Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 28, 2018

Comparison of grey wolf, whale, water cycle, ant lion and sine-cosine algorithms for the optimization of a vehicle engine connecting rod

Optimierung eines Fahrzeugmotorpleuels mittels des Grey-Wolf-Algorithmus
  • Betül Sultan Yıldız and Ali Rıza Yıldız
From the journal Materials Testing

Abstract

The product design process has a very important effect on product costs. It aims to develop products that are able to compete by achieving an optimum design in the product design process. This research presents the first application in the literature of the grey wolf, whale, water cycle, ant lion and sine-cosine optimization algorithms for the optimum design of vehicle components. In this study, the optimal structural model of a vehicle connecting rod was determined. In the optimization process, various design alternatives were created by using the latin hypercube method. Stress analysis was performed for each of these designs. According to the generated responses, equations for objective and constraint functions were obtained. The optimization problem was solved using the above mentioned algorithms which have been newly developed in the literature, resulting in optimum connection rod design. The results demonstrate that the grey wolf, whale, water cycle, ant lion and sine-cosine algorithms are very important options in optimizing design and manufacturing optimization problems.

Kurzfassung

Der Designprozess von technischen Produkten hat erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Kosten der Produkte. Es besteht das Ziel, Produkte zu entwickeln, die Wettbewerbsmöglichkeiten haben, indem ein optimales Design im Entwicklungsprozess erzielt wird. In der diesem Beitrag zugrunde liegenden Studie wurde das optimale strukturelle Modell einer Pleuelstange für einen Fahrzeugmotor ermittelt. In dem Optimierungsprozess wurden fünfzig verschiedene Designalternativen kreiert, indem das Latin-Hypercube-Verfahren angewandt wurde und eine Spannungsanalyse für jedes dieser Designs durchgeführt wurde. Entsprechend der so generierten Antworten wurden Gleichungen für die Ziel- und Nebenbedingungsfunktion ermittelt. Die Optimierungsaufgabe wurde mittels des Grey-Wolf-Optimierungsalgorithmus gelöst, der kürzlich aus der Literatur entnommen wurde und damit das optimale Design des Pleuels erzielt.


* Correspondence Address, Prof. Dr. Ali Rıza Yıldız, Department of Automotive Engineering, Uludağ University, Görükle, Bursa, Turkey, E-mail:

Dr. Betül Sultan Yıldız has completed her BSc and MSc at the Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. She has received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Bursa Technical University, Turkey. Her research interests are vehicle design, meta-heuristic optimisation algorithms and applications to industrial problems, structural optimisation methods.

Prof. Ali Rıza Yıldız is a Professor in the D epartment of Automotive Engineering, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. He worked in the field of multi-component topology optimization of structures as Research Associate at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. Furthermore, he worked on a NSF and DOE funded research projects at the Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS), Mississippi State University, USA. In 2015, he has been a winner of TÜBA-GEBİP Young Scientist Outstanding Achievement Award given by the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA). He also received METU (Middle East Technical University) Prof. Mustafa N. Parlar Foundation Research Incentive Award in 2015. In 2017, The TUBITAK Incentive Award, given to scientists who are under the age of 40 and who have proved to have the necessary qualifications to contribute to science in the future at an international level, has been given to Professor Dr. Ali Rıza Yildiz. His research interests are finite element analysis of automobile components, lightweight design, composite materials, vehicle design, vehicle crashworthiness, shape and topology optimization of vehicle components, meta-heuristic optimization techniques and sheet metal forming. He has been serving as a technical consultant to R&D Projects of Automobile Factories in Bursa, Turkey.


