Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter September 15, 2009

Influence of quantum dots shape approximation on size reconstructed from atomic force microscopy measurements

  • T. Piotrowski EMAIL logo and S. Sikorski
From the journal Opto-Electronics Review

Abstract

In this work we discuss the influence of the atomic force microscopy (AFM) probe tip geometry and the object — quantum dot form on the quantum dots dimension in the growth plane reconstructed from the AFM measurements. It is shown that ignoring the geometry of the probe tip and the quantum dot leads to significant differences between dimensions obtained from the AFM measurements and the real dimensions. Inaccuracies in QD size determination of the nano-objects from AFM measurements are defined.

[1] J.P. McCaffrey, M.D. Robertson, S. Fafard, Z.R. Wasilewski, E.M. Griswold, and L.D. Madsen, “Determination of the size, shape, and composition of indium-flushed self-assembled quantum dots by transmission electron microscopy”, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 2272–2277 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.128722610.1063/1.1287226Search in Google Scholar

[2] M.C. Xu, Y. Temko, T. Suzuki, and K. Jacobi, “Shape transition of InAs quantum dots on GaAs(001)”, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 083525-1–8 (2005). 10.1063/1.2076431Search in Google Scholar

[3] T. Suzuki, Y. Temko, and K. Jacobi, “Shape of InAs quantum dots grown on the GaAs (113) B surface”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4744–4746 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.148908710.1063/1.1489087Search in Google Scholar

[4] H.Z. Song, Y. Nakata, Y. Okada, T. Miyazawa, T. Ohshima, M. Takatsu, M. Kawabe, and N. Yokoyama, “Growth process of quantum dots precisely controlled by an AFM — assisted technique” Physica E21, 625–630 (2004). 10.1016/j.physe.2003.11.092Search in Google Scholar

[5] T. Piotrowski and M. Kaczmarczyk, “Statistical methods of determining the QD dimensions based on atomic force microscopy measurements”, J. Mater Sci.-Mater. El. 19, S347–S350 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10854-008-9656-710.1007/s10854-008-9656-7Search in Google Scholar

[6] D. Keller, “Reconstruction of STM and AFM images distorted by finite-size tips”, Surf. Sci. 253, 353–364 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(91)90606-S10.1016/0039-6028(91)90606-SSearch in Google Scholar

[7] K. Shiramine, S. Muto, T. Shibayama, N. Sakaguchi, H. Ichinose, T. Kozaki, S. Sato, Y. Nakata, N. Yokoyama, and M. Taniwaki, “Tip artifact in atomic force microscopy observations of InAs quantum dots grown in Stranski-Krastanow mode”, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 033527 (2007). Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Ricci and P.C. Braga, “Recognizing and avoiding artifacts in AFM imaging”, in Atomic Force Microscopy: Biomedical Methods and Applications, Vol. 242, pp. 25–37, Springer, 2003. 10.1385/1-59259-647-9:25Search in Google Scholar

[9] Y. Sun and J.H.L. Pang, “AFM image reconstruction for deformation measurements by digital image correlation”, Nanotechnology 17, 933 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/17/4/01610.1088/0957-4484/17/4/016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] T. Machleidt, R. Kastner, and K.H. Franke, “Reconstruction and geometric assessment of AFM tips”, in Nanoscale Calibration Standards and Methods, pp. 295–310, Wiley-VCH, 2006. 10.1002/3527606661.ch22Search in Google Scholar

[11] G. Dahlen, M. Osborn, H.Ch. Liu, R. Jain, W. Foreman, and J.R. Osborne, “Critical dimension AFM tip characterization and image reconstruction applied to the 45-nm node”, Proc. SPIE 6152, 61522R (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.65684810.1117/12.656848Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2009-9-15
Published in Print: 2009-9-1

© 2009 SEP, Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 24.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11772-008-0066-4/html
Scroll to top button