Determinants of Employee Whistleblowing Intentions in Indonesia: Applying Theory of Planned Behavior

Nurul Mustafida

Abstract


This study examines the effect of factors in the theory of planned behavior on whistleblowing intentions which are moderated by perceived organizational support. This study uses an online survei method with 155 samples of company employees. The research data are analyzed using the Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) approach, which used a measurement model and a structural model. The result shows that attitude and perceived subjective norms significantly and positively affect whistleblowing intentions. However, perceived behavioral control does not significantly affect whistleblowing intention due to fear of retaliation for the act of fraudulent financial reporting. Furthermore, the result indicates that perceived organizational support strengthens the positive relationship between attitude and perceived subjective norms with whistleblowing intentions, but does not have a moderating effect on the relationship of perceived behavioral control with whistleblowing intentions. This result implies that organizational support can encourage employees to enforce organizational rules and ethics. Besides, it shows employee’s feel valued and cared for in the organization so that it has positive implications, namely high commitment to the organization.


Keywords


theory of planned behavior, whistleblowing intention, perceived organizational support

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adebayo, D. O. (2005). Ethical attitudes and prosocial behaviour in the Nigeria police: Moderator effects of perceived organizational support and public recognition. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(4), 684-705.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Haniffa, R. (2015). The moderating role of perceived organisational support in breaking the silence of public accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 509-527.

Arnold, D. F., & Ponemon, L. A. (1991). Internal auditors' perceptions of whistleblowing and the influence of moral reasoning: An experiment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10, 1–15.

Aselage, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2003). Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: A theoretical integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(5), 491-509.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2018). Report to the Nations: 2018 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Texas: ACFE.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.

Bhal, K. T., & Dadhich, A. (2011). Impact of ethical leadership and leader-member exchange on whistleblowing: The moderating impact of the moral intensity of the issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 485.

Brown, J. O., J. Hays, dan M. T. Stuebs Jr. (2016). Modeling Accountant Whistleblowing Intentions: Applying the Theory of planned behavior and the Fraud Triangle. Accounting and the Public Interest, 16(1): 28-56.

Chang, Y., Wilding, M., & Shin, M. C. (2017). Determinants of whistleblowing intention: evidence from the South Korean government. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(4), 676-700.

Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 65-74.

Dalton, D., & Radtke, R. R. (2013). The joint effects of Machiavellianism and ethical environment on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 153-172.

Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of applied psychology, 75(1), 51.

Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of macro marketing, 6(1), 5-16.

Hussein, A. S. 2015. Penelitian bisnis dan manajemen menggunakan Partial Least Squares (PLS) dengan SmartPLS 3.0. Universitas Brawijaya. e-book.

Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S.(2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854-1884.

Jeon, S. H. (2017). Where to report wrongdoings? Exploring the determinants of internal versus external whistleblowing. International Review of Public Administration, 22(2), 153-171.

Latan, Hengky & Imam Ghozali. (2013). Partial Least Square Konsep Aplikasi Path Modeling SmartPLS 2.0 M3. Badan Penerbit UNDIP. Semarang

Latan, H., Ringle, C. M., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2018). Whistleblowing intentions among public accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 573-588.

Liyanarachchi, G., & Newdick, C. (2009). The impact of moral reasoning and retaliation on whistleblowing: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 37-57.

MacGregor, J., & Stuebs, M. (2014). The silent Samaritan syndrome: Why the whistle remains unblown. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(2), 149-164.

Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277-297.

Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1-16.

________ (1996). Whistleblowing: Myth and reality. Journal of Management, 22(3), 507-526.

Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2009). Whistleblowing as planned behavior–A survey of South Korean police officers. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 545-556.

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698.

Teo, H., & Caspersz, D. (2011). Dissenting discourse: Exploring alternatives to the whistleblowing/silence dichotomy. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 237-249.

Trongmateerut, P., & Sweeney, J. T. (2013). The influence of subjective norms on whistleblowing: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 437-451.

Winardi, R. D. (2013). The Influence of Individual and Situational Factors on Lower-Level Civil Servants' whistleblowing Intention in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 28(3), 361-376.

Young, R. F. (2017). Blowing the whistle: Individual persuasion under perceived threat of retaliation. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(2), 97-111.

Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. (2009). Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in China: Empirical evidence and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 25-41.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.476

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research (IJAR)

Editorial Secretariat

Master of Science and Doctoral Programs
Faculty of Economics and Business, Gadjah Mada University

Jl. Nusantara, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta 55281
CP : Novita
Phone  : +62 812-2848-2829
Fax    : +62 274 524606
Website: http://ijar-iaikapd.or.id/
Email  : sekretariat@ijar-iaikapd.or.id

Marketing and Sales Office

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia
Graha Akuntan, Jl. Sindanglaya No.1 Menteng, Jakarta Pusat 10310
CP : Reza Fauzi
Divisi Pelayanan, Keanggotaan dan Mitra IAI.
Grha Akuntan, Jl. Sindanglaya No.1, Menteng.
Telp.021-31904232 Ext.324/321

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ISSN 2086-6887 (Print)
ISSN 2655 - 1748 (online)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------