References

1 B. S. Yildiz , H.Lekesiz, A. R.Yildiz: Structural design of vehicle components using gravitational search and charged system search algorithms, Materials Testing, 58 (2016), No. 1, pp. 7981, 10.3139/120.110819Search in Google Scholar

2 A. R. Yildiz , K.Saitou: Topology synthesis of multicomponent structural assemblies in continuum domains, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design133 (2011), No. 1, pp. 19, 10.1115/1.4003038Search in Google Scholar

3 S. Karagöz , A. R.Yildiz: A comparison of recent metaheuristic algorithms for crashworthiness optimisation of vehicle thin-walled tubes considering sheet metal forming effects, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 73 (2017), No. 1–3, pp. 179188, 10.1504/IJVD.2017.082593Search in Google Scholar

4 S. Mirjalili , S. M.Mirjalili, A.Lewis: Grey Wolf Optimizer, Advances in Engineering Software69 (2014) pp. 4661, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007Search in Google Scholar

5 S. Mirjalili , A.Lewis: The whale optimization algorithm, Advances in Engineering Software95 (2016) pp. 5167, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.00Search in Google Scholar

6 H. Eskandar , A.Sadollah, A. Bahreininejad, M.Hamdi: Water cycle algorithm – A novel metaheuristic optimization method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems, Computers and Structures110–111 (2012) pp. 151166, 1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.010Search in Google Scholar

7 S. Mirjalili : Ant lion optimizer, Advances in Engineering Software83 (2015) pp. 8098, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010Search in Google Scholar

8 S. Mirjalili : SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems, Knowledge-Based System96 (2016), pp. 120133, 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022Search in Google Scholar

9 A. R. Yildiz : Comparison of evolutionary-based optimization algorithms for structural design optimization, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence28 (2013) No. 1, pp. 327333, 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.014Search in Google Scholar

10 D. Gopinatha , Ch. V.Sushma: Design and optimization of four wheeler connecting rod using finite element analysis, Materials Today: Proceedings2 (2015) pp. 22912299, 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.267Search in Google Scholar

11 A. R. Yildiz : Optimal structural design of vehicle components using topology design and optimization, Materials Testing50 (2008), No. 4, pp. 224228, 10.3139/120.100880Search in Google Scholar

12 E. Acar , K. N.Solanki: Improving accuracy of vehicle crashworthiness response predictions using ensemble of metamodels, International Journal of Crashworthiness14 (2009), pp. 4961, 10.1080/13588260802462419Search in Google Scholar

13 K. Hamza , K.Saitou: Automated vehicle structural crashworthiness design via a crash mode matching algorithm. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design133 (2011), pp. 0110031–011003-9, 10.1115/1.4003037Search in Google Scholar

14 A. Kaveh , S.Talatahari: Charged system search for optimal design of frame structures, Applied Soft Computing12 (2012), pp. 382393, 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.034Search in Google Scholar

15 E. Rashedi , H.Nezamabadi-pour, S.Saryazdi: GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm, Information Sciences17 (2009), No.9, pp. 22322248, 10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004Search in Google Scholar

16 A. R. Yildiz : Optimal structural design of vehicle components using topology design and optimization, Materials Testing50 (2008), No. 4, pp. 224228, 10.3139/120.100880Search in Google Scholar

17 P. Zhu , Y.Zhang, G. L.Chen: Metamodel-based lightweight design of an automotive front-body structure using robust optimization, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering223 (2009), No. 9, pp. 11231133, 10.1243/09544070JAUTO1045Search in Google Scholar

18 A. R. Yildiz : A novel particle swarm optimization approach for product design and manufacturing. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology40 (2009), pp. 61762810.1007/s00170-008-1453-1Search in Google Scholar

19 A. R. Yildiz , N.Kaya, Orhan B.Alankuş, F.Ozturk: Optimal design of vehicle components using topology design and optimization, International Journal of Vehicle Design34 (2004), pp. 387398, 10.1504/IJVD.2004.004064Search in Google Scholar

20 H. J. Soh , J. H.Yoo: Optimal shape design of a brake calliper for squeal noise reduction considering system instability, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering224 (2010), No. 7, pp. 909925, 10.1243/09544070JAUTO1385Search in Google Scholar

21 N. Pholdee , S.Bureerat: Hybridisation of real-code population-based incremental learning and differential evolution for multiobjective design of trusses, Information Sciences223 (2013), pp. 136152, 10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.008Search in Google Scholar

22 J. K. Kim , Y. J.Kim, W. H.Yang, Y. C.Park, K. H.Lee: Structural design of an outer tie rod for a passenger car, International Journal of Automotive Technology12 (2011), pp. 375381, 10.1007/s12239-011-0044-6Search in Google Scholar

23 H. S. Park , X.P: Dang: Structural optimization based on CAD/CAE integration and metamodeling techniques, Computer-Aided Design42 (2010), pp. 889902, 10.1016/j.cad.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

24 H. A. Gandomi : Interior Search Algorithm (ISA): A novel approach for global Optimization, ISA Transactions53 (2014), pp. 11681183, 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.03.018Search in Google Scholar

25 B. S. Yildiz , A. R.Yildiz: Moth-flame optimization algorithm to determine optimal machining parameters in manufacturing processes, Materials Testing, 59 (2017), No. 5, pp. 425429, 10.3139/120.111024Search in Google Scholar

26 A. R. Yildiz , E.Kurtuluş, E.Demirci, B. S.Yildiz, S.Karagöz: Optimization of thin-wall structures using hybrid gravitational search and Nelder-Mead algorithm, Materials Testing, 58 (2016), No. 1, pp. 7578, 10.3139/120.110823Search in Google Scholar

27 N. Pholdee , S.Bureerat, A. R.Yildiz: Hybrid real-code population-based incremental learning and differential evolution for many-objective optimisation of an automotive floor-frame, International Journal of Vehicle Design73 (2017), No. 1–3, pp. 2053, 10.1504/IJVD.2017.082578Search in Google Scholar

28 M. Kiani , A. R.Yildiz: A comparative study of non-traditional methods for vehicle crashworthiness and NVH Optimization, Archive and Computational Methods Engineering23 (2016), pp. 723734, 10.1007/s11831-015-9155-ySearch in Google Scholar

29 B.S. Yildiz : Natural frequency optimization of vehicle components using the interior search algorithm, Materials Testing, 59 (2017), No: 5, pp. 45645810.3139/120.111018Search in Google Scholar

30 A. R. Yildiz : A new hybrid particle swarm optimization approach for structural design optimization in the automotive industry, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering226 (2012), No. 10, pp. 13401351, 10.1177/0954407012443636Search in Google Scholar

31 B.S. Yildiz : A comparative investigation of eight recent population-based optimisation algorithms for mechanical and structural design problems, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 73 (2017), No. 1–3, pp. 20821810.1504/IJVD.2017.10003412Search in Google Scholar

32 A.R. Yildiz , F.Öztürk: Hybrid taguchi-harmony search approach for shape optimization, In: GeemZ (ed) Recent advances in Harmony search algorithm, pp. 8998, Springer, Berlin, 2010Search in Google Scholar

33 E. Demirci , A.R.Yildiz: Lightweight design of vehicle energy absorbers using steel, aluminum and magnesium alloys, Özer Çınar (Ed.): International Conference on Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sarajevo (2016), pp. 16841691Search in Google Scholar

34 A. R. Yildiz , Optimal structural design of vehicle components using topology design and optimization, Materials Testing, 50 (2008), No. 4, pp. 22422810.3139/120.100880Search in Google Scholar

35 A. R. Yildiz , N.Kaya, N.Öztürk, F.Öztürk: Hybrid approach for genetic algorithm and Taguchi's method based design optimization in the automotive industry, International journal of production research44 (2006), No. 22, pp. 4897491410.1080/00207540600619932Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-02-28
Published in Print: 2018-03-27

© 2018, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 4.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.3139/120.111153/html
Scroll to top button