Skip to main content
Log in

Oblique Promax Rotation Applied to the Solutions in Multiple Correspondence Analysis

  • Published:
Behaviormetrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many approaches to formulate multiple correspondence analysis of multi-item categorical data. A lower-rank approximation approach gives the freedom for the oblique rotation of axes. In the current paper, we apply the oblique rotation of axes to a variable-by-dimension matrix to arrive at simple structure. This matrix is defined in either of two different manners, that is, by treating categories as variables or, alternatively, by treating items as variables. For each of these two options, the standardized inner products between dimensions and variables are used as the elements of the component structure matrix. We adopt a promax method for the oblique rotation. In this method, scores are rotated in such a way that the above matrix is matched with the target matrix obtained from the result of the varimax rotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baseball Magazine Sha (2001). Besuboru rekodo buku 2002 (Baseball record book 2002). Tokyo: Baseball Magazine Sha (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzecri J.-P. (1973). L’analyse des donn’ees: Tome 1, la taxinomie; Tome 2, l’analyse des cor-respondances. Paris: Dunod.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Benzecri J.-P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gifi A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Chichester: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gower J.C., & Hand D.J. (1996). Biplots. London: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre M.J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre M.J. (1988). Correspondence analysis of multivariate categorical data. Biometrika, 75, 457–467.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harman H.H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd edition). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi C. (1952). On the prediction of phenomena from qualitative data and the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematico-statistical point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 3, 69–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiser W.J., & Meulman J.J. (1995). Nonlinear methods for the analysis of homogeneity and heterogeneity. In W.J. Krzanowski (Ed.), Recent advances in descriptive multivariate analysis, pp.51–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson A.E., & White P.O. (1964). PROMAX: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibaraki T., & Fukushima M. (1991). FORTRAN 77 saitekika puroguramingu (FORTRAN 77 optimization programming). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten (in Japanese with Fortran).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich R.L., & Sampson P.F. (1966). Rotation for simple loadings. Psychometrika, 31, 313–323.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe I.T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd Edition). New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiers H.A.L. (1991). Simple structure in component analysis techniques for mixtures of qualitative and quantitative variables. Psychometrika, 56, 197–212.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kiers H.A.L. (1993). A comparison of techniques for finding components with simple structure. In C.M. Cuadras & C.R. Rao, Multivariate analysis: Future directions 2, pp.67–86. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebart L. (1975). L’orientation du d’epouillement de certaines enquêetes par l’analyse des correspondances multiples. Consommation, 2, 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebart L., Morineau A., & Warwick K.M. (1984). Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis: Correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meulman J.J., Heiser W.J., & SPSS Inc. (1999). SPSS categories 10.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, T (1999). Kategorikaru deta no shuseibun bunseki no shinri keiryou gaku teki kenkyu, Heisei 9–10 nendo kagaku kenkyuhi hojokin kenkyuseika houkokusho (Psychometric studies on principal component analysis of categorical data, The report of the researches in 1998–1999 supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture) (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, T (2001). Shinri sokuteika no tachiba kara mita shitsuteki deta no suryouka (Quantification of qualitative data viewed from the standpoint of a psychometrician). In The proceeding of the 29th annual meeting of the Behaviormetric Society of Japan, pp.24–27. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishisato S. (1980), Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Ogasawara H. (1997). Sousenkei moderu ni okeru inshi kaiten (Factor rotation in bilinear models). Otaru-syouka-diagaku, Shougaku Toukyu (Economic Review, Otrau University of Commerce), 47, 181–206 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi R. (1999). Application of the varimax rotation to Hayashi’s second method of quantification. Bulletin of the Computational Statistics of Japan, 12, 35–44 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge J.M.F. (1993). Least squares optimization in multivariate analysis. Leiden: DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge J.M.F., & Kiers H.A.L. (1996). Optimality criteria for principal component analysis and generalizations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 335–345.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge J.M.F., Knol D.L., & Kiers H.A.L. (1988). A treatment of the orthomax rotation family in terms of diagonalization, and a re-examination of a singular value approach to varimax rotation. Computational Statistics Quarterly, 3, 207–217.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus M., & Young F.W. (1985). An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data. Psychometrika, 50, 91–119.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson W.S., (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoda H. (2000). Kyoubunsan kouzou bunseki, ouyouhen—Kouzou houteishiki moderingu (Co-variance structure analysis, applications: Structural equation modeling). Tokyo: Asakura Shoten (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Velden M., & Kiers H.A.L. (2003). An application of rotation in correspondence analysis. In H. Yanai A. Okada K. Shigemasu Y. Kano & J.J. Meulman (Eds.), Recent developments in psychometrics, pp.471–478. Tokyo: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Rijckevorsel J.L.A., & de Leeuw J. (1988). Component and correspondence analysis: Dimension reduction by functional approximation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanai H. (1994). Tahenryou deta kaisekihou—Riron to ouyou (Multivariate data analysis: The-ory and applications). Tokyo: Asakura Shoten (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanai H., Shigemasu K., Mayekawa S., & Ichikawa M. (1990). Inshi bunseki—Sono riron to houhou (Factor analysis: Theory and methods). Tokyo: Asakura Shoten (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kohei Adachi.

About this article

Cite this article

Adachi, K. Oblique Promax Rotation Applied to the Solutions in Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Behaviormetrika 31, 1–12 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.31.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.31.1

Key Words and Phrases

Navigation