Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 10, 2016

Influence of Processing Parameters and Composition on the Effective Compatibilization of Polypropylene–Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Blends

  • E. P. A. van Bruggen , R. P. Koster , S. J. Picken and K. Ragaert

Abstract

The effects of the addition of different functionalized compatibilizers on toughness, morphology and rheological properties of a polypropylene (PP) – poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) (85–15 wt%) blend were studied. The three compatibilizers compared were: (Styrene Ethylene Butylene Styrene)-grafted-(glycidyl methacrylate); (Styrene Ethylene Butylene Styrene) – grafted – (maleic anhydryde); (polyolefin) – grafted – (glycidyl methacrylate), abbreviated to: SEBS-g-GMA, SEBS-g-MA and POE-g-GMA respectively. The effective grafting content was the same for all three compatibilizers. Before the comparison of the different compatibilizers was done, first the effects of three different processing temperatures and three different compatibilizer contents were investigated, based on the addition of SEBS-g-GMA. The compatibilization effect was significantly improved with an increase in processing temperature from 250 to 300 °C. The toughness was increased with almost a factor two and a decrease in the average domain size of the dispersed phase was observed. An increase in compatibilizer content from 0.25 to 2.5 wt% resulted in a finer dispersity as well as in a steep increase in toughness, which was noted to approach the brittle-to-ductile transition. The comparison of the three compatibilizers was subsequently done at the most promising processing temperature and content: 300 °C and 2.5 wt%. The results showed that the addition of SEBS-g-MA and POE-g-GMA had a less significant positive effect on the compatibilization compared to SEBS-g-GMA. The difference is attributed to a higher reactivity for GMA compared to MA and a higher possibility for migration towards the PP-PET interface for the SEBS chain compared to the POE chain.


*Correspondence address, Mail address: Kim Ragaert, Ghent University – Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Technologiepark 915, 9052 Ghent, Belgium, E-mail:

References

Al-Abdulrazzak, S., Jabarin, S. A., “Processing Characteristics of Poly(ethylene terephthalate): Hydrolytic and Thermal Degradation”, Polym. Int., 51, 164173 (2002) 10.1002/pi.813Search in Google Scholar

Assadi, R., Colin, X. and Verdu, J., “Irreversible Structural Changes during PET Recycling by Extrusion”, Polymer, 45, 44034412 (2004) 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.029Search in Google Scholar

Babaei, A., Arefazar, A., “Effect of Maleated Styrene/Ethylene-Co-Butylene/Styrene on the Dispersed Particles Size and Mechanical Properties of Polyamide 6/Poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)/Poly-(styrene-B-(ethylene-co-butylene)-B-styrene) Ternary Blends”, J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys., 53, 14061420 (2014) 10.1080/00222348.2014.895634Search in Google Scholar

Bacci, D., Toaldo, A. and Scaini, M., “A Mathematical Formulation of the Brittle/Ductile Transition of Impact Modified Polymers”, J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys., 52, 14381452 (2013) 10.1080/00222348.2013.769838Search in Google Scholar

Biresaw, G., Carriere, C. G. and Sammler, R. L., “Effect of Temperature and Molecular Weight on the Interfacial Tension of PS/PDMS Blends”, Rheol. Acta, 42, 142147 (2003) 10.1007/s00397-002-0265-8Search in Google Scholar

Bucknall, C. B., Paul, D. R., “Notched Impact Behaviour of Polymer Blends: Part 2: Dependence of Critical Particle Size on Rubber Particle Volume Fraction”, Polymer, 54, 320329 (2013) 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.019Search in Google Scholar

Delva, L., Ragaert, K., Allaer, K., Gaspar-Cunha, A., Degrieck, J. and Cardon, L., “Influence of Twin-Screw Configuration on the Mechanical and Morphological Properties of Polypropylene – Clay Composites”, Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol., ??Volume, Pages?? (2015)10.1504/IJMPT.2016.073631Search in Google Scholar

Dhavalikar, R., YamaguchiM. and Xanthos, M., “Molecular and Structural Analysis of a Triepoxide-Modified Poly(ethylene terephthalate) from Rheological Data”. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 41, 958969 (2003) 10.1002/pola.10641Search in Google Scholar

Eastar Copolyesters Data Sheet, Eastman, ??Town, Country?? (2014)Search in Google Scholar

Enviromental Protection Agency (EPA), “Opportunities to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions through Materials and Land Management Practices”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, ???Town, USA?? (2009)Search in Google Scholar

European Commision, “A European Strategy on Plastic Waste in the Environment”, Green Paper, European Commision, Brussels (2013)Search in Google Scholar

Fu, S.-Y., Feng, X.-Q., Lauke, B. and Mai, Y.-W., “Effects of Particle Size, Particle/Matrix Interface Adhesion and Particle Loading on Mechanical Properties of Particulate-Polymer Composites”, Composites Part B-Engineering, 39, 933961 (2008)10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Greco, R.: Impact Modifiers: (1) Mechanisms and Applications in Thermoplastics. Plastic Additives, Pritchard, G. ???(Ed.)???, Chapman and Hall, London, p.375385 (1998)10.1007/978-94-011-5862-6_41Search in Google Scholar

Heino, M., Kirjava, J., Hietaoja, P. and Seppala, J., “Compatibilization of Polyethylene Terephthalate/Polypropylene Blends with Styrene-Ethylene/Butylene-Styrene (SEBS) Block Copolymers”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 65, 241249 (1997) 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970711)65:2<241::AID-APP4>3.0.CO;2-OSearch in Google Scholar

Higgins, J. S., Lipson, J. E. G. and White, R. P., “A Simple Approach to Polymer Mixture Miscibility”, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 368, 10091025 (2010)Search in Google Scholar

Ihm, D., White, J., “Interfacial Tension of Polyethylene Polyethylene Terephthalate with Various Compatibilizing Agents”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 60, 17 (1996) 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960404)60:1<1::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-TSearch in Google Scholar

Jain, A., Pandey, G., Singh, A. K., Rajagopalan, V., Vaidyanathan, R. and Singh, R. P., “Fabrication of Structural Composites from Waste Carpet”, Adv. Polym. Technol., 31, 380389 (2012) 10.1002/adv.20261Search in Google Scholar

Khonakdar, H. A., Jafari, S. H., Mirzadeh, H., Kalaee, M. R., Zare, D. and Saehb, M. R., “Rheology-Morphology Correlation in PET/PP Blends: Influence of Type of Compatibilizer”, J. Vinyl Add. Tech., 19, 2530 (2013) 10.1002/vnl.20318Search in Google Scholar

Lei, Y., Wu, Q., Clemons, C. M. and Gu, W., “Phase Structure and Properties of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/High-Density Polyethylene Based on Recycled Materials”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 113, 17101719 (2009) 10.1002/app.30178Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Y., Chen, H., Chan, C. and Wu, J., “Effects of Coating Amount and Particle Concentration on the Impact Toughness of Polypropylene/CaCo3 Nanocomposites”, Eur. Polym. J., 47, 294304 (2011) 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Papadopoulou, C., Kalfoglou, N., “Comparison of Compatibilizer Effectiveness for PET/PP Blends: Their Mechanical, Thermal and Morphology Characterization”, Polymer, 41, 25432555 (2000) 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00442-5Search in Google Scholar

Paul, D. R., Barlow, J. W., “Polymer Blends (or Alloys)”, J. Macromol. Sci. Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys., C18, 109168 (1980) 10.1080/00222358008080917Search in Google Scholar

Plastics Europe, “Plastics – the Facts 2014/2015. An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data”, Plastics Europe, Brussels (2015)Search in Google Scholar

Plastics Europe, EuPC, EuPR and EPRO, “Plastics – the Facts 2011. An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Recovery for 2010”, Plastics Europe, Brussels (2011)Search in Google Scholar

Pracella, M., Chionna, D., “Functionalization of Styrene-Olefin Block Copolymers by Melt Radical Grafting of Glycidyl Methacrylate and Reactive Blending with PET”, Macromol. Symp., 218, 173182 (2001) 10.1002/masy.200451418Search in Google Scholar

Pracella, M., Rolla, L., Chionna, D. and Galeski, A., “Compatibilization and Properties of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Polyethylene Blends Based on Recycled Materials”, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 203, 14731485 (2002) 10.1002/1521-3935(200207)203:10/11<1473::AID-MACP1473>3.0.CO;2-4Search in Google Scholar

Premphet, K., Paecharoenchai, W., “Polypropylene/Metallocene Ethylene-Octene Copolymer Blends with a Bimodal Particle Size Distribution: Mechanical Properties and their Controlling Factors”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 85, 24122418 (2002) 10.1002/app.10886Search in Google Scholar

Robeson, L., “Chapter 6 Properties of Polymer Blends”, in Polymer Blends – A Comprehensive Review, Hanser, Munich (2007) 10.3139/9783446436503Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, A., “Polymer Science – Designer Polymer Blends”, Nat. Mater., 1, 810 (2002) 10.1038/nmat720Search in Google Scholar

Sun, S., Zhang, M., Zhang, H. and Zhang, X., “Polylactide Toughening with Epoxy-Functionalized Grafted Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Particles”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 122, 29922999 (2011) 10.1002/app.34111Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Hu, G., Lambla, M. and Kotlar, H., “In Situ Compatibilization of Polypropylene and Poly(butylene terephthalate) Polymer Blends by one-Step Reactive Extrusion”, Polymer, 37, 41194127 (1996) 10.1016/0032-3861(96)00229-7Search in Google Scholar

Van Krevelen, D., Te Nijenhuis, K.: Interfacial Energy Properties. Properties of Polymers, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)10.1016/B978-0-08-054819-7.00008-XSearch in Google Scholar

Wu, S.: Polymer Interface and Adhesion, Marcel Dekker, New York (1982)Search in Google Scholar

Wu, S. H., “Formation of Dispersed Phase in Incompatible Polymer Blends – Interfacial and Rheological Effects”, Polym. Eng. Sci., 27, 335343 (1987) 10.1002/pen.760270506Search in Google Scholar

Yildirim, E., Yurtsever, M., “A Comparative Study on the Efficiencies of Polyethylene Compatibilizers by Using Theoretical Methods”, J. Polym. Res., 19 (2012)10.1007/s10965-011-9771-7Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Li, C. and Huang, R., “Toughness Mechanism in Polypropylene Composites: Polypropylene Toughened with Elastomer and Calcium Carbonate”, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys., 42, 16561662 (2004) 10.1002/polb.20035Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-05-19
Accepted: 2015-11-29
Published Online: 2016-05-10
Published in Print: 2016-05-29

© 2016, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

Downloaded on 28.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.3124/html
Scroll to top button