Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Optical Hydrogen Sensor including Use of Metal and Metal Alloys: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Silicon Waveguide Sensors for Carbon Dioxide Gas Sensing in the Mid-Infrared Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Continuously Tunable and Filter-Less QPSK Modulated Millimeter-Wave Signal Generation with Frequency Quadrupling Just Based on an MZM
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enriching Capacity and Transmission of Hybrid WDM-FSO Link for 5G Mobility

1
Shenzhen Pango Microsystems Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518063, China
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, Qurtuba University of Science and IT, Dera Ismail Khan 29050, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(2), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020121
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Radio over Fiber Techniques for 5G and Beyond)

Abstract

:
A dramatic increase in user and capacity demands has been noted after the COVID-19 pandemic. These challenges have damaged the 5G communication system mobility. Therefore, developing mobility and enhancing capacity transmission of 5G advanced services are the focused research gaps in the current era. In this paper, the free space optics (FSO) link is modeled with wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) technology based optical fiber system, purposing to enhance the 5G capabilities in multi-channel, high distance, and bidirectional transmissions. In addition, the presented hybrid FSO-WDM supported optical fiber network is analyzed for 4, 8, and 16 × 10 Gbps downlink and uplink transmission. The paper also includes the mathematical discussion of merged fiber length (SMF = 30 km) and FSO (600 m) with improved mobility management. In another contribution, the tolerance against Rayleigh backscattering (RB) noises is developed through various wavelengths of downlink and uplink channels. Finally, we perform the simulation analysis and reliability of the proposed structure for the 5G advanced communication system.

1. Introduction

The Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) based optical communication has successfully achieved the bandwidth requirements, particularly for the end users. The WDM enabled optical network technology is shifted to the WDM based passive optical network (WDM-PON), purposing to fulfill end users’ high capacity and multi-user demands [1]. However, the existing WDM-PON cannot perform well for large coverage areas and the user’s positions where the fiber has to be deployed over hilly areas, multistory buildings, and rivers. The WDM-PON uses the single mode fiber (SMF) for transmitting high data rate and multi-user data up to long distances [2]. This results in degrading the performance of the WDM-PON communication setup because of various losses like nonlinear and phase impairments. Therefore, new solutions are needed to tackle above mentioned limitations. Currently, the researchers are targeting the combined structure of free space optics (FSO), and optical fiber technology, which is an excellent choice for propagating high capacity information [3]. This methodology has organized the 5G communication based services, including long distance transmissions. On the other side, the current integrated optical fiber and FSO based 5G system faces new issues called Rayleigh backscattering (RB), which has bounded the system outcomes and distorts the mobility of 5G technology [4]. Furthermore, for next generation communication networks, the existing system is considered complex and costly. Thus, in order to design a less complex and cost effective model, various research works have been done so far. Researchers are pushing the 5G new radio (NR) to a higher band, specifically the sub-THz spectrum spanning between 100 and 300 GHz, due to recent advances in sub-terahertz (sub-THz) technology [5]. Due to its high data rates, 5G NR connections in the sub-THz spectrum are becoming more and more common. The high frequencies needed to increase data rates significantly are present in the sub-THz range [6]. The sub-THz band is highly suited for many future 5G applications that demand extremely fast data rates because of its high-frequency characteristics. The high-frequency property of 5G NR sub-THz communication enables the transmission of massive amounts of data across short distances. However, the significant air loss transmission window of 5G NR sub-THz communication limits the wireless transmission range. Due to its sub-THz connectivity limitations, 5G is appropriate for highly populated locations. In sparsely inhabited places, 5G sub-THz connectivity is not ideal because it cannot deliver signals through long-range wireless transmission. Researchers have naturally looked into other high frequency bands, especially the sub-terahertz (sub-THz) band, which is placed above the millimeter-wave (MMW) band, given the expanding use of MMW communications [7]. The sub-THz spectrum can be used in various developing applications that demand high access data rates because of its enormous bandwidth. MMW and sub-THz communications can deliver fast data rates across close ranges due to their properties. The MMW and sub-THz bands of 5G NR are more suitable for short-range wireless transmission than long-range wireless transmission due to their communication restrictions [8]. Aiming the transmission rates at several tens of Gb/s while employing an integrated fiber optics and FSO-based 5G NR system for the simultaneous transmission of 5G MMW and sub-THz signals is a potential strategy for accomplishing the goals of high transmission capacity and long-haul transmission. By fusing long-reach fiber-FSO convergence with short-range 5G wireless extension, the combined fiber optic and FSO enabled 5G NR system is capable of high transmission capacity, high access data rates, long-haul transmissions, and broad service regions. In [9], the authors have shown recent progress on FSO technology and the factors that interpret the outcomes. The study in [10] evaluates the performance of the FSO system in diverse geographical locations. The channel induced limitations are mitigated using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and digital signal processing (DSP) techniques. A. Bekkali et al. [11] suggested a full duplex and all FSO transceivers and evaluated its performance. The quality factor and electrical power were investigated for FSO links in [12], and simulation analyses were performed using an optisystem. Intensity modulation and direct modulation (IM/DD) FSO link was studied in [13] in terms of bit error rate (BER). Ref. [14] explained the OFDM mode division multiplexing (OFDM-MDM) based FSO transceiver. The dust effect is estimated using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and total power as key measuring parameters. The impact of sandstorm conditions was analyzed in [15] for FSO links. The backhaul network was introduced in [16] for a 5G based FSO system, and the performance is evaluated and compared with a conventional FSO link. In [17], the role of the FSO framework was investigated for the next generation satellite communication system. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has pushed the online application and marketing services and overburdened the already installed FSO setups. In this paper, the free space optics (FSO) link is modeled with wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) technology based optical fiber system, purposing to enhance the 5G capabilities in multi-channel, high distance, and bidirectional transmissions. The major contribution of this paper are summarized as follows
(1)
Long distance optical fiber communication models for 5G services are interrupted by nonlinear issues, so to minimize these issues and provide 5G smart services to the end users, the WDM-FSO link is suggested in this paper.
(2)
The joint structure of the WDM-FSO link is evaluated based on a 600 m FSO range and 30 km FSO volume, aiming to sustain the mobility issue of 5G wired and wireless communication systems.
(3)
The impacts of RB issues are examined and suppressed by applying the presented bidirectional WDM-FSO link with advanced modulation schemes and NR-Sub-THz channels.
(4)
The bidirectional WDM-FSO link performance is evaluated for enhancing the 5G mobility, using mathematical and simulation models in attenuation, received power, different weather conditions, and modulation formats.
The remaining sections of this paper are managed as follows. Section 2 describes the proposed experimental model, the theoretical background of the presented WDM-FSO link is discussed in Section 3, Section 4 mentions the results and discussion of the estimated simulation model designed based on the mathematical model, and the conclusion is summarized in the final section (Section 5).

2. Proposed Experimental Model

The block diagram of the proposed hybrid WDM-FSO link with bidirectional configuration is mentioned in Figure 1. At the input side, a multi-wavelength-based laser source is used, aiming to produce optical pulses. This laser source includes InAs/InP quantum dash laser diode (QDLD), coupler (CP) with 3 dB size, optical circulator (OC), and inducing self-generated optical comb tunable band pass filter (TBPF). The density of QD consists of 2.5 × 10 10 cm 2 , including 2.4 nm height and 19 nm diameter. In addition, 13 mA operating current is applied to QDLD. The generated optical pulses are then transformed to mach Zender modulator (MZM), and in parallel, the 64bQAM-OFDM based 5G NR = SubTHz signals are induced and injected into the MZM. The 64QAM-OFDM signals are produced using a series-to-parallel converter (S/P), a cyclic prefix (CP), symbol mapping, a parallel-to-serial converter (P/S), digital-to-analog conversion (DAC), an inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT). The conjugate symmetric data are made before the IFFT function, further enhancing the 64 OFDM process. After the modulation procedure ends, the data is passed on to the erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) to amplify the signals before further transmission. The amplified channels with 50 GHz spacing are received by a WDM multiplexer (WDM-Mux) and propagated over SMF/FSO link (15 km SMF + 600 FSO + 15 km SMF). The 64QAM-OFDM demodulation is connected to the end side of the described fiber FSO system in the final stage. All of the important parameters, including P/S and S/P converters, QAM demapper, CP removal, FFT, and ADC, are present in this block. The list of required parameters for investigating the presented model performance and simulation outcomes is mentioned in Table 1.

3. Theoretical Background

The mixed FSO and fiber link system is introduced in this paper, purposing to minimize the nonlinear issues and FSO related impairments like RF alignment issues, FSO pointing errors, and Co-channel interference. This section includes the analytical calculations for the proposed FSO and optical systems. The channel model of FSO is defined [18,19] as
F c h = ψ a ψ p ψ l .
where the F c h presents the FSO channel, ψ a , is the atmospheric turbulence loss, ψ l is the geometric loss, and the ψ p is the FSO pointing issues. Three components are considered for optical signal transmission [20]. (1) Line of sight component. (2) Line of sight coupled with the scattered component. (3) Independent scattered component. The power distribution function (pdf) for free space is expressed [21,22,23,24] as
f F c h ( F c h ) = B Σ n = 1 β m a n F c h α m + n 2 1 N α n ( 2 α m β m F c h γ β m + P )
and B means
B = 2 α m α m / 2 γ 1 + α m / 2 φ ( α m ) ( γ β m β m + P ) β m + α m / 2
where α m is the large scale scattering process, β m is the fading parameter, γ is the independent scattering component, and φ ( . ) represents gamma function. The p is defined as
p = p + 2 τ b 0 ,
where the p is the power for the first line of sight component and 2 τ b 0 is the coupled line of sight and scattered component. The parameter a n is further explain [25] as
a n = β m 1 n 1 ( γ β m + p ) 1 n 2 ( n 1 ) ! ( p U ) n 1 ( α m β m ) n 2
where β m is the fading element, α m is the effective number of large scale scattering process. The transceiver and structural ways condition the FSO system performance; this leads to FSO pointing impairments, and it is calculated in terms of PFD [26,27] as
f ψ p = u 2 A 0 u 2 ( ψ p ) u 2 1 , 0 ψ p A 0
where A 0 is integrated optical power function, u is related to jitter deviation and equal to ω z 2 σ 2 . The data-carrying laser beam’s width is denoted by ω z . The statistical analysis of FSO pointing errors, turbulence fading, and co-channel interference is expressed as
f F c h ( F c h ) = f F c h / ψ a ( F c h / ψ a ) f ψ a ( ψ a ) d ψ a
In Equation (6) the f F c h / ψ a ( F c h / ψ a ) declares the conditional probability. By substituting the Equation (1) to Equation (5) in Equation (6), the CDF of the N channel is defined as
f F c h ( F c h ) = u 2 B 2 Σ n = 1 β m ( a n [ 1 A m ] α + n 2 ) G 2 , 4 3 , 1 ( F c h A B 0 I l )
where G 2 , 4 3 , 1 is the Meijer’s G function. On the transmitter side, multi-pulse position modulation (MPPM) based intensity modulation direct detection system is used for the FSO system. The electrical filter is installed on the receiver side to remove unwanted signals from the original signals. The output of the filtered signal is calculated as
y ( t ) = R N n P R Σ n = 0 N 1 C n + k ( t )
The average received optical power, R is the photodetector responsitivity and, k ( t ) is the additive white Gaussian (AWG), C n is the signal time slot. The transmitter and receiver telescope gains are expressed as
G t = G r = ( π d / λ k ) 2
G t is the transmitter gain, G r is the receiver gain, and d is the diameter. The receiver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the FSO system is estimated as
S N R ( F c h ) = R 2 P t 2 ( η B r λ k L ) 4 M o d l o g 2 M o d 2 M σ n 2 F c h
σ is the variance of channel noise, η is the efficiency, M o d is the modulation order, and M is the number of transceivers. The conditional probability error of the presented integrated optical network and FSO system is calculated [28] as
B E R ( F c h ) = M o d 4 e r f c [ R p R ( F c h ) M o d l o g 2 M o d / 2 σ k ]
where e r f c is the error function. The outage probability of the fading channel is calculated as
p o u t = p ( S N R ) S N R
The flow diagram of the presented theoretical model is mentioned in Figure 2, which explains how the mathematical is utilized for the experimental structure.

4. Results and Discussion

The presented hybrid WDM-FSO link is modeled and discussed mathematically in previous sections. This section includes the results analysis of the simulation framework based on weather conditions, attenuation, RB losses, received power, FSO range, and fiber length. Figure 3 mentions the consequences of simulation setup for different weather conditions like summer, spring, autumn, and winter as a function of attenuation. The analysis of the presented model is also compared in Figure 3 with conventional WDM and FSO structures. Two types of estimations are described in Figure 3, wherein the first type explains that the attenuation of the WDM, FSO, and WDM-FSO links varies according to weather statuses. Like in summer, by reason of high temperature, the attenuation rate is maximum as equated to winter, autumn, and spring. To equate the attenuation rate of the presented WDM-FSO link against the standard WDM framework for summer, the WDM-FSO link is 3dBm less attenuated than standard WDM technology. The investigation of the Q-factor against various weather statuses (clear, drizzle, rainy, storm, and fogy) is measured in Figure 4 for the presented WDM-FSO link using modern modulation schemes. It is seen from Figure 4 that the WDM-FSO link with 64QAM-OFDM generated 5G NR-SubTHz signals gives an acceptable Q-factor even in bad weather conditions. On the other side, the performance of the WDM-FSO link is degraded at fogy and storm weather statuses using 8, 16, 32, and 63 QAM-OFDM modulation structures. It is also evaluated from the results that the ratio of RB generation increases with rainy, foggy, and storm weather statuses. The investigations of RB suppressed outcomes, and RB included WDM-FSO link outcomes are analyzed in Figure 5. These outcomes are evaluated in terms of Q-factor and transmission length. Figure 5 also compares the achievements of WDM-FSO link transmitting 32 and 64QAM-OFDM based 5G NR-subTHz signals with 600 FSO length and 10 Gbps data rate speed. It is investigated that the Q-factor of the output signal decreases with increasing transmission path of SMF. Furthermore, it is noted that RB suppressed based WDM-FSO link gives the output data with satisfactory Q-factor. Next, it is clarified from Figure 5 that achieving the WDM-FSO system enhances by applying a high modulation format (64QAM-OFDM). Figure 6 describes the output power in terms of SMF range simulation analysis at 50 GHz channel spacing, 600 m FSO range, and 10 Gbps data rate speed. These outcomes are then compared among suppressed RB based signals, and RB included signals. The relation between 64QAM-OFDM and 32QAM-OFDM propagated channels is also discussed in Figure 6. This explains that the desired pulses are attained at the receiver side with less power consumption by installing the 64QAM-OFDM based transmitter. Secondly, it is studied that the propagated channels with suppressed RB consumed less power in matching with RB added channels.
The analysis of various divergence angles as a function of the Q-factor is estimated in Figure 7. This figure also matches the outlets of 64QAM-OFDM based WDM-FSO link across rainy and clear weather statuses and suppressed RB based outcomes and without RB suppressed outcomes. From investigations, it is found that there is a clear difference among the products of the WDM-FSO link in clear and rainy weather statuses. However, it is evaluated that the presented model with suppressed RB channel has efficient outcomes in both rainy and precise weather conditions. Estimating the divergence angle, it is declared that system performances are degraded with increasing divergence angle. Figure 8 contains the proposed model measurements in eye diagrams. Where Figure 8a declares the eye diagram of suppressed RB based WDM-FSO link with 64QAM-OFDM generated 5G NR-SubTHz channel in clear weather. Figure 8b includes the outcomes of suppressed RB enabled WDM-FSO link with 64QAM-OFDM generated 5G NR-SubTHz signals in rainy weather. Similarly, the outputs of proposed without suppressed RB based WDM-FSO in clear and rainy weather statuses are presented in Figure 8c,d, respectively. In final step of results and discussion the proposed model products are compared with current models as depicted in Table 2, which shows that the presented has better outcomes as correlated to current frameworks.

5. Conclusions

The deployment of extended range communication networks is significant in this era, aiming to entertain the end users with 5G enabled innovative applications and devices. However, the end users based communication networks generate several hurdles (nonlinear losses, high cost, and RB issues). To resolve these limitations, a new approach called hybrid bidirectional WDM-FSO link is tested in this paper, using NR-Sub-THz channels and modern modulation schemes. The presented model is successfully estimated for 600 m FSO length 30 km SMF range based on different weather conditions and attenuation. This study finds that the attenuation varies with the status of weather and modulation formats. Furthermore, it is concluded from the simulation analysis that the presented hybrid bidirectional WDM-FSO link gives satisfactory outlets after addressing the RB issues. The structures of the proposed model can be further optimized for sustaining 5G mobility in the future by applying deep learning advanced generations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A., K.A., F.A. and M.A.; methodology, A.A., K.A. and F.A.; software, A.A.; validation, Y.S., F.A. and A.A.; formal analysis, M.A.; investigation, A.A.; resources, Y.S. and F.A.; data curation, A.A. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, F.A.; visualization, K.A.; supervision, A.A.; project administration, F.A.; funding acquisition, A.A., K.A., Y.S. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University under grant No. (DSR2022-NF-13).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, X.; Zhu, L.; Fu, S.; Liu, C.; Tang, M.; Liu, D. Dual-band accelerating beams enabled full duplex free-space optical interconnection. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2021, 27, 3700107. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yu, H.; Ali, F.; Tu, S.; Karamti, H.; Armghan, A.; Muhammad, F.; Alenezi, F.; Hameed, K.; Ahmad, N. Deducing of Optical and Electronic Domains Based Distortions in Radio over Fiber Network. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rahman, S.; Ali, F.; Smagor, A.; Muhammad, F.; Habib, U.; Glowacz, A.; Ahmad, S.; Irfan, M.; Smalcerz, A.; Kula, A.; et al. Mitigation of Nonlinear Distortions for a 100 Gb/s Radio-Over-Fiber-Based WDM Network. Electronics 2020, 9, 1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jabeena, A.; Jayabarathi, T.; Aggarwal, R.; Singh, L. Review on optimization of wireless optical communication system. Trends OptoElectro Opt. Commun. 2019, 4, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-Gailani, S.A.; Salleh, M.F.M.; Salem, A.A.; Shaddad, R.Q.; Sheikh, U.U.; Algeelani, N.A.; Almohamad, T.A. A Survey of Free Space Optics (FSO) Communication Systems, Links, and Networks. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 7353–7373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, H.; Mittal, N.; Miglani, R.; Singh, H.; Gaba, G.S.; Hedabou, M. Design and Analysis of High-Speed Free Space Optical (FSO) Communication System for Supporting Fifth Generation (5G) Data Services in Diverse Geographical Locations of India. IEEE Photonics J. 2021, 13, 7300312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brito, J.M.C.; Mendes, L.L.; Gontijo, J.G.S. Brazil 6G project-an approach to build a national-wise framework for 6G networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd 6G Wireless Summit (6G SUMMIT), Levi, Finland, 17–20 March 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Muhammad, F.; Ali, F.; Habib, U.; Usman, M.; Khan, I.; Kim, S. Time domain equalization and digital back-propagation method-based receiver for fiber optic communication systems. Int. J. Opt. 2020, 2020, 3146374. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ali, F.; Muhammad, F.; Habib, U.; Khan, Y.; Usman, M. Modeling and minimization of FWM effects in DWDM-based long-haul optical communication systems. Photon Netw. Commun. 2020, 41, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hamza, A.S.; Deogun, J.S.; Alexander, D.R. Classification framework for free space optical communication links and systems. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. 2019, 21, 1346–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Esmail, M.A.; Ragheb, A.M.; Fathallah, H.A.; Altamimi, M.; Alshebeili, S.A. 5G-28 GHz signal transmission over hybrid all-optical FSO/RF link in dusty weather conditions. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 24404–24410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mufutau, A.O.; Guiomar, F.P.; Fernandes, M.A.; Lorences-Riesgo, A.; Oliveira, A.; Monteiro, P.P. Demonstration of a hybrid optical fiber–wireless 5G fronthaul coexisting with end-to-end 4G networks. IEEE J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2020, 12, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, C.-Y.; Huang, X.-H.; Lu, H.-H.; Huang, Y.-C.; Huang, Q.-P.; Tu, S.-C. A WDM PAM4 FSO-UWOC integrated system with a channel capacity of 100 gb/s. J. Light. Technol. 2020, 38, 1766–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lima, E.S.; Borges, R.M.; Pereira, L.A.M.; Filgueiras, H.R.D.; Alberti, A.M.; Sodré, A.C. Multiband and photonically amplified fiber-wireless xhaul. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 44381–44390. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, J.; Liu, L.; Xu, T. Real-time phase delay compensation of PGC demodulation in sinusoidal phase-modulation interferometer for nanometer displacement measurement. J. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jahid, A.; Alsharif, M.H.; Hall, T.J. A contemporary survey on free space optical communication: Potentials, technical challenges, recent advances and research direction. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2022, 200, 103311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, R.; Lin, B.; Liu, Y.; Dong, M.; Zhao, S. A Survey on Laser Space Network: Terminals, Links, and Architectures. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 34815–34834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, X.; Fang, J.; Xiao, S.; Zheng, L.; Hu, W. Adaptive Probabilistic Shaping Using Polar Codes for FSO Communication. IEEE Photonics J. 2022, 14, 7913806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chowdhury, M.Z.; Shahjalal, M.; Ahmed, S.; Jang, Y.M. 6G wireless communication systems: Applications requirements technologies challenges and research directions. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2020, 1, 957–975. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar, S. Free Space Optics: A shifting paradigm in optical communication systems in difficult terrains. In First International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Computational Intelligence; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 537–550. [Google Scholar]
  21. Arti, M.K.; Jain, A. A simple approximation of FSO link distribution and its applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS), New Delhi, India, 14–17 December 2020; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  22. Corral, F.V.; Cuenca, C.; Soto, I. Design of an optical wireless network using free space optics technology (FSO), in 5G/6G networks environment. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA), Valparaíso, Chile, 22–26 March 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  23. Thi, M.N.; Mai, V.; Kim, H. Seven-Aperture Direct-Detection Receiver for Free-Space Optical Communication Systems. In Proceedings of the 2022 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 6–10 March 2022; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mao, K.; Zhu, Q.; Song, M.; Li, H.; Nig, B.; Pedersen, D.F.; Fan, W. Machine learning-based 3D channel modeling for U2V mmwave communications. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 17592–17607. [Google Scholar]
  25. Akbucak, V.; Aymelek, G.; Yolcu, B.; Kayam, O.; Ünal, O.; Gökçe, M.C.; Baykal, Y. Effect of partial coherence on signal-to-noise ratio performance of free space optical communication system in weak turbulence. Opt. Commun. 2022, 518, 128395. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, G.; Shao, L.Y.; Xiao, D.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Jiang, J.; Liu, S.; Li, W.; Wang, C.; Yan, Z. Stable and highly efficient free-space optical wireless communication system based on polarization modulation and in-fiber diffraction. IEEE/OSA J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, Y.; Singh, S.; Taleb, T.; Roy, A.; Dhillon, H.S. (Eds.) 6G Mobile Wireless Networks; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. Morales, A.; Nazarikov, G.; Rommel, S.; Okonkwo, C.; Monroy, I.T. Highly tunable heterodyne sub-THz wireless link entirely based on optoelectronics. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 261–268. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kumari, M.; Arya, V. Design of ring-based 1 Tbps hybrid PON-FSO fault protection system using add/drop multiplexer. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hsu, C.-H.; Jiang, S.-Y.; Hsieh, S.-E.; Yeh, C.-H.; Lai, Y.-T.; Chen, L.-Y.; Liaw, S.-K.; Chow, C.-W. Hybrid Self-Protected Fiber-FSO WDM-PON System with Fiber Breakage Prevention. Photonics 2022, 9, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumari, M.; Arya, V. Investigation of high-speed hybrid WDM-OCDMA-PON system incorporating integrated fiber-FSO link under distinct climate conditions. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2022, 54, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bidirectional hybrid WDM-FSO link presented model.
Figure 1. Bidirectional hybrid WDM-FSO link presented model.
Photonics 10 00121 g001
Figure 2. Theoretical model Flow chart for estimating the system performance.
Figure 2. Theoretical model Flow chart for estimating the system performance.
Photonics 10 00121 g002
Figure 3. Comparison analysis of standard and presented models against attenuation in different weather conditions.
Figure 3. Comparison analysis of standard and presented models against attenuation in different weather conditions.
Photonics 10 00121 g003
Figure 4. Weather conditions vs. Q-factor simulation investigations for different modulation formats.
Figure 4. Weather conditions vs. Q-factor simulation investigations for different modulation formats.
Photonics 10 00121 g004
Figure 5. WDM-FSO transmission range as a function of Q-factor estimations.
Figure 5. WDM-FSO transmission range as a function of Q-factor estimations.
Photonics 10 00121 g005
Figure 6. Fiber length estimations against Q-factor for matching the outcomes of suppressed RB based WDM-FSO and without suppressed RB based WDM FSO link.
Figure 6. Fiber length estimations against Q-factor for matching the outcomes of suppressed RB based WDM-FSO and without suppressed RB based WDM FSO link.
Photonics 10 00121 g006
Figure 7. Measuring suppressed and without suppressed RB based WDM-FSO link for 50 GHz channel spacing, 10 Gbps data rate, and 600 m FSO range.
Figure 7. Measuring suppressed and without suppressed RB based WDM-FSO link for 50 GHz channel spacing, 10 Gbps data rate, and 600 m FSO range.
Photonics 10 00121 g007
Figure 8. Estimation of eye diagrams; (a) WDM-FSO outcomes with suppressed RB and clear weather, (b) WDM-FSO outcomes with suppressed RB and rainy weather, (c) WDM-FSO outcomes without suppressed RB and clear weather, and (d) WDM-FSO outcomes without suppressed RB and rainy weather.
Figure 8. Estimation of eye diagrams; (a) WDM-FSO outcomes with suppressed RB and clear weather, (b) WDM-FSO outcomes with suppressed RB and rainy weather, (c) WDM-FSO outcomes without suppressed RB and clear weather, and (d) WDM-FSO outcomes without suppressed RB and rainy weather.
Photonics 10 00121 g008
Table 1. List of required parameters for evaluating the hybrid WDM-FSO outcomes.
Table 1. List of required parameters for evaluating the hybrid WDM-FSO outcomes.
Name of ParameterDescription of Parameter
Length of fiber15 km + 15 km
Range of FSO600 m
Downlink speed10 Gbps
uplink speed2.5 Gbps
WDM mux bandwidth0.6 nm
Modulation format64QAM-OFDM
Temperature for SMF300 k
SMF dispersion17 ps/nm/km
Dispersion slop0.075 ps/nm 2 /k
Attenuation for clear weather0.4 dBm/km
Attenuation of rainy weather6 dBm/km
Attenuation of fogy weather9 dBm/km
Inserstion loss2 dB
Filter order2
Table 2. Comparison estimations of presented hybrid WDM-FSO link with current approaches.
Table 2. Comparison estimations of presented hybrid WDM-FSO link with current approaches.
Name of Used Technique [29][30][31]Presented Hybrid WDM-FSO Link
FSO range500 nm500 nm300 nm600 nm
Modulation formatOOKOFDMDDOOK64QAM-OFDM
SMF20 km25 km22 km30 km
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, Y.; Armghan, A.; Ali, F.; Aliqab, K.; Alsharari, M. Enriching Capacity and Transmission of Hybrid WDM-FSO Link for 5G Mobility. Photonics 2023, 10, 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020121

AMA Style

Shi Y, Armghan A, Ali F, Aliqab K, Alsharari M. Enriching Capacity and Transmission of Hybrid WDM-FSO Link for 5G Mobility. Photonics. 2023; 10(2):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Yutao, Ammar Armghan, Farman Ali, Khaled Aliqab, and Meshari Alsharari. 2023. "Enriching Capacity and Transmission of Hybrid WDM-FSO Link for 5G Mobility" Photonics 10, no. 2: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10020121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop