Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Polyethylene Using a New Test Method Based on Stress Response to Relaxation and Recovery
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological Dependence of Breast Cancer Cell Responses to Doxorubicin on Micropatterned Surfaces
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 14
10.3390/polym14142760
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of Y2O3/TiO2-Loaded Polyester Fabric and Its Photocatalytic Properties under Visible Light Irradiation

by
Yu Ren
1,
Ziyao Zhao
1,
Wenwen Jiang
1,
Guangyu Zhang
1,
Yuxin Tan
1,
Yongyin Guan
2,
Long Zhou
2,
Li Cui
2,
Sung Woong Choi
3 and
Mei-Xian Li
1,*
1
School of Textile and Clothing, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
2
Xin Feng Ming Group, Huzhou Zhongshi Technology Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313000, China
3
Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong 53064, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(14), 2760; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142760
Submission received: 27 May 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 1 July 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Fibers)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric was prepared to improve the catalytic activity of the TiO2 and to increase its reuse efficiency. The samples were systematically characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Furthermore, the degradation performance of methyl orange in the presence of simulated visible light irradiation was also investigated. The results showed that the TiO2 in the Y2O3/TiO2 composite photocatalyst was suitably anatase. In addition, Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric had higher photocatalytic performance than that of pure polyester fabric under visible light and the degradation rate reached 83% after 120 min of light exposure but remained above 50% after repeated exposure (three times). Compared to the pure polyester fabric, Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric had self-cleaning effects in methyl blue and soy sauce solutions under visible light.

1. Introduction

Recently, the development of functional and intelligent textiles has attracted considerable attention worldwide [1] and among these, fabrics with photocatalytic and self-cleaning properties have been widely studied [2,3]. The energy band structure of semiconductors contributes to the theoretical basis of photocatalytic reactions [4], and most semiconductor photocatalysts are of the n-type semiconductor material with a band gap between the valence and conduction bands. An incident photon makes the electrons in the valence band become excited and transition to the conduction band after energy absorption, leaving holes in the valence band. At the same time, many photo-generated holes (h+) and electrons (e−) will be produced in the conduction band and valence band, which makes the valence band reduced, and the electrons in the conduction band oxidized, leading to oxidation or reduction of the contaminants. The surface of the fabric is modified by loading a photocatalyst [5], which will generate electrons and holes with redox ability under sunlight to purify pollutants [6].
Commonly used photocatalysts include TiO2 [7,8], SnO2 [9,10], ZnO [11,12], and ZrO2 [13,14]. Among them, TiO2, as a photosensitive semiconductor, has attracted widespread attention due to its high stability and non-toxicity [15] and therefore, has been widely used in the field of photocatalysis. However, the wide band gap of TiO2 (3.2 eV) means that it can only be photo-activated under ultraviolet light, resulting in low collection efficiency of the visible light in sunlight [16]. It has been reported that TiO2 has various size, nanostructure, and polymorphs (anatase polymorph, rutile polymorph, mixed anatase-rutile polymorphs, etc.) [17]. Moreover, the TiO2 lattice is distorted by doping with rare earth oxides, which can accept more light to excite holes and generate stronger surface free radicals causing oxidation of the pollutant molecules [18]. In addition, rare earth elements have a special electronic structure of 4fx5dy, which plays an important role in the photo-generated charge transfer between the 4f energy level and the conduction band or valence band of TiO2 [19]. As a heavy rare earth oxide, Y2O3 has a relatively small atomic radius with the energy gap of 6.3 eV [20], which can improve the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 [21] and it has been found that an appropriate combination of Y2O3 can effectively improve the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in the visible light band [22].
To date, Jiang et al. [23] prepared Ag-loaded TiO2/Y2O3 hollow microspheres with a double shell structure of melamine formaldehyde using the sol-gel method and high temperature calcination reduction. The results showed that the degradation efficiency of methyl orange by TiO2/Ag/Y2O3 increased seven times under visible light when compared to TiO2 hollow spheres. Using the combustion and precipitation method, Li et al. [24] synthesized a novel composite photocatalyst TiO2/Y2O3:Yb3+, Tm3+ and the photocatalytic activity of this composite was higher than that of pure TiO2 under solar light irradiation. Ahmed et al. [25] prepared an Eu-doped Y2O3:TiO2 nanocomposite via the sol-gel synthesis process and the optical properties of the synthesized nanocomposite were investigated at different temperatures, and its application as a potential material for thermographic phosphor and in LED fabrication was investigated.
Although photocatalysts from the above research exhibited enhanced photoactivity, photocatalysts mostly exist in the form of nano powders, which are difficult to separate and recover from bodies containing water causing a waste of resources. Therefore, the development of matrix materials loaded with photocatalysts to improve the service efficiency of photocatalysts is urgently needed. Zhu et al. [26] developed a nanoparticle/polymeric capsule via an in situ growth method, of which lead-free bismuth halide peroskite nanocrystals and covalent organic frameworks are used as core and shell, respectively, demonstrating good water processability as well as excellent photocatalytic performance. Polyester fabrics are also widely used because of their low cost, good durability, and high stability [27,28]. However, polyester fabric macromolecules lack polar functional groups on their surfaces as well as a highly crystalline structure. It is reported that nanoparticle/polymer composites designed with combination of initial interpenetrating polymer network structure and organo-inorganic interpenetrating polymer network structure could significantly influence the relaxation behavior of the composites [29]. Moreover, the ordered polymer chains in the crystal lattice are too dense, which makes low bonding strengths when combining them with inorganic nano-photocatalytic materials [30]. Polar functional groups can be introduced onto the surface by chemical modification and plasma treatment to improve the speed of bonding of the inorganic powder and fabric surface [31].
In this study, tetrabutyl titanate and yttrium nitrate hexahydrate were used as raw materials to prepare Y2O3/TiO2 with photocatalytic activity in the visible light range using the sol-gel method. Y2O3/TiO2 was modified by 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) to enhance, the interaction between Y2O3/TiO2 and polyester fabrics through Si-O-Ti bonds [27] for the preparation of Y2O3/TiO2 loaded polyester fabrics. The samples were systematically characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Furthermore, methyl orange was used as an organic pollutant and the photocatalytic self-cleaning properties of modified polyester fabrics were studied under xenon lamp irradiation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Polyester fabrics were provided from the Jiangsu Kuangda group, and the reagents used in this study, namely tetrabutyl titanate (Jiangsu Qiangsheng Functional Chemical Co., Ltd. Suzhou, China), anhydrous alcohol (Runjie Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), glacial acetic acid (Hubao Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Yangzhou, China), yttrium nitrate hexahydrate (Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), methyl orange (Chengji Chemical Trading Co., Ltd., Nantong, China), and methyl blue (Chengji Chemical Trading Co., Ltd., Nantong, China), were all of analytical grade.

2.2. Preparation of Y2O3/TiO2

First, 46 mL of absolute ethanol and 6 mL of glacial acetic acid were mixed followed by the addition of 10 mL of tetrabutyl titanate under vigorous stirring, and then 3 mL of distilled water and an appropriate amount of Y(NO3)3⋅6H2O were sequentially added with vigorous stirring for 60 min. After this, the xerogel was prepared via aging for 90 min and drying at 60 °C for 24 h. Finally, the xerogel was calcined in a resistance furnace at 500 °C for 2 h to obtain a Y2O3/TiO2 catalyst. Composite catalysts containing different mole fractions (0.5%, 0.75%, 1%) of Y2O3 were prepared with different molar ratios of Y(NO3)3⋅6H2O. The preparation flow chart of Y2O3/TiO2 is shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Preparation of Y2O3/TiO2-Loaded Polyester Fabrics

First, 0.5 g of Y2O3/TiO2 was dispersed in 100 mL of diluted ethanol solution (Vethanol:Vdistilled water = 95:5), and then 5 mL of 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) was added and sonicated for 30 min. The mixture was then centrifuged and washed with alcohol, followed by drying in a vacuum oven at 70 °C to obtain amino functionalized Y2O3/TiO2, which was abbreviated to NH2-Y2O3/TiO2. The polyester fabrics were immersed in a solution containing 1 mg/L NH2-Y2O3/TiO2, and then oscillated for 1 h to ensure that ester groups in polyester fabrics and amino groups in NH2-Y2O3/TiO2 were fully reacted, followed by drying at 60 °C to obtain Y2O3/TiO2 loaded polyester fabrics.
The schematic diagram of APTMS modified Y2O3/TiO2 is shown in Figure 2 and the local enlarged view of Y2O3/TiO2-NH2 nanoparticles bonded on polyester fabrics is shown in Figure 3.

2.4. Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange

Methyl orange solution with a concentration of 20 mg/L was prepared, and then 100 mL of the prepared solution taken to the photocatalytic materials, followed by magnetically stirring for 30 min in the dark to reach the adsorption equilibrium. A xenon light source (300 W) was used to simulate a visible light source to analyze the visible light catalytic performance of the photocatalyst. The supernatant was extracted at regular intervals and the absorbance at a wavelength of 464 nm was measured by a dual-beam UV–Vis spectrophotometer (TU-1900).

2.5. Surface Morphology Analysis

The surface characteristics and crystal shape of the catalysts were analyzed by using ZEISS Gemini SEM 300 field emission scanning electron microscope.

2.6. Crystal Structure Analysis

The photoelectric spectrum was analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with the model K-Alpha+ produced by Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).

2.7. Chemical Composition Analysis

The phase composition of the catalyst was analyzed by using the D/MAX-2500 X-ray diffractometer (XRD) produced by Rigaku Corporation (Tokyo, Japan), with a 40 kV working voltage, 100 mA current as well as a 10°–80° scanning range (2θ).
The samples were irradiated with infrared light in the scanning range of 8300–350 cm−1 using a model of Spectrum Two equipment produced by Perkin Elmer (Boston, MA, USA). When the vibration of the molecular groups was the same as the frequency of the infrared spectrum, they could be distinguished. This group was compared with the standard infrared spectrum to determine the composition of the sample.

2.8. UV-Vis Analysis

A UH4150 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV–vis), produced by Hitachi (Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the UV–visible light absorption spectrum of the samples at a scanning speed of 1200 nm/min at intervals of 1 nm.

2.9. Self-Cleaning Property

To investigate the self-cleaning performance of the pure polyester fabric and Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric under simulated visible light, 0.1 mL of methyl blue solution and soy sauce were dropped on the polyester fabric and that loaded with Y2O3/TiO2 and irradiated under a xenon lamp for 18 h and sample images taken every 6 h.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Morphology Analysis

Figure 4 shows scanning electron microscope images of TiO2 and Y2O3 (the molar content is 0.75%) under 100,000 times magnification. It can be seen from Figure 4a that the prepared TiO2 nanoparticles were spherical, with a diameter of about 10 nm, and the distribution is relatively uniform. As shown in Figure 4b, Y2O3/TiO2 remained spherical without differences in morphology due to the low content of Y2O3. However, there were slight clusters between the particles because the diameters of the particles were slightly reduced after recombination, and the nanoparticles with small diameters were more likely to agglomerate. This showed that addition of an appropriate amount of Y2O3 inhibited the growth of TiO2 grains.
Figure 5 shows scanning electron photomicrographs of pure polyester fabric loaded with Y2O3/TiO2 (the molar content of Y2O3 was 0.75%) under two different magnifications of 2000× and 5000× Figure 5a,c represent surface morphology of pure polyester fabric under 2000× and 5000× magnification, respectively. From the two images, it can be observed that the surface of the pure polyester fabrics was flat and smooth. Figure 5b,d represent surface morphology of polyester fabrics loaded with amino functionalized Y2O3/TiO2 composite photocatalyst under 2000× and 5000× magnification. From Figure 5b, it can be observed that the polyester fabric was covered with white particles resulting in a rough surface. Under a magnification of 5000×, it could be observed that white particles of Y2O3/TiO2 were distributed evenly and tightly on the surface of the fabric. It showed that the prepared Y2O3/TiO2 catalyst was successfully loaded onto the polyester fabric and evenly distributed on the surface of the polyester, which played an important role in photocatalytic performance under visible light.

3.2. Crystal Structure Analysis

The crystalline structure of the three photocatalytic materials, namely TiO2, Y2O3, and Y2O3/TiO2 (the molar content of Y2O3 is 0.75%) are shown in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6a, the diffraction peaks appeared at 2θ of 25.26°, 37.2°, 48°, 54.04°, and 62.84°, which corresponded to the crystal plane indices of (101), (104), (200), (105), and (204) of the TiO2 anatase phase, respectively [32]. In addition, contrast diffraction peak positions were in accordance with TiO2 standard diffraction card (JCP-DS84-1285), indicating that the prepared TiO2 was anatase type [33]. In Figure 6b, the diffraction peaks at 29.1°, 33.79°, 48.54°, and 57.62° corresponded to the (222), (400), (440), and (622) planes of Y2O3, respectively. The positions of the diffraction peaks are also consistent with the Y2O3 standard diffraction card (JCP-DS25-1200), showing good crystallization and crystal integrity [34]. However, the diffraction peak of Y2O3 could not be seen in Figure 6c; this may be due to the low content of Y2O3 which may not have been enough to change the crystal form of TiO2 [35], where TiO2 remained the titanite type in the Y2O3 composite photocatalyst [36].
The crystalline structures of the polyester fabric and Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric (the molar content of Y2O3 is 0.75%) are shown in Figure 7. The diffraction peaks at 17.2°, 22.8°, and 25.7° were the characteristic peaks of polyester fabric [37], while those at 25.5°, 37.2°, 48°, 54.04°, and 62.84° corresponded to the crystal plane indices of (101), (104), (200), (105), and (204) of the TiO2 anatase phase [33], respectively. The characteristic peak of TiO2 at 25.5° was coincident with that of polyester. Furthermore, all the other diffraction peaks coincided with the characteristic peaks of the Y2O3/TiO2 composite catalyst in Figure 7, which indicated that the Y2O3/TiO2 composite catalyst was successfully loaded on the polyester fabric.

3.3. Chemical Composition Analysis

Figure 8 represents the XPS full spectrum of the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric (the molar content of Y2O3 is 0.75%). Figure 8b–d are the high resolution XPS image of Ti, O, and Y in the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric. It can be seen from Figure 8a that Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric mainly contained Ti, Y, O, and C elements, and the C peak and O peak were mainly from polyester [38], while the Ti peak, O peak, and Y peak were from Y2O3/TiO2 composite photocatalyst in polyester fabric. In Figure 8b, two Ti2p peaks (Ti2p3/2 and Ti2p1/2) were detected at 456.05 eV and 463 eV, respectively, indicating the presence of Ti4+ on the polyester fabric [37,39]. Figure 8c is the XPS spectrum of the O1s region of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric, which is mainly divided into three peaks. The O element appearing at 529.03 eV shows the Ti-O-Y bond, while that at 529.9 eV indicates O2− in the sample [40]. The content of O2− was relatively high, indicating that O in the Y2O3/TiO2 composite photocatalyst mainly existed in the form of the negative divalent [41]. Moreover, the O element at 532 eV was derived from the -OH produced by the adsorption and dissociation on the sample surface [39], indicating that the holes generated by the Y2O3/TiO2 composite photocatalyst after light excitation reacted with the adsorbed H2O or OH ions on the surface, forming the hydroxyl radicals, which helped to improve the photocatalytic performance of Y2O3/TiO2 composite photocatalyst [42].
Figure 9 shows the Fourier infrared spectra of two photocatalytic materials, the polyester fabric, and Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric (the molar content of Y2O3 is 0.75%). As shown in Figure 9, the polyester fabric had an obvious characteristic peak at 1714.47 cm−1, which was the peak of polyester C=O stretching vibration. Moreover, peaks at 1339.37 cm−1 and 1240.05 cm−1 were attributed to CH2 groups and CO stretching vibration, respectively [43]. In addition, the peaks at 1058.77 cm−1 and 1014.41 cm−1 corresponded to Si-O-Si stretching vibration and the trans conformation band of the CH bond on the benzene ring [44], respectively. Furthermore, those at 960.71 cm−1 and 850.48 cm−1 were assigned to Ti-O-Si bonds and CH2 in-plane rocking vibration, respectively. The peak of Ti-O bond stretching vibration and the absorption peak of CH2 out-of-plane bending on the benzene ring of the polyester fabric overlapped at 724.17 cm−1. This indicated that the Y2O3/TiO2 was modified by 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS), in which the effect of organosilicon on the adsorption and interaction of Y2O3/TiO2 was attained through the formation of Si-O-Ti bonds. During this, the Y2O3/TiO2 was loaded onto the surface of the polyester fabric, where the silanized Y2O3/TiO2 was nucleophilically attacked by the introduction of amine groups, causing breakage of the ester bonds and the formation of the amide bonds to form a covalent bond with the surface of the polyester fabric. Eventually, Y2O3/TiO2 after amino functionalization treatment was successfully loaded on the polyester fabric.

3.4. UV–Vis Analysis

Figure 10 shows the UV–Vis absorption spectra for the polyester fabric and Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric (the molar content of Y2O3 is 0.75%). When compared to the polyester fabric, the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric not only absorbed in the entire spectrum, but also was enhanced in the entire visible range. In addition, the absorption spectrum of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric appeared red shift at the boundary of the visible range due to changes in the conduction band and valence band of the Y2O3/TiO2 photocatalysts [19]. As shown in Figure 10, the absorption edge of the polyester fabrics and the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabrics was about 390 nm and 420 nm, respectively. According to the formula Eg = 1240/λ, the corresponding band gaps were calculated as 3.17 eV and 2.95 eV and compared to polyester fabric, the band gap of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric was narrower, indicating a higher light absorption rate to improve the photocatalytic performance of the fabric.

3.5. Degradability Analysis

Figure 11 shows the degradation curves with methyl orange solutions under irradiation with a 300 W xenon lamp for 120 min for the polyester fabric and Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric (with a molar content of 0.75% of Y2O3). When samples were left in the dark for 40 min, some of the methyl orange solution could be absorbed by the samples and reach adsorption equilibrium of the catalyst and the solution, then the methyl orange solution was irradiated with different fabrics using the 300 W xenon lamp to simulate sunlight for 120 min. The supernatant was taken every 20 min for absorbance testing, and the control samples were 100 mL and 20 mg/L of methyl orange solution. As shown in Figure 11, the methyl orange solution hardly degraded in the absence of fabrics. However, the methyl orange solution added to the polyester fabric was slightly degraded under irradiation, whereas that added to Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric was degraded at a rapid rate. After 120 min of light exposure, the removal efficiency of the polyester fabric, Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric and methyl orange were 16.9%, 83%, and 10%, respectively.
From Figure 12, it can be seen that methyl orange had a maximum absorption at 464 nm [45], and the absorbance was the highest at 0 min whereas it was the smallest after 120 min of irradiation with the xenon lamp. Furthermore, the color of the methyl orange solution changed significantly from bright orange (0 min) to colorless (120 min), indicating the decrease of the chromophore and the destruction of the benzene ring of methyl orange under the irradiation of the xenon lamp [46]. In addition, no new peaks appeared during the whole irradiation process, indicating that the methyl orange was successfully degraded.
The used polyester fabric loaded with Y2O3/TiO2 (the molar content of Y2O3 is 0.75%) was recycled, collected, washed, and dried. Then, the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange on the dried polyester fabric loaded with Y2O3/TiO2 was carried out three times under visible light irradiation. Figure 13 shows the cycles for the degradation of methyl orange by Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric under visible light. The degradation efficiency changes from 80% to 70%. This result indicates that the photocatalytic activity does not obviously deteriorate after three recycles for the photodegradation of methyl orange, revealing the good stability of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.

3.6. Photocatalytic Reaction Kinetics

Several recent reports claim that Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic model can describe the photocatalytic degradation of heterogeneous TiO2 well [47,48].
The form of the photocatalytic degradation rate model can be expressed by the following equation [49,50].
r = − d C d t = k r k s C 0 1 + k s C 0
where C0 is the organic concentration, Kr is reaction rate constant, Ks is the apparent adsorption constant, and t is the time of reaction. The term KsC0 is often negligible when the concentration is low, and the reaction rate can be expressed as pseudo-first-order model as follows:
− d C d t = k r K s C 0 = K a p p t
where Kapp is the apparent first-order reaction rate.
Integration of the equation yields the following equation:
ln ( C C 0 ) = − K a p p t
A plot of −ln(C/C0) against (t) and slope of linear regression analysis is equal to the value of Kapp. The calculated results indicated that photocatalytic degradation at the reaction conditions follows pseudo-first-order kinetics (Figure 14). The values of Kapp were obtained directly from the regression analysis of the linear curve in the plot.
Table 1 summarizes the pseudo-first-order constants and correlation coefficients, and the results show that the photodegradation process follows a pseudo-first-order reaction. As shown in the Table 1, the reaction rate constant of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric is about four times higher than that of polyester, exhibiting good degradation activities.

3.7. Self-Cleaning Performance Analysis

To test the self-cleaning performance of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric under simulated visible light, 0.1 mL of methyl blue solution and soy sauce were dropped on the polyester fabric and Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric and then irradiated under a xenon lamp for 18 h. Sample images were taken every 6 h, and the results are shown in Figure 15. Figure 15a,c,e,g represent the polyester fabric with methyl blue solution. It can be found that the blue mark of the polyester fabric dyed with methyl blue basically remains after 6 h of xenon lamp irradiation. Figure 15b,d,f,h show the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric with methyl blue solution. It can be seen that the methyl blue was degraded significantly after irradiation for 18 h with the xenon lamp. Figure 15i,k,m,o show the polyester fabric with the applied soy sauce. Although the soy sauce was degraded after 12 h of irradiation, there were no obvious changes in color, and there still existed a large stain on the surface of the polyester fabric after 18 h of irradiation, indicating a low degradation rate for soy sauce on the surface of the polyester fabric. As shown in Figure 15j,l,n,p, the soy sauce on the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric began to degrade significantly after 6 h of light exposure and was completely decomposed after 18 h of xenon lamp irradiation. The reason for this is that the Y2O3/TiO2 will produce electron–hole pairs when irradiated by photons which have greater energy than its band gap energy [51], and the holes in the valence band can react with H+ and ⋅OH generated from adsorbed water, and the electrons can reduce oxygen to produce O2−. These active functional groups such as ⋅OH and O2− could oxidize the organic compounds in methyl blue and soy sauce until they were completely mineralized [52].

4. Conclusions

Our Y2O3/TiO2 photocatalyst was prepared and treated with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS), and then the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric was successfully prepared via covalent bonding between Y2O3/TiO2 and the polyester fabric by the formation of an amide bond.
The TiO2 in the Y2O3/TiO2 composite catalyst (anatase type) was uniformly distributed on the surface of the polyester fabric. The diffraction peaks obtained from the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric were in good agreement with those from Y2O3/TiO2 powder.
Furthermore, compared to polyester fabrics, the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabrics had better photocatalytic performance under simulated sunlight. After 120 min of light exposure, the degradation rate of methyl orange reached 83% and when compared to the polyester fabric with the same drop of methyl blue solution and soy sauce, the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric had superior photocatalytic self-cleaning properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.R.; investigation, Y.R. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, M.-X.L., W.J. and Y.T.; methodology, G.Z., Y.G. and L.Z., data curation, Y.R., L.C. and S.W.C.; writing—original draft, Y.R., M.-X.L. and Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.-X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51503105), Nantong Science and technology project (No. JC2021039), Jiangsu University “Qinglan” excellent teaching team project, Jiangsu University “Qinglan” outstanding young teacher project, Jiangsu Provincial Double-Innovation Doctor Program (JSSCBS20211096), and Large Instruments Open Foundation of Nantong University (KFJN2147).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rehan, M.; Hartwig, A.; Ott, M.; Gaetjen, L.; Wilken, R. Enhancement of photocatalytic self-cleaning activity and antimicrobial properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) fabrics. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 219, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jeong, E.; Woo, H.; Moon, Y.; Lee, D.Y.; Jung, M.; Lee, Y.-S.; Bae, J.-S. Self-Cleaning Polyester Fabric Prepared with TiOF2 and Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane. Polymers 2021, 13, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, H.; Manivannan, R.; Heo, G.; Ryu, J.W.; Son, Y.-A. Porphyrin dye/TiO2 entrenched in PET to attain self-cleaning property through visible light photocatalytic activity. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2019, 45, 3655–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Min, K.S.; Manivannan, R.; Son, Y.-A. Porphyrin Dye/TiO2 imbedded PET to improve visible-light photocatalytic activity and organosilicon attachment to enrich hydrophobicity to attain an efficient self-cleaning material. Dye. Pigment. 2019, 162, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, X.G.; Wang, D.W. Photocatalysis: From Fundamental Principles to Materials and Applications. Acs Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 6657–6693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, S.F.; Zhang, S.J.; Liu, W.; Zhao, W. Preparation and activity evaluation of p-n junction photocatalyst NiO/TiO2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 155, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qin, Y.Y.; Guo, Y.C.; Liang, Z.Q.; Xue, Y.J.; Zhang, X.L.; Yang, L.; Tian, J. Au nanorods decorated TiO2 nanobelts with enhanced full solar spectrum photocatalytic antibacterial activity and the sterilization file cabinet application. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 1523–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schneider, J.; Matsuoka, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Zhang, J.L.; Horiuchi, Y.; Anpo, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chemical Reviews 2014, 114, 9919–9986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, M.; Ma, L.N.; Luo, L.; Liu, Y.G.; Xu, M.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.H.; Kong, X.G.; Duan, H.H. Efficient photocatalytic epoxidation of styrene over a quantum-sized SnO(2)on carbon nitride as a heterostructured catalyst. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2022, 309, 121268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, C.Y.; Yang, J.K.; Xu, M.; Cui, Y.; Ren, W.W.; Zhang, J.X.; Zhao, H.L.; Liang, B. Recent intensification strategies of SnO2-based photocatalysts: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goktas, S.; Goktas, A. A comparative study on recent progress in efficient ZnO based nanocomposite and heterojunction photocatalysts: A review. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 863, 158734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, D.; Yong, K. Boron doping induced charge transfer switching of a C3N4/ZnO photocatalyst from Z-scheme to type II to enhance photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2021, 282, 119538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hassan, N.S.; Jalil, A.A. A review on self-modification of zirconium dioxide nanocatalysts with enhanced visible-light-driven photodegradation of organic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 126996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tian, J.Y.; Shao, Q.; Zhao, J.K.; Pan, D.; Dong, M.Y.; Jia, C.X.Z.; Ding, T.; Wu, T.T.; Guo, Z.H. Microwave solvothermal carboxymethyl chitosan templated synthesis of TiO2/ZrO2 composites toward enhanced photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 541, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Wang, G.H.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J.G.; Fan, J.J. Sulfur-doped g-C3N4/TiO2 S-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst for Congo Red photodegradation. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sánchez-Rodríguez, D.; Medrano, M.G.M.; Remita, H.; Escobar-Barrios, V. Photocatalytic properties of BiOCl-TiO2 composites for phenol photodegradation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1601–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Serga, V.; Burve, R.; Krumina, A.; Romanova, M.; Kotomin, E.A.; Popov, A.I. Extraction-Pyrolytic Method for TiO2 Polymorphs Production. Crystals 2021, 11, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, C.; Shao, Q.; Lei, J.; Zhu, Y.F.; Ge, S.S. Preparation of NiO/TiO2 p-n heterojunction composites and its photocathodic protection properties for 304 stainless steel under simulated solar light. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 703, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rao, Z.P.; Shi, G.S.; Wang, Z.; Mahmood, A.; Xie, X.F.; Sun, J. Photocatalytic degradation of gaseous VOCs over Tm3+-TiO2: Revealing the activity enhancement mechanism and different reaction paths. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kirm, M.; Feldbach, E.; Kink, R.; Lushchik, A.; Lushchik, C.; Maaroos, A.; Martinson, I. Mechanisms of intrinsic and impurity luminescence excitation by synchrotron radiation in wide-gap oxides. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1996, 79, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ravishankar, T.N.; Vaz, M.D.; Khan, S.; Ramakrishnappa, T.; Teixeira, S.R.; Balakrishna, G.R.; Nagaraju, G.; Dupont, J. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production from Y2O3/TiO2 nano-composites: A comparative study on hydrothermal synthesis with and without an ionic liquid. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 3578–3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, X.N.; Wu, P.; Liu, M.; Lu, D.Z.; Ming, J.L.; Li, C.H.; Ding, J.G.; Yan, Q.Y.; Fang, P.F. Y2O3 modified TiO2 nanosheets enhanced the photocatalytic removal of 4-chlorophenol and Cr (VI) in sun light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 410, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiang, X.L.; Peng, Z.T.; Gao, Y.R.; You, F.; Yao, C. Preparation and visible-light photocatalytic activity of ag-loaded TiO2@Y2O3 hollow microspheres with double-shell structure. Powder Technol. 2021, 377, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, T.G.; Liu, S.W.; Zhang, H.P.; Wang, E.H.; Song, L.J.; Wang, P. Ultraviolet upconversion luminescence in Y2O3:Yb3+,Tm3+ nanocrystals and its application in photocatalysis. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 2882–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ahmed, A.; Singh, A.; Sharma, A.; Prerna; Verma, S.; Mahajan, S.; Arya, S. Investigating the thermographical effect on optical properties of Eu doped Y2O3:TiO2 nanocomposite synthesized via sol-gel method. Solid State Sci. 2021, 116, 106617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, Y.F.; Liu, Y.F.; Ai, Q.; Gao, G.H.; Yuan, L.; Fang, Q.Y.; Tian, X.Y.; Zhang, X.; Egap, E.; Ajayan, P.M.; et al. In Situ Synthesis of Lead-Free Halide Perovskite-COF Nanocomposites as Photocatalysts for Photoinduced Polymerization in Both Organic and Aqueous Phases. Acs Mater. Lett. 2022, 4, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pasqui, D.; Barbucci, R. Synthesis, characterization and self cleaning properties of titania nanoparticles grafted on polyester fabrics. J. Photochem. Photobiol. a-Chem. 2014, 274, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qi, K.H.; Xin, J.H.; Daoud, W.A.; Mak, C.L. Functionalizing polyester fiber with a self-cleaning property using anatase TiO2 and low-temperature plasma treatment. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2007, 4, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tsebriienko, T.; Popov, A.I. Effect of Poly(Titanium Oxide) on the Viscoelastic and Thermophysical Properties of Interpenetrating Polymer Networks. Crystals 2021, 11, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, C.Y.; Corrigan, N.; Lim, C.H.; Jung, K.; Zhu, J.; Miyake, G.; Xu, J.T.; Boyer, C. Guiding the Design of Organic Photocatalyst for PET-RAFT Polymerization: Halogenated Xanthene Dyes. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saleem, M.; Kousar, N.; Shoukat, B.; Shoaib-ur-Rehman, M.; Batool, F.; Naz, M.Y.; Ghaffar, A.; Publishing, I.O.P. Plasma-fabric interaction for surface activation and functionalization: A review. In Proceedings of 5th UTP-UMP-UAF Symposium on Energy Systems (SES), Kuantan, Malaysia, 1–2 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. D'Amato, C.A.; Giovannetti, R.; Zannotti, M.; Rommozzi, E.; Minicucci, M.; Gunnella, R.; Di Cicco, A. Band Gap Implications on Nano-TiO2 Surface Modification with Ascorbic Acid for Visible Light-Active Polypropylene Coated Photocatalyst. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tian, X.M.; Huang, S.Y.; Wang, L.C.; Li, L.; Lou, Z.Y.; Huang, S.Q.; Zhou, Z. Mitigation of low methane content landfill gas through visible-near-infrared photocatalysis over Y2O3:Er3+/Graphene/TiO2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 456, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jo, W.K.; Shin, S.H.; Hwang, E.S. Removal of dimethyl sulfide utilizing activated carbon fiber-supported photocatalyst in continuous-flow system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 191, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Metanawin, T.; Metanawin, S. The photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes in the nanotitanium dioxide—Polyester based nonwoven fibers. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 9658–9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, H.; Wang, C.; Song, Y.H.; Zhu, J.X.; Xu, Y.G.; Yan, J.; Song, Y.X.; Li, H.M. CNT/Ag3PO4 composites with highly enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity and stability. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 241, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Q.Z.; Li, J.J.; Bai, Y.; Lu, X.L.; Ding, Y.M.; Yin, S.Q.; Huang, H.H.; Ma, H.C.; Wang, F.P.; Su, B.T. Photodegradation of textile dye Rhodamine B over a novel biopolymer-metal complex wool-Pd/CdS photocatalysts under visible light irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B-Biol. 2013, 126, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xu, Y.; Wu, N.; Wei, Q.F.; Chu, L.B. Surface Functionalisation of Polyester Nonwoven Fabrics by Sputter Coating of Titanium Dioxide. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2009, 17, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cataldo, S.; Weckhuysen, B.M.; Pettignano, A.; Pignataro, B. Multi-doped Brookite-Prevalent TiO2 Photocatalyst with Enhanced Activity in the Visible Light. Catal. Lett. 2018, 148, 2459–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, S.X.; Ma, Z.; Qin, Y.N.; He, F.; Jia, L.S.; Zhang, Y.J. XPS study of copper doping TiO2 photocatalyst. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2003, 19, 967–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Louangsouphom, B.; Wang, X.J.; Song, J.K.; Wang, X. Low-temperature preparation of a N-TiO2/macroporous resin photocatalyst to degrade organic pollutants. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 1061–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, W.; Tian, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, H.; Geng, W.; Zhang, Q. Novel BiOCl/TiO2 hierarchical composites: Synthesis, characterization and application on photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 516, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kato, K.; Xin, Y.Z.; Shirai, T. Structural-Controlled Synthesis of Highly Efficient Visible Light TiO2 Photocatalyst via One-Step Single-Mode Microwave Assisted Reaction. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Alkhursani, S.A.; Madani, M.; Ghobashy, M.M. Photocatalytic TiO2 Embedded on PET-g-PAAc Fabric by Sono-gamma Irradiation Technique. Asian J. Chem. 2019, 32, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Klaudia, M.; Anna, Ż.; Karolina, W.; Ewa, M. Boosting of Antibacterial Performance of Cellulose Based Paper Sheet via TiO2 Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1451. [Google Scholar]
  46. Du, Z.F.; Cheng, C.; Tan, L.; Lan, J.W.; Jiang, S.X.; Zhao, L.D.; Guo, R.H. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Bi2WO6/TiO2 composite coated polyester fabric under visible light irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Delnavaz, M.; Ayati, B.; Ganjidoust, H.; Sanjabi, S. Kinetics study of photocatalytic process for treatment of phenolic wastewater by TiO2 nano powder immobilized on concrete surfaces. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2012, 94, 1086–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lazar, M.A.; Varghese, S.; Nair, S.S. Photocatalytic Water Treatment by Titanium Dioxide: Recent Updates. Catalysts 2012, 2, 572–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Guettai, N.; Amar, H.A. Photocatalytic oxidation of methyl orange in presence of titanium dioxide in aqueous suspension. Part II: Kinetics study. Desalination 2005, 185, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xiao, X.; Hu, R.P.; Liu, C.; Xing, C.L.; Qian, C.; Zuo, X.X.; Nan, J.M.; Wang, L.S. Facile large-scale synthesis of beta-Bi2O3 nanospheres as a highly efficient photocatalyst for the degradation of acetaminophen under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2013, 140, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, X.; Duan, W.; Chen, Y.; Jiao, S.; Zhao, Y.; Kang, Y.; Li, L.; Fang, Z.; Xu, W.; Pang, G. Porous TiO2 Assembled from Monodispersed Nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Tan, C.L.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y.H.; Tang, Z.R.; Xu, Y.J. Au clusters-based visible light photocatalysis. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2021, 47, 29–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 02760 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Y2O3/TiO2 preparation process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Y2O3/TiO2 preparation process.
Polymers 14 02760 g001
Polymers 14 02760 g002 550
Figure 2. Reaction scheme for the surface functionalization of Y2O3/TiO2 by APTMS.
Figure 2. Reaction scheme for the surface functionalization of Y2O3/TiO2 by APTMS.
Polymers 14 02760 g002
Polymers 14 02760 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the interaction between Y2O3/TiO2-NH2 and polyester fabrics.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the interaction between Y2O3/TiO2-NH2 and polyester fabrics.
Polymers 14 02760 g003
Polymers 14 02760 g004 550
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrograph images of photocatalyst (a) TiO2 (×100,000), (b) Y2O3/TiO2 (×100,000).
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrograph images of photocatalyst (a) TiO2 (×100,000), (b) Y2O3/TiO2 (×100,000).
Polymers 14 02760 g004
Polymers 14 02760 g005 550
Figure 5. Scanning electron micrograph of photocatalytic materials (a) polyester fabric (×2000), (b) Y2O3/TiO2 loaded polyester fabric (×2000), (c) polyester fabric (×5000), (d) Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric (×5000).
Figure 5. Scanning electron micrograph of photocatalytic materials (a) polyester fabric (×2000), (b) Y2O3/TiO2 loaded polyester fabric (×2000), (c) polyester fabric (×5000), (d) Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric (×5000).
Polymers 14 02760 g005
Polymers 14 02760 g006 550
Figure 6. X-ray diffraction pattern of the photocatalyst (a) TiO2, (b) Y2O3, and (c) Y2O3/TiO2.
Figure 6. X-ray diffraction pattern of the photocatalyst (a) TiO2, (b) Y2O3, and (c) Y2O3/TiO2.
Polymers 14 02760 g006
Polymers 14 02760 g007 550
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction patterns of polyester fabric and Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction patterns of polyester fabric and Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.
Polymers 14 02760 g007
Polymers 14 02760 g008 550
Figure 8. XPS survey of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric: (a) full peak of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric, (b) Ti2p peak, (c) O1s peak, (d) Y3d peak.
Figure 8. XPS survey of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric: (a) full peak of Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric, (b) Ti2p peak, (c) O1s peak, (d) Y3d peak.
Polymers 14 02760 g008
Polymers 14 02760 g009 550
Figure 9. Infrared spectra of photocatalytic materials (a) polyester fabric, (b) Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.
Figure 9. Infrared spectra of photocatalytic materials (a) polyester fabric, (b) Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.
Polymers 14 02760 g009
Polymers 14 02760 g010 550
Figure 10. UV–Visible absorption spectrum of the photocatalytic materials.
Figure 10. UV–Visible absorption spectrum of the photocatalytic materials.
Polymers 14 02760 g010
Polymers 14 02760 g011 550
Figure 11. Degradation of methyl orange under xenon lamp irradiation.
Figure 11. Degradation of methyl orange under xenon lamp irradiation.
Polymers 14 02760 g011
Polymers 14 02760 g012 550
Figure 12. Absorbance changes in methyl orange (20 mg/L) on the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.
Figure 12. Absorbance changes in methyl orange (20 mg/L) on the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.
Polymers 14 02760 g012
Polymers 14 02760 g013 550
Figure 13. Cycles of methyl orange (20 mg/L) by Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.
Figure 13. Cycles of methyl orange (20 mg/L) by Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric.
Polymers 14 02760 g013
Polymers 14 02760 g014 550
Figure 14. First-order kinetic plot of −ln(C/C0) vs. t.
Figure 14. First-order kinetic plot of −ln(C/C0) vs. t.
Polymers 14 02760 g014
Polymers 14 02760 g015 550
Figure 15. The self-cleaning performance of the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric to methyl blue and soy sauce: (a,c,e,g) are polyester fabrics with methyl blue; (b,d,f,h) are the polyester fabric with methyl blue and loaded with Y2O3/TiO2; (i,k,m,o) are the polyester fabric with soy sauce; (j,l,n,p) are Y2O3/TiO2 loaded polyester fabric dripped with soy sauce.
Figure 15. The self-cleaning performance of the Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric to methyl blue and soy sauce: (a,c,e,g) are polyester fabrics with methyl blue; (b,d,f,h) are the polyester fabric with methyl blue and loaded with Y2O3/TiO2; (i,k,m,o) are the polyester fabric with soy sauce; (j,l,n,p) are Y2O3/TiO2 loaded polyester fabric dripped with soy sauce.
Polymers 14 02760 g015
Table
Table 1. Pseudo-first-order rate constants of photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange.
Table 1. Pseudo-first-order rate constants of photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange.
SampleKapp (min−1)R2
MO0.06750.98398
polyester fabric0.127250.99273
Y2O3/TiO2-loaded polyester fabric0.478460.98363
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, G.; Tan, Y.; Guan, Y.; Zhou, L.; Cui, L.; Choi, S.W.; Li, M.-X. Preparation of Y2O3/TiO2-Loaded Polyester Fabric and Its Photocatalytic Properties under Visible Light Irradiation. Polymers 2022, 14, 2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142760

AMA Style

Ren Y, Zhao Z, Jiang W, Zhang G, Tan Y, Guan Y, Zhou L, Cui L, Choi SW, Li M-X. Preparation of Y2O3/TiO2-Loaded Polyester Fabric and Its Photocatalytic Properties under Visible Light Irradiation. Polymers. 2022; 14(14):2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142760

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Yu, Ziyao Zhao, Wenwen Jiang, Guangyu Zhang, Yuxin Tan, Yongyin Guan, Long Zhou, Li Cui, Sung Woong Choi, and Mei-Xian Li. 2022. "Preparation of Y2O3/TiO2-Loaded Polyester Fabric and Its Photocatalytic Properties under Visible Light Irradiation" Polymers 14, no. 14: 2760. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142760

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop