language Modernization and Planning in Comparison with Other Types of National Modernization and Planning.” In Advances in Language Planning, ed. Fishman, Joshua A.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A., ed. 1986. “Language Rights and the English Language Amendment.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, no. 60.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie. 1987. “Are Language Rights Fundamental?” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 25:639–69.Google Scholar
Guboglo, M. N. 1979. “Jazyk edinstva i edinstvo jazykov” [Language of unity and unity of languages]. In Aktual'nye problemy nacional'nyx otnošenij v svete novoj konstitucii SSSR [Current problems of nationality relations in light of the new constitution of the USSR], ed. Bromlej, Julian V., et al. Moscow: Institut istorii SSSR.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Language Conflict and Language Planning: The Case of Modern Norwegian. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaev, M. I. 1977. National Languages in the USSR: Problems and Solutions. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C. 1971. “Language As an Aid and Barrier to Involvement in the National System.” In Can Language Be Planned?, ed. Rubin, Joan and Jernudd, Björn H.. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
King, C. E. 1977. The Implications of Additional Languages in the United Nations System. Document no. A/32/237. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. 1966. “Types of Multilingual Communities: A Discussion of Ten Variables.” In Explorations in Sociolinguistics, ed. Lieberson, Stanley. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1977. Politics, Language, and Thought: The Somali Experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1989. “Language Policy and Political Strategy in India.” Policy Sciences 22: 415–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laponce, Jean A. 1984. Langue et territoire [Language and territory]. Quebec: Les presses de I'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean A. 1989. “L'aménagement linguistique et les effets pervers” [Language planning and side effects]. In Langue et droit [Language and law], ed. Pupier, Paul and Woehrling, José. Montreal: Wilson & Lafleur.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Walter, and Rubin, Berry, eds. 1979. The Human Rights Reader. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Lau versus Nichols. 1974. 414 U.S. 563.Google Scholar
Mackey, William F. 1977. “La planification linguistique au Canada: Politiques et applications: introduction [Language planning in Canada: Principles and applications: Introduction]. In The Individual, Language, and Society in Canada, ed. W. H. Coons, , Taylor, Donald M., and Tremblay, Marc-Adélard. Ottawa: Canada Council.Google Scholar
McRae, Kenneth D. 1983. Conflict and Compromise in Multilingual Societies: Switzerland. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
McRae, Kenneth D. 1986. Conflict and Compromise in Multilingual Societies: Belgium. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Mazrui, Ali A. 1976. A World Federation of Cultures: An African Perspective. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Muñiz-Argüelles, Luis. 1989. “The Status of Languages in Puerto Rico.” In Langue et droit [Language and Law], ed. Pupier, Paul and Woehrling, José. Montreal: Wilson & Lafleur.Google Scholar
Noss, Richard. 1967. Language Policy and Higher Education. Paris: Unesco and International Association of Universities.Google Scholar
O'Barr, William M. 1976. “The Study of Language and Politics.” In Language and Politics, eds. O'Barr, William M. and O'Barr, Jean F.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
O'Barr, William M., and O'Barr, Jean F., eds. 1976. Language and Politics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrower, Alexander. 1965. Language, Law, and Diplomacy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar. 1968. “The Choice of Official Languages in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.” In Language Problems of Developing Nations, eds. Fishman, Joshua A., Ferguson, Charles A., and Gupta, Jyotirindra Das. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan. 1976. “Developing the Soviet Turkic Tongues: The Language of the Politics of Language.” Slavic Review 35:425–42.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan. 1978. “Soviet Language Planning: Goals, Results, Options.” In Soviet Nationality Policies and Practices, ed. Azrael, Jeremy R.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pool, Jonathan. 1987. “Thinking about Linguistic Discrimination.” Language Problems and Language Planning 11:3–21.Google Scholar
Rabushka, Alvin, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
Radner, Roy. 1986. “Information Pooling and Decentralized Decision Making.” In Information Pooling and Group Decision Making, eds. Grofman, Bernard and Owen, Guillermo. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, Eric. 1989. Games and Information. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rubango, Nyunda ya. 1986. “Le français au Zaïre: langue ‘supérieure’ et chances de ‘survie’ dans un pays africain” [French in Zaire: “Superior” language and “survival” chances in an African country]. Language Problems and Language Planning 10:253–71.Google Scholar
Rubin, Joan. 1984. “Planning for Language Change in the United States: The Case of Monolingual Spanish Speakers.” In Language and Power, eds. Kramarae, Cheris, Schulz, Muriel, and O'Barr, William M.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. 1968. “Language, Modernization, and Nationhood—an Attempt at Typology.” In Language Problems of Developing Nations, eds. Fishman, Joshua A., Ferguson, Charles A., and Gupta, Jyotirindra Das. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2:337–63.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Harold. 1987. “Losing the Battle for Balanced Bilingualism: The German-American Case.” Language Problems and Language Planning 11:66–81.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Fletcher, Joseph F., Russell, Peter H., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1989. “Political Culture and the Problem of Double Standards: Mass and Elite Attitudes toward Language Rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 22: 259–84.Google Scholar
Spencer, Gregory. 1986. Projections of the Hispanic Population: 1983 to 2080. Current Population Report P-25, no. 995. Washington: Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Strategy Research Corporation. 1987. 1987 U.S. Hispanic Market Study. Miami: SRC.Google Scholar
Tabory, Mala. 1980. Multilingualism in International Law and Institutions. Rockville, MD: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Thorburn, Thomas. 1971. “Cost-Benefit Analysis in Language Planning.” In Can Language Be Planned?, eds. Rubin, Joan and Jernudd, Björn H.. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Tollefson, James W. 1986. “Language Policy and the Radical Left in the Philippines: The New People's Army and Its Antecedents.” Language Problems and Language Planning 10:177–89.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, François. 1983. “The Economics of Language and Language Planning.” Language Problems and Language Planning 7:162–78.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Vernon. 1976. “Human Rights without Distinction As to Language.” International Studies Quarterly 20:3–38.Google Scholar
Vikør, Lars S. 1988. Språkplanlegging: Prinsipp og praksis [Language planning: Theory and practice]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Brian. 1983. The Civic Tongue: Political Consequences of Language Choices. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Brian, ed. 1990. Language Policy and Political Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Wilfred J. 1974. “Language Policies of Independent African States.” In Advances in Language Planning, ed. Fishman, Joshua A.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. 1989. “Sentences in the Language Prison: The Rhetorical Structuring of an American Language Policy Debate.” American Ethnologist 16:268–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, Stephen A. 1974. “Language Policy, Language Engineering and Literacy in New Guinea and Australia.” In Advances in Language Planning, ed. Fishman, Joshua A.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Young, Crawford. 1976. The Politics of Cultural Pluralism. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar