Abstract
Data are said to be ipsative when the sum of the measures obtained over the variables is a constant for each individual. In this article, three types of ipsative data that are commonly encountered in social research are discussed. Each of them can be used to control the effect of different response set biases. Using an artificial example in the context of factor analysis, however, it is showed that the three types of ipsative data cannot simply be analyzed as if they were normative because this will give us misleading and improper results. Correct methods for factor-analyzing the additive and the ordinal ipsative data are discussed. Empirical results from our examples indicate that the suggested methods recover the normative factor structure successfully. It is concluded that ipsative data, if analyzed appropriately, can provide us useful information in psychological research.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
13 February 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-020-00129-1
References
Aitchison, J. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Alwin, D. F. & Krosnick, J. A. (1985). The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings. Public Opinion Survey, 49, 535–552.
Bachman, J. G., Smith, C. G., & Slesinger, J. A. (1966). Control, performance, and satisfaction: An analysis of structural and individual effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 127–136.
Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 49–56.
Bartram, D. (1996). The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 25–39.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
Böckenholt, U. (1992). Thurstonian representation for partial ranking data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 31–49.
Brady, H. E. (1989). Factor and ideal point analysis for interpersonally incomparable data. Psychometrika, 54, 181–202.
Broverman, D. M. (1962). Normative and ipsative measurement in psychology. Psychological Review, 69, 295–305.
Burt, C. L. (1948). The factorial study of temperamental traits. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 178–203.
Cattell, R. B. (1944). Psychological measurement: Normative, ipsative, interactive Psychological Review, 51, 292–303.
Cattell, R. B. & Brennan, J. (1994). Finding personality structure when ipsative measurements are the unavoidable basis of the variables. American Journal of Psychology, 107, 261–274.
Chan, W. (1995). Covariance structure analysis of ipsative data. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Chan, W. & Bentler, P. M. (1993). The covariance structure analysis of ipsative data. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 214–247.
Chan, W. & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Covariance structure analysis of partially additive ipsative data using restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 289–312.
Chan, W. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Covariance structure analysis of ordinal ipsative data. Psychometrika, 63, 369–399.
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W. Z., Zhang, J. X., & Zhang, J. P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Song, W. Z., Zhang, J. X., & Zhang, J. P. (1993). The Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Cheung, M. W.-L. & Chan, W. (2002). Reducing uniform response bias with ipsative measurement in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 55–77.
Clemans, W. V. (1966). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures. Psychometric Monographs, 14.
Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychornetrika, 31, 33–42.
Closs, S. J. (1996). On the factoring and interpretation of ipsative data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 41–47.
Cornwell, J. M. & Dunlap, W. P. (1994). On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Saville & Willson (1991). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 89–100.
Cunningham, W. H., Cunningham, C. M., & Green, R. T. (1977). The ipsative process to reduce response set bias. Public Opinion Survey, 41, 379–384.
Dunlap, W. P. & Cornwell, J. M. (1994). Factor analysis of ipsative measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 115–126.
French, J. & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
Greer, T. & Dunlap, W. P. (1997). Analysis of variance with ipsative measures. Psychological Methods, 2, 200–207.
Guilford, J. P. (1952). When not to factor analyze. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 26–37.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw Hill.
Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167–184.
Jackson, D. J. & Alwin, D. F. (1980). The factor analysis of ipsative measures. Sociological Methods & Research, 9, 218–238.
Johnson, C. E., Wood, R., & Blinkhorn, S. F. (1988). Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 153–162.
Kohn, M. L. (1969). Class and conformity: A study in values. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Kolb, D. A. (1985). Learning style inventory. Boston, MA: McBer and Company.
Leung, K. & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for crosscultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133–151.
Loo, R. (1999). Issues in factor-analyzing ipsative measures: The Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985) example. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 149–154.
Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1999). Thurstonian modeling of ranking data via mean and covariance structure analysis. Psychornetrika, 64, 325–340.
McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566.
Merritt, S. L. & Marshall, J. C. (1984). Reliability and construct validity of ipsative and normative forms of the learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 463–472.
Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Poon, W. Y. & Chan, W. (2002). Influence analysis of ranking data. Psychometrika, 67, 421–436.
Radcliffe, J. A. (1963). Some properties of ipsative score matrices and their relevance for some current interest tests. Australian Journal of Psychology, 15, 1–11.
Saville, P. & Willson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 219–238.
Schönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal Procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31, 1–10.
Schriesheim, C. A., Hinkin, T. R., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1991). Can ipsative and singleitem measures produce erroneous results in field studies of French and Raven’s (1959) five bases of power? An empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 106–114.
Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1999). A legitimate case of component analysis of ipsative measures, and partialling the mean as an alternative to ipsatization. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 89–102.
Tenopyr, M. L. (1988). Artifactual reliability of forced-choice scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 749–751.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286.
Tremblay, P. F. & Gardner, R. C. (1996). On the growth of structural equation modeling in psychological journals. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 93–104.
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army.
Wrigley, C. C. & Neuhaus, J. O. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors. American Psychologist, 10, 418–419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original online version of this article was revised due to the retrospective open access order.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, W. Analyzing Ipsative Data in Psychological Research. Behaviormetrika 30, 99–121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.30.99
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.30.99