Next Article in Journal
Impact of FDI Inflows on Poverty Reduction in the ASEAN and SAARC Economies
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Education in the Sustainable Regeneration of Built Heritage: A Case Study of Malta
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Spatiotemporal Pattern of Decoupling Transport CO2 Emissions from Economic Growth across 30 Provinces in China

1
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(9), 2564; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092564
Submission received: 8 April 2019 / Revised: 22 April 2019 / Accepted: 29 April 2019 / Published: 3 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Transportation)

Abstract

:
Since 2005, China has become the largest emitter of CO2. The transport sector is a major source of CO2 emissions, and the most rapidly growing sector in terms of fuel consumption and CO2 emissions in China. This paper estimated CO2 emissions in the transport sector across 30 provinces through the IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) top-down method and identified the spatiotemporal pattern of the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth during 1995 to 2016 by the modified Tapio’s decoupling model. The CO2 emissions in the transport sector increased from 103.10 million ton (Mt) in 1995 to 701.04 Mt in 2016. The year, 2005, was a turning point as the growth rate of transport CO2 emissions and the intensity of transport CO2 emissions declined. The spatial pattern of transport CO2 emissions and its decoupling status both exhibited an east-west differentiation. Nearly 80% of the provinces recently achieved decoupling, and absolute decoupling is beginning to take place. The local practices of Tianjin should be the subject of special attention. National carbon reduction policies have played a significant role in achieving a transition to low-carbon emissions in the Chinese transport sector, and the integration of multi-scale transport CO2 reduction policies will be promising for its decarbonisation.

1. Introduction

The reduction of CO2 emissions is a global environmental challenge [1]. The United Nations identified ‘take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts’ as one of the goals to achieve sustainable development across the globe [2]. According to the International Energy Agency, the transport sector accounts for 28.81% of total energy consumption in 2017 [3] and 25% of total CO2 emissions in 2016 [4]. The growth of CO2 emissions is led by developing countries experiencing rapid economic growth [5]. In many developing countries, CO2 emissions in the transport sector have attracted great attention because of their high contribution and unprecedented increase in scale and speed [1,6]. China has become the largest country of CO2 emissions since 2005 [7]. The transport sector is a major source of CO2 emissions and the most rapidly growing sector in terms of fuel consumption and CO2 emissions in China [8,9]. The key challenge for China, as well as other developing countries, is what can be done to reduce CO2 emissions in the transport sector while achieving economic development [10], especially in the aspect of environmental governance [11].
Decoupling CO2 emissions in the transport sector from economic growth is the key to providing a local practical solution to low-carbon development. In 2000, this concept was first introduced by Zhang et al. [12]. In 2012, the concept of decoupling was developed as an indicator by the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD) [13]. Vehmas et al. [14] and Tapio [15] then made great progress in decoupling: Vehmas et al. [14] constructed a framework that explained different aspects of decoupling and Tapio [15] proposed the elastic decoupling model. The decoupling of CO2 emissions from economic growth subsequently became a hot topic [16,17,18,19], since economic growth is desirable, but CO2 emissions are not. Three decoupling indicators have been employed most frequently in previous research to reveal the relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth: (1) Indicator DO, introduced by the OECD [13], represents the ratio of environmental pressure to economic growth for a given research year in relation to a base year; (2) indicator DT, introduced by Tapio [15], denotes the emission-to-economic activity elasticity; and (3) indicator DL, introduced by Lu et al. [20] and developed based on the IPAT (Human Impact, Population, Affluence and Technology) framework [21], represents the decreasing rate of emissions’ intensity. Indicator DT can distinguish between absolute decoupling and relative decoupling, which indicator DO cannot, and it can also distinguish the ‘absolute decoupling’ between an economy’s recession and growth periods, which indicator DL cannot. However, the existing decoupling indicators cannot capture the relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth in terms of per capita. Placing the blame on developing countries for causing massive CO2 emissions worldwide is questionable from both the historical and per capita perspective [6]. In addition, important effects of individual characteristics and behaviors on transport CO2 emissions have been observed [22,23]. The decoupling indicator in terms of per capita is also especially important for large developing countries, such as China.
The transport sector has recently attracted much attention in decoupling research. Most existing research has focused on the national level, regional level, and one or several provinces or cities. Loo and Banister [6] extended the discussion on the decoupling of environmental and social issues in the transport sector from economic growth by examining absolute and relative decoupling in a strong and a weak version. Wu et al. [3] analyzed the decoupling states of CO2 emissions in the Chinese transport sector from the perspective of fuel types and found a negative or a non-existent decoupling state accounted for 72.2% during the study period. Wang et al. [10] estimated the decoupling elasticity between economic growth and CO2 emissions in the transport sector in China and analyzed the key factors driving Chinese transport CO2 emissions during 2000 to 2015. Due to the imbalanced regional development in China [24,25], it is necessary to undertake a comparative study of the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth at the regional and provincial level. Zhu and Li [5] analyzed the decoupling of CO2 emissions in the transport sector from economic growth in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) area of China. The changes in transport CO2 emissions and economic growth were not synchronized during 2005 to 2013 in BTH. Guo et al. [1] analyzed transport CO2 emission patterns in China at both regional and provincial levels and found significant regional disparities in transport CO2 emissions in China. In China, national CO2 reduction targets are assigned to the provincial level, and the mitigation policies at the provincial level are more pertinent and flexible. Therefore, the decoupling analysis of transport CO2 emissions at the provincial level has attracted much attention. Zhao et al. [7] found that the year, 2005, was a turning point in the transport CO2 emissions’ decoupling level in Guangdong province, China. Dong et al. [26] took Xinjiang as a case to conduct decoupling analysis on the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth, and they found a fluctuating decoupling pattern from 1990 to 2014. Wang et al. [27] conducted research on the decoupling of carbon emissions from economic growth in the transportation sector in Jiangsu and proposed that transportation has made achievements in reducing CO2 emissions since 2010. However, the inter-regional comparability of previous research results is relatively poor due to different decoupling indicators and decoupling state typology. Wu et al. [28] reviewed the mitigation policies related to on-road transportation emissions in China and proposed that most of the previous transport CO2 mitigation policies were at the national level. It is necessary to research the spatiotemporal pattern of the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth at the provincial level in China to identify provinces with good local practices and to provide a scientific basis for the formulation of appropriate transport CO2 mitigation policies, taking into consideration local factors.
In order to address the abovementioned research shortcomings, this study developed an extended decoupling indicator in terms of per capita, and explored the spatiotemporal pattern of the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth across 30 provinces in China during the period 1995–2016. This study presents three major contributions by: (1) Evaluating the CO2 emissions in the transport sector for 30 provinces from 1995 to 2016; (2) uncovering the spatiotemporal pattern of transport CO2 decarbonisation at the provincial level; and (3) identifying good local practices to achieve decarbonisation in the transport sector. The remaining structure of this paper is as follows: The research methodology is described in Section 2; the results are presented and discussed in Section 3; and Section 4 summarizes the conclusions and proposes transport CO2 reduction policies.

2. Methods and Data Collection

2.1. Data Description

The provincial energy consumption data used to calculate the CO2 emissions in the transport sector in China from 1995 to 2016 are collected from the China Energy Statistical Yearbook [29]. Ten types of fuels are considered in this study: Raw coal, cleaned coal, coke, crude oil, gasoline, kerosene, diesel oil, fuel oil, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and natural gas. According to the Classification of National Economic Industries (GB/T 4754-2017), the transportation, warehousing, and postal service includes railway transportation industry, road transportation industry, ship transportation industry, air transportation industry, pipeline transportation industry, multimodal transport and transport agent industry, handling and warehousing industry, and postal industry. The GDP and population data are collected from the China Statistical Yearbook [30]. To eliminate the effect of price fluctuations, GDP and GDP per capita values are converted into the constant price in 2016 from the current prices using the consumer price index (CPI). Due to data limitations in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao, and Tibet, these areas are excluded in this study. Data of Chongqing is from 1997 to 2016 since it was established in 1997. Data of Fujian from 1997 to 1998 and Ningxia from 2000 to 2002 are absent in the statistical yearbook.

2.2. Calculation of CO2 Emissions in the Transport Sector

According to the IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change, IPCC) method of greenhouse gas emission inventories [31], the “top-down” approach is applied to calculate the CO2 emissions of the transport sector of 30 provinces in China from 1995 to 2016. The method can be expressed as the following formula:
C = i E i × F i × K i ,
where C denotes the total CO2 emissions of the transport sector; Ei denotes the consumption of the ith fuel; Fi denotes the conversion coefficient of standard coal of the ith fuel; and Ki denotes the CO2 emission factor of the ith fuel. The conversion coefficients of standard coal of diverse fuels, shown in Table 1, are based on the China Energy Statistical Year Book [29].

2.3. Tapio Decoupling Model

The decoupling model proposed by Tapio [15] is widely used to analyze the relationship between economic growth and negative environmental externalities [32,33], especially CO2 emissions in the transport sector [34]. The decoupling index from year T-j to year T can be calculated as follows:
D T j T = Δ C T j T Δ G D P T j T ,
where D T j T denotes the decoupling index from year T-j to year T; Δ C T j T denotes the CO2 emissions change percentage from year T-j to year T; and Δ G D P T j T denotes the economic growth change percentage from year T-j to year T. Δ C T j T and Δ G D P T j T can be calculated as follows:
Δ C T j T = ( C T C T j ) C T j ,
Δ G D P T j T = ( G D P T G D P T j ) G D P T j .
The relationship between GDP and CO2 emissions in the transport sector at a given time can be calculated as follows:
C E T = C T G D P T ,
where C E T denotes the transport the CO2 emissions intensity per unit GDP.

2.4. Decoupling Indicator in Terms of Per Capita and Decoupling Typology

To better understand and reduce the transport CO2 emissions in developing countries while they strive for economic development, the decoupling index in terms of per capita is proposed as follows:
D P T j T = Δ C P T j T Δ G D P P T j T ,
where D P T j T denotes the decoupling index in terms of per capita from year T-j to year T; Δ C P T j T denotes the transport CO2 emissions per capita change percentage from year T-j to year T; and Δ G D P P T j T denotes the GDP per capita change percentage from year T-j to year T.
The degrees of decoupling between transport CO2 emissions and GDP are divided into 8 types [6], and the typology is shown in Table 2.
Both economic growth and minimized transport CO2 emissions are desirable, but these two goals are not always compatible. For developing countries, economic development is one of the most urgent goals. Attention should be paid to the provinces that belong to the most desirable or undesirable categories, in order to learn or avoid their practices. This can serve as a reference for other Chinese provinces and developing countries for the formulation of more effective and reasonable policies to mitigate CO2 emissions in the transport sector.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Spatiotemporal Patterns of CO2 Emissions in the Transport Sector

3.1.1. Total Amount and the Energy Structure of Transport CO2 Emissions

Figure 1 shows the national CO2 emissions in the transport sector and their contribution to the total national CO2 emissions in China from 1995 to 2016. The national transport CO2 emissions increased 6.80-fold, from 103.10 million tons (Mt) in 1995 to 701.04 Mt in 2016. The average annual growth rate of national CO2 emissions in the transport sector was 9.56%, more than the average annual growth rate of CO2 emissions (0.78%) in the agriculture sector during 1997 to 2014, as demonstrated by Luo et al. [35] From 1995 to 2000, national traffic CO2 emissions increased continuously at the rate of 7.25%. Transport CO2 emissions increased sharply with a growth rate of 19.54% from 2000 to 2005. After 2005, the growth rate of national transport CO2 emissions noticeably slowed down. From 2005 to 2010, the average annual growth rate of national transport CO2 emissions was 9.21%. The average annual growth rate was 3.97% during 2010 to 2016, even lower than during the period of 1995 to 2000. In addition, during 2012 to 2013, transport CO2 emissions showed a marked decrease. From 1995 to 2016, the contribution of transport CO2 emissions to the total CO2 emissions increased from 4.47% to 9.10%. In the first five years of the study period, the proportion of transport CO2 emissions relative to the total CO2 emissions increased rapidly from 4.47% to 7.61%. During 2000 to 2010, the contribution of the transport sector fluctuated around 7.5%. After 2010, the proportion of CO2 emissions from the transport sector showed a slowly increasing trend.
Both the amount and contributions of CO2 emissions in the transport sector in China during the study period showed a 5-year periodical change, in accordance with the National Five-Year Plan. During the periods known as the Ninth Five-Year Plan (1995–2000) and the Tenth Five-Year Plan (2000–2005), the government focused mainly on economic development, which demands a great deal of transportation, and paid little attention to reducing CO2 emissions. It should be noted that 2005 was a turning point. From 2005 to 2015, the period of the Eleventh Five-Year Plan and the Twelfth Five-Year Plan, measures and policies were formulated to optimize energy-use efficiency and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For example, the Outline of the National Medium- and Long-Term Program for Science and Technology Development (2006–2020) claimed that the transport industry should promote energy savings, resource conservation, and environmental protection and that breakthroughs in key technologies in the fields of resource saving and environmental protection should be widely applied.
Ten different fuel categories of national CO2 emissions in the transport sector were evaluated, namely, raw coal, clean coal, coke, crude oil, gasoline kerosene, diesel oil, fuel oil, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and natural gas (shown in Figure 2). In 2016, the proportion of traffic CO2 emissions of these different fuel categories was as follows: Diesel oil (48.38%) > gasoline (24.15%) > kerosene (14.52%) > fuel oil (7.55%) > raw coal (3.67%) > clean coal (0.93%) > natural gas (0.42%) > LPG (0.36%) > coke (0.01%) > crude oil (0.00%). Transport CO2 emissions from diesel oil and gasoline always made up the greatest proportion during 1995 to 2016. During the period of 1995 to 2016, the proportion of transport CO2 emissions from diesel oil, clean coal, LPG, and natural gas showed an increase. Though the proportions of transport CO2 emissions from LPG and natural gas were still relatively low, the increasing trend indicated the vigorous development of new energy vehicles in China over the past two decades. The proportion of transport CO2 emissions from gasoline, raw coal, coke, and crude oil decreased from 1995 to 2016.

3.1.2. Spatiotemporal Changes in Transport CO2 Emissions

To uncover the current status and temporal characteristics of transport CO2 emissions’ spatial patterns in China, the provincial transport CO2 emissions in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2016 are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3f depicts the traffic CO2 emissions of 30 provinces in 2016. Most provinces have a relatively high level of CO2 emissions in the transport sector above 10 Mt, except for Qinghai (3.24 Mt), Ningxia (3.35 Mt), Hainan (5.82 Mt), Tianjin (8.58 Mt), and Gansu (9.20 Mt). Rounding out the top 10 are Guangdong (68.24 Mt), Shanghai (48.34 Mt), Jiangsu (40.87 Mt), Shandong (39.83 Mt), Liaoning (38.86 Mt), Hubei (36.65 Mt), Zhejiang (30.90 Mt), Hunan (29.22 Mt), Sichuan (28.31 Mt), and Henan (25.64 Mt). Currently, the spatial pattern of transport CO2 emissions in China shows an east-west differentiation. CO2 emissions in the transport sector are higher in the east of China, especially in the eastern coastal region, and lower in the west, especially in the northwest regions, such as Qinghai, Ningxia, Gansu, and Shaanxi provinces. The current status of CO2 emissions in the transport sector essentially parallels the current situation in regional economic development.
The spatial pattern of CO2 emissions in the transport sector in China changed greatly from 1995 to 2016 and can be divided into three phases: North-south differentiation (1995–2000), east-west differentiation (2000–2010), and differentiation in the northwest (2010–2016). In the first phase, transport CO2 emissions were low in the north of China and high in the south, and they were especially high in the southern coastal region. The period of 2000 to 2005 was an important stage when the hotspots of transport CO2 emissions moved northward. During 2000 to 2005, namely, the second phase, the north-south differentiation gradually disappeared, and transport CO2 emissions became lower in the west of China and higher in the east, especially in the eastern coastal area. From 2005 to 2016, the hotspots of transport CO2 emissions continuously expanded westward, especially to the central region and the southwest border area. In the third phase, transport CO2 emissions in the northwest were lower than in other areas of China. Generally, the hotspots showed an expansion from the southeast coastal area to the eastern coastal area, and to the central area and the southwest border area.
From 1995 to 2016, CO2 emissions in the transport sector of all provinces increased, except the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Transport CO2 emissions in Inner Mongolia decreased from 1995 to 2000, increased during 2000 to 2010, and decreased from 2010 to 2016. The Tenth and Eleventh Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region proposed the acceleration of a new type of industrialization during 2000 to 2010. The coal industry production was high during 2000 to 2010, especially during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan period, with an annual growth rate of 25% in raw coal productivity. After 2010, the government of Inner Mongolia paid more attention to the ecological environment, and the Twelfth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region promoted green development and the construction of an environmentally friendly and resource-saving society.

3.1.3. Per Capita Transport CO2 Emissions

The provincial transport CO2 emissions per capita in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2016 are shown in Figure 4. National transport CO2 emissions per capita increased from 85.12 kg in 1995 to 507.00 kg in 2016. The annual average growth rate of national transport CO2 emissions per capita was 8.87% during the period of 1995 to 2016, lower than the growth rate of the total amount of transport CO2 emissions (9.56%). The variations in transport CO2 emissions per capita were in accordance with the total amount of transport CO2 emissions during the study period. From 1995 to 2000, transport CO2 emissions per capita increased continuously at a rate of 5.82%. It increased rapidly from 2000 to 2005 at a growth rate of 19.31%. After 2005, the growth rate of transport CO2 emissions per capita slowed down, to 8.66% during 2005 to 2010 and to 3.44% during 2010 to 2016. The analogous variation characteristics of the two variables indicated that transport CO2 emissions per capita is an important factor influencing the total amount of transport CO2 emissions during the study period. The growth rate of transport CO2 emissions per capita was always lower than the total amount of transport CO2 emissions. The difference between the growth rate of transport CO2 emissions per capita and the total amount became less after 2000. This indicates that the influence of transport CO2 emissions per capita on the total amount of transport CO2 emissions has become more and more important recently.
In 2016, the transport CO2 emissions per capita in all provinces were above 300 kg, except Hebei (259.54 kg) and Henan (268.99 kg). Rounding out the top 10 were Shanghai (1997.60 kg), Beijing (1121.40 kg), Liaoning (887.67 kg), Xinjiang (763.88 kg), Inner Mongolia (667.05 kg), Hainan (635.03 kg), Hubei (622.7 kg), Guangdong (620.47 kg), Chongqing (608.94 kg), and Jilin (601.04 kg). In addition, the transport CO2 emissions per capita in Shanghai were far higher than in other provinces, and transport CO2 emissions per capita in Shanghai were nearly twice that of Beijing, the second largest transport CO2 emissions province in China. Current provincial transport CO2 emissions per capita showed a ‘dumbbell’ spatial pattern, higher in the east and west of China and lower in the central region. The high value of transport CO2 emissions per capita in the west of China was mainly attributed to the primitive energy-saving and emission-reduction technology of automotive vehicles. Despite the fact that the economically developed eastern region of China has a relatively high level of carbon reduction technologies, the constant economic activity, improvements in living standards, and the increase in travel and transportation demand cause the eastern region of China to have a relatively high transport CO2 emissions per capita.
Transport CO2 emissions per capita of most provinces showed an increasing trend from 1995 to 2016, except for six provinces, including Inner Mongolia, Hainan, Tianjin, Shandong, Gansu, and Shaanxi. Generally, the spatial pattern of transport CO2 emissions per capita in China from 1995 to 2016 can be divided into two phases: North-south differentiation (1995–2000) and the ‘dumbbell’ pattern (2000–2016). In the first phase, transport CO2 emissions per capita were high in the north of China and low in the south, contrary to the total amount of traffic CO2 emissions, for which the north was lower than the south. During the second phase (2000–2016), transport CO2 emissions per capita in the southwest and eastern coastal regions increased noticeably and showed a ‘dumbbell’ spatial pattern. More attention should be paid to Shanghai, Guangdong, Liaoning, and Hubei. These four provinces are in the top 10 of transport CO2 emissions, both in terms of the total amount and in terms of per capita. Attention should also be paid to Beijing, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Hainan, Chongqing, and Jilin. These six provinces are included in the top 10 of transport CO2 emissions per capita, although their total amount of transport CO2 emissions are not included in the top 10 list.
CO2 emissions in the transport sector are not only associated with socioeconomic development at the macroscopic level [36,37], but they are also related to lifestyle changes at the individual level [38]. Considering the differences in terms of the total amount and per capita in the temporal trends and spatial patterns of CO2 emissions in the transport sector, together with the different meanings embodied in these two variables, the decoupling of CO2 emissions in the transport sector should be analyzed in both aspects.

3.1.4. CO2 Emissions Intensity in the Transport Sector (kg/104 yuan)

Figure 5 summarizes the national and provincial CO2 emissions intensity in the transport sector in China from 1995 to 2016. The national transport CO2 emissions intensity stayed at the level of 102 to 105 kg/104 yuan during 1995 to 2000. From 2000 to 2005, the national transport CO2 emissions intensity fluctuated upward from 104.08 kg/104 yuan in 2000 to a peak value of 133.51 kg/104 yuan in 2005. The average annual growth rate was 5.11% during 2000 to 2005, much lower than the rate of national transport CO2 emissions (19.54%) and national transport CO2 emissions per capita (19.31%). The year, 2005, was a turning point for national transport CO2 emissions intensity in China. After 2005, the intensity declined to 89.87 kg/104 yuan in 2016, even 22.57 kg/104 yuan lower than in 1995. Since 2005, a series of policies have been proposed by the government. In 2006, the Renewable Energy Law of People’s Republic of China was enacted to promote the development and utilization of renewable energy. In 2007, China’s National Climate Change Program was issued, which proposed the elimination of old passenger cars and vessels with high fuel consumption. In 2009, the Measures for Testing and Supervision of Fuel Consumption of Vehicles and Notice of Demonstration and Promotion of the Energy Saving and New Energy Vehicles were released. These two measures promoted the enhancement of energy-saving management of vehicles and encouraged energy saving and new-energy vehicles by financial means. The Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Energy Saving and Emission Reduction of Highway and Waterway Transportation, issued in 2010, proposed establishing a low-carbon transportation system. In 2013, the Instructions of Accelerating the Development of Green, Circular and Low-Carbon Transportation promoted the construction of a low-carbon transportation system by introducing cyclical development into the system. It should be noted that the government played an important role in low-carbon transportation development and that more such positive actions should be taken to achieve further improvement.
Generally, provincial transport CO2 emissions intensity showed an east-west differentiation during 1995 to 2016, and transport CO2 emissions intensity was higher in the west of China and lower in the east, which showed an inverse relationship to the spatial pattern of the economic and technological levels. In 2016, the highest figure of 189.83 kg/104 yuan was recorded in Xinjiang, and the lowest figure of 47.97 kg/104 yuan was found in Tianjin. The transport CO2 emissions intensity of four provinces, including those of Zhejiang, Henan, Hebei, and Jiangsu, were below 100 kg/104 yuan throughout the period of 1995 to 2016.

3.2. Analysis of the Decoupling between Transport CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth

Given that most economic, social, and environmental plans in China are five-year plans, and given the five-year periodic trends in transport CO2 emissions intensity and transport CO2 emissions from both the total and individual perspective, the decoupling of CO2 emissions in the transport sector from economic growth was measured over four periods: 1995–2000, 2000–2005, 2005–2010, and 2010–2015. Figure 6 shows the provincial decoupling states for the above four periods in terms of total amount. No observations fall in category IIb, which represents the worst case situation and denotes absolute strong coupling. As a result of economic growth over the last two decades in China, all observations fall in four categories as follows: Category Ia denotes strong relative coupling, Ib denotes weak relative decoupling, IIIa denotes weak absolute decoupling, and IIIb denotes strong absolute decoupling. As a reminder, IIIb refers to the most desirable situation with good local practices.
During 1995 to 2000, strong absolute decoupling appeared in Anhui province, weak absolute decoupling appeared in four provinces (Inner Mongolia, Shandong, Shaanxi, and Hubei), and weak relative decoupling appeared in 12 other provinces. These 12 provinces experienced an increase in both GDP and transport CO2 emissions, and the GDP growth rate was lower than that for transport CO2 emissions. The Bohai Rim region, Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, and the northwest region experienced more rapid growth in transport CO2 emissions than in their economy. It is notable that the decoupling worsened in most provinces from 2000 to 2005, during the Tenth Five-Year Plan period. Strong relative coupling occurred in 20 provinces in China, and only 10 provinces (Jilin, Beijing, Tianjin, Shanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Hainan, and Guizhou) showed weak relative decoupling. During 2005 to 2010, an apparent improvement took place in comparison to 2000 to 2005. Weak relative decoupling took place in more than 70% of provinces in China, and only seven provinces (Beijing, Hebei, Shanxi, Qinghai, Guizhou, Hainan, and Fujian) showed strong relative coupling. Although the decoupling was only in the weak relative decoupling category, a turn for the better can definitely be detected. During 2010 to 2015, seven provinces (Heilongjiang, Jilin, Xinjiang, Gansu, Henan, Anhui, and Jiangxi) did not achieve decoupling, and weak absolute decoupling appeared in seven provinces (Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Tianjin, Shandong, Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Hainan). There were 16 provinces that showed weak relative decoupling, and decoupling took place in nearly 80% of provinces in China during 2010 to 2015.
The decarbonisation state in the transport sector showed periodic changes. During the Tenth Five-Year Plan period, coupling included nearly 70% of provinces in China, and only 10 provinces experienced weak relative decoupling. During the Eleventh and Twelfth Five-Year Plan period, significant progress was made in the decarbonisation of the transport sector. The characteristics of the periods are indicative of the influence of national policies on CO2 reductions in the transport sector. However, the decoupling achieved was almost all relative decoupling, and no strong absolute decoupling took place. Therefore, transport CO2 reduction policies are not enough to achieve the most desirable decoupling state. Improvements in technology, including the development of renewable energy, utilization of new energy vehicles, eco-driving behaviors, and an intelligent transportation system, are urgently needed.
Table 3 shows the decoupling index in terms of the total amount (D) and per capita (DP) of the 30 provinces during the four periods. The D and DP indices of five provinces (Inner Mongolia, Anhui, Shandong, Hubei, and Shaanxi) during 1995 to 2000 and seven provinces (Tianjin, Hebei, Inner Mongolia, Shandong, Hainan, Sichuan, and Shaanxi) during 2010 to 2015 were below zero. This shows that these provinces achieved an absolute decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth in terms of both the total amount and per capita during the same period. The practices of these five provinces during 1995 to 2000 and these seven provinces during 2010 to 2015 are worth studying. Although Hebei and Jilin did not achieve absolute decoupling in terms of the total amount during 1995 to 2000, an absolute decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth in terms of per capita was achieved in these provinces during 1995 to 2000. The practices for the reduction of transport CO2 emissions from the individual perspective in Hebei and Jilin from 1995 to 2000 should also be paid attention to. In addition, the D indices of five of the provinces (Tianjin, Liaoning, Guangdong, Guangxi, and Sichuan) kept declining during 1995 to 2015, and the decoupling state of these five provinces has improved over the past two decades. In particular, Tianjin not only showed continuous progress in the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth, but it also achieved absolute decoupling from 2010 to 2015, the closest Five-Year Plan period. In 2004, the Measures for Supervision and Test Energy Saving Management in Tianjin were proposed, and in 2010, Tianjin’s Program to Address Climate Change was carried out. It emphasized energy savings and emission reductions that have no negative effects on the environment when the economy and society develop rapidly. The year after, Tianjin suggested that it will explore a path for the creation of a compact city, prompt the construction of a green and low-carbon transportation system, enhance public transportation, implement energy standards above national standards, promote energy-saving and new-energy vehicles, develop energy efficiency assessment and energy-saving indices management, and develop the low-carbon lifestyle of its residents. In general, the policies in Tianjin covered various aspects, from the city-level to the enterprise-level, and even down to the individual-level.
The D index of 11, 13, 8, and 6 provinces was lower than the DP index during 1995 to 2000, 2000 to 2005, 2005 to 2010, and 2010 to 2015, respectively. The D index of 15, 11, 15, and 22 provinces was higher than the DP index during the above four periods. This finding indicates that the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth from the perspective of the total amount was better than from the individual perspective when the D index was lower than the DP index. The year, 2005, was a turning point. Before 2005, the proportion of provinces with a higher D or a higher DP index was similar. After 2005, the proportion of the provinces with a higher D was much higher than DP. The important achievements in decoupling after 2005 were more due to changes at the individual level. Policies that encouraged public transport and eco-driving behaviors had a definite effect on the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth. To further achieve absolute decoupling from both the individual perspective and the total amount, these measures should be paid more attention to: Maintenance of long-term eco-driving behaviors, promotion and application of energy-saving technologies and renewable energy, construction of an intelligent and efficient transportation system, and flexible working schedules to alleviate the overloading of road transportation in metropolitan areas.

4. Conclusions

To show the decoupling of CO2 emissions in the transport sector from economic growth and to identify good local practices for reducing transport CO2 emissions in China, this paper estimated CO2 emissions in the transport sector of 30 provinces from 1995 to 2016 and examined the provincial decoupling of CO2 emissions in the transport sector from economic growth. In addition, this paper developed a decoupling indicator in terms of per capita in the framework of the Tapio decoupling model to better understand the relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth for developing countries and under-developed regions. The key findings can be summarized as follows: (1) The 5-year periodical change, which was also observed in the power industry in China [39], and the turning point in 2005 in CO2 emissions in the transport sector indicated that national carbon reduction policies played a significant role in partially achieving a low-carbon transition in the transport sector during 1995 to 2016. (2) The inverse spatial patterns of transport CO2 emissions in terms of the total amount and per capita—‘higher in east lower in west’—and the transport CO2 intensity—‘lower in east higher in west’—indicate that traffic energy-saving technologies improved with economic growth and had an influence on CO2 reduction in the transport sector, and depending only on improvements in low-carbon technologies was not enough to achieve absolute CO2 reduction in the transport sector. (3) Although the decoupling states improved a lot, great challenges still exist for achieving absolute decoupling, especially strong absolute decoupling. Decoupling was achieved in nearly 80% of provinces in China during 2010 to 2015. However, most of the decoupling was relative decoupling, and absolute decoupling only took place in seven provinces (Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Tianjin, Shandong, Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Hainan). (4) A comparison of the indices, D and DP, revealed the significant influence of transport CO2 reduction policies from the individual perspective. More policies to achieve decoupling in the transport sector from economic growth from the perspective of the total amount are urgently needed. (5) Tianjin has good local practices for achieving decoupling in the transport sector. The integration of multi-scale traffic CO2 reduction policies in Tianjin should also be promoted in Beijing and Hebei as part of the national strategy of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Cooperative Development in advance and then promoted in other regions.
Interregional CO2 reduction cooperation in the transport sector should be promoted. To further achieve the strong absolute decoupling state, especially in terms of total amount, the transfer of CO2 reduction technology in the transport sector from developed areas to underdeveloped areas should be facilitated. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region should be taken as the center and the north and northeast provinces should be promoted, including Shandong, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang. The Yangtze River Delta region should be taken as the center and central China promoted, including Anhui, Hubei, Hunan, and Jiangxi. Guangdong should be taken as the center and Guangxi, Gujian, and Hainan promoted. In addition, one-to-one traffic CO2 reduction technical assistance relationships on the basis of poverty alleviation assistance relationships need to be created. For example, Tianjin exports CO2 reduction technology by transporting to Gansu, Yunnan and Guizhou import technology from Shanghai, etc. However, transport CO2 emissions in terms of both the total amount and individual are great in developed areas, although the transport CO2 intensity is lower. This phenomenon is due to the large demand of travel derived from economic activities. Therefore, flexible working schedules and carpooling may become effective transportation demand management measures for alleviating transportation overload and traffic jams in developed areas. In February 2019, Price Waterhouse Coopers Consulting in China implemented a flexible working schedule. Carpooling is becoming fashionable in metropolitan areas, such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Improving the safety of carpooling platforms to encourage the sharing of travel resources in both inner-city and inter-city transportation is also an important path for reducing transport CO2 emissions.
Due to the limitation of energy consumption statistics in the transport sector in China, a certain uncertainty exists in this study. Although the uncertainty exists, it did not significantly influence the regularities and results since the main aim of this study was to explore the spatiotemporal pattern and uncover its decoupling status from economic growth. With the continuous improvements in the energy consumption statistics in China, more accurate results of the transport CO2 emissions can be obtained in the future. In addition, the identification of the driving forces of the decoupling of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth is of great significance to achieve a strong absolute decoupling state. Therefore, identifying influencing factors of decoupling transport CO2 emissions from economic growth and quantifying theirs effects on the decoupling status will be an important topic in the next step.

Author Contributions

Research framework: J.Z., Y.H. and S.D.; methodology: J.Z., Y.H. and Y.L.; data collection: Y.H. and J.Z.; results analysis: J.Z., Y.L. and Y.H.; writing: J.Z., Y.H. and Y.L.; revising: J.Z., S.D., Y.H., Y.L.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 41771182, Science & Technology Basic Resources Investigation Program of China, Grant No. 2017FY101300, 2017FY101303, and the National Social Science Fund of China, Grant No. 17VDL016.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Guo, B.; Geng, Y.; Franke, B.; Hao, H.; Liu, Y.X.; Chiu, A. Uncovering China’s transport CO2 emission patterns at the regional level. Energy Policy 2014, 74, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/climate-change-2/ (accessed on 18 April 2019).
  3. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2018; IEA Publication: Paris, France, 2018; p. 42. [Google Scholar]
  4. International Energy Agency (IEA). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018; IEA Publication: Paris, France, 2008; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu, Y.; Zhu, Q.W.; Zhu, B.Z. Comparisons of decoupling trends of global economic growth and energy consumption between developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 2018, 116, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Loo, B.P.Y.; Banister, D. Decoupling transport from economic growth: Extending the debate to include environmental and social externalities. J. Transp. Geogr. 2016, 57, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, Y.L.; Kuang, Y.Q.; Huang, N.S. Decomposition analysis in decoupling transport output from carbon emissions in Guangdong Province, China. Energies 2016, 9, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Zheng, J.; Dong, S.; Wen, X.; Jin, X.; Zhang, L.; Peng, X. Temporal variations of local traffic CO2 emissions and its relationship with CO2 flux in Beijing, China. Transport. Res. Part D Trans. Environ. 2019, 67, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, X.P.; Li, R.R. An analysis of decoupling and influencing factors of carbon emissions from the transportation sector in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area, China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.C. Influencing factors and decoupling elasticity of China’s transportation carbon emissions. Energies 2018, 11, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, F.; Tian, Z.; Shen, Y.; Chiu, Y.; Lin, T. Energy, CO2, and AQI efficiency and improvement of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Energies 2019, 12, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Z.X. Decoupling China’s carbon emissions increase from economic growth: An economic analysis and policy implications. World Dev. 2000, 28, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth; OECD: Paris, France, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vehmas, J.; Malaska, P.; Luukkanen, J.; Kaivo-oja, J.; Hietanen, O.; Vinnari, M.; Ilvonen, J. Europe in the Global Battle of Sustainability: Rebound Strikes Back? Advanced Sustainability Analysis; Series Discussion and Working Papers; Turku School of Economics and Business Administration: Turku, Finland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tapio, P. Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp. Policy 2005, 2, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andreoni, V.; Galmarini, S. Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions: A decomposition analysis of Italian energy consumption. Energies 2012, 44, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Muradov, N. Decarbonization at crossroads: The cessation of the positive historical trend or a temporary detour? Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1060–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Z.L.; Xue, B.; Pang, J.X.; Chen, X.P. The decoupling of resource consumption and environmental impact from economic growth in China: Spatial pattern and temporal trend. Sustainability 2016, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Riti, J.S.; Song, D.Y.; Shu, Y.; Kamah, M. Decoupling CO2 emission and economic growth in China: Is there consistency in estimation results in analyzing environmental Kuznets curve? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 166, 1448–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, Z.; Wang, H.; Yue, Q. Decoupling indicators: Quantitative relationships between resource use, waste emission and economic growth. Resour. Sci. 2011, 33, 2–9. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Ehrlich, P.R.; Holdren, J.P. Impact of population growth. Science 1971, 171, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Y.; Zheng, J.; Li, Z.H.; Yuan, L.; Yang, Y.; Li, F.J. Re-estimating CO2 emission factors for gasoline passenger cars adding driving behaviour characteristics—A case study of Beijing. Energ. Policy 2017, 102, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, Y.H.; Ng, E.C.Y.; Zhou, J.L.; Surawski, N.C.; Chan, E.F.C.; Hong, G. Eco-driving technology for sustainable road transport: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 596–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.X.; Wang, H.K.; Liang, S.; Xu, M.; Liu, W.D.; Li, S.L.; Zhang, R.R.; Nielsen, C.P.; Bi, J. Temporal and spatial variations in consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 40, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, G.X.; Ouyang, X.L.; Yao, X. Dynamics of China’s regional carbon emissions under gradient economic development mode. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 51, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, J.; Huang, J.; Wu, R.; Deng, C. Delinking indicators on transport output and carbon emissions in Xinjiang, China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2017, 26, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Y.H.; Xie, T.Y.; Yang, S.L. Carbon emission and its decoupling research of transportation in Jiangsu Province. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, Y.; Zhang, S.J.; Hao, J.M.; Liu, H.; Wu, X.M.; Hu, J.N.; Walsh, M.P.; Wallington, T.J.; Zhang, K.M.; Stevanovic, S. On-road vehicle emissions and their control in China: A review and outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 574, 332–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 1996–2017.
  30. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 1996–2017.
  31. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC Greenhouse Gas Inventory: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; United Kingdom Meteorological Office: Bracknell, UK, 2006.
  32. Dong, B.; Zhang, M.; Mu, H.L.; Su, X.M. Study on decoupling analysis between energy consumption and economic growth in Liaoning Province. Energy Policy 2016, 97, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Naqvi, A.; Zwickl, K. Fifty shades of green: Revisiting decoupling by economic sectors and air pollutants. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 133, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fan, F.Y.; Lei, Y.L. Responsive relationship between energy-related carbon dioxide emissions from the transportation sector and economic growth in Beijing—Based on decoupling theory. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2017, 11, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Luo, Y.S.; Long, X.L.; Wu, C.; Zhang, J.J. Decoupling CO2 emissions from economic growth in agricultural sector across 30 Chinese provinces from 1997 to 2014. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 159, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Poumanyvong, P.; Kaneko, S.; Dhakal, S. Impacts of urbanization on national transport and road energy use: Evidence from low, middle and high income countries. Energy Policy 2012, 46, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Talbi, B. CO2 emissions reduction in road transport sector in Tunisia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nejadkoorki, F.; Nicholson, K.; Lake, L.; Davies, T. An approach for modelling CO2 emissions from road traffic in urban areas. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 406, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, L.; He, L.; Shang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, X. Influencing factors and scenario forecasts of carbon emissions of the Chinese power industry: Based on a Generalized Divisia Index Model and Monte Carlo Simulation. Energies 2018, 11, 2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Total amount and contribution of transport CO2 emissions in China during 1995 to 2016.
Figure 1. Total amount and contribution of transport CO2 emissions in China during 1995 to 2016.
Sustainability 11 02564 g001
Figure 2. Temporal trends in the transport CO2 emissions from 10 fuel categories in China.
Figure 2. Temporal trends in the transport CO2 emissions from 10 fuel categories in China.
Sustainability 11 02564 g002
Figure 3. Transport CO2 emissions across 30 provinces in China in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2016 (af); and chart throughout the period of 1995 to 2016 (g).
Figure 3. Transport CO2 emissions across 30 provinces in China in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2016 (af); and chart throughout the period of 1995 to 2016 (g).
Sustainability 11 02564 g003
Figure 4. Transport CO2 emissions per capita across 30 provinces in China in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2016 (af); and chart throughout the period of 1995 to 2016 (g).
Figure 4. Transport CO2 emissions per capita across 30 provinces in China in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2016 (af); and chart throughout the period of 1995 to 2016 (g).
Sustainability 11 02564 g004
Figure 5. Transport CO2 intensity in China in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2016 (af); and chart throughout the period of 1995 to 2016 (g).
Figure 5. Transport CO2 intensity in China in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2016 (af); and chart throughout the period of 1995 to 2016 (g).
Sustainability 11 02564 g005
Figure 6. Decoupling state of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth. Ia denotes the strong relative coupling, Ib denotes the weak relative decoupling, IIIa denotes the weak absolute decoupling, and IIIb denotes the strong absolute decoupling. IIIb refers to the most desirable situation.
Figure 6. Decoupling state of transport CO2 emissions from economic growth. Ia denotes the strong relative coupling, Ib denotes the weak relative decoupling, IIIa denotes the weak absolute decoupling, and IIIb denotes the strong absolute decoupling. IIIb refers to the most desirable situation.
Sustainability 11 02564 g006
Table 1. The conversion coefficients of standard coal of diverse fuels 1.
Table 1. The conversion coefficients of standard coal of diverse fuels 1.
FuelFi (tce/t)
Raw coal0.7143
Cleaned coal0.9000
Coke0.9714
Crude oil1.4286
Gasoline1.4714
Kerosene1.4714
Diesel oil1.4571
Fuel oil1.4286
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)1.7143
Natural gas1.2000 tce/104 m3
1 The tce denotes ton of standard coal equivalent; Fi denotes the conversion coefficients of standard coal of diverse fuels based on China Energy Statistical Year Book; the conversion coefficient of CO2 emissions of standard coal is 2.204 kg/kg.
Table 2. The typology of changing relationships between transport CO2 emissions and GDP.
Table 2. The typology of changing relationships between transport CO2 emissions and GDP.
Transport CO2 Emissions or Per Capita Transport CO2 Emissions
Decrease ( Δ C T j T < 0 or Δ C P T j T < 0)Increase ( Δ C T j T > 0 or Δ C P T j T > 0)
GDP or GDP per capitaGrowth
( Δ G D P T j T > 0
or Δ G D P P T j T > 0)
IIIa
C E T falls
| Δ G D P T j T | > | Δ C T j T | or | Δ G D P P T j T | > | Δ C P T j T |
| D T j T | < 1 or | D P T j T | < 1 , negative
Decoupling: absolute; weak
Ia
C E T increases
| Δ G D P T j T | | Δ C T j T | or | Δ G D P P T j T | | Δ C P T j T |
| D T j T | 1 or | D P T j T | 1 , positive
Coupling: relative; strong
IIIb 2
C E T falls
| Δ G D P T j T | | Δ C T j T | or | Δ G D P P T j T | | Δ C P T j T |
| D T j T | 1 or | D P T j T | 1 , negative
Decoupling: absolute; strong
Ib
C E T falls
| Δ G D P T j T | > | Δ C T j T | or | Δ G D P P T j T | > | Δ C P T j T |
| D T j T | < 1 or | D P T j T | < 1 , positive
Decoupling: relative; weak
Decline
( Δ G D P T j T < 0
or
Δ G D P P T j T < 0)
IVa
C E T increases
| Δ G D P T j T | > | Δ C T j T | or | Δ G D P P T j T | > | Δ C P T j T |
| D T j T | < 1 or | D P T j T | < 1 , positive
Coupling: relative; weak
IIa
C E T increases
| Δ G D P T j T | > | Δ C T j T | or | Δ G D P P T j T | > | Δ C P T j T |
| D T j T | < 1 or | D P T j T | < 1 , negative
Coupling: absolute; weak
IVb
C E T falls
| Δ G D P T j T | | Δ C T j T | or | Δ G D P P T j T | | Δ C P T j T |
| D T j T | 1 or | D P T j T | 1 , positive
Decoupling: relative; strong
IIb 2
C E T increases
| Δ G D P T j T | | Δ C T j T | or | Δ G D P P T j T | | Δ C P T j T |
| D T j T | 1 or | D P T j T | 1 , negative
Coupling: absolute; strong
2. The most desirable decoupling category is in green, while the most undesirable decoupling category is in dark gray.
Table 3. Comparison of D and DP across 30 provinces in China.
Table 3. Comparison of D and DP across 30 provinces in China.
RegionD (Decoupling Index)DP (Decoupling Index in the Sense of Per Capita)
1995–20002000–20052005–20102010–20151995–20002000–20052005–20102010–2015
Beijing1.190.551.120.601.230.511.180.46
Tianjin2.460.380.27−0.132.630.350.07−0.70
Hebei0.031.221.28−0.09−0.051.221.30−0.23
Shanxi0.720.931.120.760.660.931.130.73
Inner Mongolia−0.442.440.64−0.24−0.552.450.63−0.30
Liaoning1.952.580.320.542.022.570.290.54
Jilin0.050.730.881.90−0.070.730.881.91
Heilongjiang0.811.030.264.040.811.030.263.98
Shanghai1.461.570.650.281.631.670.460.13
Jiangsu0.681.610.590.780.651.620.570.78
Zhejiang1.130.860.660.821.150.860.620.81
Anhui−1.485.330.651.78−1.455.480.661.83
Fujian0.481.551.050.580.421.581.050.55
Jiangxi2.571.02 0.351.062.641.020.331.07
Shandong−0.478.090.56−0.63−0.598.220.54−0.74
Henan0.061.510.641.220.031.520.641.23
Hubei−0.7714.830.230.33−0.9013.300.230.30
Hunan0.971.610.410.900.971.590.390.89
Guangdong1.260.880.510.311.490.870.410.23
Guangxi6.821.190.620.346.431.200.630.28
Hainan2.960.821.31−0.073.750.801.33−0.17
Chongqing-2.180.540.69-2.060.530.67
Sichuan10.991.170.73−0.042.251.160.74−0.08
Guizhou0.810.721.290.490.800.701.270.48
Yunnan0.993.680.770.290.993.850.760.26
Tibet--------
Shaanxi−0.131.980.82−0.20−0.192.000.82−0.24
Gansu1.610.000.261.301.670.010.261.31
Qinghai1.880.262.020.432.060.212.060.38
Ningxia0.301.110.200.210.091.130.170.11
Xinjiang0.451.410.321.59 0.211.440.241.71

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, J.; Hu, Y.; Dong, S.; Li, Y. The Spatiotemporal Pattern of Decoupling Transport CO2 Emissions from Economic Growth across 30 Provinces in China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092564

AMA Style

Zheng J, Hu Y, Dong S, Li Y. The Spatiotemporal Pattern of Decoupling Transport CO2 Emissions from Economic Growth across 30 Provinces in China. Sustainability. 2019; 11(9):2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Ji, Yingjie Hu, Suocheng Dong, and Yu Li. 2019. "The Spatiotemporal Pattern of Decoupling Transport CO2 Emissions from Economic Growth across 30 Provinces in China" Sustainability 11, no. 9: 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop