skip to main content
10.3115/981732.981751dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Verbs semantics and lexical selection

Published:27 June 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper will focus on the semantic representation of verbs in computer systems and its impact on lexical selection problems in machine translation (MT). Two groups of English and Chinese verbs are examined to show that lexical selection must be based on interpretation of the sentences as well as selection restrictions placed on the verb arguments. A novel representation scheme is suggested, and is compared to representations with selection restrictions used in transfer-based MT. We see our approach as closely aligned with knowledge-based MT approaches (KBMT), and as a separate component that could be incorporated into existing systems. Examples and experimental results will show that, using this scheme, inexact matches can achieve correct lexical selection.

References

  1. DORR, B. J. (1990). Lexical Conceptual Structure and machine Translation. PhD thesis, MIT. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. GOODMAN, K. & NIRENBURG, S., editors (1991). The KBMT Project: A Case Study in Knowledge-Based Machine Translation. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. HOBBS, J. (1986). Overview of the TACITUS Project. Computational Lingustics, 12(3). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. JACKENDOFF, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. KUROHASHI, S. & NAGAO, M. (1992). Dynamic Programming Method for Analyzing Conjunctive Structures in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-92), Nantes, France. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. LANGACKER, R. W. (1988). An overview of cognitive grammar. In RUDZKA-OSTYN, B., editor, Topics in Cognitive Grammar. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. LEVIN, B. (1992). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Technical report, Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University, 2016 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. NIRENBURG, S., CARBONELL, J., TOMITA, M., & GOODMAN, K. (1992). Machine Translation: A Knowledge-Based Approach. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. RAVIN, Y. (1990). Lexical Semantics without The-matic Roles. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. RESNIK, P. (1993). Selection and Information: A Class-Based Approach to Lexical Relationships. PhD thesis, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of Pennsylvania. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. WU, D. (1991). On Serial verb Construction. PhD thesis, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of Maryland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Verbs semantics and lexical selection

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image DL Hosted proceedings
          ACL '94: Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
          June 1994
          353 pages

          Publisher

          Association for Computational Linguistics

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 June 1994

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate85of443submissions,19%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader