Next Article in Journal
Phytochemicals from Polyalthia Species: Potential and Implication on Anti-Oxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-Cancer, and Chemoprevention Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
A Stability-Indicating Ultra Performance Liquid Chromato-Graphic (UPLC) Method for the Determination of a Mycophenolic Acid-Curcumin Conjugate and Its Applications to Chemical Kinetic Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Zinc Recovery from Wulagen Sulfide Flotation Plant Tail by Applying Ether Amine Organic Collectors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization, Validation and Application of HPLC-PDA Methods for Quantification of Triterpenoids in Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modification of Arabinogalactan Isolated from Larix sibirica Ledeb. into Sulfated Derivatives with the Controlled Molecular Weights

by
Yuriy N. Malyar
1,2,*,
Natalia Yu. Vasilyeva
1,2,
Aleksandr S. Kazachenko
1,2,
Valentina S. Borovkova
1,2,
Andrei M. Skripnikov
1,2,
Angelina V. Miroshnikova
1,2,
Dmitriy V. Zimonin
1,2,
Vladislav A. Ionin
1,2,
Anna S. Kazachenko
1 and
Noureddine Issaoui
3
1
School of Non-Ferrous Metals and Material Science, Siberian Federal University, Pr. Svobodny, 79, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
2
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Krasnoyarsk Science Center, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademgorodok, 50/24, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
3
Laboratory of Quantum and Statistical Physics (LR18ES18), Faculty of Sciences, University of Monastir, Monastir 5079, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(17), 5364; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175364
Submission received: 17 July 2021 / Revised: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 31 August 2021 / Published: 3 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromatographic Science of Natural Products II)

Abstract

:
The process of sulfation of arabinogalactan—a natural polysaccharide from Larix sibirica Ledeb.—with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane using different activators has been studied for the first time. The dynamics of the molecular weight of sulfated arabinogalactan upon variation in the temperature and time of sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane has been investigated. It has been found that, as the sulfation time increases from 10 to 90 min, the molecular weights of the reaction products grow due to the introduction of sulfate groups without significant destruction of the initial polymer and sulfation products. Sulfation at 95 °C for 20 min yields the products with a higher molecular weight than in the case of sulfation at 85 °C, which is related to an increase in the sulfation rate; however, during the further process occurring under these conditions, sulfation is accompanied by the destruction and the molecular weight of the sulfated polymer decreases. The numerical optimization of arabinogalactan sulfation process has been performed. It has been shown that the optimal parameters for obtaining a product with a high sulfur content are a sulfamic acid amount of 20 mmol per 1 g of arabinogalactan, a process temperature of 85 °C, and a process time of 2.5 h.

1. Introduction

The anticoagulant drug most widely used in modern medical practice is heparin, a natural hexosaminoglycan of animal origin. Heparin is used to improve the hemocompatibility of the surface of medical devices [1,2,3]. This natural sulphated linear glucosaminoglycan is produced by the mast cells of some animal tissues Unfortunately, the use of heparin, as well as other modern anticoagulants, can be accompanied by collateral damages, including thrombocytopenia and bleeding, regardless of the mechanism of the anticoagulant effect. A promising alternative to heparin is the sulfated derivatives of plant polysaccharides [2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Various sulphated polysaccharides are known as heparinoids of both natural and synthetic origins have distinctive anticoagulant properties [2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Owing to their structural diversity and high negative charge, these biopolymers can bind to many proteins, including receptors, thereby exhibiting a wide range of biological activities.
A promising and available substance alternative to heparin is sulfated arabinogalactan [13,14,15,22,23,24,25,26], a product of chemical modification of the plant polysaccharide arabinogalactan [27,28,29,30]. A significant advantage of arabinogalactan [27,28,29,30] over other biologically active polysaccharides is availability, since a reliable source of its industrial production is larch wood, which is one of the most widespread conifers [28]. Depending on the species, larch contains from 10% to 35% of this valuable polysaccharide [28], which is indicative of the huge actual reserves of the raw material and prospects for mass production of the new arabinogalactan-based bioactive agent [27,28]. On the territory of Siberia and the Far East grow Siberian larch (L. sibirica Ledeb), Gmelina (L. gnielinii Rupr.), and Cajandera (L. cajanderi Mayr.) [28]. The quantitative monosaccharide composition and molecular weight of arabinogalactan vary not only depending on the type of larch, but also within the same species [31]. For galactan-containing polysaccharides, the most important characteristics are the size of the galactan core, the structure of the side chains, as well as the molecular weight and the ability to form intermolecular associates [27,28]. The ratio of galactose and arabinose fragments in AG fractions from western larch wood increases from 2.33:1 to 6.99:1 with an increase in molecular weight from 3 to 79 kDa [27].
It was found that in AG macromolecules from western larch, arabinose units are located at the ends of lateral branches consisting of three or four monosaccharide residues [27]. The content of glucuronic acid units in AG from various larch species is insignificant [27], and acid fragments were not found in purified AG samples from Western, European, Mountain, and Siberian larch. The macromolecule AG from larch wood has a highly branched structure; its main chain consists of galactose units linked by β-(1→3) glycosidic bonds, and side chains with β-(1→6) bonds- of galactose and arabinose units, of arabinose single units, and of uronic acids, mainly glucuronic acid. It is acknowledged that there are also arabinose units in the main macromolecule chain [29]. The ratio of galactose to arabinose units approximately is equal to 6:1, with one-third of the arabinose units in pyranose form, and two-thirds in furanose one [28,30]. It is expected that AG macromolecules probably exist in a very compact and spherical form (Figure 1) [32,33]
Arabinogalactan exhibits a wide range of biological properties: the immunobiological, hepatoprotective, antimutagenic, mitogenic, gastroprotective, and membranotropic activity; the probiotic, mycogenic, hypolipidemic, and immunomodulatory characteristics; the dispersing effect; etc. [27,29,30,31]. The macromolecule of arabinogalactan isolated from Siberian larch wood has a branched structure and a molecular weight of 15–20 kDa [28].
At the laboratory of natural synthons and ligands of the Irkutsk Institute of Chemistry, Siberian Branch, of the Russian Academy of Sciences, sulfated arabinogalactan in the form of a potassium salt was obtained by sulfation with a SO3-dimethylformamide complex in dimethyl sulfoxide [14]. The preclinical studies showed that the product is a promising lipid-lowering agent with the pronounced anticoagulant effect [14].
As is known, the anticoagulant activity of sulfated polysaccharides directly depends on the sulfation method used, which affects the degree of sulfation, arrangement of sulfate groups, molecular weight, etc. [3,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. For example, drugs based on heparin, which are produced from lung tissue or mucose (intestinal mucosa) of animals, with subsequent purification and obtaining a heterogeneous substance with a molecular weight range from 3 to 30 kDa, with an average molecular weight of 15 kDa (15 to 100 monosaccharide residues). Such heparin in the current terminology is defined as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and only about 30% of UFH molecules have anticoagulant activity. A decrease in the molecular weight to 5.4 kDa (18–19 monosaccharide residues) causes significant qualitative changes in the activity of heparin. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are produced by chemical or enzymatic depolymerization of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and are about one-third of the size of its molecule. LMWH consist of a mixture of polysaccharides with an average molecular weight of 4000–6000 Da [3,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Current methods of AG sulfates producing are based on the use of aggressive and environmentally hazardous sulfating agents such as sulfuric anhydride and chlorosulfonic acid [13,14,15,22,23,24,26]. We also developed a new, simple and environmentally friendly than known, method for the synthesis of sulfated arabinogalact by sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in dioxane in the presence of the main catalyst—urea [25]—and studied the physicochemical properties of the sulfated arabinogalactan obtained by this method [34]. Samples of sulfated arabinogalactan with different sulfur content were isolated depending on the process conditions. Therefore, controlling the characteristics of sulfated polysaccharides with a specified molecular weight as anticoagulants during their synthesis is of great practical importance in the continuation of these studies [25,34].
In the continuation of the work [25], the aims of this study were: (1) to study effect of urea-based activators on sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane; (2) searching of the optimal parameters for obtaining arabinogalactan sulfate with the maximum sulfur content based on the obtained experimental data sulfating arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane in the presence of the main catalyst—urea and using the method of numerical optimization of the Box‒Behnken; (3) investigation of the dynamics of changes in molecular weight of sulfated arabinogalactan, obtained by sulfating arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane in the presence urea under different conditions by gel permeation chromatography for obtaining the sulfated product with the desired molecular weight characteristics.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effect of Activators on Sulfation of Arabinogalactan with Sulfamic Acid in 1,4-Dioxane

As is known, the process of sulfation with sulfamic acid is activated by organic bases [35,36,37]. Sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane in the presence of activators proceeds according to the scheme shown in Figure 2 [25].
In [37], the sulfation activators of different origins—including 1,4-dioxane,N,N-dimethylformamide, urea, pyridine, morpholine, and piperidine—were investigated. However, the effect of activators of the same origin on the process of sulfation with sulfamic acid has not been systematically studied. Here, we examine the effect of the urea-based activators on sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid. The data are given in Table 1.
It was shown that, at the introduction of substituents into the urea molecule, their activating ability in the reaction of arabinogalactan sulfation with sulfamic acid decreases. In particular, the process activated by methylurea yields sulfated arabinogalactan with a sulfur content of 9.4 wt % and a Mw value of 12,310 Da. An increase in the substituent chain length in the urea molecule leads to a decrease in the sulfur content in arabinogalactan sulfate; for ethyl urea, it becomes 8.0 wt %. It should be noted that the use of the ethyl urea and hydroxyethyl urea activators ensures the same sulfur content (8.0 wt %) and PD value (1.22) in the product, with slightly different Mw values (10,969 and 11,130 Da, respectively). The use of biuret as an activator in the process of sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid leads to the formation of a product with the lowest sulfur content (7.6 wt %).
The highest sulfur content (12.6 wt %) and molecular weight (19,667 Da) in arabinogalactan sulfated with sulfamic acid were obtained with the urea activator. The results are consistent with the literature data [37].

2.2. Numerical Optimization of the Process of Sulfation of Arabinogalactan with Sulfamic Acid in 1,4-Dioxane in the Presence of Urea

In this study, we exploited the effects of the process temperature and time and the amount of the sulfating complex on the sulfur content in the synthesized arabinogalactan sulfates.
The three factors included in the study as independent variables (the values are in parenthesis) were sulfation temperature X1 (75, 80, and 85 °C), sulfation time X2 (0.5, 1.75, and 3 h), and sulfating complex amount X3 per 1 g of arabinogalactan (10, 15, and 20 mmol). The output parameter of the sulfation process was sulfur content Y1 (wt %) in arabinogalactan sulfate. The Box‒Behnken experimental design (BBD) was used. Each experiment was carried out in duplicate. The designation of variables is given in Table 2.
The experimental results are shown in Table 3.
An increase in the process temperature should lead to an increase in the rate of sulfation, and the rate of depolymerization [38]. It is obvious that the low molecular weight fractions of arabinogalactan not only exhibit high reactivity in the sulfation reaction, but also undergo more rapid hydrolytic depolymerization under the action of sulfamic acid. Since the rate of depolymerization increases with process temperature [38], over time, a large amount of low molecular weight arabinogalactan sulfate with a sufficiently high sulfur content is formed, which is removed during dialysis purification (Section 2.3).
According to the data given in Table 3, the highest sulfur content in arabinogalactan sulfate (12.3 wt %) is obtained using 15 mmol of the sulfating complex at a process temperature of 85 °C and a process time of 3 h. The results of the variance analysis are given in Table 4.
The BBD experiment has proven useful in developing an accurate experimental model between important factors [39]. Experimental data on the sulfur content of arabinogalactan sulfates were analyzed by ANOVA. Significant factors were defined as p < 0.05. For all independent variables in the area of the factor space, in our case, p < 0.0043 was observed (Table 4).
The variance analysis showed that, under the established experimental conditions, the greatest contribution to the total variance of the output parameter is made by the temperature of the sulfation process. This is indicated by the high dispersion factors F for the main effects, also called the efficiencies (see Table 4).
The dependence of the sulfur content Y1 in arabinogalactan sulfates on the variable process factors is approximated by the regression equation:
Y1 = −111.536 + 2.27633X1 + 3.14067X2 + 1.0695X3 − 0.0103333X12 + 0.004X1X2 − 0.013X1X3 − 0.437333X22
0.064X2X3 + 0.00866667X32
The predictive properties of Equation (1) are illustrated in Figure 3, in which the experimental output parameter Y1 is compared with its values calculated using Equation (1). The straight shows the calculated Y1 values and dots correspond to the results of observations. The proximity of the dots to the line confirms the good predictive properties of Equation (1).
Figure 4 shows a graphical representation of Equation (1) in the form of a response surface.
The dependence of the output parameter Y1 on the variable factors X1 and X2 is described by a slightly curved response surface and reaches a ‘plateau’ after the X2 value of 2.5 h (Figure 3). The dependence of the output parameter Y1 on the variable factors X1 and X3 is described by an almost flat (with slight bends) response surface with a constant increase as the values of X1 and X3 increase. The dependence of the output parameter Y1 on the variable factors X2 and X3 has an ‘arched’ appearance with a maximum for X2 2 h, after which there is a slight decrease in values (Figure 4).
In addition, the quality of the approximation is characterized by the coefficient of determination R2adj. In the problem under consideration, it is R2adj = 94.0%, which indicates the high quality of the approximation. Therefore, we can state that the data obtained using Equation (1) are consistent with the observation results and this equation can be used as a mathematical model of the investigated process.
The calculated optimal parameters of the sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in dioxane in the presence of urea are a sulfamic acid amount of 15 mmol per 1 g of arabinogalactan, a temperature of 85 °C, and a time of 2.5 h.

2.3. Effect of the Method of Isolation of Sulfated Arabinogalactan on Its Molecular Weight Characteristics

A classical method of purification of high molecular weight compounds from low molecular weight impurities is the dialysis process, in which low molecular weight components are removed through a semipermeable membrane. A membrane is conventionally a film based on cellulose derivatives with a pore size from 3 to 100 kDa. However, this polymer purification method is rather laborious. In view of this, we compared the molecular weight characteristics of the sulfated arabinogalactan samples obtained directly from the reaction medium and purified by dialysis. Chromatograms of the crude sulfated arabinogalactan samples are shown in Figure 5.
It was found that the main arabinogalactan peak with a retention time of ~22 min shifts to the left with an increase in the sulfation time, which indicates an increase in the mass of polymer chains due to the included sulfate groups. The peaks with a retention time of more than 25 min correspond to the initial reagents (sulfamic acid, urea, and dioxane) and to the low molecular weight reaction products.
The peaks corresponding to the main product are somewhat broadened, which can be attributed to the inhomogeneity of the initial arabinogalactan molecules and the fact that the low- and high-molecular chains are sulfated differently.
To remove the low molecular weight chains, the initial arabinogalactan was also dialyzed and then sulfated (Figure 5).
At a sulfation process time of 60 min, the ‘low molecular weight’ shoulder appears at the main arabinogalactan peak. As the time increases to 120 min, arabinogalactan completely passes to the low molecular weight form. In this case, the product yield was lower than 30%. These changes may indicate that, during dialysis of the initial arabinogalactan, the stabilizing polysaccharide chains were removed, which intensified the glycosidic bond breaking and the formation of low molecular weight products during sulfation.
The GPC data on the dialyzed sulfated arabinogalactan samples obtained at a temperature of 85 °C and the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15 (g:mmol) are presented in Figure 6.
According to the GPC data, during the dialysis, low molecular weight impurities were removed almost completely, while the retention time and form of the main product remained unchanged, in contrast to the case of the crude samples. Thus, the GPC technique can be used to analyze the molecular weight characteristics of crude products of sulfation of arabinogalactan without the additional laborious dialysis process. The use of cellophane bags in dialysis, which have smaller pore sizes than those used, could lead to the appearance of the low molecular weight fraction peak on the chromatogram and a different molecular weight distribution.

2.4. GPC Study of the Dynamics of the Molecular Weight Distribution of Sulfated Arabinogalactan

The GPC data on the MWD for the samples of the reaction mass of arabinogalactan sulfation at different process times and temperatures of 85 and 95 °C are given in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively.
The GPC data showed that, in contrast to the initial arabinogalactan, the number-average and weight-average molecular weights of sulfated arabinogalactan increase with the sulfation temperature already in the first 10–30 min of the process due to the introduction of sulfate groups; the degree of polydispersity changes insignificantly as compared with the value for the initial arabinogalactan and remains within 1.11–1.16 (Table 5).
Sulfation of arabinogalactan at a temperature of 85 °C and a process time of up to 90–120 min (Table 5) proceeds with an increase in the number-average and weight-average molecular weights of the sulfated polymer over the entire reaction time and is not accompanied by a significant change in the polydispersity of the reaction products, as compared with each other and with the initial arabinogalactan. The growth of the polymer molecular weight is apparently due to the change in the degree of sulfation of arabinogalactan, which increases with the process time [28]. The molecular weight characteristics of the investigated sulfated polymer suggest that, for a process time of up to 120 min, no significant destruction is observed in the initial and sulfated arabinogalactan. In 120 min, the molecular weights of the samples slightly decrease, which can be attributed to the onset of destruction processes. After dialysis of sulfated arabinogalactan at 85 °C for 180 min, the sample with a narrow MWD and a degree of polydispersity of 1.11 was obtained, which allows us to speak about purification from low molecular weight impurities and products of partial depolymerization of arabinogalactan.
The chromatographic study of the molecular weight characteristics of the arabinogalactan sulfation products obtained at 95 °C yielded different results (Table 6).
Up to a 50-min process time, the maximum peak coordinate Mp increases, most likely due to the introduction of sulfate groups into the macromolecule, while the Mw value decreases with an increase in polydispersity. Such a change in the molecular weight characteristics can result from the partial destruction of both the initial and sulfated arabinogalactan. To 120–180 min of the sulfation process, the molecular weights significantly decrease. A decrease in the molecular weight was previously observed during mechanochemical activation of arabinogalactan [29]. As was shown in [30], during sulfation of the mechanically activated arabinogalactan with a sulfuric anhydride‒pyridine complex in pyridine, with an increase in the sulfation temperature, the low molecular weight fraction in the sulfated product increases simultaneously with the sulfur content, which is due to the intensified partial destruction of the initial arabinogalactan and its sulfated derivatives.
The obtained results of the study of the molecular weight characteristics of the samples of the reaction mass sulfated at 85 and the duration of the process 40–180 min show that under these conditions the formation of sulfated products with close values of the average molecular weight, molecular weight distribution, and sulfur content (~12%). In contrast, the results of the chromatographic study of the molecular weight characteristics of the samples of the reaction mass sulfated at 95 °C and a process duration of 20–60 min show the possibility of obtaining sulfated arabinogalactan of different average molecular weight, but close molecular weight distribution and sulfur content (~12%). The results obtained in the future can be useful in studying the effect of the preparation conditions and the value of the molecular weight of the sulfated biopolymer on its anticoagulant activity.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Material

AG from the wood of the Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) produced by OOO “Khimiya drevesiny” (“Chemistry of wood”, Irkutsk, Russia) under the trade name “FibrolarS” was used as the initial material.

3.2. Synthesis of Sulfated Arabinogalactan

Sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane in the presence of urea, ethylurea, biuret, methylurea and hydroxyethyl urea (base), using the modified procedure, described in [28]. 1,4-dioxane (50 mL), sulfamic acid 4.9–9.7 g (50–100 mmol), and suitable base catalyst (50–100 mmol) were placed in a three-necked bottle equipped with a thermometer, a mechanical stirrer, and a water bath, the mixture was heated under intensive stirring to a fixed value (according to the sulfation conditions given in Table 1 and Table 3), air-dried AG (5 g) was added, and the mixture was stirred at this temperature for 0.5–3 h. After the termination of sulfation, the solvent was decanted, the resulting viscous residue was dissolved in water (25 mL), and excessive sulfamic acid was neutralized by a 25% aqueous ammonia solution to the neutral reaction and poured into ethanol (100 mL). The resulting viscous product was separated and washed three times by ethanol (10 mL each portion) until a solid precipitate formed. The precipitate, which was a sulfated AG derivative in the form of ammonium salt, was washed on a filter with 10 mL of ethanol and dried in air. The ammonium salt of sulfated AG was dissolved in 30 mL of distilled water and was purified by the dialysis on cellophane against distilled water. The product was dialyzed for 10–15 h; water was changed at 1–2 h intervals. Dialysis bag MF-5030-46 (MFPI, Seguin, TX, USA) with a pore size of 3.5 kDa and width of 46 mm was used. For the comparison of the molecular weight characteristics of the sulfated arabinogalactan obtained at different temperatures and duration of the sulfation process, a portion of the reaction mass was taken and was studied by gel permeation chromatography (Figure 4 and Figure 5; Table 5 and Table 6).

3.3. Experimental Methods

The dynamics of the molecular weight characteristics of the reaction mass during the sulfation of arabinogalactan was studied by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The reaction mass samples (100–200 mg) for the GPC investigations were taken after 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min of the process, dissolved in 5 mL of distilled water, and neutralized with an aqueous solution of ammonia to pH 7.
The molecular weight distribution (MWD) of the reaction mass samples was determined on an Agilent 1200 Infinity II multi-detector GPC/SEC system with triple detection: refractometer (PL), viscometer (VS) and light scattering (LS). The separation was made on two Aquagel-OH Mixed-M columns (300 × 7.5 mm, 8 µm) using the aqueous solution of 0.1 M NaNO3 (pH = 7) as a mobile phase. The column was calibrated by the polyethylene glycol standards (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The eluent flow rate was 1 mL/min and the sample volume was 100 μL. Before the analysis, the samples were dissolved in the mobile phase (1 mg/mL) and filtered through a 0.22 μm hydrophilic PTFE membrane filter (Agilent). Data collection and data processing were performed using the Agilent GPC/SEC MDS software.
The sulfur content was determined on a Thermo Quest Flash EA-1112 thermal analyzer (Thermo Electron, Milan, Italy). This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.
The software Statgraphics Centurion XVI V16.1.09, DOE block (design of experiment), was used for numerical optimization of the AG sulfation process [40].

4. Conclusions

In this study, the dynamics of the molecular weight characteristics of sulfated arabinogalactan upon variation in the temperature and time of sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane was investigated.
It was found that, during sulfation of arabinogalactan at 85 °C with an increase in the process time from 10 to 90 min, the molecular weights of the reaction products increase due to the introduction of sulfate groups without significant destruction of the initial polymer and sulfation products. Sulfation at 95 °C for 20 min leads to the formation of the products with a higher molecular weight than at 85 °C, since the sulfation rate increases; however, in the further course of the process under these conditions, sulfation is accompanied by destruction and the molecular weight of the sulfated polymer decreases.
The conditions for obtaining sulfated arabinogalactan with the desired molecular weight characteristics were established.
The effect of urea-based activators on sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid was examined. It was shown that an increase in the substituent chain length leads to a decrease in the sulfur content in arabinogalactan sulfate. It was found that urea exhibits the best activating ability among the investigated activators.
The Box‒Behnken numerical optimization of the process of sulfation of arabinogalactan with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane was performed. It was shown that the optimal parameters for obtaining arabinogalactan sulfate with the maximum sulfur content (12.8 wt %) are a sulfamic acid amount of 20 mmol per 1 g of arabinogalactan, a process temperature of 85 °C, and a process time of 2.5 h.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.N.M. and N.Y.V.; Methodology, N.Y.V. and A.S.K. (Aleksandr S. Kazachenko); Software, N.I.; Validation, Y.N.M., N.Y.V. and A.S.K. (Aleksandr S. Kazachenko); Formal analysis, A.S.K. (Aleksandr S. Kazachenko), V.A.I., V.S.B. and A.V.M.; Investigation, A.S.K. (Aleksandr S. Kazachenko), A.M.S., V.S.B., A.S.K. (Anna S. Kazachenko) and D.V.Z.; Resources, N.Y.V.; Data curation, Y.N.M., N.Y.V., A.V.M. and A.S.K. (Anna S. Kazachenko); Writing—original draft preparation, Y.N.M., N.Y.V. and A.S.K. (Aleksandr S. Kazachenko); Writing—review and editing, Y.N.M. and N.Y.V.; Visualization, V.S.B., A.V.M., D.V.Z. and N.I.; Supervision, Y.N.M.; Project administration, Y.N.M.; Funding participants, Y.N.M., A.M.S. and V.A.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was supported by Russian Science Foundation, grant N 21-73-20269 using the equipment of Krasnoyarsk Regional Research Equipment Centre of SB RAS.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated during this study are included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Zamani, M.; Khafaji, M.; Naji, M.; Vossoughi, M.; Alemzadeh, I.; Haghighipour, N. A biomimetic heparinized composite silk-based vascular scaffold with sustained antithrombogenicity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Krylov, V.; Ustyuzhanina, N.E.; Nifantiev, N.E. Synthesis of low-molecular-weight carbohydrate mimetics of heparin. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2011, 37, 672–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gray, E.; Mulloy, B.; Barrowcliffe, T.W. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin. Thromb. Haemost. 2008, 99, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mourão, P.A.S. Perspective on the use of sulfated polysaccharides from marine organisms as a source of new antithrombotic drugs. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2770–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Duric, K.; Kovac-Besovic, E.E.; Niksic, H.; Muratović, S.; Sofic, E. Anticoagulant activity of some Artemisia dracunculus leaf extracts. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2015, 15, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jiao, G.; Yu, G.; Zhang, J.; Ewart, S. Chemical structures and bioactivities of sulfated polysaccharides from Marine algae mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 196–223. [Google Scholar]
  7. Alban, S. Anticoagulant sulfated polysaccharides: Part I. Synthesis and structure–activity relationships of new pullulan sulfates. Carbohydr. Polym. 2002, 47, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Desai, U.R. New antithrombin-based anticoagulants. Med. Res. Rev. 2003, 24, 151–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Drozd, N.N.; Kuznetsova, S.A.; Savchik, E.Y.; Miftakhova, N.T.; Vasil’Eva, N.Y. Effects of subcutaneous microcrystalline cellulose sulfate extracted from the wood of the siberian fir (Abies sibirica Ledeb) on the Clotting of Rabbit Plasma. Pharm. Chem. J. 2015, 49, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, L.; Huang, X.; Zhang, W.-D. Preparation of cellulose sulphate and evaluation of its properties. J. Fiber Bioeng. Inform. 2010, 3, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Paulsen, B.S.; Barsett, H. Bioactive pectic polysaccharides. In Polysaccharides I. Advances in Polymer Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; Volume 186, pp. 69–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oliveira, R.C.R.; Almeida, R.R.; Gonçalves, T.A. A review of plant sulfated polysaccharides and their relations with anticoagulant activities. J. Dev. Drugs 2016, 5, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shurygina, I.A.; Sukhov, B.G.; Fadeeva, T.V.; Umanets, V.A.; Shurygin, M.; Ganenko, T.V.; Kostyro, Y.A.; Grigoriev, E.G.; Trofimov, B.A. Bactericidal action of Ag(0)-antithrombotic sulfated arabinogalactan nanocomposite: Coevolution of initial nanocomposite and living microbial cell to a novel nonliving nanocomposite. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2011, 7, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kostyro, Y.A.; Kovalskaya, G.N. Sulfated arabinogalactan—A promising domestic analogue of sulodexide. Acta Biomed. Sci. 2008, 60, 117. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuznetsova, S.A.; Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Drozd, N.N.; Mikhailenko, M.A.; Shakhtshneider, T.P.; Malyar, Y.N.; Kuznetsov, B.N.; Chesnokov, N.V. Sulfated derivatives of arabinogalactan and their anticoagulant activity. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 46, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Drozd, N.N.; Bannikova, G.E.; Makarov, V.; Varlamov, V.P. Anticoagulant activity of sulfated polysaccharides. Eksperimental’naia Klin. Farmakol. 2007, 69, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ciancia, M.; Quintana, I.; Cerezo, A.S. Overview of Anticoagulant Activity of Sulfated Polysaccharides from Seaweeds in Relation to their Structures, Focusing on those of Green Seaweeds. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 2503–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pereira, M.S.; Melo, F.R.; Mourão, P.A. Is there a correlation between structure and anticoagulant action of sulfated galactans and sulfated fucans? Glycobiology 2002, 12, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Liu, R. Overview on biological activities and molecular characteristics of sulfated polysaccharides from marine green algae in recent years. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 4984–5020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wu, Q.X.; Guan, Y.X.; Yao, S.J. Sodium cellulose sulfate: A promising biomaterial used for microcarriers’ designing. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2019, 13, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Yang, L.; Yang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z. In Vitro antioxidant activities of sulfated derivatives of polysaccharides extracted from Auricularia auricular. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 3288–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tang, S.; Wang, T.; Huang, C.; Lai, C.; Fan, Y.; Yong, Q. Sulfated modification of arabinogalactans from Larix principis-rupprechtii and their antitumor activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 215, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Levdansky, A.V.; Karacharov, A.A.; Mazurova, E.V.; Bondarenko, G.N.; Levdansky, V.A.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Kuznetsov, B.N. Study of structure of product’s obtained by sulfation of arabinogalactan from Larch wood with chlorosulfonic acid in pyridine. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Chem. 2014, 7, 547–555. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ganenko, T.V.; Tantsyrev, A.P.; Sapozhnikov, A.N.; Khutsishvili, S.S.; Vakulskaya, T.I.; Fadeeva, T.V.; Sukhov, B.; Trofimov, B. Nanocomposites of silver with arabinogalactan sulfate: Preparation, structure, and antimicrobial activity. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2015, 85, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vasil’Eva, N.Y.; Levdansky, A.V.; Kuznetsov, B.N.; Skvortsova, G.P.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Djakovitch, L.; Pinel, C. Sulfation of arabinogalactan by sulfamic acid in dioxane. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2015, 41, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Levdansky, A.V.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Djakovitch, L.; Pinel, C.; Kuznetsov, B.N. Sulfation of mechanically activated arabinogalactan by complex sulfuric anhydride—pyridine in pyridine medium. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Chem. 2013, 6, 158–169. [Google Scholar]
  27. Medvedeva, E.N.; Babkin, V.A.; Ostroukhova, L.A. Larch arabinogalactan: Properties and application prospects. Khimia Rastit. Syr’ia 2003, 1, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  28. Babkin, V.A.; Neverova, N.A.; Medvedeva, E.N.; Fedorova, T.E.; Levchuk, A.A. Investigation of physicochemical properties of arabinogalactan of different larch species. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2016, 42, 707–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Holmbom, B. Isolation and characterisation of water soluble polysaccharides from Norway spruce and Scots pine. Wood Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ermakova, M.F.; Chistyakova, A.K.; Shchukina, L.V.; Pshenichnikova, T.; Medvedeva, E.N.; Neverova, N.A.; Belovezhets, L.A.; Babkin, V.A. Effect of arabinogalactan isolated from Siberian larch on the baking value of soft wheat flour and bread quality. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2010, 36, 951–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Medvedeva, E.N.; Neverova, N.A.; Fedorova, T.E.; Babkin, V.A.; Meteleva, E.S.; Dushkin, A.V.; Tolstikova, T.G.; Khvostov, M.V.; Dolgikh, M.P. Structural transformations of arabinogalactan from the Siberian larch during mechanochemical processing and the biological properties of the products. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2010, 36, 853–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goellner, E.M.; Utermoehlen, J.; Kramer, R.; Classen, B. Structure of arabinogalactan from Larix laricina and its reactivity with antibodies directed against type-II-arabinogalactans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1739–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kazachenko, A.S.; Tomilin, F.N.; Pozdnyakova, A.A.; Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Malyar, Y.N.; Kuznetsova, S.A.; Avramov, P.V. Theoretical DFT interpretation of infrared spectra of biologically active arabinogalactan sulphated derivatives. Chem. Pap. 2020, 74, 4103–4113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kuznetsov, B.N.; Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Levdansky, A.V.; Karacharov, A.A.; Krylov, A.S.; Mazurova, E.V.; Bondarenko, G.N.; Levdansky, V.A.; Kazachenko, A.S. The raman spectroscopy, XRD, SEM, and AFM study of arabinogalactan sulfates obtained using sulfamic acid. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 43, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Al-Horani, R.; Desai, U.R. Chemical sulfation of small molecules—Advances and challenges. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 2907–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Spillane, W.; Malaubier, J.-B. Sulfamic acid and its n- and o-substituted derivatives. Chem. Rev. 2013, 114, 2507–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kazachenko, A.S.; Malyar, Y.N.; Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Fetisova, O.Y.; Chudina, A.I.; Sudakova, I.G.; Antonov, A.V.; Borovkova, V.S.; Kuznetsova, S.A. Isolation and sulfation of galactoglucomannan from larch wood (Larix sibirica). Wood Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 1091–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kazachenko, A.S.; Malyar, Y.N.; Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Bondarenko, G.N.; Korolkova, I.V.; Antonov, A.V.; Karacharov, A.A.; Fetisova, O.Y.; Skvortsova, G.P. «Green» synthesis and characterization of galactomannan sulfates obtained using sulfamic acid. Biomass-Convers. Biorefin. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Johny, L.C.; Kudre, T.G.; Suresh, P.V. Production of egg white hydrolysate by digestion with pineapple bromelain: Optimization, evaluation and antioxidant activity study. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pen, R.Z. Planning an Experiment at Statgraphics Centurion; SibSTU: Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 2014; 291p. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Fragment of the arabinogalactan molecule with marked hydroxyl groups responsible for the occurrence of predominant sulphation. The main chain consists of galactose units linked by glycosidic bonds, and the side chains consist of galactose and arabinose units and separate arabinose units.
Figure 1. Fragment of the arabinogalactan molecule with marked hydroxyl groups responsible for the occurrence of predominant sulphation. The main chain consists of galactose units linked by glycosidic bonds, and the side chains consist of galactose and arabinose units and separate arabinose units.
Molecules 26 05364 g001
Figure 2. Scheme of sulfation of arabinogalactan.
Figure 2. Scheme of sulfation of arabinogalactan.
Molecules 26 05364 g002
Figure 3. Results of observations vs. Y1 values predicted by mathematical model (1).
Figure 3. Results of observations vs. Y1 values predicted by mathematical model (1).
Molecules 26 05364 g003
Figure 4. Response surface of the output parameters under different effects of the experimental conditions.
Figure 4. Response surface of the output parameters under different effects of the experimental conditions.
Molecules 26 05364 g004
Figure 5. Gel permeation chromatograms of the solutions of sulfated arabinogalactan samples at a temperature of 85 °C, the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15 (g:mmol).
Figure 5. Gel permeation chromatograms of the solutions of sulfated arabinogalactan samples at a temperature of 85 °C, the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15 (g:mmol).
Molecules 26 05364 g005
Figure 6. Gel permeation chromatograms of the sulfated arabinogalactan samples after dialysis (temperature of 85 °C and the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15).
Figure 6. Gel permeation chromatograms of the sulfated arabinogalactan samples after dialysis (temperature of 85 °C and the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15).
Molecules 26 05364 g006
Table 1. Effect of the urea-based activators on the MWD and sulfur content in arabinogalactan sulfated with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane at 85 °C for 3 h, the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15 (g:mmol).
Table 1. Effect of the urea-based activators on the MWD and sulfur content in arabinogalactan sulfated with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane at 85 °C for 3 h, the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15 (g:mmol).
No.SampleActivatorActivator FormulaMpMn (Da)Mw (Da)PDSulfur Content, wt %
1Initial arabinogalactan--9451799810,3401.29
2Sulfated arabinogalactanurea Molecules 26 05364 i00119,90217,66119,6671.1112.6
3Sulfated arabinogalactanethyl
urea
Molecules 26 05364 i0029838896810,9691.228.0
4Sulfated arabinogalactanbiuret Molecules 26 05364 i0039681859110,9531.277.6
5Sulfated arabinogalactanhydroxyethyl urea Molecules 26 05364 i0049838915511,1301.228.0
6Sulfated arabinogalactanmethyl
urea
Molecules 26 05364 i00510,406956712,3101.299.4
Table 2. Independent factors and output parameter (experimental results).
Table 2. Independent factors and output parameter (experimental results).
Factors and ParametersDesignation in the EquationsRange
Process temperature, °CX175–85
Process time, hX20.5–3.0
Amount of sulfating complex per 1 g AG, mmolX310–20
Sulfur content, wt %Y1-
Table 3. Effect of the conditions for arabinogalactan sulfation with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane in the presence of urea on the degree of substitution in arabinogalactan sulfates.
Table 3. Effect of the conditions for arabinogalactan sulfation with sulfamic acid in 1,4-dioxane in the presence of urea on the degree of substitution in arabinogalactan sulfates.
Temperature, °CProcess Time, hAmount of Sulfating Complex Per 1 g AG, mmolSulfur Content, wt %
1801.75159.9
2750.5155.6
3850.51510.1
4753157.7
58531512.3
6751.75106.9
7851.751011.7
8801.75159.8
9751.75208.6
10851.752012.1
11800.5106.4
12803109.9
13800.5209.7
148032011.6
15801.75159.9
Table 4. Result of the variance analysis.
Table 4. Result of the variance analysis.
Variance SourceStatistical Characteristic
F Factorp Value
X1146.780.0001
X245.620.0011
X324.440.0043
X120.960.3732
X1X20.010.9254
X1X31.640.2567
X226.690.0491
X2X32.480.176
X320.670.4496
Df14
R297.9
R2adj94.0
Table 5. MWD for the samples of the reaction mass sulfated at a temperature of 85 °C, the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15.
Table 5. MWD for the samples of the reaction mass sulfated at a temperature of 85 °C, the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15.
Sample No.Time, minMp, DaMn, DaMw, DaMn/Mw%S
AG15,60114,39316,7891.16
11017,11115,18117,5251.157.79
22018,36915,49217,4181.129.82
33019,12216,11718,0321.1211.047
44019,90216,77618,7561.1212.30
55019,90216,77218,7861.1212.30
66020,10116,94118,9151.1212.62
79020,30217,17719,0841.1112.95
812020,10116,97918,9301.1212.62
915019,90816,73718,7401.1212.31
1018019,90316,68918,6921.1212.30
11 *18019,90217,66119,6671.1112.30
* Dialysis-purified sulfated arabinogalactan (the sulfur content is 12.3 wt %).
Table 6. MWD for the samples of the reaction mass sulfated at a temperature of 95 °C, the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15.
Table 6. MWD for the samples of the reaction mass sulfated at a temperature of 95 °C, the ratio of the amount of the complex to the amount of the polysaccharide corresponds to 1:15.
Sample No.Time, minMp, DaMn, DaMw, DaDegree of Polydispersity, Mn/Mw%S
AG15,60114,39316,7891.16
11020,10116,85018,8031.1212.62
22020,91516,22118,3311.1313.93
33020,70915,24117,3431.1413.60
44020,50415,01917,2491.1413.27
55020,50414,36216,6601.1613.27
66020,30212,93915,0101.1612.94
79018,18412,75514,9241.179.52
812016,85712,23614,4391.187.37
915014,50412,20614,2821.173.57
1018013,90511,87913,8891.172.60
11 *18016,937844012,6611.5013.9
* Dialysis-purified sulfated arabinogalactan (the sulfur content is 13.9 wt %).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malyar, Y.N.; Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Borovkova, V.S.; Skripnikov, A.M.; Miroshnikova, A.V.; Zimonin, D.V.; Ionin, V.A.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Issaoui, N. Modification of Arabinogalactan Isolated from Larix sibirica Ledeb. into Sulfated Derivatives with the Controlled Molecular Weights. Molecules 2021, 26, 5364. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175364

AMA Style

Malyar YN, Vasilyeva NY, Kazachenko AS, Borovkova VS, Skripnikov AM, Miroshnikova AV, Zimonin DV, Ionin VA, Kazachenko AS, Issaoui N. Modification of Arabinogalactan Isolated from Larix sibirica Ledeb. into Sulfated Derivatives with the Controlled Molecular Weights. Molecules. 2021; 26(17):5364. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175364

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malyar, Yuriy N., Natalia Yu. Vasilyeva, Aleksandr S. Kazachenko, Valentina S. Borovkova, Andrei M. Skripnikov, Angelina V. Miroshnikova, Dmitriy V. Zimonin, Vladislav A. Ionin, Anna S. Kazachenko, and Noureddine Issaoui. 2021. "Modification of Arabinogalactan Isolated from Larix sibirica Ledeb. into Sulfated Derivatives with the Controlled Molecular Weights" Molecules 26, no. 17: 5364. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175364

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop