Skip to content
Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 10, 2013

Attitudes towards service robots in domestic environments: The role of personality characteristics, individual interests, and demographic variables

  • Natalia Reich EMAIL logo and Friederike Eyssel EMAIL logo

Abstract

The majority of EU citizens report a positive view about robots in general according to recent EU-level survey data. However, does this also hold true for attitudes towards service robots in particular? To investigate this research question, we conducted a survey on a representative sample from Germany. Importantly, we explored the role of demographic variables, interest in science and technology, and personality traits associated with psychological anthropomorphism in determining perceived acceptance of service robots in everyday life. Overall, attitudes towards service robots turned out to be relatively positive. Moreover, demographic variables (e.g., gender, occupation), interest in science and technology, and dispositional correlates of anthropomorphism had a significant impact on attitudes towards such assistive technology.

References

[1] International Federation of Robotics, “Service robots [Provisional definition of service robots],” n.d., Retrieved from http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/Search in Google Scholar

[2] International Federation of Robotics Statistical Department, “World robotics 2012 service robots,” 2012, Retrieved from http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/statistics/Search in Google Scholar

[3] N. Epley, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo, “On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism,” Psychological Re-view, vol. 114, pp. 864-886, 2007.10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] A. Waytz, C. K. Morewedge, N. Epley, G. Monteleone, J. H. Gao, and J. T. Cacioppo, “Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism,” Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, vol. 99, pp. 410-435, 2010.10.1037/a0020240Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] K. Zawieksa, B. R. Duffy, and A. Sprónska, “Understanding anthropomorphisation in social robotics,” Pomiary AutomatykaRobotyka, vol. 11, pp. 78-82, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[6] F. Eyssel and N. Reich,“Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots). On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism,” Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2013), pp. 121-122, 2013.10.1109/HRI.2013.6483531Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. T. Cacioppo, R. E. Petty, and C. F. Kao, “The efficient assessment of need for cognition,” Journal of Personality Assess-ment, vol. 48, pp. 306-307, 1984.10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] K. O. Arras and D. Cerqui, “Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000-people survey,” Technical Report Nr. 0605-001, Autonomous Systems Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), pp. 1-38, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[9] I. H. Kuo, J. M. Rabindran, E. Broadbent, Y. I. Lee, N. Kerse, R. M. Q. Stafford, and B. A. MacDonald, “Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots,” Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Toyama, Japan, pp. 214-219, 2009.10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326292Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Meyer, Mein Freund der Roboter. Servicerobotik für ältere Menschen - eine Antwort auf den demografischen Wandel [My friend the robot. Service robotics for elderly - an answer to the demographic change?], Berlin: VDE, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. Broadbent, I. Kuo, Y. I. Lee, J. Rabindran, N. Kerse, R. M. Q. Stafford, and B. A. MacDonald, “Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 16, pp. 608-613, 2010.10.1089/tmj.2009.0171Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] C. Bartneck, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and T. Nomura, “The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitudes towards robots,” AI & Society - The Journal of Human-Centred Systems, vol. 21, pp. 217-230, 2007.10.1007/s00146-006-0052-7Search in Google Scholar

[13] T. Nomura, T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, and K. Kato, “Prediction of human behavior in human-robot interaction using psychological scales for anxiety and negative attitudes toward robots,” IEEE Transac-tions on Robotics, vol. 24, pp. 442-451, 2008.10.1109/TRO.2007.914004Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. Nomura, T. Kanda, and T. Suzuki, “Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction,” AI & Society - The Journal of Human-CentredSystems, vol. 20, pp.138-150, 2006.10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Nomura, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and K. Kato, “Measurement of anxiety toward robots,” Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 372-377, 2006.10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314462Search in Google Scholar

[16] European Commission, “Public attitudes towards robots. Special Eurobarometer 382,” September 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[17] K. Olsen, C. Camp, and D. Fuller, “Curiosity and need for cognition,” Psychological Reports, vol. 54, pp. 71-74, 1984.10.2466/pr0.1984.54.1.71Search in Google Scholar

[18] H. Bless, M. Wänke, G. Bohner, R.F. Fellhauer, and N. Schwarz, “Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [Need for cognition: a scale for measuring commitment and joy in problem solving],” Zeitschriftfür Sozialpsychologie, vol. 25, pp. 147-154, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. M. Burger and H. M. Cooper, “The desirability for control,” Mo-tivation and Emotion, vol. 3, pp. 381-393, 1979.10.1007/BF00994052Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. M. Burger, “Desire for control and achievement-related behaviors,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 48, pp. 1520-1533, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

[21] J. M. Burger and L. T. Hemans, “Desire for control and the use of attribution processes,” Journal of Personality, vol. 56, pp. 531-546, 1988.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00901.xSearch in Google Scholar

[22] R. F. Baumeister and M. R. Leary, “The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 117, pp. 497-529, 1995.10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497Search in Google Scholar

[23] J. K. Maner, C. N. DeWall, R. F. Baumeister, and M. Schaller, “Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”,” Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, vol. 92, pp. 42-55, 2007.10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] K. M. Lee, Y. Jung, J. Kim, and S. R. Kim, “Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human-robot interaction,” International Journal ofHuman-Computer Studies, vol. 64, pp. 962-973, 2006.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[25] N. Epley, A. Waytz, S. Akalis, and J. T. Cacioppo, “When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism,” SocialCognition, vol. 26, pp.143-155, 2008.10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143Search in Google Scholar

[26] N. Epley, S. Akalis, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo, “Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds,” Psycho-logical Science, vol.19, pp.114-120, 2008.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] D. Hanson, “Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots,” Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Workshop toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, Stresa, Italy, pp. 39-42, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[28] C. Bartneck, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita, “My robotic Doppelgänger - A critical look at the uncanny valley,” Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, pp. 269-276, 2009.10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326351Search in Google Scholar

[29] C. Jacobi, J. Brand-Jacobi, J. Westenhöfer, and A. Weddige- Diedrichs, “ZurErfassung von Selbstkontrolle: Entwicklungeinerdeutschsprachigen Form des Self-Control-Schedule und der Desirability of Control Scale [The measurement of self-control: Development of a German-language version of the self-controlschedule and desirability of control scale],” Diagnostica, vol. 32, pp. 229-247, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

[30] N. Döring and J. Bortz, “PsychometrischeEinsamkeitsforschung: Deutsche Neukonstruktion der UCLA-Loneliness Scale [Psychometric loneliness research: German new construction of the UCLA loneliness scale],” Diagnostica, vol. 39, pp. 224-239, 1993. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-12-10
Published in Print: 2013-12-1

This content is open access.

Downloaded on 1.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/pjbr-2013-0014/html
Scroll to top button