Abstract
In this paper, a novel hybrid optimization algorithm (H-HHONM) which combines the Nelder-Mead local search algorithm with the Harris hawks optimization algorithm is proposed for solving real-world optimization problems. This paper is the first research study in which both the Harris hawks optimization algorithm and the H-HHONM are applied for the optimization of process parameters in milling operations. The H-HHONM is evaluated using well-known benchmark problems such as the three-bar truss problem, cantilever beam problem, and welded beam problem. Finally, a milling manufacturing optimization problem is solved for investigating the performance of the H-HHONM. Additionally, the salp swarm algorithm is used to solve the milling problem. The results of the H-HHONM for design and manufacturing problems solved in this paper are compared with other optimization algorithms presented in the literature such as the ant colony algorithm, genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization algorithm, simulated annealing algorithm, artificial bee colony algorithm, teaching learning-based optimization algorithm, cuckoo search algorithm, multi-verse optimization algorithm, Harris hawks optimization optimization algorithm, gravitational search algorithm, ant lion optimizer, moth-flame optimization algorithm, symbiotic organisms search algorithm, and mine blast algorithm. The results show that H-HHONM is an effective optimization approach for optimizing both design and manufacturing optimization problems.
References
1 B. S. Yildiz , A. R.Yildiz: Comparison of grey wolf, whale, water cycle, ant lion and sine-cosine algorithms for the optimization of a vehicle engine connecting rod, Materials Testing60 (2018), No. 3, pp. 311–31510.3139/120.111153Search in Google Scholar
2 A. R. Yildiz : A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for turning operations, Information Sciences210 (2012), pp. 81–8810.1016/j.ins.2012.03.005Search in Google Scholar
3 A. R. Yildiz : Cuckoo search algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology64 (2013), No. 1–4, pp. 55–6110.1007/s00170-012-4013-7Search in Google Scholar
4 B. S. Yildiz : Natural frequency optimization of vehicle components using the interior search algorithm, Materials Testing59 (2017), No. 5, pp. 456–45810.3139/120.111018Search in Google Scholar
5 A. R. Yildiz , K.Saitou: Topology Synthesis of Multi-Component Structural Assemblies in Continuum Domains, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design133 (2011), No. 1, 011008-9 10.1115/1.4003038Search in Google Scholar
6 A. R. Yildiz : A new hybrid differential evolution algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations, Applied Soft Computing13 (2013), No. 3, pp. 1561–156610.1016/j.asoc.2011.12.016Search in Google Scholar
7 A. R. Yildiz : Hybrid Taguchi-differential evolution algorithm for optimization of multi-pass turning operations, Applied Soft Computing13 (2013), No. 3, pp. 1433–143910.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.012Search in Google Scholar
8 A. R. Yildiz : A novel hybrid immune algorithm for global optimization in design and manufacturing, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing25 (2009), No. 2, pp. 261–27010.1016/j.rcim.2007.08.002Search in Google Scholar
9 A. R. Yildiz : An effective hybrid immune-hill climbing optimization approach for solving design and manufacturing optimization problems in industry, Journal of Materials Processing Technology209 (2009), No. 6, pp. 2773–278010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.028Search in Google Scholar
10 A. R. Yildiz : A new hybrid artificial bee colony optimization approach for robust optimal design and manufacturing, Applied Soft Computing13 (2013), No. 5, pp. 2906–291210.1016/j.asoc.2012.04.013Search in Google Scholar
11 A. R. Yildiz , F.Ozturk: Hybrid enhanced genetic algorithm to select optimal machining parameters in turning operation, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture220 (2006), No. 12, pp. 2041–205310.1243/09544054JEM570Search in Google Scholar
12 A. R. Yildiz : Comparison of evolutionary based optimization algorithms for structural design optimization, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence26 (2013), No. 1, pp. 327–33310.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.014Search in Google Scholar
13 G. G. Tejani , N.Pholdee, S.Bureerat, D.Prayogo, A. H.Gandomi: Structural optimization using multi-objective modified adaptive symbiotic organisms search, Expert Systems with Applications125 (2019), pp. 425–44110.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.068Search in Google Scholar
14 A. R. Yıldız : A new hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for robust optimal design and manufacturing, Applied Soft Computing13 (2013), pp. 2906–291210.1016/j.asoc.2012.04.013Search in Google Scholar
15 A. R. Yildiz : A new hybrid particle swarm optimization approach for structural design optimization in automotive industry, Journal of Automobile Engineering226 (2012), No. 10, pp. 1340–135110.1177/0954407012443636Search in Google Scholar
16 W. W. Gilbert : Economics of machining theory and practice, American Society Metals, Cleveland, OH, USA (1950)Search in Google Scholar
17 K. Okushima , K.Hitomi: A study of economic machining: an analysis of maximum profit cutting speed, International Journal of Production Research3 (1964), pp. 73–7810.1080/00207546408943046Search in Google Scholar
18 D. S. Ermer : Optimization of the constrained machining economics problem by geometric programming, Journal of Engineering for Industry93 (1971), No. 4, pp. 1067–107210.1115/1.3428044Search in Google Scholar
19 P. G. Petropoulos : Optimal selection of machining rate variable by geometric programming, International Journal of Production Research11 (1973), No. 4, pp. 305–31410.1080/00207547308929981Search in Google Scholar
20 G. Boothroyd , P.Rusek: Maximum rate of profit criteria in machining, Journal of Engineering for Industry98 (1976), No. 1, pp. 217–22010.1115/1.3438822Search in Google Scholar
21 S. K. Hati , S. S.Rao: Determination of optimum machining conditions deterministic probabilistic approaches, Journal of Engineering for Industry98 (1976), No. 1, pp. 354–35910.1115/1.3438853Search in Google Scholar
22 K. Iwata , Y.Murotsu, T.Iwatsubo, F.Oba: Optimization of cutting conditions for multi-pass operations considering probabilistic nature in machining conditions, Journal of Engineering for Industry99 (1977), No. 1, pp. 211–21710.1115/1.3439140Search in Google Scholar
23 B. K. Lambert , A.Walvekar: Optimization of multi pass machining operations, International Journal of Production Research16 (1978), No. 4, pp. 259–26510.1080/00207547808930018Search in Google Scholar
24 M. C. Chen , D. M.Tsai: A simulated annealing approach for optimization of multi-pass turning operations, International Journal of Production Research34 (1996), No. 10, pp. 2803–282510.1080/00207549608905060Search in Google Scholar
25 D. S. Ermer , S.Kromodihardo: Optimization of multi pass turning with constraints, Journal of Engineering for Industry103 (1981), No. 4, pp. 462–46810.1115/1.3184513Search in Google Scholar
26 S. Bureerat , N.Pholdee: Inverse problem based differential evolution for efficient structural health monitoring of trusses, Applied Soft Computing66 (2018), pp. 462–47210.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.046Search in Google Scholar
27 Y. C Shin , Y. S.Joo: Optimization of machining conditions with practical constraints, International Journal of Production Research30 (1992), No. 12, pp. 2907–291910.1080/00207549208948198Search in Google Scholar
28 A. R. Yildiz : Optimal structural design of vehicle components using topology design and optimization, Materials Testing50 (2008), No. 4, pp. 224–22810.3139/120.100880Search in Google Scholar
29 F. P. Tan , R. C.Creese: A generalized multi-pass machining model for machining parameter selection in turning, International Journal of Production Research33 (1995), No. 5, pp. 1467–148710.1080/00207549508930221Search in Google Scholar
30 J. S. Agapiou : The optimisation of machining operations based on a combined criterion Part 2: Multipass operations, Journal of Engineering for Industry114 (1992), No. 4, pp. 508–51310.1115/1.2900705Search in Google Scholar
31 E. J. A. Armarego , A. J. R.Smith, J.Wang: Constrained optimization strategies CAM software for single-pass peripheral milling, International Journal of Production Research, 31 (1993), No. 9, pp. 2139–216010.1080/00207549308956849Search in Google Scholar
32 E. J. A. Armarego , A. J. R.Simith, J.Wang: Computer-aided constrained optimisation analyses strategies for multipass helical tooth milling operation, Annals of the CIRP43 (1994), No. 1, pp. 437–44210.1016/S0007-8506(07)62248-3Search in Google Scholar
33 A. R. Yildiz : A new design optimization framework based on immune algorithm and Taguchi method, Computers in Industry60 (2009), pp. 613–62010.1016/j.compind.2009.05.016Search in Google Scholar
34 M. Tolouei-Rad , I. M.Bidhendi: On the optimization of machining parameters for milling operations, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture37 (1997), No. 1, pp. 1–1610.1016/S0890-6955(96)00044-2Search in Google Scholar
35 A. R. Yildiz , H.Abderazek, S.Mirjalili: (in press) A Comparative Study of Recent Non-traditional Methods for Mechanical Design Optimization, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering10.1007/s11831-019-09343-xSearch in Google Scholar
36 A. R. Yildiz : Hybrid Taguchi-Harmony Search Algorithm for Solving Engineering Optimization Problems, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Theory, Applications and Practice15 (2008), No. 3, pp. 286–293Search in Google Scholar
37 İ. Durgun , A. R.Yildiz: Structural design optimization of vehicle components using Cuckoo search algorithm, Materials Testing54 (2012), No. 3, pp. 185–18810.3139/120.110317Search in Google Scholar
38 B. S. Yildiz , H.Lekesiz: Fatigue-based structural optimisation of vehicle components, International Journal of Vehicle Design73 (2017), pp. 54–6210.1504/IJVD.2017.10003398Search in Google Scholar
39 A. R. Yildiz : Designing of optimum vehicle components using new generation optimization methods, Journal of Polytechnic20 (2017), No. 2, pp. 319–32310.2339/2017.20.2325-332Search in Google Scholar
40 H. Gokdağ , A. R.Yildiz: Structural damage detection using modal parameters and particle swarm optimization Materials Testing54 (2012), No. 6, pp. 416–42010.3139/120.110346Search in Google Scholar
41 A. Demirci , A. R.Yıldız. ‘A new hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization of structural components, Materials Testing61 (2019), No. 2, pp. 111–11910.3139/120.111291Search in Google Scholar
42 F. Hamza , H.Abderazek, S.Lakhdar, D.Ferhat, A. R.Yildiz: Optimum design of cam-roller follower mechanism using a new evolutionary algorithm, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology99 (2018), No. 5–8, pp. 1261–128210.1007/s00170-018-2543-3Search in Google Scholar
43 S. Mirjalili , S. M.Mirjalili, A.Hatamlou: Multi-verse optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization, Neural Computing and Applications27 (2016), No. 2, pp. 495–51310.1007/s00521-015-1870-7Search in Google Scholar
44 A. R. Yildiz , N.Öztürk, N.Kaya, F.Öztürk: Hybrid multi-objective shape design optimization using Taguchi's method and genetic algorithm, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization34 (2007), No. 4, pp. 317–33210.1007/s00158-006-0079-xSearch in Google Scholar
45 S. Saremi , S.Mirjalili, A.Lewis: Grasshopper optimisation algorithm: theory and application, Advances in Engineering Software, 105 (2017), pp. 30–4710.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.004Search in Google Scholar
46 A. R. Yildiz : Optimization of cutting parameters in multi-pass turning using artificial bee colony-based approach, Information Sciences220 (2013), pp. 399–40710.1016/j.ins.2012.07.012Search in Google Scholar
47 S. Mirjalili , S. M.Mirjalili, A.Lewis: Grey wolf optimizer, Advances in Engineering Software69 (2014), pp. 46–6110.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007Search in Google Scholar
48 S. Mirjalili : Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems, Neural Computing and Applications27 (2016), No. 4, pp. 1053–107310.1007/s00521-015-1920-1Search in Google Scholar
49 S. Mirjalili : Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm, Knowledge-Based Systems89 (2015), pp. 228–24910.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006Search in Google Scholar
50 S. Mirjalili , A. H.Gandomi, S. Z.Mirjalili, S.Saremi, H.Faris, S. M.Mirjalili: Salp swarm optimization Algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems, Advances in Engineering Software114 (2017), pp. 163–19110.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.002Search in Google Scholar
51 S. Mirjalili , The ant lion optimizer, Advances in Engineering Software83 (2015), pp. 80–9810.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010Search in Google Scholar
52 X.-S. Yang , S.Deb: Cuckoo search via Lévy flights, Proc. of the World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing, NaBIC (2009), pp. 210–21410.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690Search in Google Scholar
53 A. R. Yildiz , E.Kurtuluş, E.Demirci, B. S.Yildiz, S.Karagöz: Optimization of thin-wall structures using hybrid gravitational search and Nelder-Mead algorithm, Materials Testing58 (2016), No. 1, pp. 75–7810.3139/120.110823Search in Google Scholar
54 M. Kiani , A. R.Yildiz: A comparative study of non-traditional methods for vehicle crashworthiness and NVH optimization, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering23 (2016), No. 4, pp. 723–73410.1007/s11831-015-9155-ySearch in Google Scholar
55 S. Mirjalili : SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems, Knowledge-Based Systems96 (2016), pp. 120–13310.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022Search in Google Scholar
56 B. S. Yildiz : A comparative investigation of eight recent population-based optimisation algorithms for mechanical and structural design problems, International Journal of Vehicle Design73 (2017), No. 1–3, pp. 208–21810.1504/IJVD.2017.082603Search in Google Scholar
57 A. Sadollah , H.Eskandar, A.Bahreininejad, J. H.Kim: Water cycle algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems, Soft Computing19 (2015), No. 9, pp. 2587–260310.1007/s00500-014-1424-4Search in Google Scholar
58 A. R. Yıldız , U. A.Kılıçarpa, E.Demirci: ‘Topography and topology optimization of diesel engine components for light-weight design in the automotive industry’, Materials Testing61 (2019), No. 1, pp.27–3410.3139/120.111277Search in Google Scholar
59 B. S. Yildiz , A. R.Yildiz: Moth-flame optimization algorithm to determine optimal machining parameters in manufacturing processes, Materials Testing59 (2017), No. 5, pp. 425–42910.3139/120.111024Search in Google Scholar
60 A. I. Sonmez , A.Baykasoglu, T.Dereli, I. H.Filiz: Dynamic optimization of multi-pass milling operations via geometric programming, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture39 (1999), No. 2, pp. 297–33210.1016/S0890-6955(98)00027-3Search in Google Scholar
61 Z. G. Wang , M.Rahman, Y. S.Wong, J.Sun: Optimization of multi-pass milling using parallel genetic algorithm parallel genetic simulated annealing, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture45 (2005), No. 15, pp. 1726–173410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.03.009Search in Google Scholar
62 G. C. Onwubolu : Performance-based optimization of multi-pass face millingoperations using tribes, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture46 (2006), No. 7–8, pp. 717–72710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.041Search in Google Scholar
63 R. V. Rao , P. J.Pawar: Parameter optimization of a multi-pass milling process using non-traditional optimization algorithms, Applied Soft Computing10 (2010), No. 2, pp. 445–45610.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.007Search in Google Scholar
64 P. J. Pawar , R. V.Rao: Parameter optimization of machining processes using teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology67 (2013), No. 5–8, pp. 995–100610.1007/s00170-012-4524-2Search in Google Scholar
65 J. Huang , L.Gao, X.Li: An effective teaching-learning-based cuckoo search algorithm for parameter optimization problems in structure designing and machining processes, Applied Soft Computing36 (2015), pp. 349–35610.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.031Search in Google Scholar
66 A. R. Yildiz : A new hybrid particle swarm optimization approach for structural design optimization in automotive industry, Journal of Automobile Engineering226 (2012), No. 10, pp. 1340–135110.1177/0954407012443636Search in Google Scholar
67 G. Zhang , M.Liu, J.Li, W.Ming, X.Shao, Y.Huang: Multiobjective optimization for surface grinding process using a hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology71 (2014), No. 9–12, pp. 1861–187210.1007/s00170-013-5571-zSearch in Google Scholar
68 A. G. Krishna : Retracted: Optimization of surface grinding operations using a differential evolution approach, Journal of Materials Processing Technology183 (2007), No. 2–3, pp. 202–20910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.010Search in Google Scholar
69 X. Lin , H.Li: Enhanced Pareto particle swarm approach for multiobjective optimization of surface grinding process, Proc. of the Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, IITA’08, IEEE (2008), pp. 618–62310.1109/IITA.2008.75Search in Google Scholar
70 R. Gupta , K. S.Shishodia, G. S.Sekhon: Optimization of grinding process parameters using enumeration method, Journal of Materials Processing Technology112 (2001), No. 1, pp. 63–6710.1016/S0924-0136(01)00546-5Search in Google Scholar
71 A. Slowik , J.Slowik: Multi-objective optimization of surface grinding process with the use of evolutionary algorithm with remembered Pareto set, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology37 (2008), No. 7–8, pp. 657–66910.1007/s00170-007-1013-0Search in Google Scholar
72 A. R. Yildiz , N.Öztürk, N.Kaya, F.Öztürk: Hybrid multi-objective shape design optimization using Taguchi's method and genetic algorithm, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization34 (2007), No. 4, pp. 317–33210.1007/s00158-006-0079-xSearch in Google Scholar
73 A. R. Yildiz , N.Öztürk, N.Kaya, F.Öztürk: Integrated optimal topology design and shape optimization using neural networks, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization25 (2003), No. 4, pp. 251–26010.1007/s00158-003-0300-0Search in Google Scholar
74 A. Heidari , S.Mirjalili, H.Farris, I.Aljarah, M.Mafarja, H.Chen: Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications, Future Generation Computer Systems, 97 (2019), pp. 849–872, 10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028Search in Google Scholar
75 N. Krasnogor , J.Smith, J: A tutorial for competent memetic algorithms: model, taxonomy and design issues, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation9 (2005), No. 5, pp. 474–48810.1109/TEVC.2005.850260Search in Google Scholar
76 C. Shilaja , K.Ravi: Optimal Power Flow Using Hybrid DA-APSO Algorithm in Renewable Energy Resources, Energy Procedia117 (2017), pp. 1085–109210.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.232Search in Google Scholar
77 C. W. Reynolds : Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model, ACM SIGGRAPH computer graphics21 (1987), No. 4, pp. 25–3410.1145/37401.37406Search in Google Scholar
78 A. Rajan , T.Malakar: Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid Nelder–Mead simplex based firefly algorithm, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems66 (2015), pp. 9–2410.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.041Search in Google Scholar
79 J. Smith : Coevolving memetic algorithms: A review and progress report. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics37 (2007), No. 1, pp. 6–1710.1109/TSMCB.2006.883273Search in Google Scholar
80 H. Ishibuchi , T.Yoshida, T.Murata: Balance between genetic search and local search in memetic algorithms for multiobjective permutation flowshop scheduling, IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation7 (2003), No. 2, pp. 204–22310.1109/TEVC.2003.810752Search in Google Scholar
81 B. Liu , L.Wang, Y. H.Jin, Y.H: An effective PSO-based memetic algorithm for flow shop scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B Cybernetics37 (2007), No. 1, pp. 18–2710.1109/TSMCB.2006.883272Search in Google Scholar
82 S. M. Tse , Y.Liang, K. S.Leung, K. H.Lee, T. S. K.Mok: A memetic algorithm for multiple-drug cancer chemotherapy schedule optimization, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B Cybernetics37 (2007), No. 1, pp. 84–9110.1109/TSMCB.2006.883265Search in Google Scholar
83 J. E. Gallardo , C.Cotta, A. J.Fernández: On the hybridization of memetic algorithms with branch-and-bound techniques, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B Cybernetics37 (2007), No. 1, pp. 77–8310.1109/TSMCB.2006.883266Search in Google Scholar
84 J. Tang , M. H.Lim, Y. S.Ong: Diversity-adaptive parallel memetic algorithm for solving large scale combinatorial optimization problems, Soft Computing11 (2007), No. 11, pp. 873–88810.1007/s00500-006-0139-6Search in Google Scholar
85 M. Tang , X.Yao: A memetic algorithm for VLSI floorplanning, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B Cybernetics, 37 (2007), No. 1, pp. 62–6910.1109/TSMCB.2006.883268Search in Google Scholar
86 C. K. Goh , K. C.Tan: A coevolutionary paradigm for dynamic multi-objective optimization, C. K.Goh, K. C.Tan (Eds.): Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization in Uncertain Environments, Studies in Computational Intelligence 186, Springer, Berlin, Germany (2009)Search in Google Scholar
87 J. A. Nelder , R.Mead: A simplex method for function minimization, The Computer Journal7 (1965), No. 4, pp. 308–31310.1093/comjnl/7.4.308Search in Google Scholar
88 A. R. Yildiz , E.Kurtuluş, E.Demirci, B. S.Yildiz, S.Karagöz: Optimization of thin-wall structures using hybrid gravitational search and Nelder-Mead algorithm, Materials Testing58 (2016), No. 1, pp. 75–7810.3139/120.110823Search in Google Scholar
89 A. Sadollah , A.Bahreininejad, H.Eskandar, M.Hamdi: Mine blast algorithm: a new population based algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems, Applied Soft Computing13 (2013), No. 5, pp. 2592–261210.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.026Search in Google Scholar
90 A. H. Gandomi , X.-S.Yang, A. H.Alavi: Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems, Engineering with Computers29 (2013) No. 1, pp. 17–3510.1007/s00366-011-0241-ySearch in Google Scholar
91 M. Zhang , W.Luo, X. WangX: Differential evolution with dynamic stochastic selection for constrained optimization, Information Sciences178 (2008), No. 15, pp. 3043–307410.1016/j.ins.2008.02.014Search in Google Scholar
92 H. Liu H , Z.Cai, Y.Wang: Hybridizing particle swarm optimization with differential evolution for constrained numerical and engineering optimization, Applied Soft Computing10 (2010), No. 2, pp. 629–64010.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.031Search in Google Scholar
93 T. Ray , P.Saini: Engineering design optimization using a swarm with an intelligent information sharing among individuals, Engineering Optimization33 (2001), No. 6, pp. 735–74810.1080/03052150108940941Search in Google Scholar
94 J.-F. Tsai : Global optimization of nonlinear fractional programming problems in engineering design, Engineering Optimization37 (2005), No. 4, pp. 399–40910.1080/03052150500066737Search in Google Scholar
95 C. A. Coello Coello : Constraint-handling using an evolutionary multiobjective optimization technique, Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems17 (2000), No. 4, pp. 319–34610.1080/02630250008970288Search in Google Scholar
96 K. Deb : An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering186 (2000), No. 2–4, pp. 311–33810.1016/S0045-7825(99)00389-8Search in Google Scholar
97 K. Ragsdell , D.Phillips: Optimal design of a class of welded structures using geometric programming, Journal of Engineering for Industry98 (1976), No. 3, pp. 1021–102510.1115/1.3438995Search in Google Scholar
98 Q. He , L.Wang: An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence20 (2007), No. 1, pp. 89–9910.1016/j.engappai.2006.03.003Search in Google Scholar
99 C. A. Coello Coello : Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering191 (2002), No. 11–12, pp. 1245–128710.1016/S0045-7825(01)00323-1Search in Google Scholar
100 C. A. Coello Coello , E. MezuraMontes: Constraint-handling in genetic algorithms through the use of dominance-based tournament selection, Advanced Engineering Informatics16 (2002), No. 3, pp. 193–20310.1016/S1474-0346(02)00011-3Search in Google Scholar
101 J. N. Siddall : Analytical Decision-Making in Engineering Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA (1972)Search in Google Scholar
102 A. H. Gandomi , X.-S.Yang, A. H.Alavi: Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems, Engineering with Computers29 (2013) No. 1, pp. 17–3510.1007/s00366-011-0241-ySearch in Google Scholar
103 G. G. Wang : Adaptive response surface method using inherited latin hypercube design points, Journal of Mechanical Design125 (2003), No. 2, pp. 210–22010.1115/1.1561044Search in Google Scholar
104 M.-Y. Cheng , D.Prayogo: Symbiotic organisms search: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm, Computers & Structures139 (2014), pp. 98–11210.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.007Search in Google Scholar
105 A. Kaveh , M.Khayatazad: A new meta-heuristic method: ray optimization, Computers & Structures112 (2012), pp. 283–29410.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.003Search in Google Scholar
106 H. Chickermane , H.Gea: Structural optimization using a new local approximation method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering39 (1996), No. 5, pp. 829–84610.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19960315)39:5<829::AID-NME884>3.0.CO;2-USearch in Google Scholar
© 2019, Carl Hanser Verlag, München
