Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 27, 2014

Modeling the risk of groundwater contamination using modified DRASTIC and GIS in Amman-Zerqa Basin, Jordan

  • Abdulla Al-Rawabdeh EMAIL logo , Nadhir Al-Ansari , Ahmed Al-Taani , Fadi Al-Khateeb and Sven Knutsson
From the journal Open Engineering

Abstract

Amman-Zerqa Basin (AZB) is the second largest groundwater basin in Jordan with the highest abstraction rate, where more than 28% of total abstractions in Jordan come from this basin. In view of the extensive reliance on this basin, contamination of AZB groundwater became an alarming issue. This paper develops a Modified DRASTIC model by combining the generic DRASTIC model with land use activities and lineament density for the study area with a new model map that evaluates pollution potential of groundwater resources in AZB to various types of pollution. It involves the comparison of modified DRASTIC model that integrates nitrate loading along with other DRASTIC parameters. In addition, parameters to account for differences in land use and lineaments density were added to the DRASTIC model to reflect their influences on groundwater pollution potential. The DRASTIC model showed only 0.08% (3 km2) of the AZB is situated in the high vulnerability area and about 30% of the basin is located in the moderately vulnerable zone (mainly in central basin). After modifying the DRASTIC to account for lineament density, about 87% of the area was classified as having low pollution potential and no vulnerability class accounts for about 5.01% of the AZB area. The moderately susceptible zone covers 7.83% of the basin’s total area and the high vulnerability area constitutes 0.13%. The vulnerability map based on land use revealed that about 71% of the study area has low pollution potential and no vulnerability area accounts for about 0.55%, whereas moderate pollution potential zone covers an area of 28.35% and the high vulnerability class constitutes 0.11% of AZB. The final DRASTIC model which combined all DRASTIC models shows that slightly more than 89% of the study area falls under low pollution risk and about 6% is considered areas with no vulnerability. The moderate pollution risk potential covers an area of about 4% of AZB and the high vulnerability class constitutes 0.21% of the basin. The results also showed that an area of about 1761 km2 of bare soils is of low vulnerability, whereas about 28 km2 is moderately vulnerable. For agriculture and the urban sector, approximately 1472 km2 are located within the low vulnerability zone and about 144 km2 are moderately vulnerable, which together account for about 8% of the total agriculture and urban area. These areas are contaminated with human activities, particularly from the agriculture. Management of land use must be considered when changing human or agricultural activity patterns in the study area, to reduce groundwater vulnerability in the basin. The results also showed that the wells with the highest nitrate levels (81–107 mg/l) were located in high vulnerable areas and are attributed to leakage from old sewage water.

[1] Villeneuve J., Banton O. and Lafrance P., A problematic approach for the groundwater vulnerability to contamination by pesticides: the VULPEST model. Ecological Modeling 51, 1990, 47–58 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(90)90057-N10.1016/0304-3800(90)90057-NSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Al-Adamant R., Foster I., and Baban S., Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, Remote sensing and DRASTIC, Applied Geography 23(4), 2003, 303–324 10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.007Search in Google Scholar

[3] El-Naqa A., Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Using the DRASTIC Model at Russeifa Landfill, Northeast Jordan, Environmental Geology 47(1), 2004, 51–62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1126-910.1007/s00254-004-1126-9Search in Google Scholar

[4] Al Kuisi M., El-Naqa A. and Hammouri N., Vulnerability mapping of shallow groundwater aquifer using SINTACS model in the Jordan Valley area, Jordan, Environmental Geology 50, 2006, 645–650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0238-910.1007/s00254-006-0238-9Search in Google Scholar

[5] Werz H. and Hötz H., Groundwater Risk Intensity Mapping in Semi-Arid Regions Using Optical Remote Sensing Data as an Additional Tool, Hydrogeology Journal 15(6), 2007, 1031–1049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10040-007-0202-010.1007/s10040-007-0202-0Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hammouri N. and El-Naqa A., GIS based Hydrogeological Vulnerability Mapping of Groundwater Resources in Jerash Area-Jordan, Geofísica Internacional 47(2), 2008, 85–97 10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2008.47.2.70Search in Google Scholar

[7] Awawdeh M. and Jaradat R., Evaluation of Aquifers Vulnerability to Contamination in the Yarmouk Basin, Jordan, Based on DRASTIC Method, Jaradat Arabian Journal of Geosciences 3(3), 2010, 273–282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12517-009-0074-910.1007/s12517-009-0074-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] Al-Rawabdeh A., Al-Ansari N. Al-Taani A., and Knutsson S., A GIS-Based Drastic Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Amman-Zerqa Groundwater Basin, Jordan, J. Engineering 5(12), 2013, 490–504 10.4236/eng.2013.55059Search in Google Scholar

[9] Shirazi S., Imran H., and Akib S., GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: A review. Journal of Risk Research 15(8), 2012, 991–1011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.68605310.1080/13669877.2012.686053Search in Google Scholar

[10] Al Hallaq A. and Elaish A., Assessment of aquifer vulnerability to contamination in Khan younis Governorate, Gaza Strip, Palestine, using the DRASTIC model within GIS environment. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 1, 2011, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12517-011-0284-9 10.1007/s12517-011-0284-9Search in Google Scholar

[11] Shamrukh M., Corapcioglu M., Hassona, A. and Fayek A., Modeling the Effect of Chemical Fertilizers on Ground Water Quality in the Nile Valley Aquifer, Egypt. Ground Water 39 2001, 59–67 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb00351.x10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb00351.xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Al-Hanbali A., and Kondoh A., Groundwater vulnerability assessment and evaluation of human activity impact (HAI) within the Dead Sea groundwater basin, Jordan. Hydrogeology Journal 16(3), 2008, 499–510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0280-710.1007/s10040-008-0280-7Search in Google Scholar

[13] Jasem H., Alraggad M., Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability in Azraq Basin Area by a Modified DRASTIC Index. Water Resource and Protection 2, 2010, 944–951 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2010.21111210.4236/jwarp.2010.211112Search in Google Scholar

[14] DOS-Department of Statistics, Estimation of population by Governorate, Department of Statistics, Amman, 2004, www.dos.gov.jo/sdb_pop_e/ehsaat/alsokan/1_2004.htm Search in Google Scholar

[15] Awawdeh M. and Nawafleh A., A GIS-based EPIK model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Irbid Governorate, North Jordan, Jordan Journal of civil Engineering 2(3), 2008 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Obeidat M., Ahmad F., Hammouri N., Massadeh F. and Athamneh F., Assessment of nitrate contamination of karst spring, Bani Kanana, northern Jordan. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geologicas 25, 2008, 426–437 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lee SR., Lee D. H., Choi S. H., Kim W. Y., Lee S. G., Regional groundwater pollution susceptibility analysis using DRASTICsystem and lineament density. The Eighteen International ESRI User Conference, 1998 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ferreira J. and Oliveira J., DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability mapping of Portugal. In Groundwater: an endangered resource Proceedings of theme C of the 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, San Francisco, USA, 1997, 6 Search in Google Scholar

[19] American Public Health Association (APHA), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1998 Search in Google Scholar

[20] WAJ — Water Authority of Jordan, WAJ Internal Files for Groundwater Basins in Jordan, 2006, http://www.mwi.gov.jo/sites/en-us Search in Google Scholar

[21] MOA — Ministry of Agricultural, The soils of Jordan. National soil map and land use project. Hunting Technical Services Ltd. in association with Soil Survey and Land Research Centre. Vol. 2-level 2, main report. Ministry of Agricultural, Amman, Jordan. 1994 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Salameh L., Assessment of land use /cover changes in the Zerqa basin using remote sensing and Markove model, Faculty of graduate studies, University of Jordan, Amman.(unpublished M.Sc. thesis, 2006 Search in Google Scholar

[23] MacDonald M. and Partners in Cooperation with Hunting Geological Surveys Limited: East Bank Water Resources, East Bank Water Resources, Vol. 5, Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, 1965, 512 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Salameh E. and Udluft P., The Hydrodynamic Pattern of the Central Part of Jordan, Geologisches Jahrbuch Reihe C 38, 1985, 39–55 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Bender F., Geology of Jordan, Contributions to the Regional Geology of the Earth, Supplementary Edition of Vol. 7, 196, Berline-Stuttgart (Gebruder Borntraeger), 1974 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Al Mahamid J., Integration of Water Resources of the Upper Aquifer in Amman-Zerqa Basin Based on Mathematical Modeling and GIS, Jordan, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Jordan, Amman, 2005 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Napolitano P. and Fabbri A., Single-Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Using DRASTIC and SINTACS, Proceedings of the Vienna conference on Hydro GIS 96: Application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management, IAHS 235, 1996, 559–566. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Aller L., Bennett T., Lehr J. H., Petty R. J. and Hackett G., DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings, US Environmental Protection Agency Report 600/2-87/035, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1987 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Vrba J. and Zoporozec A., Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. IAH International Contribution for Hydrogeology 16, 1994, Hannover7, Heise, 131 Search in Google Scholar

[30] US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), (Handbook: Groundwater and Wellhead Protection). US EPA Report No. EPA/625/R-94/001, Washington, DC, 1994, 239 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Rosen. L., A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions, Ground Water 32(2), 1994, 278–285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00642.x10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00642.xSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Babiker M. Mohammed T. Hiyama and Kato K., A GIS-Based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kakmigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan, Science of the Total Environmental 3 45(1–3), 2005, 127–140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.00510.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.11.005Search in Google Scholar

[33] Anwar M., Prem C. and Rao V. B., Evaluation of Groundwater Potential of Musi River Catchment Using DRASTIC Index Model, In: Venkateshwar, B. R. Ram, M. K. Sarala C. S. and Raju, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydrology and Watershed Management, B. S. Publishers, Hyderabad, 2003, 399–409 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Chandrashekhar H., Adiga S., Lakshminarayana V., Jagdeesha C. J. and Nataraj, C., A Case Study Using the Model ‘DRASTIC’ for Assessment of Groundwater Pollution Potential, Proceedings of the ISRS National Symposium on Remote Sensing Applications for Natural Resources, Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Bagalore, 19–21 June 1999, 414–417 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Dixon B., Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping: A GIS and Fuzzy Rule Based Integrated Tool, Applied Geography, 2005, 25(4), 327–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.07.00210.1016/j.apgeog.2005.07.002Search in Google Scholar

[36] Margane M., Management and Protection and Sustainable Use of Groundwater and Soil Resources in the Arab Region, Volume 4: Guideline for Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping and Risk Assessment for Susceptibility of Groundwater Resources to Contamination, Project No. 1996.2189.7, Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Bonn, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Shahid S., A Study of Groundwater Pollution Vulnerability Using DRASTIC/GIS, west Bengal, India, Journal of Environmental Hydrology 8(11–12), 2000, 124 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Rundquist A., Peters D. Liping Rodekohr D., Ehrman R. and Murray G., State-Wide Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment in Nebraska Using the DRASTIC/GIS Model, Geo-Cartography International 6(2), 1991, 51–58 10.1080/10106049109354307Search in Google Scholar

[39] O’Leary D., Freidman J., and Pohn H., Lineaments, linear, lineation-some proposed new standards for old terms. Geological Society of America Bulletin 87, 1976, 1463–1469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<1463:LLLSPN>2.0.CO;210.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<1463:LLLSPN>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[40] Lattman H. and Parizek R. Relationship between fracture traces and the occurrence of ground water in carbonate rocks. Journal of Hydrology 2, 1964, 73–91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(64)90019-810.1016/0022-1694(64)90019-8Search in Google Scholar

[41] Mabee S. Hardcastle K. and Wise D., A method of collecting and analyzing lineaments for regionalscale fractured-bedrock aquifer studies, Groundwater 32(6), 1994, 884–894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00928.x10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00928.xSearch in Google Scholar

[42] Hardcastle K., Photolineament factor: a new computer-aided method for remotely sensing the degree to which bedrock is fractured, Photogramm, Eng Remote Sensing 61(6), 1995, 739–747 Search in Google Scholar

[43] Magowe M. and Carr R., Relationship between lineaments and ground water occurrence in western Botswana, Ground Water 37(2), 1999, 282–286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00985.x10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00985.xSearch in Google Scholar

[44] Fernandes D. and Rudolph A., The influence of Cenozoic tectonics on the groundwater production capacity of fractured zones: A case study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hydrogeology Journal 9, 2001, 151–167 10.1007/s100400000103Search in Google Scholar

[45] MOCT (Ministry of Construction and Transportation) and KOWACO (Korea Water Resources Corporation), The handbook of drawing and management of hydrogeological map, MOCT, Korea, 1998, 456 Search in Google Scholar

[46] Merchant G., GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTC model, Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 60, 1994, 1117–1127 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Secunda S., Collin M. and Melloul A. J., Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using a Composite Model Combining DRASTIC with Extensive Land Use in Israel’s Sharon Region, Journal of Environmental Management 54(1), 1998, 39–57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.1998.022110.1006/jema.1998.0221Search in Google Scholar

[48] Chowdany V., Rao N. and Samara P., Decision support framework for assessment of non-point source pollution of groundwater in large irrigation projects, Agric Water Manag 75, 2005, 194–225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.12.01310.1016/j.agwat.2004.12.013Search in Google Scholar

[49] Mac Quarrie K., Sudicky E., and Roberston W., Numerical simulation of a fine-grained denitrification layer for removing septic system nitrate from shallow groundwater, J Hydrol 52, 2001, 29–55 10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00152-8Search in Google Scholar

[50] Postma D., Boesen C., Kristiansen H. and Larsen F., Nitrate reduction in an unconfined sandy aquifer: water chemistry, reduction processes and geochemical modeling. Water Resource Res 527, 1991, 45–202 10.1029/91WR00989Search in Google Scholar

[51] Baker L., Introduction to non-point source pollution in the United States and prospects for wetland use, Ecol Eng 1, 1992, 1–26 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-8574(92)90023-U10.1016/0925-8574(92)90023-USearch in Google Scholar

[52] Hubbard R. and Sheridan J., Nitrates in groundwater in the southeastern USA. In; Adriano, D., Iskadar A., Murarka I. editors. Contamination of groundwaters. Northwood, United Kingdom, Science Reviews, 1994, 45–303 10.1201/9781003070412-12Search in Google Scholar

[53] Ford M. and Tellam J., Source, type and extent of inorganic contamination within the Birmingham urban aquifer system, UK, J. Hydrol. 156, 1994, 101–135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90074-410.1016/0022-1694(94)90074-4Search in Google Scholar

[54] Lerner D., Yang Y., Barrett M. and Tellam J., Loading of non-agricultural nitrogen in urban groundwater. In: Ellis, J.B. (Ed.), Impacts of urban growth on surface and groundwater quality, IAHS publ. No. 259. IAHS Press, 1999, 117–123 Search in Google Scholar

[55] Seiler R., Combined use of 15N and 18O of nitrate and 11B to evaluate nitrate contamination in groundwater, Applied Geochemistry 20, 2005, 1626–1636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.04.00710.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.04.007Search in Google Scholar

[56] Navarro M. Carbonell, Evaluation of groundwater contamination beneath an urban environment: The Besòs river basin (Barcelona, Spain). Journal of Environmental Management 85, 2007, 259–269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.08.02110.1016/j.jenvman.2006.08.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] World Health Organization (WHO), Drinking water quality-water, Background document for preparation of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality, Geneva, 4th ed., 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[58] Jordanian Drinking Water Standards JS286/1997, http://ocid.nacse.org/rewab/docs/JS286_Drinking_Water_Standards_1997_en.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-7-27
Published in Print: 2014-9-1

© 2014 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s13531-013-0163-0/html
Scroll to top button